AJP - Regu Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (January 9, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00668.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/3/R738    most recent
00668.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Spector, A. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Spector, A. C
Submitted on September 14, 2007
Accepted on January 4, 2008

Experimentally cross-wired lingual taste nerves can restore normal unconditioned gaping behavior in response to quinine stimulation

Camille Tessitore King1*, Mircea Garcea2, Danielle S. Stolzenberg1, and Alan C Spector2

1 Psychology, Stetson University, DeLand, Florida, United States
2 Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cking{at}stetson.edu.

Studies examining the effects of transection and regeneration of the glossopharyngeal (GL) and chorda tympani (CT) nerves on various taste-elicited behaviors in rats have demonstrated that the GL (but not the CT) is essential for the maintenance of both an unconditioned protective reflex (gaping) and the neural activity observed in central gustatory structures in response to lingual application of a bitter substance. An unresolved issue however is whether recovery depends more on the taste nerve and the central circuits it supplies and/or on the tongue receptor cell field being innervated. To address this question, we experimentally cross-wired these taste nerves which remarkably can regenerate into parts of the tongue they normally do not innervate. We report that quinine-stimulated gaping behavior was fully restored; and neuronal activity, as assessed by Fos immunohistochemistry in the nucleus of the solitary tract and the parabrachial nucleus, was partially restored only if the posterior tongue (PT) taste receptor cell field was reinnervated; the particular taste nerve supplying the input was inconsequential to the recovery of function. Thus, PT taste receptor cells appear to play a privileged role in triggering unconditioned gaping to bitter tasting stimuli regardless of which lingual gustatory nerve innervates them. Our findings demonstrate that even when a lingual gustatory nerve (the CT) forms connections with taste cells in a non-native receptor field (the PT), unconditioned taste rejection reflexes to quinine can be maintained. These findings underscore the extraordinary ability of the gustatory system to adapt to peripherally reorganized input for particular behaviors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
N. R. Kinzeler and S. P. Travers
Licking and gaping elicited by microstimulation of the nucleus of the solitary tract
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): R436 - R448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.