|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biotechnology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
2 Physics, Danish Technical University, Lyngby, Denmark
3 Biomedical Engineering, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA
4 Medical Physiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: marsh{at}ash.biomed.brown.edu.
We developed a model of tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) and the myogenic mechanism in afferent arterioles to understand how the two mechanisms are coupled. This paper presents the model. The tubular model predicts pressure, flow, and NaCl concentration as functions of time and tubular length in a compliant tubule that reabsorbs NaCl and water; boundary conditions are glomerular filtration rate (GFR), a nonlinear outflow resistance, and initial NaCl concentration. The glomerular model calculates GFR from a change in protein concentration using estimates of capillary hydrostatic pressure, tubular hydrostatic pressure, and plasma flow rate. The arteriolar model predicts fraction of open K channels, intracellular C
concentration, (C
i), PD, rate of actin--myosin cross bridge formation, force of contraction, and length of elastic elements, and was solved for two arteriolar segments, identical except for the strength of TGF input, with a third, fixed resistance segment representing pre-arteriolar vessels. The two arteriolar segments are electrically coupled. The arteriolar, glomerular, and tubular models are linked; TGF modulates arteriolar circumference which determines vascular resistance and glomerular capillary pressure. The model couples TGF input to voltage gated C
channels. It predicts autoregulation of GFR and renal blood flow, matches experimental measures of tubular pressure and macula densa NaCl concentration, and predicts TGF--induced oscillations and a faster smaller vasomotor oscillation. There are nonlinear interactions between TGF and the myogenic mechanism, and these include the modulation of the frequency and amplitude of the myogenic oscillation by TGF. The prediction of modulation is confirmed in a companion study.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. A. Williamson, R. Loutzenhiser, X. Wang, K. Griffin, and A. K. Bidani Systolic and mean blood pressures and afferent arteriolar myogenic response dynamics: a modeling approach Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): R1502 - R1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Iliescu, R. Cazan, G. R. McLemore Jr., M. Venegas-Pont, and M. J. Ryan Renal blood flow and dynamic autoregulation in conscious mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): F734 - F740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. V. Sosnovtseva, A. N. Pavlov, E. Mosekilde, K.-P. Yip, N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou, and D. J. Marsh Synchronization among mechanisms of renal autoregulation is reduced in hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): F1545 - F1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Just and W. J. Arendshorst A novel mechanism of renal blood flow autoregulation and the autoregulatory role of A1 adenosine receptors in mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): F1489 - F1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, R. D. Loutzenhiser, and W. A. Cupples Frequency modulation of renal myogenic autoregulation by perfusion pressure Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1199 - R1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wan, R. Bellomo, and C. N. May The Effects of Normal and Hypertonic Saline on Regional Blood Flow and Oxygen Delivery Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 141 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ditlevsen, K.-P. Yip, D. J. Marsh, and N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou Parameter estimation of feedback gain in a stochastic model of renal hemodynamics: differences between spontaneously hypertensive and Sprague-Dawley rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): F607 - F616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rosivall, S. Mirzahosseini, I. Toma, A. Sipos, and J. Peti-Peterdi Fluid flow in the juxtaglomerular interstitium visualized in vivo Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): F1241 - F1247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Kang, I. Toma, A. Sipos, F. McCulloch, and J. Peti-Peterdi Quantitative imaging of basic functions in renal (patho)physiology Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): F495 - F502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Raghavan, X. Chen, K.-P. Yip, D. J. Marsh, and K. H. Chon Interactions between TGF-dependent and myogenic oscillations in tubular pressure and whole kidney blood flow in both SDR and SHR Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): F720 - F732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. DiBona Physiology in perspective: The Wisdom of the Body. Neural control of the kidney Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): R633 - R641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |