AJP - Regu Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (May 23, 2002). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00160.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/3/R568    most recent
00160.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stebbins, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jafarzadeh, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stebbins, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jafarzadeh, M.

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print May 23, 2002
Am J Physiol Regu Physiol, 10.1152/ajpregu.00160.2002
Submitted on March 11, 2002
Accepted on May 15, 2002

Cardiovascular Responses to Static and Dynamic Contraction During Comparable Workloads in Humans

Charles L. Stebbins1*, Buddy Walser2, and Mehrdad Jafarzadeh2

1 Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Human Physiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
2 Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: clstebbins{at}ucdavis.edu.

Previous studies suggest that the blood pressure response to static contraction is greater than that caused by dynamic exercise. In anesthetized cats, however, pressor responses to electrically induced static and dynamic contraction of the same muscle group are similar during equivalent workloads and peak tension-development (i.e., similar tension-time index [TTI]). To determine if the same relationship exists in humans, where contraction is voluntary and central command is present, dynamic (180 s; 1/s) and static (90 s) contraction at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) were performed. Dynamic contraction also was repeated at the same TTI for 90 s at 60% MVC. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), MAP during post-exercise arterial occlusion (an index of the metabo-receptor-induced activation of the exercise pressor reflex) and relative perceived exertion (RPE) (an index of central command) were assessed. No differences in these variables were found between static and dynamic contraction at a tension of 30 % MVC. During dynamic contraction at 60% MVC, changes in MAP (16±3 vs. 19±4 mmHg) and absolute HR (92±6 vs. 69±5 bpm), CO (7.9±0.4 vs.6.3±0.3L/min), RPE (16±1 vs. 13±1) and MAP during post-exercise arterial occlusion (115±3 vs. 100±4 mmHg) were greater than during static contraction (P<0.05). Thus, increases in MAP and HR, activation of central command, and muscle metabolite-induced stimulation of the exercise pressor reflex during static and dynamic contraction in humans seem to be similar when peak tension and TTI are equal. Augmented responses to dynamic contraction at 60% MVC are likely related to greater activation of these two mechanisms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. G. Edwards, C. R. Mastin, and R. W. Kenefick
Wave reflection and central aortic pressure are increased in response to static and dynamic muscle contraction at comparable workloads
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 439 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2002 by the American Physiological Society.