AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (December 8, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00045.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/4/R909    most recent
00045.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, L.
Right arrow Articles by York, D. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, L.
Right arrow Articles by York, D. A
Submitted on January 21, 2005
Accepted on June 4, 2005

Different Metabolic Responses to Central and Peripheral Injection of Enterostatin

Ling Lin1, MieJung Park1, Matt Hulver1, and David A York1*

1 Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yorkda{at}pbrc.edu.

Enterostatin, a pentapeptide cleaved from procolipase, suppresses fat intake after peripheral and central administration. Chronic treatment of rats with enterostatin decreases body weight and body fat. The effect was greater than could be accounted by the reduction in food intake alone. Hence, we have investigated the effect of enterostatin on energy metabolism. Male Sprague-Dawley rats adapted to a high fat diet were implanted with lateral cerebral ventricular or amygdala cannulas. The metabolic effects were determined by indirect calorimetry. After habituation to the test cages, fasted rats were injected with either saline vehicle or enterostatin given either intraperitoneal (ip) (100nmoles) or intracerebral ventricle (icv) (1nmole) or onto specific brain regions [amygdala (0.01nmole) or paraventricular nucleus (PVN) (0.1nmole)]. Respiratory quotient (RQ) and energy expenditure were monitored over 2 hours. Ip enterostatin reduced RQ (saline: 0.81 ± 0.02 vs enterostatin: 0.76 ± 0.01) and increased energy expenditure by 44%. Icv enterostatin increased the energy expenditure without any effects on RQ whereas PVN enterostatin increased metabolic rate while preventing the increase in RQ observed in the control animals. In contrast, neither RQ nor energy expenditure was altered after enterostatin was injected into the amgydala. Enterostatin activated AMPkinase in primary cultures of human myocytes in a dose and time dependent manner and increased the rate of fatty acid {beta}-oxidation. These findings suggest that enterostatin regulates energy expenditure and substrate partitioning through both peripheral and central effects.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.