|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APPETITE, OBESITY, DIGESTION, AND METABOLISM
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Submitted 4 March 2005 ; accepted in final form 20 October 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 s of quiescence. Restraint stress enhanced postprandial gastric motility in the antrum and pylorus to 140 ± 9% and 134 ± 9% of basal, respectively (n = 6). The number of episodes of antropyloric coordination before restraint stress, 2.4 ± 0.4/10 min, was significantly reduced to 0.6 ± 0.3/10 min by restraint stress. Intracisternal injection of the CRF type 2 receptor antagonist astressin 2B (60 µg) or guanethidine partially restored restraint stress-induced impairment of antropyloric coordination (1.6 ± 0.3/10 min, n = 6). The restraint stress-induced augmentation of antral and pyloric contractions was increased by astressin 2B and guanethidine but abolished by atropine, hexamethonium, and vagotomy. Restraint stress enhanced postprandial gastric motility via a vagal cholinergic pathway. Restraint stress-induced delay of solid gastric emptying is due to impairment of antropyloric coordination. Restraint stress-induced impairment of antropyloric coordination might be mediated via a central CRF pathway. corticotropin-releasing factor; restraint stress
Several brain neuropeptides are known to act as stress-related neurotransmitters that modify GI motor functions (8, 29, 33, 37, 39). Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), one of the stress-related neuropeptides, is known to act in the brain to influence GI functions. Exogenous administration of CRF into the central nervous system (CNS) delays gastric emptying and inhibits acid secretion, whereas it stimulates colonic transit through the autonomic nervous system (5, 22, 35). Restraint stress augments CRF mRNA in the amygdala and paraventricular nucleus (PVN) (13, 16), resulting in alteration of GI motor activities. Restraint stress-induced delayed gastric emptying is abolished by central administration of CRF antagonist (23), suggesting that endogenous CRF has an important role in mediating stress-induced delay of gastric emptying. We recently demonstrated that restraint stress delays solid gastric emptying via a central CRF and peripheral sympathetic neuron in rats (30).
Although CRF and restraint stress attenuate gastric emptying (22), little is known about the postprandial gastric motility mediated by restraint stress. It remains unclear how restraint stress modifies gastric motility to delay gastric emptying.
Liquid meal emptying primarily reflects the activity of the fundus (27), whereas gastric emptying of a solid meal is regulated by coordination of the antrum, pylorus, and duodenum (3, 11, 15, 27).
The postprandial gastric motor pattern in response to a solid food involves a grinding and an emptying period in humans (3), dogs (40), and rats (14, 15). Immediately after a feeding, a grinding period, i.e., significant contraction, is observed in the antrum and pylorus. In contrast, the contractile pattern of the antrum is significantly changed from 40 min after a feeding in rats. The coordinated motility between the antrum and pylorus, which seems to be effective in propelling the gastric contents to the duodenum, is observed in this emptying period. Thus coordinated postprandial antropyloric contractions play an important role in the gastric emptying of solids in rats (14, 15).
We previously showed that hyperglycemia impairs antropyloric coordination and delays solid gastric emptying in conscious rats (15). We also demonstrated that injection of neuropeptide Y (NPY) into the CNS increased gastric motility but impaired antropyloric coordination, resulting in delayed solid gastric emptying in conscious rats (14). These results led us to speculate that restraint stress could impair antropyloric coordination and delay solid gastric emptying.
The present study was designed to examine the restraint stress-induced alteration of gastric motility from the viewpoint of postprandial antropyloric coordination. We assessed the mechanisms of restraint stress-mediated antropyloric coordination. In addition, we used a CRF type 2 receptor antagonist, astressin 2B, to examine the role of endogenous CRF in restraint stress-induced alteration of gastric motility.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (280320 g body wt) were housed in group cages under conditions of controlled temperature (2224°C), humidity, and illumination (12 h of light starting at 6 AM) for
7 days before the experiments and maintained on laboratory chow and water. After surgery, the rats were housed individually with access to a standard diet and tap water until the beginning of the experiments. All experiments were started at 9 AM. Protocols describing the use of rats were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines.
Substances and Treatments
A rat/human CRF and astressin 2B (both from Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were kept in powder form, CRF at 70°C and astressin 2B at room temperature. Peptides were dissolved in 0.9% saline (CRF) or double-distilled water (astressin 2B) immediately before use. Under light (3%) isoflurane anesthesia, rats were placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (model 900; David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA). Peptides or vehicles were injected intracisternally (5 µl/rat) by puncture of the occipital membrane with a needle of a 10-µl microsyringe (Hamilton, Reno, NV). The presence of cerebrospinal fluid in the syringe on aspiration before injection verified the accuracy of needle placement into the cisterna magna, as previously described (30, 31).
Experimental Design
Recording of antral and pyloric motility in restraint stress. After 12 h of fasting, the rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (45 mg/kg ip). An abdominal incision was performed, and two strain gauge force transducers were sutured onto the serosal surface of the antrum and pylorus for recording of circular muscle contractions, as previously described (14, 15). The wires to the transducers were run under the skin to an opening made in the back of the neck using a rat protective system (Star Medical, Tokyo, Japan). After the transducers were sutured, the abdominal wall was closed.
At 1 wk after the operation, the rats were fasted for 12 h just before monitoring of gastric motility. The wires from the transducers were connected to the recording system (Power-Lab model 8SP; ADInstruments, Colorado Springs, CO). The rats were fed 3 g of rat chow, and gastric motor activities were recorded for 90 min before the restraint stress loading. The rats were lightly anesthetized (3% isoflurane) and placed on a wooden plate with their trunks wrapped in a confining harness consisting of a bandage fabricated from packaging tape. The animal was able to move its limbs and head but not its trunk (2, 23). Gastric motility was measured during restraint stress for 90 min. After 90 min of restraint stress loading, the rats were immediately released, and gastric motility was recorded for 90 min.
The area under the curve was calculated using a computer-assisted system (MacLab, ADInstruments) and expressed as a motility index. Each rat was subjected to the restraint stress loading at
4-day intervals.
Ascending contraction and descending relaxation play a crucial role in promoting effective peristalsis in the GI tract (9). When contractions occur simultaneously in adjacent parts of the GI tract, the content between those parts would not be expelled effectively. Thus the temporal relation of contraction between adjacent parts of the gut needs to be analyzed. As previously described (14, 15), antropyloric coordination was defined as a single contraction at the antrum that propagated aborally in the pylorus within 10 s and was followed by
20 s of quiescence. Individual contractions were defined as >2-g changes of >1-s duration. To investigate how restraint stress alters the motility of the antrum and pylorus, we evaluated the number of episodes of antropyloric coordination during restraint stress, as previously described (14).
Pharmacological and surgical approaches. To investigate whether restraint stress-induced alteration of gastric motility is mediated via a noradrenergic and cholinergic pathway, guanethidine (5.0 mg/kg ip) and atropine sulfate (50 µg/kg ip) were injected 30 min before the restraint stress loading. To evaluate the involvement of nicotinic receptors in the mediation of restraint stress, hexamethonium (20 mg/kg ip) was injected 30 min before the restraint stress loading. The dose of these antagonists was chosen on the basis of our previous studies (30, 38). Saline (0.3 ml)-injected rats served as controls.
To study the role of the vagus nerve in stress-induced alteration of gastric motility, rats underwent truncal vagotomy: the vagal trunks were cut around the abdominal esophagus at the time the transducers were sutured, as previously reported (32). Sham-operated rats served as controls. The feeding behavior was not affected by truncal vagotomy.
To examine the role of endogenous CRF in restraint stress-induced modification of gastric motility, the CRF type 2 receptor antagonist astressin 2B (60 µg/rat) or saline was injected intracisternally (ic) 10 min before the restraint stress loading under light (3%) isoflurane anesthesia. It has been shown that astressin 2B (60 µg ic) had a tendency to prevent the inhibitory effect of urocortin on fasting gastric motility and that astressin 2B (100 µg ic) had a statistically significant effect on the urocortin-induced inhibition of gastric motility in anesthetized rats (4). As shown in Fig. 8, CRF (0.5 µg ic) attenuated postprandial gastric motility in conscious rats. In our preliminary study, 60 µg of astressin 2B almost completely abolished CRF (0.5 µg ic)-induced inhibition of gastric motility.
|
Recording of antral and pyloric motility in response to intracisternal CRF. After 12 h of fasting, the rats were fed 3 g of rat chow, and gastric motor activities were recorded for 90 min before administration of CRF (0.11.0 µg/rat). CRF or saline was administered by intracisternal injection while the animals were under light (3%) isoflurane anesthesia. After the peptide injection, gastric motility was monitored for 180 min, and the CRF-induced alteration of gastric motility was evaluated. The number of episodes of antropyloric coordination was also counted before and after CRF injection for 30 min. To investigate the involvement of sympathetic nerves on CRF-induced alteration of gastric motility, guanethidine (5.0 mg/kg ip) was injected 30 min before CRF injection.
Statistical Analysis
Values are means ± SE. Data from control animals and those subjected to restraint stress were compared by paired Student's t-test. Data from sham-operated control rats and rats subjected to truncal vagotomy were compared by Student's t-test. A multiple-group comparison was performed by ANOVA followed by Fisher's protected least significant difference method. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At 90 min after feeding, the contraction maxima of the antrum occurred most often 36 s before the contraction maxima of the pylorus (Fig. 1), as previously reported (14, 15). The number of episodes of antropyloric coordination was 2.4 ± 0.4/10 min before the restraint stress (Table 1).
|
|
|
Effect of Guanethidine, Atropine, Hexamethonium, and Truncal Vagotomy on Restraint Stress-Induced Alteration of Antral and Pyloric Motility
Guanethidine enhanced restraint stress-induced augmentation of antral and pyloric contractions (Fig. 3B). During the restraint stress, guanethidine increased the peak amplitude of the antrum and pylorus to 145 ± 21% and 146 ± 10% of basal (n = 6), respectively. During the restraint stress, guanethidine increased the frequency of antral and pyloric contractions from 2.6 ± 0.5 to 5.0 ± 0.2 and from 3.3 ± 0.8 to 5.1 ± 0.1/min, respectively. The motility index of the antrum was also increased from 25,500 ± 2,467 to 37,211 ± 2,342 g/s for 30 min (Fig. 2A) during stress loading. The motility index of the pylorus tended to be enhanced by guanethidine, although the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 2B). The number of episodes of antropyloric coordination was partially restored to 1.5 ± 0.4/10 min by guanethidine during stress loading (Table 1).
|
Postprandial antral and pyloric contractions were attenuated in vagotomized compared with sham-operated rats (Fig. 4, B and C). Restraint stress did not affect postprandial antral and pyloric contractions in vagotomized rats (Fig. 4).
|
Intracisternal astressin 2B (60 µg) did not affect postprandial antral and pyloric contractions (Fig. 5, A and B). Intracisternal astressin 2B significantly enhanced restraint stress-induced augmentation of antral and pyloric contractions (Fig. 6) and increased the motility index of antral and pyloric contractions stimulated by restraint stress (Fig. 5, A and B).
|
|
In guanethidine-treated rats, intracisternal astressin 2B did not further increase the motor activities stimulated by restraint stress (Fig. 5, A and B). The time lag between the antral and pyloric contractions was also observed in animals treated with astressin 2B + guanethidine (Fig. 7). The number of episodes of antropyloric coordination was also restored to 1.4 ± 0.5/10 min during the restraint stress loading (Table 1).
|
Intracisternal injection of saline or CRF (0.1 µg) did not affect postprandial antral contractions (Figs. 8, A and B, and 9). In contrast, intracisternal injection of CRF (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 µg) inhibited postprandial antral contractions in a dose-dependent manner (Figs. 8, CE, and 9). The inhibitory effects were observed for 30 min after CRF (1.0 µg) injection (Fig. 8E). The inhibitory effect of CRF on the pyloric contractions was also observed (data not shown).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our present study demonstrated that restraint stress significantly augmented gastric contractions of the antrum and pylorus in response to solid food ingestion. We also showed that the augmented gastric motility was restored to basal levels immediately after termination of the restraint stress loading. Because atropine, hexamethonium, and vagotomy blocked restraint stress-induced augmentation of gastric motility, the vagal-cholinergic pathway might be involved in this event.
Previous reports indicate that the CNS produces several neuropeptides in response to restraint stress (16, 20). Cold-restraint stress increases thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in the brain stem, which stimulates gastric motility and liquid emptying (17, 36). It remains unknown whether endogenous TRH is involved in mediating restraint stress-induced augmentation of postprandial gastric contractions. Some other unknown factors might be involved in the mechanism of restraint stress-induced augmentation of gastric motility.
It is generally accepted that solid gastric emptying is regulated by coordination of the antrum, pylorus, and duodenum (11, 27). In particular, coordination between the antrum and pylorus is an important factor in the emptying of solid foods (3, 6, 14, 21, 27).
In pre- and postrestraint stress, a time lag was observed between the antral and pyloric contractions; most often, the contraction maxima of the antrum occurred 36 s before the contraction maxima of the pylorus.
During restraint stress loading, the time lag between the antral and pyloric contractions was not observed frequently and the contraction maxima of the antrum and pylorus occurred simultaneously. The number of episodes of antropyloric coordination was significantly reduced during the restraint stress. Simultaneous contractions of the antrum and pylorus are considered to impair the effective emptying process and delay gastric emptying of a solid food.
It remains unclear whether the augmented gastric contractions are well correlated with the acceleration of gastric emptying. Pentagastrin significantly augments gastric antral contractions, but it does not accelerate gastric emptying (12, 25). Although restraint stress-induced augmentation of gastric contractions was further increased by guanethidine, gastric emptying was not fully restored (30). Thus augmented gastric motility does not necessarily improve delayed gastric emptying. The coordinated motor pattern between the antrum and pylorus seems to be more important than augmented gastric contractions in mediating gastric emptying of solid food.
CRF is known to act in the brain as a neurotransmitter to influence GI function through the autonomic nervous system (5, 7, 22, 30). The present study revealed that intracisternal injection of CRF dose dependently attenuated postprandial gastric motility of the antrum and pylorus for up to 30 min. Furthermore, we demonstrated that intracisternal injection of CRF (0.5 µg) produced simultaneous contractions, resulting in impairment of antropyloric coordination. These results indicated that administration of CRF into the CNS not only attenuates gastric motility but also impairs antropyloric coordination. It is conceivable that endogenous CRF may be involved in the impairment of antropyloric coordination in stress loading.
The pathway through which central CRF attenuates gastric motility remains to be elucidated. A previous report demonstrated that microinjection of CRF at the dorsal vagal complex attenuates bethanechol-stimulated gastric contractions in anesthetized rats (24). The inhibitory effect of CRF is mediated via activation of inhibitory nonadrenergic noncholinergic vagal input to the stomach (24). In contrast, our present study demonstrated that guanethidine abolished inhibition of postprandial gastric motility induced by intracisternal injection of CRF in conscious rats, suggesting involvement of the sympathetic pathway.
We also showed that intracisternal injection of the CRF type 2 receptor antagonist astressin 2B (60 µg) enhanced restraint stress-induced augmentation of gastric motility. The pathophysiological significance of the inhibitory effect of central CRF on postprandial gastric motility remains unclear. It has been reported that hypothalamic microinfusions of CRF increase bicarbonate content, decrease gastric acid content, and protect against cold restraint-induced gastric mucosal damage (10). It is conceivable that central CRF may act against stress-induced augmentation of gastric motility. This may provide new information about the role of endogenous CRF in stress-induced alteration of postprandial gastric motility.
Restraint stress-induced impairment of antropyloric coordination was partially restored by treatment with guanethidine. Intracisternal injection of astressin 2B did not produce any further changes in stress-induced impaired coordination in guanethidine-treated rats. These results suggest that the inhibitory effect of endogenous CRF on gastric motility is mediated via sympathetic pathways.
Although intracisternal injection of astressin 2B did not fully restore impaired antropyloric coordination induced by restraint stress (Table 1), our previous study showed that restraint stress-induced delay of gastric emptying was completely restored by astressin 2B (30). The reason for this difference remains to be elucidated. One possibility may be the difference in the stress models. In our previous study, partial body-tubing stress was applied (30); in the present study, partial body-wrapping stress was used. In the wrapping stress model, stress-induced delay of solid gastric emptying might not be completely inhibited by intracisternal injection of astressin 2B.
We cannot exclude the possibility that other stress-related neuronal factors, in addition to CRF, might be involved in the impaired antropyloric coordination induced by partial body-wrapping stress. Several central coding neuropeptides, such as NPY or TRH, seem to be involved in the mechanism of stress-induced alteration of gastric motor functions (14, 17, 20). We previously showed that centrally administered NPY impairs antropyloric coordination (14). It is of interest to examine whether stress-induced impairment of antropyloric coordination is mediated by these neuropeptides.
In summary, restraint stress augmented postprandial gastric motility but impaired antropyloric coordination in conscious rats. The augmented postprandial gastric motility is mediated via vagal cholinergic pathways. Central CRF in response to restraint stress may play an important role in impairment of postprandial antropyloric coordination. Delayed gastric emptying by restraint stress might be due to impairment of antropyloric coordination. These results provide new evidence that restraint stress modifies gastric motor function.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |