AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 284: R674-R681, 2003. First published November 7, 2002; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00589.2002
0363-6119/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
284/3/R674    most recent
00589.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, J. S.
Vol. 284, Issue 3, R674-R681, March 2003

Unique endothelin receptor binding in kidneys of ETB receptor deficient rats

Traci A. Taylor1, Cheryl E. Gariepy2, David M. Pollock3,4, and Jennifer S. Pollock1,3

Departments of 1 Pharmacology and Toxicology and 4 Surgery, 3 Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912; and 2 Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Gariepy and colleagues (Gariepy CE, Williams SC, Richardson JA, Hammer RE, and Yanagisawa M. J Clin Invest 102: 1092-1101, 1998.) developed rescued spotting-lethal rats that carry a naturally occurring deletion of the endothelin (ET) type B receptor gene resulting in a lack of functional renal ETB receptor expression. It has been shown that rats homozygous (sl/sl) for the deletion have elevated plasma ET-1 levels; thus, the purpose of this study was to determine whether this deletion would result in a downregulation of ETA receptors in renal tissue. ET-1 and ET-3 binding experiments were performed with cortex, outer medullary, and inner medullary membranes of heterozygous (sl/+) and sl/sl ETB receptor-deficient rats. 125I-labeled ET-1 binding in sl/sl cortex and outer medulla was significantly lower than cortex and outer medulla from sl/+ rats. In contrast to sl/+ rats, [125I]ET-3 binding was not detected in the cortex and outer medulla of sl/sl rats, indicating a lack of ETB receptor expression. The inner medulla of sl/+ rats also demonstrated an abundance of ETB receptors. Surprisingly, however, we also observed significant [125I]ET-3 binding in the sl/sl inner medulla. Furthermore, ET-3 binding in the inner medulla could be blocked with an ETA receptor antagonist in sl/sl rats but not in tissue from sl/+ rats. These studies indicate that rats deficient in ETB receptors have decreased renal cortical and outer medullary ETA receptor number, most likely in response to elevated plasma ET-1 levels. In addition, homozygous ETB-deficient rats express a novel inner medullary ET-3 binding site.

endothelin B receptor; kidney; receptor binding; spotting-lethal rats


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

IN 1988, YANAGISAWA ET AL. (33) isolated a potent vasoconstrictor produced by endothelial cells that was named endothelin (ET). Inoue and colleagues (14) determined through DNA analysis that there are three distinct genes encoding three ET isopeptides (ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3). G protein-coupled receptors were discovered and then characterized by their selective affinity to each of the ET isopeptides, location, and their biological function (18). Endothelin A (ETA) receptors bind ET-1 with higher affinity than ET-2 or ET-3, are localized to vascular smooth muscle cells, and cause vasoconstriction. Endothelin B (ETB) receptors are found on endothelial cells and have been shown to produce vasodilation and bind all three ET isopeptides with equal affinity. Additionally, there is evidence that ETB receptors in pulmonary endothelial cells "clear" ET-1 from the circulation (7). However, this classification of ET receptors may be oversimplified, with increasing evidence suggesting additional receptor subtypes. It is now known that there exist two pharmacologically distinct subtypes of the ETB receptor, ETB1 and ETB2, whose biological activity is a function of their localization. ETB1 are located on the vascular endothelium and produce vasodilation upon agonist binding, whereas ETB2 are found on vascular smooth muscle cells and mediate non-ETA vasoconstriction.

Within the kidney, both ET receptor subtypes have been identified in various regions differing both in number and function. In both cortex and medulla, ETB receptors are more abundant than ETA receptors (24). The ETB receptor has been localized to renal arterioles, glomeruli, proximal convoluted tubule, medullary thick ascending loop, and collecting duct (29). ETB receptors in the renal vasculature couple to nitric oxide and prostaglandin synthesis, leading to vasorelaxation (6), whereas ETB receptors on renal tubular cells promote natriuresis and diuresis (8, 20). ETA receptors localized in arterioles and proximal tubules mediate vasoconstrictor (5, 20) and antinatriuretic effects (18, 26).

Elevated plasma levels of ET-1 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of many disease models, including pulmonary hypertension (2) and DOCA salt hypertension (27). Although plasma ET-1 levels are high in these disease models, there is still conflicting evidence as to the regulation of ET receptors. Studies by Bauer et al. (2) have shown increased mRNA transcripts encoding the ETB receptor with no difference in ETA mRNA levels in pulmonary arterial tissue taken from patients with pulmonary hypertension. However, in endothelium-denuded saphenous veins from African-American patients with essential hypertension, elevated plasma ET-1 levels may be responsible for a decrease in ETA mRNA expression together with increased ETB mRNA levels (13). In DOCA-salt hypertensive rats, Pollock et al. (27) observed increased ETB receptor number with an apparent decrease in ETA receptor number in the renal medulla. Conversely, a transient elevation of plasma ET-1 levels induced by adenovirus gene transfer led to systemic hypertension but no change in renal ET receptor number (28).

The spotting-lethal rat carries a natural 301-bp deletion in the ETB receptor that abrogates expression of functional ETB receptors. Rats that are homozygous (sl/sl) for this mutation exhibit a lethal phenotype of congenital intestinal agangliosis and are commonly used as a model for Hirschsprung's disease (9). In 1998, Gariepy et al. (11) used a dopamine-beta -hydroxylase promoter to direct transgenic ETB receptor expression in adrenergic tissue that "rescued" the rats from the intestinal defect. The sl/sl animals have elevated plasma ET-1 levels. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether ETB receptor deficiency and elevated plasma ET-1 levels are associated with changes in ET receptor density in the kidney.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Membrane preparations. All of the procedures carried out on the rats were approved by the Medical College of Georgia Animal Care and Use Committee and followed the guidelines of the American Physiological Society. Rats (300-350 g) heterozygous and homozygous for the ETB receptor deficiency from our local breeding colony and male Sprague-Dawley (Harlan) rats (300-350 g) were anesthetized, and kidneys were excised and separated with a razor blade on ice into cortex, outer medulla, and inner medulla and frozen at -80°C. Tissue was weighed, pulverized, and then homogenized in buffer containing 250 mM sucrose, 50 mM Tris · HCl, 5 mM EDTA, and 15 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), pH 7.4, as described (27). Briefly, homogenized samples were then centrifuged at 1,000 g at 4°C for 30 min. The supernatant was further centrifuged at 30,000 g at 4°C for 45 min, and the resulting pellet was resuspended in one-half of the starting volume of homogenization buffer and frozen at -80°C. The protein concentration of the membrane preparations was determined by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

Saturation binding curves. Receptor binding curves were performed to quantify the amount of ET receptors in the cortex, outer medulla, and inner medulla of sl/+ or sl/sl rats for the ETB receptor deficiency. Sprague-Dawley rat renal tissue was also used in preliminary experiments to serve as a comparison to both previously published data and the transgenic animals. Membrane preparations from each of the three renal tissue sections were bound to wheat germ agglutinin scintillation proximity beads as previously described (27). Briefly, membrane preparations of sl/+ or sl/sl ETB receptor-deficient rats from renal cortex (20 µg), outer medulla (20 µg), or inner medulla (5 µg) were added to each well of a 96-well microtiter plate (Optiplate; Packard Instruments, Meridian, CT). Wheat germ agglutinin polyvinyltoluene beads (scintillation proximity beads; Amersham Life Science, Arlington Heights, IL) were suspended in binding buffer (40 mg/ml), with 1 mg added to each well. Binding buffer consisted of 20 mM Tris · HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 3 mM EDTA, pH 7.4, with additional 0.1 mM PMSF, 5 µg/ml pepstatin A, 0.025% bacitracin, and 0.2% BSA. The plate was covered and shaken for 3 h at room temperature to allow for coupling of the protein to the beads. After this precoupling, 25 µl of binding buffer were added to wells for total binding determination, whereas 2 µM ET-1 or ET-3 was added to determine nonspecific binding. [125I]ET-1 or [125I]ET-3 was diluted in binding buffer and added to each well with a final concentration of 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, or 3 nM. The plate was sealed and shaken for 18 h at room temperature. The plate was then centrifuged for 5 min at 1,000 g before being counted on a Packard TopCount microplate scintillation counter. Our laboratory had previously determined optimum incubation times and procedures (27). All measurements were performed in duplicate, and all dilutions of radioactive and nonradioactive peptides were made in siliconized tubes.

Additional experiments were performed using whole kidney homogenate or separated renal inner medulla from sl/+ and sl/sl animals that were homogenized as described above. Protein from whole kidney homogenate (90 µg) or inner medulla (5 µg) was added to wells followed by precoupling to scintillation proximity beads. Unlabeled ET-1 (2 µM) was added to wells to determine nonspecific binding, whereas the total binding wells received buffer. Radiolabeled ET-1 (1 nM) was added to all wells, and the plate was covered, shaken for 18 h at room temperature, and then counted on the microplate scintillation counter.

Competition binding curves. Competition binding curves were performed using selective ETA and ETB receptor antagonists. Preliminary experiments were performed using inner medullary tissue preparations from Sprague-Dawley animals. Membrane preparations from the inner medulla (5 µg) of sl/+ or sl/sl animals were precoupled to scintillation proximity beads similar to the same receptor binding protocol described above. For generation of competition binding curves, either the ETA receptor antagonist A-127722 (0.01 pM-0.5 mM), the ETB receptor antagonist A-192621 (100 pM-10 mM), or unlabeled ET-1 (10 pM-1 µM) was added to separate wells followed by the addition of [125I]ET-1 (1 nM) to every well. The plate was shaken for 18 h and then counted on the microplate scintillation counter.

Determination of maximal binding and dissociation constant values. Experiments using Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with either the ETA or ETB receptor have shown that the ETA receptor preferentially binds ET-1 over ET-3 (IC50 values of 0.28 and 475 nM, respectively), whereas the ETB receptor binds both ET-1 and ET-3 with similar affinity (IC50 values of 0.14 and 0.08 nM, respectively; see Ref. 19). Thus, in our receptor binding experiments, [125I]ET-3 receptor binding was used to determine maximal binding (Bmax) values for ETB receptor number. To determine ETA receptor number, Bmax values for [125I]ET-3 binding were subtracted from [125I]ET-1 Bmax values.

Materials. Wheat germ agglutinin scintillation proximity assay beads were purchased from Amersham Life Sciences. [125I]ET-1 (2,200 Ci/mmol) was obtained from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA), and [125I]ET-3 (2,000 Ci/mmol) was acquired from Amersham Life Sciences. ET-1 and ET-3 were purchased from American Peptide (Sunnyvale, CA). A-127722 {trans-trans-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-([N,N-dibutylamino]carbonylmethyl)pyrrolidine-3-carboxylate} and A-192621 {[2R-(2alpha ,3beta ,4alpha )]-4-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-{2-[(2,6 diethylphenyl)amino}-2-oxoethyl]-2-(4-propoxyphenyl)-3-pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid} were obtained from Dr. Jerry Wessale at Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, IL). PMSF, pepstatin A, and bacitracin were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). All other agents were acquired from Bio-Rad Laboratories.

Data and statistical analysis. Receptor binding data were analyzed by nonlinear regression using the one-site model of the binding isotherm except for the Scatchard analysis of [125I]ET-1 binding in inner medulla of sl/sl animals in which a two-site model was utilized (Prism; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Statistical differences in the mean values for all binding data were determined by ANOVA, and Fisher's protected least-significant difference test was used to determine differences between individual means (StatView, Abacus Concepts, Berkley, CA). Values are reported as means ± SE, with P < 0.05 and P < 0.001 considered significant.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Saturation binding of [125I]ET-1 in renal tissue. Total and nonspecific binding was determined for [125I]ET-1 over a wide range of renal cortical, outer medullary, and inner medullary membrane protein concentrations. Maximum binding for sl/+ and sl/sl cortex and outer medulla preparations was achieved at 20 µg, whereas only 5 µg were needed for maximum binding in the inner medulla (data not shown). Maximum binding of [125I]ET-3 in the inner medulla required only 0.5 µg for maximum binding (data not shown). Figure 1 shows saturation binding curves of cortex (20 µg), outer medulla (20 µg), or inner medulla (5 µg) of membrane preparations from sl/+ or sl/sl rats incubated with [125I]ET-1 (1 nM). Specific binding of ET-1 was similar and saturable in both the renal cortex (Fig. 1A) and renal outer medulla (Fig. 1B) of sl/+ ETB receptor-deficient rats. Additionally, ET-1 binding in cortex and outer medullary preparations from sl/sl rats was less than one-half that observed in sl/+ rats. Specific binding of ET-1 in the inner medulla was eightfold higher in both sl/sl and sl/+ rats compared with the cortex and outer medulla.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Saturation binding curves were performed using 125I-labeled endothelin (ET)-1 incubated with 20 µg of membrane preparations from sl/+ () or sl/sl () ETB receptor-deficient rat renal cortex (A), outer medulla (B, n = 4-6 animals/group), or 5 µg of inner medulla membrane preparations (C, n = 3 animals/group). Values are means of nonspecific binding subtracted from total binding ± SE.

Scatchard analysis of [125I]ET-1 saturation binding curves. To visualize Bmax and dissociation constant (Kd) differences between sl/+ and sl/sl animals, Scatchard analyses were performed on nonlinear regression results from [125I]ET-1 saturation binding curves (Table 1). Scatchard analyses from both sl/+ and sl/sl renal cortex and outer medulla were linear (data not shown), revealing a one-site model of receptor binding, which was expected. Figure 2 depicts Scatchard plots of inner medullary saturation binding curves of radiolabeled ET-1. Figure 2A shows inner medullary binding results from the sl/+ rat that are linear, indicating a single binding site. However, the Scatchard plot of [125I]ET-1 for inner medullary tissue from sl/sl rats (Fig. 2B) reveals a two-site model of receptor binding, each with a distinct Kd. There appears to be one site that has very high affinity (0.08 ± 0.03 nM) but relatively few binding sites (14.2 ± 2.8 fmol/mg protein), whereas the other has lower affinity (5.72 ± 0.79 nM) but is greater in abundance (347.5 ± 25.4 fmol/mg protein).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Bmax and Kd of [125I]ET-1 and [125I]ET-3 binding in membrane preparations



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Scatchard analysis of sl/+ (A, ) and sl/sl (B, ) inner medulla [125I]ET-1 binding curve results.

Saturation binding of [125I]ET-3 in renal tissue. Figure 3 represents saturation binding curves using [125I]ET-3 incubated with either renal cortex (Fig. 3A), renal outer medullary (Fig. 3B), or renal inner medullary (Fig. 3C) membrane preparations. Specific binding of [125I]ET-3 was similar and saturable in the cortex and outer medulla of the sl/+ ETB-deficient rats. The inner medulla of the sl/+ ETB-deficient rat exhibited an almost 10-fold greater binding of [125I]ET-3 compared with the cortex and outer medulla, indicating a greater number of ETB receptors in this renal section. Predictably, there was no detectable [125I]ET-3 specific binding in the renal cortex and outer medulla from sl/sl ETB-deficient rats. However, within the renal inner medulla of the sl/sl ETB-deficient rat, there was an unexpected [125I]ET-3 binding.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Saturation binding curves were performed using [125I]ET-3 incubated with 20 µg membrane preparations from sl/+ () or sl/sl () ETB receptor-deficient rat renal cortex (A), outer medulla (B, n = 4-6 animals/group), or 0.5 µg inner medulla membrane preparations (C, n = 3 animals/group). Values are means of nonspecific binding subtracted from total binding ± SE.

Bmax and Kd values. By definition, ET-1 binds both ETA and ETB receptors, and ET-3 is selective for ETB receptors at low concentrations; Bmax values for [125I]ET-3 binding were subtracted from [125I]ET-1 Bmax values to determine ETA receptor number in each of the renal sections from sl/+ and sl/sl ETB-deficient rats. [125I]ET-3 receptor binding was used to determine ETB receptor number. Figure 4 represents Bmax values from renal cortical (Fig. 4A), outer medullary (Fig. 4B), and inner medullary (Fig. 4C) tissue from both sl/+ and sl/sl membrane preparations. ETA receptor number was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in sl/sl cortical (19.95 ± 0.61 fmol/mg protein) and outer medullary (23.75 ± 0.36 fmol/mg protein) membrane preparations compared with the sl/+ cortex (33.40 ± 1.20 fmol/mg protein) and outer medulla (41.49 ± 1.30 fmol/mg protein) preparations. Additionally, there were no detectable ETB receptors in the sl/sl cortex or outer medulla. ETA receptor number was not significantly different in the inner medulla between sl/+ and sl/sl animals (60.20 ± 39.89 and 76.00 ± 50.31 fmol/mg protein, respectively). There was a significantly (P < 0.05) lower number of ETB receptors in the sl/sl inner medulla (211.50 ± 25.36 fmol/mg protein) compared with the sl/+ inner medulla (309.40 ± 26.58 fmol/mg protein); however, the observation that significant [125I]ET-3 binding was detected in the inner medulla of sl/sl ETB receptor-deficient rats was surprising.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Because the ETB receptor has similar affinity for both ET-1 and ET-3, whereas ETA receptors preferentially bind ET-1, [125I]ET-3 receptor binding was used to determine ETB receptor number. Maximal binding (Bmax) values for [125I]ET-3 were subtracted from [125I]ET-1 Bmax values to determine ETA receptor number. ETA receptor number () and ETB receptor number () were calculated for sl/+ and sl/sl renal cortex (A), outer medulla (B), and inner medulla (C). Values represent the means ± SE of Bmax calculations from 3-6 animals/group. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-tests with * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.001.

Binding of [125I]ET-1 in whole kidney. Experiments were also performed to explore the possibility that the use of whole kidney homogenate may mask or prevent the detection of ET-3 binding sites in the inner medulla of sl/sl ETB-deficient rats. Figure 5 shows [125I]ET-1 specific binding using inner medulla and whole kidney membrane preparations from either sl/+ or sl/sl ETB-deficient rats. [125I]ET-1 specific binding in the inner medulla of sl/+ ETB-deficient rats was not significantly different compared with [125I]ET-1 specific binding in the whole kidney [1,356 ± 200 and 1,447 ± 354 counts · min-1 (cpm) · µg protein-1, respectively]. However, when inner medullary membrane preparations from sl/sl ETB-deficient rats were incubated with [125I]ET-1, significantly more specific binding occurred compared with that observed in whole kidney membrane preparations (832 ± 74 vs. 72 ± 38 cpm/µg protein, respectively).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Specific binding [counts/min (cpm)] of [125I]ET-1 to either 5 µg inner medullary membrane preparations (n = 3 animals/group) or 90 µg whole kidney membrane preparations (n = 3 animals/group) from sl/+ and sl/sl ETB-deficient rats. Values are means of nonspecific binding subtracted from total binding ± SE. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-tests with ** P < 0.001.

Competition binding curves with selective ETA and ETB receptor antagonists. Competitive binding experiments were conducted to ascertain whether the novel ET-3 binding in the sl/sl inner medulla could be inhibited by ETA or ETB receptor antagonists. Competition binding curves were generated using various concentrations of the ETA receptor selective antagonist A-127722, the ETB receptor selective antagonist A-192621, or unlabeled ET-1. Results previously reported using Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with either the ETA or ETB receptor report IC50 values using A-127722 as 0.09 nM for the ETA receptor and 128 nM for the ETB receptor, whereas the IC50 of ET-1 for the ETA receptor is 0.28 and 0.14 nM for the ETB receptor (31). Results from von Geldern and colleagues (30a) report that the ETB receptor selective antagonist has an IC50 of 1.10 µM for the ETA receptor and 0.7 nM for ETB receptor. Thus, in sl/+ inner medullary membrane preparations (Fig. 6A), ET-1 was found to have the highest affinity (IC50 0.16 ± 0.24 nM; Table 2) followed by the ETB receptor antagonist A-192621 (IC50 0.12 ± 0.05 µM; Table 2), whereas A-127722, the ETA receptor antagonist, had the lowest affinity (IC50 7.3 ± 0.11 µM; Table 2). However, competition binding curves performed on inner medullary membrane preparations from sl/sl rats were quite different (Fig. 6B). The ETB receptor antagonist A-192621 displaced the [125I]ET-1 with similar concentrations in the sl/sl rats (IC50 0.11 ± 0.15 µM; Table 2) as it did in the sl/+ animals. Additionally, ET-1 was less able to compete for binding sites as [125I]ET-1 (IC50 1.8 ± 0.14 nM; Table 2), and most strikingly the ETA receptor antagonist was extremely potent, with an IC50 of 1.2 ± 0.15 pM (Table 2). Additional competition binding experiments performed on Sprague-Dawley inner medullary tissue preparations revealed that the IC50 for ET-1 was 0.18 ± 0.16 nM (Table 2), similar to that of the sl/+ rat. The ETB receptor antagonist was next highest in affinity for the receptor (IC50 0.10 ± 0.04 µM; Table 2), again similar to results from the sl/+ rat, whereas the ETA receptor antagonist had the least affinity of the three ligands, with an IC50 value of 20.7 ± 0.69 µM (Table 2). Taken together, results from the saturation binding curves suggest that there is an ET-3 binding site in the inner medulla of sl/sl rats and that competition binding curves suggest that this site binds the ETA receptor antagonist with very high affinity.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Competition binding curves were generated from sl/+ (A) and sl/sl (B) ETB-deficient inner medullary membrane preparations (5 µg) incubated with [125I]ET-1 along with various concentrations of either ET-1 (), the ETA receptor antagonist A-127722 (), or the ETB receptor antagonist A-192621 (). Values represent means ± SE (n = 3 animals).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   IC50 values of ET receptor ligands against [125I]ET-1 binding to inner medullary preparations


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The present study was conducted to determine if any changes in ETA receptor binding in the kidney would occur under conditions of ETB receptor deficiency that is associated with chronic elevations in circulating ET-1 levels. We hypothesized that long-term exposure to ET-1 would cause a downregulation of ETA receptor expression. Indeed, results showed that ETA receptor binding was reduced significantly in renal tissue of sl/sl compared with sl/+ rats. These observations are consistent with a compensatory change in ETA receptor expression when ETB receptor function is lost and plasma levels of ET-1 are increased. An unexpected observation was evidence for a novel ET-3 binding site in the renal inner medulla of ETB receptor-deficient animals.

Saturation binding curves using radiolabeled ET-1 reveal an expected decrease in overall ligand-receptor binding interactions in all three regions of kidneys from sl/sl compared with sl/+ rats. Consistent with previous studies, Bmax values determined from ET-1 binding were ~10-fold greater in the inner medulla compared with the cortex and outer medulla of both sl/+ and sl/sl rats, highlighting the abundance of ET receptors in this region (16). However, when ET-1 saturation binding results were plotted using Scatchard analysis, the inner medulla from sl/sl rats revealed a surprising two-site model, whereas a linear one-site model was detected in the sl/+ inner medulla. This two-site model found in the sl/sl rat indicated that there was another ET binding site that was different from both ETA and ETB receptors. When the results from both the ET-1 and ET-3 saturation curves were plotted as a function of receptor number, the total amount of ET receptors was significantly greater in the inner medulla of both sl/+ and sl/sl animals compared with their respective cortex and outer medulla, with the majority of receptors representing the ETB subtype. However, Bmax values were substantially lower in both sl/+ and sl/sl rats compared with published values from Sprague-Dawley rats (24). The reason for this difference may be related to methodology but could be because of differences in rat strain that have yet to be discerned.

We performed additional experiments to compare previously published ET-1 binding data using whole kidney homogenates with similar whole kidney preparations from sl/+ and sl/sl rats (11). When sl/+ whole kidney or inner medulla membranes were used, ligand-receptor binding was similar between the two preparations. However, the same experiment performed on sl/sl preparations indicates that significant ET-1 binding occurs only when the inner medulla was separated from the cortex and outer medulla, and this binding is "diluted out" when included in a whole kidney preparation. This led us to examine the nature of this binding site through competition binding curves using specific ETA and ETB receptor antagonists. Findings from competition binding curves using radiolabeled ET-1 in sl/+ inner medullary preparations indicated that the ETB receptor antagonist had less affinity compared with the natural ligand, ET-1 but more affinity for the receptor than the ETA receptor antagonist. However, within the sl/sl inner medulla, the ETA receptor antagonist had very high affinity, greater than either ET-1 or the ETB antagonist.

The sl/sl animal is devoid of ETB receptor apart from adrenergic tissue where its expression in these regions is essential for survival (9). Because plasma ET-1 levels are elevated, these animals have had to adapt to the loss of renal ETB receptor function in the face of high circulating ET-1. Plasma ET-1 levels in sl/sl rats are significantly elevated compared with sl/+ rats, and results from this colony of rats have been published previously (25). Consistent with our original hypothesis, the sl/sl rat appears to downregulate ETA receptors in renal cortical and outer medullary tissue. However, the situation in the renal inner medulla appears more complex. Within the inner medulla, there is not a downregulation of ETA receptors. In fact, ETA receptor number is similar to those found in the sl/+ inner medulla. Additionally, our studies provide evidence for the existence of a unique binding site that has the novel characteristics of having a high affinity for ET-3 that competes with an ETA receptor antagonist. We can only speculate, at this point, that this novel binding site represents some form of compensation for the lack of functional ETB receptors in this region of the kidney. More exhaustive biochemical studies will be needed to determine why this novel binding site has a different binding profile from the traditional ETA or ETB receptor. Further studies exploring the possibility that this novel binding site is actually a putative ET receptor along with its estimated size, biochemical behavior, and its pharmacological profile against multiple ET-related ligands are clearly warranted. In addition, to determine whether this binding site is unique to the renal inner medulla, receptor binding experiments will need to be performed using tissue from the sl/sl animals that normally are enriched with ETB receptors, such as the lungs and the cerebellum.

The physiological significance of this novel ET binding site has yet to be determined, but we can speculate that it could be of importance in models of hypertension that have elevated circulating ET levels. In the DOCA-salt rat model of hypertension, it has been shown that plasma ET-1 levels are elevated compared with placebo-treated controls (1). Additionally, it has been shown that there is an upregulation of ETB receptors in the renal medulla from DOCA-salt rats whose function is thought to promote sodium and water excretion (27). Thus the DOCA-salt model of hypertension is associated with elevated ET-1 levels, and the kidney responds by upregulating renal medullary ETB receptors. In rats that lack functional ETB receptors, there are also elevated plasma ET-1 levels, and these animals have elevated blood pressures (10); we would expect the kidney to respond by upregulating medullary ETB receptors. However, because there is a mutation in the ETB receptor gene, we speculate that the sl/sl animal tries to compensate by expressing a renal inner medullary ET binding site that has a unique binding profile different from that of the ETA and ETB receptors. We can speculate further that it may influence blood pressure because of its ETA receptor-like sensitivity to the ETA antagonist but might also function to promote natriuresis because of its ETB receptor-like binding of ET-3. Future studies are required to determine if this renal inner medullary binding site has functional significance under normal physiological conditions.

There is anecdotal evidence for the existence of a third class of ET receptors, named ETC. By definition, the ETC receptor has a rank order of affinity of ET-3 > ET-1 in radioligand binding and functional studies. In 1993, Karne et al. (17) cloned an ETC-like receptor that has high affinity for ET-3 from Xenopus dermal melanophores. However, no ETC receptor has yet been cloned from mammalian sources (17). The possibility arises that the ET-3 binding site is unmasked in the renal inner medulla of the sl/sl ETB-deficient animal and could be the mammalian counterpart to the ETC receptor found in Xenopus melanophores. In addition, Zeng and colleagues (34) have cloned and characterized a novel ET receptor type B-like gene enriched in the brain that encodes an ET receptor type B-like protein. This could explain the ET-3 binding found in the inner medulla of the sl/sl animals. Additionally, there is the possibility of a splice variant of this ET receptor type-B-like gene or even a splice variant of the ETA receptor.

In recent years, evidence has accumulated supporting the notion of alternative splice variants of the ETB receptor. Cheng et al. (4) identified a splice variant of the ETB receptor in rat brain. More recently, Nambi and colleagues (24) demonstrated the existence of a splice variant of the ETB receptor in porcine cerebellum that differs in the last 32 amino acids of the COOH-terminal tail from that of the wild-type receptor but that binding and stimulation of inositol phosphate production are identical to that found in the wild type. Radioligand binding data also indicated that the splice variant and the wild-type ETB receptor are expressed at the same level in the porcine brain. Additionally, Tsutsumi et al. (30) provide evidence of a novel ETB receptor transcript that could potentially generate a new receptor. It should be noted that the dopamine-beta -hydroxylase ETB receptor transgene was constructed using the ETB cDNA, that is, it does not contain ETB gene introns, making splice variants from the transgene unlikely.

The sl/sl ETB-deficient animal has a 301-bp deletion in the gene encoding for the first two membrane-spanning regions of the receptor, and this shortened transcript does not encode functional ETB receptors (11), normally, the part of the NH2-terminal domain that is in close proximity to the first transmembrane region required for ligand binding. Through proteolytic truncation experiments, it has been shown that ET-1 binds to a 29-amino-acid sequence in the NH2-terminal region of the ETB receptor near the first transmembrane-spanning domain (18, 31). Thus we can speculate that ET-3 binding in the sl/sl inner medulla must be to an ET-like receptor that contains an NH2-terminal region of 29 amino acids near the first transmembrane segment. Future studies will need to be completed to address whether this binding site has an alteration at the COOH-terminal region of the receptor.

In summary, our data suggest that there is a reduction in ETA receptor number in the cortex and outer medulla of rats deficient of functional ETB receptor consistent with a downregulation related to elevated circulating ET-1 levels. Furthermore, we provide evidence for an ET-3 binding site within the inner medulla of ETB receptor-deficient rats that binds the ETA antagonist, A-127722, with very high affinity. We speculate that this binding site is a novel ET receptor that is unmasked during ETB receptor deficiency.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Masashi Yanagisawa for efforts in providing us with breeders for our ETB receptor-deficient colony. We also thank Dr. Jerry Wessale for the ETA and ETB receptor antagonists used in this study.


    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Research Grants HL-60653 and HL-64776 and by Scientist Development Grants from the American Heart Association.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. S. Pollock, Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912 (E-mail: jpollock{at}mail.mcg.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

First published November 7, 2002;10.1152/ajpregu.00589.2002

Received 20 September 2002; accepted in final form 31 October 2002.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Allcock, GH, Venema RC, and Pollock DM. ETA receptor blockade attenuates the hypertension but not renal dysfunction in DOCA-salt rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R245-R252, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Bauer, M, Wilkens H, Langer F, Schneider SO, Lausberg H, and Schafers HJ. Selective upregulation of endothelin B receptor gene expression in severe pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 105: 1034-1036, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Ceccherini, I, Zhang AL, Matera I, Yang G, Devoto M, Romeo G, and Cass DT. Interstitial deletion of the endothelin-B receptor gene in the spotting lethal (sl) rat. Hum Mol Genet 4: 2089-2096, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Cheng, H, Su Y, Yeh J, and Chang K. Alternative transcript of the nonselective-type endothelin receptor from rat brain. Mol Pharmacol 44: 533-538, 1993[Abstract].

5.   Doucet, J, Gonzalez W, and Michel JB. Endothelin antagonists in salt dependent hypertension associated with renal insufficiency. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 27: 643-651, 1996[ISI][Medline].

6.   Edwards, RM, Pullen M, and Nambi P. Activation of endothelin ETB receptors increases cGMP via an L-arginine dependent pathway. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 263: F1020-F1025, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Fukuroda, T, Fujikawa T, Ozaki S, Ishikawa K, Yano M, and Nishikibe M. Clearance of circulating endothelin-1 by ETB receptors in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 199: 1461-1465, 1994[ISI][Medline].

8.   Gallego, MS, and Ling BN. Regulation of amiloride sensitive Na+ channels by endothelin-1 in distal nephron cells. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 271: F451-F460, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Gariepy, CE, Cass DT, and Yanagisawa M. Null mutation of endothelin receptor type B in spotting lethal rats causes aganglionic megacolon and white coat color. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 867-872, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Gariepy, CE, Ohuchi T, Williams SC, Richardson JA, and Yanagisawa M. Salt-sensitive hypertension in endothelin-B receptor-deficient rats. J Clin Invest 105: 925-933, 2000[ISI][Medline].

11.   Gariepy, CE, Williams SC, Richardson JA, Hammer RE, and Yanagisawa M. Transgenic expression of the endothelin-B receptor prevents congenital intestinal agangliosis in a rat model of Hirschsprung disease. J Clin Invest 102: 1092-1101, 1998[ISI][Medline].

12.   Gellai, M, DeWolf R, Pullen M, and Nambi P. Distribution and functional role of renal ET receptor subtypes in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Kidney Int 46: 1287-1294, 1994[ISI][Medline].

13.   Grubbs, AL, Anstadt MP, and Ergul A. Saphenous vein endothelin system expression and activity in African American patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22: 1122-1127, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Inoue, A, Yanagisawa M, Takuwa Y, Kobayashi M, and Masaki T. The human endothelin family: three structurally and pharmacologically distinct isopeptides predicted by three separate genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 2863-2867, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Ivy, DD, Yanagisawa M, Gariepy CE, Gebb SA, Colvin KL, and McMurtry IF. Exaggerated hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in endothelin B receptor-deficient rats. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282: L703-L712, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Jones, CR, Hiley CR, Pelton JT, and Miller RC. Autoradiographic localization of endothelin binding sites in the kidney. Eur J Pharmacol 160: 379-382, 1989.

17.   Karne, S, Jayawickreme CK, and Lerner MR. Cloning and characterization of an endothelin-3 specific receptor (ETC receptor) from Xenopus laevis dermal melanophores. J Biol Chem 268: 19126-19133, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Kivilighn, SD, Gabel RA, and Siegl PK. Effects of BQ-123 on renal function and acute cyclosporin induced renal dysfunction. Kidney Int 45: 131-136, 1994[ISI][Medline].

19.   Kohan, DE. Endothelins in the normal and diseased kidney. Am J Kidney Dis 29: 2-26, 1997[ISI][Medline].

20.   Kohan, DE, Padilla E, and Hughes AK. Endothelin B receptor mediates ET-1 effects on cAMP and PGE2 accumulation in rat IMCD. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 265: F670-F676, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Kozuka, M, Ito T, Hirose S, Lodhi KM, and Hagiwara H. Purification and characterization of bovine lung endothelin receptor. J Biol Chem 266: 16892-16896, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Martin, ER, Marsden PA, Brenner BM, and Ballermann BJ. Identification and characterization of endothelin binding sites in rat renal papillary and glomerular membranes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 162: 130-137, 1989[ISI][Medline].

23.   Nambi, P, Hsiao HL, Pullen M, Aiyar N, Bryan H, and Elliott J. Identification of endothelin receptor subtypes in rat kidney cortex using subtype-selective ligands. Mol Pharmacol 42: 336-339, 1992[Abstract].

24.   Nambi, P, Wu H, Gagnon D, and Elshourbagy N. Characterization of a novel porcine endothelin B receptor splice variant. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 292: 247-253, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Perry, MG, Molero MM, Giulumian AD, Katakam PVG, Pollock JS, Pollock DM, and Fuchs LC. ETB receptor-deficient rats exhibit reduced contraction to ET-1 despite an increase in ETA receptors. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H2680-H2686, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Plato, CF, Pollock DM, and Garvin JL. Endothelin inhibits thick ascending limb chloride flux via ETB receptor-mediated NO release. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 279: F326-F333, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

27.   Pollock, DM, Allcock GH, Krishnan A, Dayton BD, and Pollock JS. Upregulation of endothelin B receptors in kidneys of DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278: F279-F286, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Telemaque-Potts, S, Kuc RE, Yanagisawa M, and Davenport AP. Tissue-specific modulation of endothelin receptors in a rat model of hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 36: S122-S123, 2000[ISI][Medline].

29.   Terada, Y, Tomita K, Nonagushi H, and Marumo F. Different localization of two types of endothelin receptors mRNA in micro-dissected rat nephron segments using reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Invest 90: 107-112, 1992[ISI][Medline].

30.   Tsutsumi, M, Liang G, and Jones PA. Novel endothelin B receptor transcripts with the potential of generating a new receptor. Gene 228: 43-49, 1999[ISI][Medline].

30a.   Von Geldern, TW, Tasker AS, Sorensen BK, Winn M, Szczepankiewicz BG, Dixon DB, Chiou WJ, Wang L, Wessale JL, Adler A, Marsh KC, Nguyen B, and Opgenorth TJ. Pyrrolidine-3-carboxylic acids as endothelin antagonists. 4. Side chain conformational restriction leads to ET(B) selectivity. J Med Chem 42: 3668-3678, 1999[ISI][Medline].

31.   Wada, K, Hashido K, Terashima H, Adachi M, Fujii Y, Hiraoka O, Furuichi Y, and Miyamoto C. Ligand binding domain of the human endothelin-B receptor subtype. Protein Expr Purif 6: 228-236, 1995[ISI][Medline].

33.   Yanagisawa, M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, and Masaki T. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature 332: 411-415, 1988[Medline].

34.   Zeng, Z, Su K, Kyaw H, and Li Y. A novel endothelin receptor type-B-like gene enriched in the brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 233: 559-567, 1997[ISI][Medline].


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 284(3):R674-R681
0363-6119/03 $5.00 Copyright © 2003 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
D. Nakano, J. S. Pollock, and D. M. Pollock
Renal medullary ETB receptors produce diuresis and natriuresis via NOS1
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): F1205 - F1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
Y. Ge, A. Bagnall, P. K. Stricklett, K. Strait, D. J. Webb, Y. Kotelevtsev, and D. E. Kohan
Collecting duct-specific knockout of the endothelin B receptor causes hypertension and sodium retention
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): F1274 - F1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Ergul, V. Portik-Dobos, A. D. Giulumian, M. M. Molero, and L. C. Fuchs
Stress upregulates arterial matrix metalloproteinase expression and activity via endothelin A receptor activation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): H2225 - H2232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. P. Granger
Endothelin
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): R298 - R301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
284/3/R674    most recent
00589.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, J. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online