| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
Acute release of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) during repeated restraint (3-h restraint on each of 3 days) causes temporary hypophagia but chronic suppression of body weight in rats. Here we demonstrated that a second bout of repeated restraint caused additional weight loss, but continuing restraint daily for 10 days did not increase weight loss because the rats adapted to the stress. In these two studies serum leptin, which suppresses the endocrine response to stress, was reduced in restrained rats. Peripheral infusion of leptin before and during restraint did not prevent stress-induced weight loss, although stress-induced corticosterone release was suppressed. Restrained rats were hyperthermic during restraint, but there was no evidence that fever or elevated free interleukin-6 caused the sustained reduction in weight. Restraining food-restricted rats caused a small but significant weight loss. Food-restricted rats fed ad libitum after the end of restraint showed a blunted hyperphagia and slower rate of weight regain than their controls. These results indicate that repeated acute stress induces a chronic change in weight independent of stress-induced hypophagia and may represent a change in homeostasis initiated by repeated acute activation of the central CRF system.
corticotropin-releasing factor; food intake; food restriction; corticosterone
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
RATS EXPOSED to repeated restraint stress experience a temporary reduction in 24-h food intake but maintain a reduced body weight compared with controls (12). The weight loss is dependent on the acute central release of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) (28), but there is no sustained activation of this pathway to account for the maintained suppression of body weight (27). CRF activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the sympathetic nervous system, and serotonergic and catecholamine systems. All of these systems have the potential to inhibit food intake and reduce body weight, but none of them is activated significantly during the hours or days after exposure to repeated restraint (12, 27).
All of the weight loss that occurs on the days of restraint is accounted for by a loss of lean tissue. During the days immediately after the end of repeated restraint, there is a shift in tissue metabolism so that the difference in weight between control and restrained rats is a combination of both lean and fat tissue (30). The reduction in weight is relatively small and represents only 5-10% of body weight (12), but there are aspects of the model that are unique. First, the stressed rats do not make any attempt to overeat once stress is ended, implying that the feedback signals that promote hyperphagia after weight loss due to food restriction (10) are not responding to the loss of weight caused by stress. Second, the maintenance of a reduced body weight for extended periods of time provides a model that can be used to examine mechanisms that normally regulate body weight. Although the stressed rats gain weight once stress has ended, they do not recover the weight that has been lost during the period of restraint and remain significantly lighter than their controls (12). Weight changes induced by environmental conditions such as diet composition (15), food restriction (10), or temperature (22) are usually reversed as soon as the environmental factor is removed. A sustained reduction of body weight in ad libitum-fed animals is found in rats with lesions of the lateral hypothalamus (17) or mice in which gene expression has been modified (16), but this stress model provides an opportunity to examine chronic weight reduction in an intact animal.
The mechanism of the response has not been elucidated, but it appears that the repeated acute stress initiates a cascade of events that resets the homeostatic equilibrium of the animal, with a reduced body weight being a representative end point of the new equilibrium. To have a better understanding of the limits of the response, it was necessary to clarify whether the amount of weight that could be lost during stress was limited or was proportional to the number of exposures to stress. In addition, others have shown that weight loss in rats injected with turpentine, to induce an inflammatory response, correlates with the energy status of the animal (20, 21). Overfed animals lose more weight and underfed animals lose less weight than ad libitum-fed rats. Therefore, the objective of the first two experiments described here was to test whether weight loss in restrained rats was proportional to the number of episodes of stress they experienced. In the process of conducting these studies, we found that leptin was unexpectedly low in restrained rats. Heiman et al. (14) have reported that leptin, a cytokine released from adipose tissue that may be a negative-feedback signal in the regulation of energy balance (29), suppresses the endocrine response to stress. Additionally, it has been shown that leptin treatment of rats or mice specifically reduces body fat but protects muscle mass (2). All of the initial weight loss in restrained rats is lean body mass (30); therefore, the third experiment tested whether chronic treatment with leptin would prevent stress-induced weight loss or change the composition of the loss. Finally, to determine whether the weight loss of restrained rats was dependent on the energy status of the rats at the time of stress, we tested whether restraint stress inhibited food intake or body weight of rats that were already food restricted and weight reduced.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
Experiment 1: 10 days of repeated restraint. In previous experiments, rats were exposed to 3 h of restraint stress on each of 3 consecutive days, and this resulted in a chronic downregulation of body weight (12). In this experiment we determined whether additional days of restraint would produce a progressively greater weight loss in the rats.
Twelve Wistar male rats (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) weighing ~400 g were housed individually in hanging wire mesh cages with free access to food and water in a room maintained at 23 ± 2°C, with lights on 12 h a day from 6:30 AM. They were adapted for 10 days to a diet containing 40% kcal fat and 16% kcal protein, because a high-fat diet exaggerates the energy balance response to restraint stress (12). Baseline daily food intakes and body weights were recorded for 7 days, and then the rats were divided into two weight-matched groups. One was exposed to 3 h of restraint each morning, from 7:00 to 10:00 AM, on each of 10 consecutive days. The nonstressed controls were moved to the same room as restrained rats and housed without food or water for the period of restraint. On days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 of restraint, a small blood sample was collected from the tail of each rat for measurement of corticosterone (corticosterone RIA kit; ICN Diagnostics, Costa Mesa, CA) and leptin (rat leptin RIA kit; Linco Research, St. Charles, MO). On days 1, 4, 6, and 10 of restraint, rectal temperatures were measured at the end of restraint. Two and five days after the end of restraint a tail blood sample was collected at 10:00 AM, after a 3-h fast, for measurement of corticosterone and leptin. Twelve days after the end of restraint, the rats were decapitated between 9:30 AM and 10:30 AM after a 3-h fast. Trunk blood was collected for measurement of corticosterone and leptin, and the carcass, less gut content, was analyzed for composition (9).Experiment 2: two bouts of 3 days of repeated restraint. This experiment tested whether weight loss induced during the first bout of repeated restraint represented a maximal response to the stimulus or whether exposure to a second bout of repeated restraint caused additional weight loss in the rats. Serum interleukin (IL)-6 and rectal temperatures were also measured to test whether repeated restraint induced an inflammatory response.
Fourteen male Wistar rats, weighing ~400 g, were housed in individual cages with free access to water and the 40%-kcal-fat diet. After 10 days they were divided into two weight-matched groups, and one was exposed to 3 h of restraint on each of 3 days. On the morning before the start of stress, and for the next 5 days, a small tail blood sample was collected at a time that was equivalent to 1 h after the end of restraint. Serum leptin and free IL-6 (Quantikine M IL-6, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) were measured. Rectal temperatures of the rats were measured immediately before and immediately after restraint and at an equivalent time on the 4 days after stress. Seven days after the end of restraint, the rats were exposed to a second bout of repeated restraint. Rectal temperatures were measured and blood samples were collected as before. The experiment ended on day 26, 13 days after the end of the second bout of repeated restraint, and carcass composition was determined (9).Experiment 3: effect of chronic leptin infusion in rats exposed to repeated restraint. Experiments 1 and 2 indicated that leptin declined during the days after repeated restraint. It is well established that leptin has little effect on lean mass while reducing body fat (2, 7, 8), and it has been reported that leptin inhibits some of the HPA responses to stress (14). Therefore, we tested whether chronic infusion of leptin before and during repeated restraint would prevent weight loss during restraint, which is predominantly lean tissue (30), or influence the body composition of the rats during the poststress period.
Forty-eight male rats, each weighing 375 g, were housed individually with free access to water and the 40%-kcal-fat diet. Food intakes and body weights were recorded daily for 10 days, after which the rats were divided into three weight-matched groups. Each rat was anesthetized with isoflurane, and an Alzet miniosmotic pump (model 2 ML4, Durect, Cupertino, CA) delivering 0, 30, or 100 µg/day recombinant rat leptin (R&D Systems) for 28 days was placed in the intraperitoneal cavity. Two days after pump placement, a small tail blood sample was collected in the morning after a 3-h fast to measure serum leptin and corticosterone. On day 21 of leptin infusion, the rats within each leptin treatment group were subdivided into two weight-matched groups. One subgroup was exposed to 3 h of restraint on each of 3 days, and the other subgroup was a nonrestrained control. One hour after the start of restraint on the first day of stress, a tail blood sample was collected for measurement of leptin and corticosterone. On the day after the end of stress, the rats were food deprived for 3 h in their home cages, and a blood sample was collected for measurement of leptin and corticosterone. Five days after the end of restraint, the rats were decapitated. Trunk blood was collected for measurement of serum corticosterone, leptin, insulin, glucose, and free fatty acids (NEFA C kit, WAKO Chemicals). Epididymal fat was weighed and snap frozen, and total RNA was extracted for measurement of leptin mRNA expression by Northern blot test (11). Thymus, adrenal glands, liver, and inguinal, retroperitoneal, perirenal, and mesenteric fat pads were dissected and weighed before being returned to the carcass. The carcass, less gut content, was analyzed for composition (9).Experiment 4: repeated restraint in weight-reduced, food-restricted rats. In other experimental protocols that induce a prolonged downregulation of body weight, the energy balance status of the animal at the time that weight loss is induced determines the amount of weight that is lost. For example, weight loss caused by an inflammatory response is exaggerated if the rats have been overfed before being exposed to turpentine, whereas they gain weight if they are weight reduced at the time of treatment (21). The objective of this experiment was to determine whether weight-reduced rats would lose weight in response to repeated restraint stress.
Sixty male Wistar rats, each weighing ~320 g, were singly housed in suspended stainless steel cages with ad libitum access to water and the 40%-kcal-fat diet. Food intakes and body weights were recorded daily for a week before the rats were divided into three weight-matched groups. One group had ad libitum access to food, and the two remaining groups were restricted to 50% of their voluntary food intake for 10 days, by which time food-restricted rats weighed 75 g less than ad libitum-fed animals. Food-restricted rats were given their food at the onset of the dark cycle. Each of the three groups was divided into two weight-matched subgroups. One subgroup was exposed to repeated restraint, and the other was a nonstressed control group. A small blood sample was collected from each rat by tail bleeding after the first hour of restraint on the first day of stress for measurement of serum corticosterone. After the third restraint, the ad libitum group continued to eat ad libitum (AL), one group of food-restricted rats remained on 50% voluntary food intake (FR), and the rats in the second food-restricted group were returned to ad libitum feeding (FR-AL). Twelve days after the end of restraint, the rats were killed in the morning, between 9:00 and 11:00 AM. Trunk blood was collected for determination of serum corticosterone, leptin, glucose, insulin, and free fatty acids. The carcass, less gut content, was analyzed for compositionStatistical analysis. Daily body weight and food intake measures were modeled separately with repeated-measures ANOVA. Initial body weight or food intake at the start of stress was used as a covariate in the analysis. Post hoc comparisons of treatment means at different time points were effected by t-test, and the significance levels reported are unadjusted for multiple comparisons (SAS for Windows, release 6.12, SAS Institute). Differences in single time point measures were determined by t-test, one-way ANOVA, or two-way ANOVA and post hoc Duncan's multiple range test (Statistica, StatSoft, Tulsa, OK).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
Experiment 1: restraint stress on 10 consecutive days.
Exposing rats to repeated restraint for 10 days caused a significant
loss of body weight (Fig. 1A:
restraint, P < 0.002; day, P < 0.0001; interaction, P < 0.0001), such that restrained
rats weighed significantly less than controls from day 3 to
the end of the experiment. The extended period of repeated restraint
did not increase the amount of weight lost because restrained rats weighed significantly less on day 5 of restraint than
day 0, but their body weight was not significantly different
on day 10 of restraint compared with day 3.
Stress inhibited food intake on the days of restraint, but the intake
of restrained rats returned to control levels once stress ended (Fig.
1B: restraint, P < 0.02; day,
P < 0.0001; interaction, P < 0.0001).
Restraint stress caused a significant increase in serum corticosterone
(Fig. 2A: restraint, P < 0.03; day, P < 0.0001;
interaction, P < 0.0001) and body temperature (Table
1: restraint, P < 0.04;
day, P < 0.0009; interaction, P < 0.004). The rats appeared to be adapting to repeated exposure to stress
because corticosterone was significantly higher after restraint on
day 1 than on days 7 or 9.
Similarly, rectal temperatures were higher on days 1,
4, and 6 than on day 10. Temperatures
of the controls were also elevated on day 1, which suggests
that being moved to a novel environment was stressful. In contrast, repeated restraint caused a delayed decline in serum leptin (Fig. 2B: restraint, P < 0.08; day,
P < 0.005; interaction, P < 0.0005). Leptin in restrained rats was significantly lower than that in controls
from day 7 of restraint to day 17 of the
experiment, a week after the stress had ended. The reduced body weight
of restrained rats was accounted for by nonsignificant decreases in
both fat and lean tissue (control fat, 71 ± 11 g; restrained fat, 52 ± 3 g; control lean mass, 389 ± 7 g;
restrained lean mass, 378 ± 7 g).
|
|
|
Experiment 2: two bouts of repeated restraint.
Exposing rats to two bouts of repeated restraint had an additive effect
on weight loss. Restrained rats weighed significantly less than
controls from the last day of the first bout of repeated restraint
(day 3) to the end of the experiment [Fig.
3A: restraint, P < 0.0001; day, P < 0.0001;
interaction, not significant (NS)]. The difference in weights between
the two groups plateaued after the first bout of restraint and was then
increased by the second bout of restraint. This response is illustrated
in Fig. 3B, which is a plot of the difference between the
mean body weight of the two groups of rats on each day of the
experiment. Restraint significantly inhibited food intake (Fig.
3C: restraint, P < 0.04; day,
P < 0.0001; interaction, NS) but only on the days that
stress was applied. Restraint caused a significant elevation of rectal
temperature compared with either controls or with prestress
temperatures (Fig. 4: restraint,
P < 0.0001; day, P < 0.001;
prestress/poststress, P < 0.0001;
restraint × day, P < 0.0001;
prestress/poststress × restraint, P < 0.0001;
prestress/poststress × day, P < 0.0001). Hyperthermia was transient and was not present 24 h after the end
of stress.
|
|
|
Experiment 3: repeated restraint of leptin-infused rats.
There was no effect of peripheral leptin infusion on food intake or
body weight during the 21 days before restraint stress in rats
consuming a 40%-kcal-fat diet, as shown in Table
2. Serum leptin concentrations, measured
2 days after the start of infusion, were increased ~4-fold in rats
receiving 100 µg/day compared with controls (Table 2). There was no
effect of leptin on serum corticosterone, glucose, or free fatty acids
at this time point. By the end of the study serum leptin was ~7-fold
higher in the 100 µg/day group than in controls (see Fig.
7A). All of the rats that were exposed to repeated
restraint-stress lost weight, but rats infused with 100 µg/day leptin
appeared to regain weight faster than the two other groups (Fig.
6A: leptin, NS; stress,
P < 0.03; day, P < 0.0001;
stress × day, P < 0.002; leptin × day,
P < 0.02). All rats exposed to repeated restraint ate
less during stress than their controls. There was no effect of leptin
on this response (Fig. 6B: leptin, NS; stress,
P < 0.002; stress × leptin, NS; day,
P < 0.0001; stress × day, P < 0.009), and intakes returned to control levels once restraint ended.
Serum corticosterone measured during the first restraint was lower in
both control and restrained rats receiving 100 µg/day leptin than in
comparable treatment groups receiving 0 or 30 µg/day leptin (Fig.
7B: leptin, P < 0.005; stress, P < 0.06; interaction, NS). There
were no differences in corticosterone measured the day after the end of
repeated restraint (Fig. 7B), but at the end of the
experiment, 5 days after the end of restraint, corticosterone was lower
in all rats that had been restrained than in controls (Fig.
8A: leptin, NS; stress, P < 0.01; interaction, NS). There were no differences
in serum glucose or insulin at this time point (data not shown). Stress had no effect on serum leptin concentrations at the end of the experiment (Fig. 8B), but there was a significant
interaction between leptin and stress (P < 0.05) on
leptin mRNA expression in epididymal fat (Fig. 8C).
Expression was inhibited in restrained 100 µg/day rats, compared with
their controls, even though there were no differences in serum leptin
concentrations of the two groups.
|
|
|
|
Experiment 4: restraint of food-restricted rats.
Restraint stress caused a significant reduction in body weight,
independent of the rat's feeding status (Fig.
9A: feeding status,
P < 0.0001; restraint, P < 0.0001;
day, P < 0.0001; feeding status × restraint,
P < 0.0008; feeding status × restraint × day, P < 0.01). Restrained AL and FR-AL rats weighed
significantly less than their respective nonstressed controls on all
poststress days. Restrained FR rats weighed significantly less than
nonstressed FR rats for the last 5 days of the recovery period.
Restrained rats gained less weight than their nonstressed controls
during the 12-day poststress period (days 3-14),
independent of feeding status (Fig.
10A: feeding status, P < 0.0001; restraint, P < 0.0001; interaction, NS).
|
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
Exposing rats to restraint stress causes weight loss, and the
stressed rats subsequently maintain a body weight that is 5-10% less than that of nonrestrained controls for periods as long as 40 days
after stress has ended (12, 27). This response is blocked
by infusion of a CRF receptor antagonist, 
hCRF, into the third
ventricle immediately before restraint (28), suggesting that the chronic downregulation of body weight is initiated by acute
release of CRF in an area of the brain close to the hypothalamus. Chronic weight loss is not limited to restraint stress as similar changes have been found in rats exposed to a single social defeat (25) or chronic mild stress (13). The
restraint protocol, however, allows us to expose a relatively large
number of animals to a standardized stressor. The experiments described
here were carried out to provide further clarification of physiological conditions that influence the chronic response to repeated acute stress.
Previous experiments have shown that exposure to 3 h of restraint on each of 3 days (12) causes a greater weight loss than that produced by one 3-h period of restraint (27). The results of experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that exposing rats to a second bout of repeated restraint increased the amount of weight lost by stressed rats, but increasing the number of consecutive days that the rats were restrained did not exaggerate the weight loss caused by 3 days of restraint. This may be explained by the rats adapting to the stress in experiment 1, such that stress-induced activation of central mechanisms that initiate the chronic response was ameliorated on successive days of restraint, and the subsequent effect on body weight was limited. This concept is supported by the gradual decline in stress-induced corticosterone release during the 10 days of exposure to restraint stress. In contrast, when the rats were exposed to two bouts of restraint, with an interval of 1 wk between bouts, the hyperthermic response to stress was as great during the second bout of restraint as the first, implying that the central response was also intact and induced further loss of body weight in the rats.
In both experiments 1 and 2 we found a delayed decline in serum leptin concentrations during the poststress period. When rats were restrained daily for 10 days, the reduction in leptin was significant after 5 days of restraint and was maintained for 1 wk after the stress had ended. The time delay between onset of stress and the drop in leptin implies that it did not result from direct inhibition of expression by activation of either the HPA axis or stress-induced release of catecholamines. In addition, these results do not support the concept of physiological concentrations of leptin having an inhibitory effect on corticosterone release in stressed animals (14), because both leptin and corticosterone were significantly reduced on the last 5 days of restraint. If leptin provided a tonic inhibition of the HPA axis, corticosterone release in response to stress would be expected to increase, or at least be maintained, once leptin concentrations declined. It is interesting to note that although leptin concentrations were reduced at the end of restraint and after stress had ended, there was no evidence of poststress hyperphagia to compensate for the period of hypophagia during restraint. The failure to show compensatory overeating in restrained rats may contribute to their maintenance of a reduced body weight compared with controls. Although leptin is hypothesized to be a circulating satiety signal (29), and, on the basis of this hypothesis, food intake would be expected to increase when leptin levels decline, the results from these experiments clearly demonstrate that leptin is not responsible for either the inhibition of intake during stress or for the failure to overeat once stress has ended.
We have previously reported that weight loss during restraint is exclusive to lean tissue, but during the days after the end of stress, the weight difference between control and restrained rats shifts to a combination of both lean and fat tissue (12, 30). In experiments 1 and 2, body composition of the rats was measured almost 2 wk after the end of stress; therefore it was not possible to determine whether the decline in leptin coincided with changes in body fat content of the rats. Unlike previous experiments (12, 30) or experiment 1, all of the weight loss in animals that had been exposed to two bouts of repeated restraint was accounted for by lean body mass. This suggests that a second exposure to stress does not promote the same cascade of metabolic events initiated by the first exposure to stress.
It has been established in normal mice that leptin protects lean mass while selectively reducing body fat content (2, 6), and in vitro studies have shown a direct inhibition of cortisol secretion from adrenocortical cells (19). Therefore, in experiment 3, we determined whether treating the rats with leptin before and during exposure to repeated restraint would moderate, or prevent, stress-induced weight loss. The rats in all of the experiments described here were fed a high-fat diet, and peripheral leptin had no effect on food intake or body weight during the prestress infusion. Thus the response to stress was not confounded by rats treated with different doses of leptin having different starting body weights or body compositions. The results of the experiment demonstrate that, although the highest dose of leptin did inhibit stress-induced release of corticosterone during restraint, it did not influence the amount or composition of weight that was lost. Thus a fivefold elevation of circulating concentrations of leptin was able to suppress glucocorticoid release from the adrenal gland, whereas endogenous leptin in experiment 1 did not appear to exert any limiting effect on corticosterone release. Although the high dose of leptin inhibited stress-induced corticosterone release, it did not prevent stress-induced hypophagia or weight loss, confirming previous observations that the chronic response to stress is independent of glucocorticoid release (28).
Five days after the end of restraint, corticosterone, measured in blood collected between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM, was lower in all of the rats exposed to restraint than in their controls. These results are contrary to those from other investigators who have reported a stress-induced chronic elevation of basal corticosterone during the trough of the diurnal cycle (1, 4). Because only a single measure was made in our experiment, it is not possible to determine whether there was a sustained inhibition of activity of the adrenal cortex or whether stress had modified the circadian rhythm of corticosterone release. Dallman et al. (3) have proposed that a small elevation of basal corticosterone may promote abdominal obesity due to the metabolic effects of glucocorticoids. On the basis of this hypothesis, a reduction in the lowest diurnal level of corticosterone release would not be expected to have any substantial effect on metabolism or body composition. If, however, the pattern of release of corticosterone had shifted, this would disrupt the dynamic equilibrium between catabolic and anabolic hormones and could account for the change in body weight of the rats. Leptin expression was increased in the epididymal fat of control 100 µg leptin/day rats compared with all other groups, although there were no differences in serum leptin concentrations between this group and the restrained rats that received the same dose of leptin. The increase in leptin expression reflected the significant enlargement of epididymal depots in these animals. It is possible that stress had reversed a similar degree of adiposity in the restrained 100 µg leptin/day rats and had also changed the rate of leptin clearance, as there were no differences in circulating concentrations of leptin in control and restrained rats infused with 100 µg leptin/day.
In the final experiment described here, we determined whether rats that were already weight reduced would show the same chronic response to repeated restraint as ad libitum-fed rats. Restrained rats that remained food restricted after the end of stress lost only a small amount of weight, suggesting that there is an innate protective mechanism that prevents an additive response to two simultaneous stressors. These results are similar to those reported by Gursoy et al. (5), who found that daily immobilization stress did not reduce the body weight of food-restricted rats. In experiment 4, the restrained FR-AL rats were initially hyperphagic and gained weight once stress had ended. The rate at which they gained weight was not as rapid as that in the control FR-AL rats, and food intake of restrained FR-AL rats returned to control levels before that of the FR-AL control rats. These results imply that, although the weight-reduced rats did not lose weight in response to restraint, the mechanisms responsible for initiating a chronic downregulation of body weight was intact and caused restrained FR-AL rats to gain less weight than their nonrestrained counterparts during refeeding. Similar results have been reported for weight loss after lesions of the lateral hypothalamus. Rats that have been weight reduced have a lower energy expenditure (18) and lose less weight than ad libitum-fed animals so that both groups of lesioned animals reach the same postlesion weight (17). Other investigators (20, 21) have shown that the metabolic response to acute inflammation caused by turpentine injection is also related to the energy status of the rats at the time of injection. Overfed rats become hypermetabolic and anorexic and lose weight, whereas weight-reduced rats given ad libitum access to food after the injection are hyperphagic and gain weight so that the postinflammation weight is the same for all of the rats, independent of their energy status at the onset of inflammation. Thus it appears that both restraint stress and inflammation initiate a series of events that lead to the rats defending a reduced body weight. Because we did not find any evidence that restraint stress caused an independent stimulation of IL-6 or development of fever, it is not clear whether the two different types of stress cause weight loss through the same mechanisms or whether different mechanisms result in similar changes in the two models.
In summary, exposing rats to repeated restraint stress causes a chronic downregulation of body weight initiated by acute activation of central CRF receptors (28). Exposing the rats to a second bout of restraint caused further weight loss, whereas extending the number of days of restraint within one bout did not, possibly because the rats adapted to the stressor. Although there was a delayed decline in serum leptin concentrations of restrained rats, infusing the rats with leptin before and during exposure to restraint did not protect against weight loss even though stress-induced corticosterone release was inhibited by high concentrations of leptin. Stress-induced weight loss was inhibited in weight-reduced rats, but animals that were allowed to refeed after the stress has ended gained less weight than their nonrestrained controls. These results indicate that the reduced body weight is not dependent on stress-induced hypophagia.
Perspectives
The effects of stress on body weight are determined both by the severity of the stress and by an individual's perception of the stress. In animals, mild stressors, such as tail pinch, increase food intake (23), whereas more severe stressors, such as restraint or immobilization, inhibit food intake (24) and have long-term effects on body weight and behavior (12, 25). In humans, extreme stress, such as combat, inhibits food intake (26), but the chronic effects on food intake and body composition have not been determined. Experiments described here demonstrate that the sustained reduction in body weight caused by acute stress is not a direct result of hypophagia, but on the basis of the response of food-restricted rats, it appears that repeated restraint changes some aspect of the metabolic equilibrium. This change is induced in weight-reduced animals but is only expressed as a difference in body weight in ad libitum-fed animals. Further studies are needed to identify other chronic behavioral and biochemical changes present in these animals. Elucidation of the mechanisms that cause this disruption of homeostasis would provide new information on the regulation of body composition and body weight and may also be valuable in developing new treatments for trauma patients.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by U.S. Department of Defense Grant DAMD-17-97-2-7013 to the Pennington Biomedical Research Center.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. B. S. Harris, Dept. of Foods and Nutrition, Dawson Hall, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 (E-mail: harrisrb{at}arches.uga.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 19 March 2001; accepted in final form 27 August 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
1.
Brennan, FX,
Ottenweller JE,
Seifu Y,
Zhu G,
and
Servatius RJ.
Persistent stress-induced elevations of urinary corticosterone in rats.
Physiol Behav
71:
441-446,
2000[Medline].
2.
Chen, Y,
and
Heiman ML.
Chronic leptin administration promotes lipid utilization until fat mass is greatly reduced and preserves lean mass of normal female rats.
Regul Pept
92:
113-119,
2000[ISI][Medline].
3.
Dallman, MF,
Akana SF,
Bhatnagar S,
Bell ME,
and
Strack AE.
Bottomed out: metabolic significance of the circadian trough in glucocorticoid concentrations.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
24:
S40-S46,
2000.
4.
Fleshner, M,
Deak T,
Spencer RL,
Laudenslager ML,
Watkins RL,
and
Maier SF.
A long-term increase in basal levels of corticosterone and a decrease in corticosteroid-binding globulin after acute stressor exposure.
Endocrinology
136:
5336-5342,
1995[Abstract].
5.
Gursoy, E,
Cardounel A,
Hu Y,
and
Kalimi M.
Biological effects of long-term caloric restriction: adaptation with simultaneous administration of caloric stress plus repeated immobilization stress in rats.
Exp Biol Med
226:
97-102,
2001
6.
Halaas, JL,
Boozer C,
Blair-West J,
Fidahusein N,
Denton DA,
and
Friedman JM.
Physiological response to long-term peripheral and central leptin infusion in lean and obese mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
8878-8883,
1997
7.
Halaas, JL,
Gajiwala KS,
Maffei M,
Cohen SL,
Chait BT,
Rabinowitz D,
Lallone RL,
Burley SK,
and
Friedman JM.
Weight-reducing effects of the plasma protein encoded by the obese gene.
Science
269:
543-546,
1995
8.
Harris, RBS
Acute and chronic effects of leptin on glucose utilization in lean mice.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
245:
502-509,
1998[ISI][Medline].
9.
Harris, RBS
Growth measurements in Sprague-Dawley rats fed diets of very low fat concentration.
J Nutr
121:
1075-1080,
1991.
10.
Harris, RBS,
Kasser TR,
and
Martin RJ.
Dynamics of recovery of body composition after overfeeding, food restriction or starvation of mature female rats.
J Nutr
116:
2536-2546,
1986.
11.
Harris, RBS,
Ramsay TG,
Smith SR,
and
Bruch RC.
Early and late stimulation of ob mRNA expression in meal-fed and overfed rats.
J Clin Invest
97:
2020-2026,
1996[ISI][Medline].
12.
Harris, RBS,
Zhou J,
Youngblood BD,
Rybkin II,
Smagin GN,
and
Ryan DH.
Effect of repeated stress on body weight and body composition of rats fed low- and high-fat diets.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
275:
R1928-R1938,
1998
13.
Harris, RBS,
Zhou J,
Youngblood BD,
Smagin GN,
and
Ryan DH.
Failure to change exploration or saccharin preference in rats exposed to chronic mild stress.
Physiol Behav
63:
91-100,
1997[Medline].
14.
Heiman, ML,
Ahima RS,
Craft LS,
Schoner B,
Stephens TW,
and
Flier JS.
Leptin inhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in response to stress.
Endocrinology
138:
3859-3863,
1997
15.
Hill, JO,
Dorton J,
Sykes MN,
and
DiGirolamo M.
Reversal of dietary obesity is influenced by its duration and severity.
Int J Obes
13:
711-722,
1989[ISI][Medline].
16.
Inui, A.
Transgenic approach to the study of body weight regulation.
Pharmacol Rev
52:
35-61,
2000
17.
Keesey, RE,
Boyle PC,
Kemnitz JW,
and
Mitchel JS.
The role of the lateral hypothalamus in determining the body weight set point.
In: Hunger: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Implications, edited by Novin D.. New York: Raven, 1975, p. 243-255.
18.
Keesey, RE,
Corbett SW,
Hirvonen MD,
and
Kaufman LN.
Heat production and body weight changes following lateral hypothalamic lesions.
Physiol Behav
32:
309-317,
1984[Medline].
19.
Kruse, M,
Bornstein SR,
Uhlmann K,
Paeth G,
and
Scherbaum WA.
Leptin down-regulates the steroid producing system in the adrenal.
Endocr Res
24:
587-590,
1998[ISI][Medline].
20.
Lennie, TA.
Relationship of body energy status to inflammation-induced anorexia and weight loss.
Physiol Behav
64:
475-481,
1998[Medline].
21.
Lennie, TA,
McCarthy DO,
and
Keesey RE.
Body energy status and the metabolic response to acute inflammation.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
269:
R1024-R1031,
1995
22.
Leung, PM,
and
Horwitz BA.
Free-feeding patterns of rats in response to changes in environmental temperature.
Am J Physiol
231:
1220-1224,
1976.
23.
Levine, AS,
and
Morley JE.
Stress-induced eating in rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
241:
R72-R76,
1981.
24.
Marti, O,
Marti J,
and
Armario A.
Effects of chronic stress on food intake in rats: influence of stressor intensity and duration of daily exposure.
Physiol Behav
55:
747-753,
1994[Medline].
25.
Meerlo, P,
Overkamp GJ,
and
Koolhaas JM.
Behavioural and physiological consequences of a single social defeat in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats.
Psychoneuroendocrinology
22:
155-168,
1997[ISI][Medline].
26.
Popper, R,
Smits G,
Meiselman HL,
and
Hirsch E.
Eating in combat: a survey of U.S. Marines.
Mil Med
154:
619-623,
1989[ISI][Medline].
27.
Rybkin, II,
Zhou Y,
Volaufova J,
Smagin GN,
Ryan DH,
and
Harris RBS
Effect of restraint stress on food intake and body weight is determined by time of day.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
273:
R1612-R1622,
1997
28.
Smagin, GN,
Howell LA,
Redmann S,
Ryan DH,
and
Harris RBS
Prevention of stress-induced weight loss by third ventricle CRF receptor antagonist.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
276:
R1461-R1468,
1999
29.
Zhang, Y,
Proenca R,
Maffei M,
Barone M,
Leopold L,
and
Friedman JM.
Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue.
Nature
372:
425-432,
1994[Medline].
30.
Zhou, J,
Yan X,
Ryan DH,
and
Harris RBS
Sustained effects of repeated restraint stress on muscle and adipocyte metabolism in high-fat-fed rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
277:
R757-R766,
1999
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. R. Miragaya and R. B. S. Harris Antagonism of corticotrophin-releasing factor receptors in the fourth ventricle modifies responses to mild but not restraint stress Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): R404 - R416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Rickenbacher, M. A. Baez, L. Hale, S. C. Leiser, S. A. Zderic, and R. J. Valentino From the Cover: Impact of overactive bladder on the brain: Central sequelae of a visceral pathology PNAS, July 29, 2008; 105(30): 10589 - 10594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. K. Tamashiro, M. M. N. Nguyen, M. M. Ostrander, S. R. Gardner, L. Y. Ma, S. C. Woods, and R. R. Sakai Social stress and recovery: implications for body weight and body composition Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): R1864 - R1874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Zalutskaya, M. Arai, G. S. Bounoutas, and A. B. Abou-Samra Impaired adaptation to repeated restraint and decreased response to cold in urocortin 1 knockout mice Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2007; 293(1): E259 - E263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. T. Foster, M. B. Solomon, K. L. Huhman, and T. J. Bartness Social defeat increases food intake, body mass, and adiposity in Syrian hamsters Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): R1284 - R1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Kapoor and S. G Matthews Short periods of prenatal stress affect growth, behaviour and hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in male guinea pig offspring J. Physiol., August 1, 2005; 566(3): 967 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. R. Rooks, D. M. Penn, E. Kelso, R. R. Bowers, T. J. Bartness, and R. B. S. Harris Sympathetic denervation does not prevent a reduction in fat pad size of rats or mice treated with peripherally administered leptin Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): R92 - R102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Evans, M. M. Messina, W. D. Knight, A. D. Parsons, and J. M. Overton Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley rats exhibit divergent responses to refeeding after caloric restriction Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): R1468 - R1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Cupples Peptides that regulate food intake Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): R1370 - R1374. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Scholz Fever Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): R913 - R915. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||
).
