|
|
||||||||
-Adrenoceptor-mediated cell signaling in the neonatal
heart and liver: responses to terbutaline
Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Terbutaline, a
2-adrenoceptor (
2-AR) agonist, is a
widely used tocolytic that also crosses the placenta to stimulate fetal
-ARs. The current study examines the effects of terbutaline
administered to neonatal rats. Terbutaline (10 mg/kg sc) given on
postnatal day (PN) 2-5 or
PN 11-14 elicited significant downregulation of both
cardiac and hepatic
-ARs, with a much greater effect in the liver.
Despite the reduction in cardiac
-ARs, receptor desensitization was
absent as evidenced by the maintained ability of isoproterenol to
stimulate adenylyl cyclase (AC) in membrane preparations. The underlying mechanism was dissected by using stimulants that operate at
different points in the AC signaling pathway, NaF, forskolin, and
Mn2+. When administered in the early neonatal period,
terbutaline failed to evoke any changes in cardiac AC activity;
however, treatment on PN 11-14 evoked heterologous
sensitization downstream from the receptor, evidenced by increases in
the response to NaF and forskolin. In the liver, neonatal terbutaline
administration elicited a small (
10%) decrease in the AC response
to isoproterenol, an effect much smaller than the downregulation of
-ARs (>40%). In this tissue, desensitization was again offset by
heterologous sensitization of AC signaling. These results indicate
that, in the developing organism,
-AR-mediated cell signaling
responses are maintained in the face of receptor downregulation through heterologous induction of downstream signaling elements. These unique
responses serve to sustain
-AR signaling in the perinatal period.
adenylyl cyclase; liver;
-adrenoceptor; preterm labor; adenosine
3',5'-cyclic monophosphate; terbutaline; development; tocolysis; heart
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-ADRENOCEPTOR
(
2-AR) agonists, such as terbutaline, are widely used to
prevent preterm delivery, a leading cause of infant morbidity and
mortality in the United States (3). In addition to
blocking uterine contractions, terbutaline penetrates the placenta to
stimulate fetal
-ARs (2, 16). To a large extent, these effects are likely to be beneficial if preterm delivery occurs, as
catecholaminergic stimulation promotes cardiovascular, respiratory, and
metabolic adaptations that are necessary for perinatal survival (9). However, neonates from mothers receiving tocolytic
therapy also exhibit adverse effects, including tachycardia,
alterations in glucose metabolism (4), and elevated
incidence of cardiac anomalies (12, 17).
Both the positive and negative effects of prenatal terbutaline exposure
are likely to reflect the result of prolonged, excessive
-AR
stimulation. In adult tissues,
-AR responses are limited by receptor
downregulation and receptor uncoupling from cell signaling, best
exemplified by desensitization of the adenylyl cyclase (AC) signaling
cascade (25). However, immature tissues appear to be
resistant to desensitization (23, 24, 27, 30), and we
recently found that
-AR/AC responses are maintained in the face of
repeated terbutaline administration in fetal rats (1). The
current study extends this work into the neonatal period, a
developmental stage in rats that corresponds more closely to the status
of sympathetic innervation of peripheral tissues in the third trimester
human fetus (9), the period in which terbutaline would
most likely be used. We assessed the ability of terbutaline to induce
receptor downregulation and desensitization of
-AR signaling after
treatment on postnatal (PN) days 2-5, before the onset
of sympathetic function, and on PN 11-14, the period in which innervation shows its most rapid development (19).
We compared effects in the heart and liver, tissues that differ in the
predominant
-AR subtype (
1 in the heart,
2 in the liver). These tissues also represent major
targets for the catecholamines in the perinatal transition, mediating
essential cardiovascular and metabolic adjustments (9). In
addition to assessment of
-ARs and
-AR-mediated responses, we
determined AC responses to stimulants that bypass the receptors to act
on G proteins or on AC itself, so as to dissect the heterologous,
downstream mechanisms underlying resistance to
-AR desensitization
(1, 24).
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal treatments.
Studies were carried out in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki
and with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as adopted and promulgated by the National Institutes of
Health. Timed pregnant female Sprague-Dawley rats (Zivic-Miller Laboratories, Allison Park, PA) were shipped by climate-controlled truck (transit time, 12 h) and housed with free access to food and
water. After birth, pups were randomized and redistributed to the
nursing dams with litter sizes maintained at 10 pups; dams were
periodically reassigned to different litters to distribute any maternal
differences equally. Within each litter, equal numbers of males and
females were assigned to each treatment group. Pups were given daily
subcutaneous injections of 10 mg/kg of terbutaline hemisulfate or an
equivalent volume (1 ml/kg) of isotonic saline vehicle on PN
2-5 or on PN 11-14. This regimen has been
shown previously to elicit robust
2-AR downregulation in
the adult and to evoke cardiac activation and enhancement of lung
surfactant synthesis in the fetus (1, 8, 16). Twenty-four
hours after the final injection, hearts, and livers were dissected,
frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
45°C until assayed.
Determinations on PN 6 required two hearts for each assay.
Membrane preparation. Tissues were thawed and homogenized (Polytron, Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY) in 39 volumes of ice-cold buffer containing 145 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5) strained through several layers of cheesecloth when necessary to remove connective tissue and sedimented at 40,000 g for 15 min. The pellets were washed twice by resuspension (Polytron) in homogenization buffer followed by resedimentation and were then dispersed with a homogenizer (smooth glass fitted with a Teflon pestle) to achieve a final protein concentration (determined with Folin reagent) of 0.5-1 mg/ml in a buffer consisting of 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, and 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4).
-AR binding.
Receptor binding capabilities were assessed by methods described in
earlier publications (7, 15). The overall strategy was to
examine binding of [125I]iodopindolol at a single,
subsaturating ligand concentration (67 pM) in preparations from each
animal; changes can thereby be detected regardless of whether they
result from alterations in receptor dissociation constant or maximal
binding (Bmax). This approach was necessitated by
the requirement to measure binding in hundreds of membrane preparations
in the study; earlier work indicates that receptor downregulation
elicited by terbutaline, administered to either fetal or adult rats,
reflects a decrease in Bmax (1). Binding was
determined in samples containing
200 µg of membrane protein in 250 µl of 145 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM sodium ascorbate, 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5); samples were incubated for 20 min at ambient
temperature, and labeled membranes were trapped by vacuum filtration
onto glass fiber filters. Nonspecific binding was determined by
displacement with 100 µM D,L-isoproterenol and ranged
from 7 to 25%, depending on age and tissue.
AC activity. Aliquots of membrane preparation containing 25-50 µg protein were incubated for 30 min at 30°C with final concentrations of 100 mM Tris · HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM theophylline, 1 mM ATP, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and a creatine phosphokinase-ATP-regenerating system consisting of 10 mM sodium phosphocreatine and 8 IU/ml phosphocreatine kinase, with or without 10 µM GTP in a total volume of 250 µl. The enzymatic reaction was stopped by placing the samples in a 90-100°C water bath for 5 min, followed by sedimentation at 3,000 g for 15 min, and the supernatant solution was assayed for cAMP using radioimmunoassay kits. Preliminary experiments showed that the enzymatic reaction was linear well beyond the assay period and was linear with membrane protein concentration; concentrations of cofactors were optimal and, in particular, the addition of higher concentrations of GTP produced no further augmentation of activity.
We assessed the contributions of G protein-linked processes to AC in several ways. First, we contrasted basal AC activity in the presence or absence of GTP. Second, we determined
-adrenergic stimulation of
activity via Gs with 100 µM L-isoproterenol
in the presence of GTP. Third, to determine the net G protein-linked response of AC activity with maximal activation of all G proteins, samples were prepared containing 10 mM NaF in addition to GTP (28). Fourth, we determined the response of AC to 100 µM
forskolin or 10 mM MnCl2 in the presence of GTP. Forskolin
requires association of G proteins with AC for maximal effect
(18), whereas Mn2+ activates AC by replacing
magnesium at the active site (13) and shows decremental
effects when G proteins are associated with the enzyme
(28). The preference for one stimulant over the other also
reflects shifts in the subtype of AC being expressed (28). Finally, to determine whether effects on
-adrenoceptor signaling represented heterologous changes influencing multiple receptor inputs,
we assessed the response to clonidine, an
2-receptor agonist, using a concentration (500 µM) previously found to inhibit AC maximally (20). The effect of clonidine was assessed in
liver samples in which AC was first stimulated by isoproterenol or
forskolin (20).
Data analysis. Data are presented as means and SE. For convenience, some data are presented as the percent change from control values, but statistical differences were always established using the original data. To establish treatment differences in receptor binding or AC activity, a global ANOVA (data log transformed whenever variance was heterogeneous) was first conducted across the in vivo treatment groups, age, sex, tissue, and for AC, all in vitro conditions under which AC was determined; the in vitro stimulant conditions were repeated measures, because each membrane preparation was used for the multiple types of AC determinations. As justified by significant interactions of treatment × age and treatment × tissue (see RESULTS), data were then subdivided to permit testing of individual treatments and AC measures that differed from control values; these were conducted by lower-order ANOVAs, followed, where appropriate, by Fisher's protected least-significant difference to identify specific ages at which the terbutaline group differed from the corresponding control. However, in situations where there was no interaction of treatment × age, only main treatment effects are reported without conducting separate tests for each age. Tests of drug effects on body and tissue weights and on tissue membrane protein concentration were evaluated by similar procedures. For all tests, significance for main treatment effects was assumed at P < 0.05; however, for interactions at P < 0.1, we also examined whether lower-order main effects were detectable after subdivision of the interactive variables (22).
Materials. cAMP radioimmunoassay kits were purchased from Amersham (Chicago, IL) and [125I]iodopindolol (specific activity 2,200 Ci/mmol) was obtained from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Development of control rats. Cardiac
-AR
binding increased between PN 6 and PN 15,
paralleled by a large augmentation of the AC response to
-AR
stimulation by isoproterenol (Table 1). There was no change in basal AC activity, but the coupling of G
proteins to AC showed a substantial rise over this period, evidenced by
a greater response to the addition of GTP (15% increase on PN
6, 180% increase on PN 15). Although the response to
maximal activation of all G proteins with NaF also increased over this period, the degree of increase was smaller than that for GTP alone (age × stimulant, P < 0.0001). At both age
points, forskolin produced massive stimulation of AC, much greater than
the response to Mn2+ (main effect of stimulant,
P < 0.0001); the preference for forskolin over
Mn2+ increased significantly between PN 6 and
PN 15 (age × stimulant, P < 0.0001).
|
In contrast to the heart,
-AR binding in the liver decreased by
one-third between PN 6 and PN 15, consistent with
earlier reports (7, 15). Indexes of AC activity also
showed an overall decrease during this period (main effect of age,
P < 0.0001). The proportional stimulation evoked by
addition of GTP remained similar (
double basal activity), as did the
response to isoproterenol (
double the activity compared with +GTP)
or NaF (
7 times +GTP), so that all of them decreased in parallel.
Although the liver, like the heart, displayed a preferential
stimulation by forskolin compared with Mn2+ (main effect of
stimulant, P < 0.0001), the preference ratio was
substantially smaller than seen in the heart (tissue × stimulant, P < 0.0001) and did not show a significant change with
age (stimulant × age, not significant).
General effects of terbutaline.
Neonatal terbutaline treatment on PN 2-5 or PN
11-14 did not cause any mortality and failed to alter body
weight, heart weight, or liver weight nor did it affect the
concentration of membrane proteins (Table
2). Accordingly, results for
-ARs and
AC are compared on the basis of binding or activity per milligram of membrane protein, so as to correct for any sample-to-sample variability in the recovery of membranes. Given the lack of significant effect on
the membrane protein concentration, differences in
-ARs and AC were
also detectable when values were determined per gram of tissue.
|
-AR binding in the terbutaline group (main effect of treatment, P < 0.0001) with distinct
differences between heart and liver (treatment × tissue,
P < 0.0001) but no age specificity (not significant
for treatment × age or treatment × tissue × age). In
contrast, effects on AC activity were both tissue and age specific and
differed among the various AC measurements: P < 0.01 for main effect of treatment, P < 0.09 for
treatment × age × tissue, P < 0.0001 for
treatment × AC measure, P < 0.0001 for
treatment × tissue × AC measure, P < 0.06 for treatment × age × tissue × AC measure. Given the
significant differences in the effects of terbutaline on heart vs.
liver, the results are presented separately for each tissue.
Effects of terbutaline on the heart.
When neonatal rats were given terbutaline on PN 2-5 or
PN 11-14, there was a 15-20% decrement in cardiac
-AR binding, comparable to what is seen in fetal or adult heart
after terbutaline treatment (1; Fig. 1).
Despite the significant
-AR downregulation, neither treatment
regimen elicited desensitization of
-AR-mediated AC activity, as
assessed by the response to isoproterenol, the response to
isoproterenol relative to GTP alone (isoproterenol/+GTP ratio), or the
response to isoproterenol relative to maximal G protein stimulation
with NaF (isoproterenol/NaF ratio). For other AC stimulants, however,
there were distinct disparities in the effects of the two regimens. On
PN 6, 24 h after the last injection of the early treatment regimen, there were no changes in any of the components of AC
activity. However, with later terbutaline treatment (PN 11-14) there was significant induction of basal AC activity
and of the responses to NaF or forskolin. The induction was selective for forskolin compared with the other direct AC stimulant,
Mn2+, as evidenced by a significant decrease in the
Mn2+/forskolin ratio.
|
Effects of terbutaline on the liver.
Neonatal terbutaline had a much greater effect on hepatic
-AR
binding than on cardiac
-ARs (treatment × tissue,
P < 0.0001; Fig. 2).
Values were decreased by 40% regardless of whether treatment occurred
in the early neonatal period (PN 2-5) or in the second postnatal week (PN 11-14). Despite the marked decline
in
-ARs, the ability of isoproterenol to stimulate AC activity was
only slightly reduced (10-15%), an effect clearly distinguishable
from the robust receptor downregulation (treatment × measure,
P < 0.0001). Examination of the effects on the AC
response to stimulants downstream from the
-AR indicated that
heterologous sensitization of the signaling pathway offset the effects
of homologous desensitization of receptor-mediated signaling. On
PN 6, the AC responses to NaF, forskolin, or
Mn2+ all were elevated (main effect of treatment,
P < 0.0001). The activity ratios confirmed that the
increases in G protein-mediated and total AC catalytic activity were
able to offset homologous desensitization: there were significant
decreases in the isoproterenol/+GTP and isoproterenol/NaF activity
ratios (main effect of treatment, P < 0.0001), with a
greater effect on the latter ratio (treatment × measure,
P < 0.0001), as would be expected from differential effects on the
-AR signaling component. With treatment on PN 11-14, the same directional changes were seen except for
smaller net effects on the responses to forskolin and Mn2+
(treatment × age, P < 0.04).
|
2-AR agonist that normally
inhibits AC through its coupling to Gi. Samples were
prepared in the absence or presence of a maximally effective
concentration (500 µM) of clonidine (20), superimposed
on the stimulant effects of isoproterenol or forskolin (Fig.
3). In control rats, clonidine failed to
inhibit isoproterenol-mediated AC at either age and instead potentiated the stimulant effects (main effect of clonidine, P < 0.0003); in vivo pretreatment with terbutaline did not alter this
pattern. When forskolin was used as a stimulant, however, clonidine had little effect on the AC response in controls on PN 6,
switching to a pronounced enhancement of activity on PN 15 (P < 0.005 for main effect of clonidine,
P < 0.0007 for clonidine × age). Pretreatment of
neonates with terbutaline promoted the inhibitory actions of clonidine
(treatment × clonidine, P < 0.03), eliciting an
outright inhibitory effect on the forskolin response on PN 6 (P < 0.02) and reducing the stimulatory effect of
forskolin on PN 15 (P < 0.05).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Signaling mediated by the
-AR/AC pathway undergoes major
changes in the neonatal period. In the fetus or in the adult, the cardiac AC response to isoproterenol is much smaller than that seen
with global activation of G proteins by NaF (1), whereas in the current study, we found that the two stimulants were equally effective in the neonate. Accordingly, the relative efficiency of
-AR coupling to AC peaks in this period. In contrast, hepatic AC
responses to
-AR stimulation are highest in the fetus
(1) and decline sequentially through the neonatal period
into adulthood, paralleling the ontogenetic decline in the expression
of
-ARs (7, 15). The two tissues also differ
substantially in their developmental patterns for catalytic properties
of AC (1): throughout development, the heart displays a
preferential response to forskolin vs. Mn2+, just as seen
here in the neonate, whereas in the liver, Mn2+ is more
effective than forskolin in the fetus, less effective in the neonate,
and equally effective in the adult. Accordingly, the effects of
neonatal terbutaline treatment can be expected to differ in the two
tissues not only because of disparate proportions of
1-
and
2-subtypes but also because of inherent
discrepancies in receptor coupling and in the ontogenetic patterns of G
proteins and AC itself.
In mature cells, prolonged or excessive stimulation of
-ARs elicits
receptor downregulation as a key component of desensitization. However,
previous reports indicate that
-ARs in the neonate are resistant to
the downregulation elicited by administration of isoproterenol, a mixed
1/
2-agonist (10, 24). In an
earlier study (1), we found that in the fetus,
terbutaline, a
2-selective drug, did evoke a small
degree of cardiac
-AR downregulation and a much more robust decrease
of hepatic
-ARs. The current results resolve the apparent
discrepancy between the downregulation caused by fetal terbutaline and
lack of downregulation seen with isoproterenol in the neonate:
terbutaline administered to neonatal rats evoked cardiac and hepatic
-AR downregulation similar in magnitude (15 and 40%, respectively)
to that seen in the fetus or the adult (1); the relatively
greater effect in the liver is expected, given the higher proportion of
hepatic
2-ARs (1). Obviously, immature
cells contain the machinery necessary to elicit receptor
downregulation, yet are resistant to doing so when isoproterenol is
administered instead of terbutaline. There are two possible explanations. First, terbutaline and isoproterenol differ in their pharmacokinetics, with terbutaline providing a much more prolonged effect. Accordingly, immature cells may be resistant to, albeit not
absolutely incapable of,
-AR downregulation, requiring much more
prolonged stimulation to elicit the effect; thus there may be a
relative (but not absolute) deficiency in components necessary for
downregulation. Alternatively, specificity toward
1- vs.
2-subtypes may elicit different trophic actions on
cardiac cell development that offset receptor downregulation, producing
an active response that prevents the loss of receptors from the cell surface; if this interpretation is correct, it would imply a specific role for
1-ARs in resistance to downregulation.
Regardless of the presence or absence of
-AR downregulation, and
notwithstanding the marked difference in the degree of downregulation between heart and liver, we did not observe desensitization of AC
signaling mediated through
-ARs, the same result found after fetal
terbutaline exposure (1) or neonatal isoproterenol
treatment (30). Again, the issue comes down to two
possibilities: is there something missing from developing cells that is
necessary to receptor desensitization, or are there active processes
that are unique to developing cells, which offset the effects of
desensitization? Our results provide evidence for contributions from
both processes. In the heart, terbutaline administered on PN
11-14 produced induction of AC catalytic activity, evidenced
by a significant increase in the enzymatic response to forskolin, with
a parallel increase in the response to NaF, which operates through G
proteins; we also detected a shift in catalytic properties of AC, a
decrease in the Mn2+/forskolin stimulation ratio,
indicative of promotion of stimulatory G protein actions and/or
induction of a different AC isoform (28). As
-ARs also
operate through G proteins to stimulate AC, the induction of responses
at these two downstream signaling loci, an active compensatory process
that is not seen in mature cells, clearly could offset desensitization
at the level of the
-AR. However, terbutaline treatment on PN
2-5 did not elicit induction of the responses to forskolin or
NaF, but nevertheless the AC response to isoproterenol was maintained
in the face of receptor downregulation, suggesting that, at this
earlier stage, there is a deficiency in cellular components required
for desensitization.
Of course, a third possibility is simply that the degree of cardiac
-AR downregulation is simply too small to elicit a corresponding loss of signaling capabilities, especially given the predominance of
the
1-subtype in this tissue. This latter possibility is
addressed by our results in the liver, a tissue in which virtually all
the receptors are of the
2-subtype (1) and
in which we observed robust downregulation after neonatal terbutaline
administration. Neonates given terbutaline on PN 2-5
showed statistically significant desensitization of AC responses to
-AR stimulation, but the loss of the response was far smaller than
would be expected from the 40% decrease in receptor numbers. Just as
in the heart, we observed induction at the levels of AC (responses to
forskolin and Mn2+) and G proteins (response to NaF). The
heterologous sensitization of signaling elements downstream from the
receptor clearly contribute to the protection from desensitization:
when we compared the response to isoproterenol with that to NaF, we
detected homologous desensitization, but the net effect was offset by
induction at the level of G proteins and AC. Notably, however,
terbutaline administration on PN 11-14 produced the
same protection of the
-AR-mediated AC response, despite much
smaller induction of AC. So again, the resistance of the developing
cells to agonist-induced desensitization resides in a combination of
active, heterologous processes that offset homologous receptor
downregulation and desensitization, as well as a deficiency in the
processes that mediate desensitization. Future work needs to address
what specifically prevents developing cells from efficient
desensitization of receptor signals. Prolonged agonist exposure
activates G protein receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), which translocates to the
membrane to phosphorylate
-ARs, resulting in recruitment of
-arrestin to initiate receptor internalization (14).
Neonatal hearts contain an excess of GRK2 relative to the adult
(27), yet still do not show
-AR desensitization, even
before induction of AC (27). It is not yet known if
-AR stimulation effectively recruits GRK2 to the plasma membrane in the
neonatal heart or whether there might be deficiencies in
-arrestin expression or function. However, regardless of the actual mechanism responsible for the deficient ability of neonatal tissues to elicit
-AR desensitization, the important net result is that
-AR-mediated signaling is maintained regardless of the presence or
absence of reductions in
-ARs themselves.
Earlier work with neonatal isoproterenol administration indicated that
-AR stimulation of immature cardiac cells evokes unique changes in
the expression and function of stimulatory vs. inhibitory G proteins,
marked by an increase in Gs effect and suppression of
Gi expression (27, 29). In the current study
with terbutaline, several of our findings also indicated the targeting
of G proteins. If the only effect of terbutaline were to induce total
AC activity or a new AC isoform, then basal activity and activity in
the presence of GTP would simply follow suit. Instead, we found
differential effects on basal AC and activity in the presence of GTP,
differences of these two measures from the effects on the isoproterenol
or NaF response, as well as decreases in the Mn2+/forskolin
activity ratio (28, 29). We therefore examined the
responses mediated by
2-ARs, which ordinarily act as a
negative modulators of AC activity through coupling to Gi.
We found that stimulation of neonatal hepatic
2-ARs
potentiated isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP production, an effect
previously observed in the fetal liver (1) and in the
pregnant rat myometrium (11). Neonatal terbutaline treatment did not alter this pattern. Surprisingly, when we used forskolin as the AC stimulant, we observed a different ontogenetic pattern for
2-AR-mediated effects: on PN 6,
we found a "normal" inhibitory effect of clonidine but on PN
15 we again found a stimulatory effect. In this case, neonatal
terbutaline administration enhanced the inhibitory component of the
2-AR effect, leading to greater decreases in AC on
PN 6 and smaller increases on PN 15. The results indicate a complex relationship of neonatal
-AR stimulation to the
expression and/or function of
-ARs and their coupling to Gi, but the exact nature of this interaction is not clear
at this time. Previously, we found crosstalk of receptor expression
between
-ARs and
-ARs in developing heart and liver, effects not
seen in mature cells (24). Additionally,
2-ARs couple to both Gs and
Gi (26), so that differential effects of
terbutaline on the development of the two G protein classes could
produce the results seen here (29).
The failure of terbutaline to produce effective
-AR desensitization
in the neonatal rat is an important consideration in its use as a
tocolytic, because the neonatal rat resembles a third trimester human
fetus with respect to sympathetic innervation (9). The
effective linkage of the
-ARs to AC, combined with heterologous
sensitization downstream from the receptor, means that terbutaline
administration will produce profound and prolonged stimulation of fetal
target tissues. This is a favorable outcome in that catecholamine
actions at
-ARs are necessary for the cardiovascular and metabolic
events that enable the successful transition to extrauterine life
(9). At the same time, the fact that
-AR stimulation
elicits changes in target cell differentiation or even
apoptosis (5, 6, 21) means that the failure to
desensitize the receptors in the face of continued stimulation may
confer long-term liabilities. Indeed, abnormalities of neonatal cardiac control and glucose metabolism have been noted after tocolytic therapy
(4), along with an increased incidence of cardiac
structural anomalies (12, 17).
In conclusion, neonatal terbutaline exposure produces
-AR
downregulation without reducing the net ability of
-AR stimulation to elicit an increase in cAMP production.
-AR signaling is
maintained because of deficiencies in the ability of immature cells to
uncouple receptors from response elements, but also because of
heterologous sensitization of signaling components downstream from the
receptor. Although these processes enable
-AR function to be
maintained during the perinatal period, the same processes may promote
abnormalities in the development of
-AR target tissues when
2-AR agonists are used to arrest preterm labor.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant HD-09713.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Dr. T. A. Slotkin, Box 3813 DUMC, Dept. of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke Univ. Med. Ctr., Durham, NC 27710 (E-mail: t.slotkin{at}duke.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 18 June 2001; accepted in final form 23 August 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Auman, JT,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Regulation of fetal cardiac and hepatic
-adrenoceptors and adenylyl cyclase signaling: terbutaline effects.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
281:
R1079-R1089,
2001
2.
Bergman, B,
Bokström H,
Borga O,
Enk L,
Hedner T,
and
Wängberg B.
Transfer of terbutaline across the human placenta in late pregnancy.
Eur J Respir Dis
65:
81-86,
1984.
3.
Berkowitz, GS,
and
Papiernik E.
Epidemiology of preterm birth.
Epidemiol Rev
15:
414-443,
1993
4.
Caritis, SN,
Darby MJ,
and
Chan L.
Pharmacologic treatment of preterm labor.
Clin Obstet Gynecol
31:
635-651,
1988[ISI][Medline].
5.
Claycomb, WC.
Biochemical aspects of cardiac muscle differentiation.
J Biol Chem
251:
6082-6089,
1976
6.
Communal, C,
Singh K,
Pimentel DR,
and
Colucci WS.
Norepinephrine stimulates apoptosis in adult rat ventricular myocytes by activation of the
-adrenergic pathway.
Circulation
98:
1329-1334,
1998
7.
Huff, RA,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Glucocorticoids regulate the ontogenetic transition of adrenergic receptor subtypes in rat liver.
Life Sci
48:
1059-1066,
1991[ISI][Medline].
8.
Kudlacz, EM,
Navarro HA,
and
Slotkin TA.
Phosphatidic acid phosphatase in neonatal rat lung: effects of prenatal dexamethasone or terbutaline treatment on basal activity and on responsiveness to beta adrenergic stimulation.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
250:
236-240,
1989
9.
Lagercrantz, H,
and
Slotkin TA.
The "stress" of being born.
Sci Am
254:
100-107,
1986[ISI][Medline].
10.
Lau, C,
Burke SP,
and
Slotkin TA.
Maturation of sympathetic neurotransmission in the rat heart. IX. Development of transsynaptic regulation of cardiac adrenergic sensitivity.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
223:
675-680,
1982
11.
Lecrivain, JL,
Mhaouty-Kodja S,
Cohen-Tannoudji J,
Maltier JP,
and
Legrand C.
In vivo stimulation of the
2-adrenergic pathway increases expression of the Gi proteins and the
2a-adrenergic receptor genes in the pregnant rat myometrium.
J Endocrinol
156:
379-387,
1998[Abstract].
12.
Lenselink, DR,
Kuhlmann RS,
Lawrence JM,
and
Kolesari GL.
Cardiovascular teratogenicity of terbutaline and ritodrine in the chick embryo.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
171:
501-506,
1994[ISI][Medline].
13.
Limbird, LE,
and
Macmillan ST.
Mn-uncoupling of the catecholamine sensitive adenylate cyclase system of rat reticulocytes.
Biochim Biophys Acta
677:
408-416,
1981[Medline].
14.
Mayor, F,
Penela P,
and
Ruiz-Gomez A.
Role of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and arrestins in
-adrenergic receptor internalization.
Trends Cardiovasc Med
8:
234-240,
1998[ISI][Medline].
15.
McMillian, MK,
Schanberg SM,
and
Kuhn CM.
Ontogeny of rat hepatic adrenoceptors.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
227:
181-186,
1983
16.
Navarro, HA,
Kudlacz EM,
and
Slotkin TA.
Control of adenylate cyclase activity in developing rat heart and liver: effects of prenatal exposure to terbutaline or dexamethasone.
Biol Neonate
60:
127-136,
1991[ISI][Medline].
17.
Queisserluft, A,
Eggers I,
Stolz G,
Kieningerbaum D,
and
Schlaefer K.
Serial examination of 20,248 newborn fetuses and infants: correlations between drug exposure and major malformations.
Am J Med Genet
63:
268-276,
1996[ISI][Medline].
18.
Seamon, KB,
and
Daly JW.
Forskolin: its biological and chemical properties.
Adv Cyclic Nucleotide Protein Phosphorylation Res
20:
1-150,
1986[ISI][Medline].
19.
Slotkin, TA.
Endocrine control of synaptic development in the sympathetic nervous system: the cardiac-sympathetic axis.
In: Developmental Neurobiology of the Autonomic Nervous System, edited by Gootman PM.. Clifton, NJ: Humana, 1986, p. 97-133.
20.
Slotkin, TA,
McCook EC,
Nemeroff CB,
and
Seidler FJ.
Species differences in
2-adrenergic regulation of platelet adenylate cyclase.
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol
72:
259-271,
1991[ISI][Medline].
21.
Slotkin, TA,
Whitmore WL,
Orband-Miller L,
Queen KL,
and
Haim K.
Beta adrenergic control of macromolecule synthesis in neonatal rat heart, kidney and lung: relationship to sympathetic neuronal development.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
243:
101-109,
1987
22.
Snedecor, GW,
and
Cochran WG.
Statistical Methods. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1967.
23.
Stein, HM,
Oyama K,
Sapien R,
Chappell BA,
and
Padbury JF.
Prolonged
-agonist infusion does not induce desensitization or down-regulation of
-adrenergic receptors in newborn sheep.
Pediatr Res
31:
462-467,
1992[ISI][Medline].
24.
Thai, L,
Galluzzo JM,
McCook EC,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Atypical regulation of hepatic adenylyl cyclase and adrenergic receptors during a critical developmental period: agonists evoke supersensitivity accompanied by failure of receptor downregulation.
Pediatr Res
39:
697-707,
1996[ISI][Medline].
25.
Tsao, P,
and
von Zastrow M.
Downregulation of G-protein-coupled receptors.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
10:
365-369,
2000[ISI][Medline].
26.
Xiao, RP,
Avdonin P,
Zhou YY,
Chen HP,
Akhter SA,
Eschenhagen T,
Lefkowitz RJ,
Koch WJ,
and
Lakatta EG.
Coupling of
2-adrenoceptor to Gi proteins and its physiological relevance in murine cardiac myocytes.
Circ Res
84:
43-52,
1999
27.
Zeiders, JL,
Seidler FJ,
Iaccarino G,
Koch WJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Ontogeny of cardiac
-adrenoceptor desensitization mechanisms: agonist treatment enhances receptor/G-protein transduction rather than eliciting uncoupling.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
31:
413-423,
1999[ISI][Medline].
28.
Zeiders, JL,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Agonist-induced sensitization of
-adrenoceptor signaling in neonatal rat heart: expression and catalytic activity of adenylyl cyclase.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
291:
503-510,
1999
29.
Zeiders, JL,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Ontogeny of G-protein expression: control by
-adrenoceptors.
Dev Brain Res
120:
125-134,
2000[Medline].
30.
Zeiders, JL,
Seidler FJ,
and
Slotkin TA.
Ontogeny of regulatory mechanisms for
-adrenoceptor control of rat cardiac adenylyl cyclase: targeting of G-proteins and the cyclase catalytic subunit.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
29:
603-615,
1997[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Beitzel, M. N. Sillence, and G. S. Lynch beta-Adrenoceptor signaling in regenerating skeletal muscle after beta-agonist administration Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2007; 293(4): E932 - E940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Auman, F. J. Seidler, and T. A. Slotkin beta -Adrenoceptor control of G protein function in the neonate: determinant of desensitization or sensitization Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): R1236 - R1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Auman, F. J. Seidler, C. A. Tate, and T. A. Slotkin Are developing beta -adrenoceptors able to desensitize? Acute and chronic effects of beta -agonists in neonatal heart and liver Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): R205 - R217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Garofolo, F. J. Seidler, J. T. Auman, and T. A. Slotkin beta -Adrenergic modulation of muscarinic cholinergic receptor expression and function in developing heart Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): R1356 - R1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |