|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3G-1Y6; 2 Theratechnologies, St. Laurent, Quebec H4S-2A4; and 3 Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology, and Pharmacology, Research Center of Hôpital Ste. Justine, Montreal, Quebec H3T-1C5, Canada; and 4 University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostanoids exert significant effects on circulatory beds. They play a role in the response of the vasculature to adjustments in perfusion pressure and oxygen and carbon dioxide tension, and they mediate the actions of numerous factors. The role of prostanoids in governing circulation of the perinate is suggested to surpass that in the adult. Prostanoids are abundantly generated in the perinate. They have been implicated in autoregulation of blood flow as studied in brain and eyes. Prostaglandins are also dominant regulators of ductus arteriosus tone. The effects of these autacoids are mediated through specific G protein-coupled receptors. In addition to the pharmacological characterization of the prostanoid receptors, important advances in understanding the biology of these receptors have been made in the last decade. Their cloning and the development of animals with disrupted genes of these receptors have been very informative. The involvement of prostanoid receptors in the developing subject, especially on brain and ocular vasculature and on ductus arteriosus, has also begun to be investigated; the expression of these receptors changes with development. Some but not all of the ontogenic changes in these receptors are attributed to homologous regulation. Interestingly, in the process of elucidating their effects, functional perinuclear prostaglandin E2 receptors have been uncovered. This article reviews prostanoid receptors and addresses implications on the developing subject with attention to vascular physiology.
G protein-coupled receptors; brain vasculature; eye vasculature; ductus arteriosus; newborn
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PROSTANOIDS are important autacoids that exert diverse physiological and pathophysiological effects in various systems. These involve modulation of neuronal activ ity, including neurotransmitter release, pyrexia and sleep induction, alterations in platelet aggregation, and regulation of ion and water transport in kidneys, as well as of gastrointestinal motility and secretion. The best-characterized actions of prostanoids, however, are relaxation and contraction of smooth muscle. Of specific interest is the role of prostaglandins in the developing subject, wherein they play a major role in various conditions. Notably, prostaglandins are implicated in implantation of the fertilized egg (211), parturition (162, 200), breathing (124), control of brain and ocular circulation (38, 85, 122), and the regulation of ductus arteriosus tone (191). Of relevance, increased neonatal levels of prostanoids (103, 129, 134) have been suggested to contribute in the genesis of intraventricular cerebral hemorrhage (133, 220), patent ductus arteriosus (191), and possibly retinopathy of prematurity (73, 146).
There are five physiologically major prostanoids that are well
characterized, prostaglandin (PG) E2, PGF2
,
PGD2, PGI2, and thromboxane (Tx)
A2; other prostanoid-like compounds, namely isoprostanes, also exert biological effects through receptor sites that
are not yet clearly identified (179-181), and these
will not be covered in this review. PGE2,
PGF2
, PGD2, PGI2, and
TxA2 produce their effects by acting on distinct G
protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the last two decades the
pharmacological profile of specific agents and the cloning of GPCRs to
prostanoids, along with the disruption of the genes encoding them, have
provided great insight on the biology of prostanoid receptors and
functions. A number of comprehensive reviews on the subject have been
published (30, 53, 76, 147, 173). Lately, several studies
have reported on the ontogenic profile and developmental regulation of
prostanoid receptors. This review focuses on the implications of
prostanoid receptors on the developing subject with particular
attention to vascular physiology.
| |
FORMATION OF PROSTANOIDS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostaglandins and TxA2, collectively named
prostanoids, are mainly derived from arachidonic acid. Cyclooxygenase
(COX) is the enzyme responsible for the committed step in the
conversion of arachidonic acid to the bioactive prostanoids. There are
two separate genes encoding COX proteins, COX-1 and COX-2. Both
isozymes of COX catalyze the same reactions and share similar enzyme
kinetics (18, 116), and their crystal structures are
essentially superimposable (195, 218). The metabolism of
the COX product PGH2 is the first committed step in the
production of prostanoids. Thereafter, each primary bioactive
prostanoid is synthesized by way of individual enzymes. The catalysis
of PGH2 to PGE2 occurs mostly via PGE synthase (PGES); PGE2 can also be formed nonenzymatically from
endoperoxides (183). There exists possibly two cytosolic
glutathione (GSH)-dependent human isoforms purified from cerebrum
(158) and two microsomal forms, of which one is GSH
dependent and the other possibly independent (226). The
molecular identity of PGES has more recently been determined
(102, 136, 206); it appears that a GSH-dependent microsomal form is mainly coupled to COX-2 and the cytosolic one to
COX-1 (136, 206). There are currently three known PGD
synthases (PGDS): 1) GSH-independent PGDS (GSH-I-PGDS) (also
called brain-type PGDS) (190), 2) GSH-dependent
PGDS (GSH-D-PGDS) (also called spleen-type PGDS) (41), and
3) GSH S-transferase (GST) (214); in
addition, serum albumin catalyzes this conversion as well
(45). PGF synthase (PGFS) is a dual functioning enzyme
that requires NADPH, which catalyzes the reduction of PGH2
to PGF2
and of PGD2 to
9
,11
-PGF2 (a stereoisomer of PGF2
)
(224) at two distinct sites. Concurrent but independent
investigations into the mechanisms of PGI2
(229) and TxA2 (86, 215)
synthesis led to the suggestion that the enzymes responsible for
catalysis are analogous to P-450 monooxygenases. Subsequent
purification and cDNA cloning of the PGI2 (56,
79) and TxA2 (159, 188) isomerases
verified these predictions. Neither synthase has greater than 16%
sequence identity to any other P-450 enzymes or to each other such that each constitutes its own subfamily, designated CYP8 and
CYP5 for PGI2 synthase and TxA2
synthase, respectively. Of physiological relevance, because of
inherent characteristics and reductive cofactor requirements (GSH and
NADPH) for PGI2, PGE2, PGD2, and
PGF2
synthases, TxA2 synthesis is
preferentially preserved over that of the other prostanoids during
peroxidative processes (3, 6, 89, 182, 207, 223, 227).
High levels of prostaglandins, especially PGE2, are detected in the blood and brain of the neonate (103, 129, 134). In retina, both increased COX-1 and COX-2 activities contribute to the augmented production of neonatal prostaglandins (81). In the brain, however, this mostly arises from increased expression and activity of the COX-2 pathway in brain vasculature, as opposed to adult brain, where prostanoid formation is catalyzed mainly by COX-1 (167). The rapid drop in prostaglandin levels in brain within the first 48-72 h after birth (103) is associated with a relative decrease in COX-2 expression, which seems to increase again thereafter (165). In the ductus arteriosus both COX-1 and COX-2 are involved in prostaglandin generation, but these enzymes play distinct roles (45, 49, 75, 203). COX-1 dominates throughout gestation in PGE2 formation and regulation of ductal tone, whereas COX-2 is induced at term (49, 75), possibly by increasing oxygen tension perhaps via endothelin formation; in addition, because COX-2 is activatable by endotoxins, this enzyme may contribute more importantly to ductal tone in the prematurely born subject (49).
| |
EFFECTS OF PROSTANOIDS ON CEREBRAL AND OCULAR VASCULAR TISSUE AND DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostanoids produce significant effects on circulation. They
mediate vasomotor response to asphyxia, ischemia, hypercapnia, and hypotension, as well as both systemic and pulmonary hypertension (35-37, 66, 80, 91, 118, 120, 122, 141, 170, 228). The vasomotor effects of prostanoids vary not only by virtue of their
nature but also as a function of the type of tissue and their
development. PGD2 and PGI2 are for the most
part vasorelaxants, PGF2
and TxA2 are
constrictors, and the effects of PGE2 depend on the type of
tissue, which takes into account the receptor and receptor coupling; as
will be discussed later, these seemingly opposing effects of
PGE2 are due to the existence of multiple receptor subtypes
with different signal transduction pathways that are often coexpressed.
The developmental profile of prostaglandin-mediated actions has been
thoroughly investigated, mostly in the ductus arteriosus, as well as in
the vascular beds of the brain and eye. On retinal and brain pial
microvasculature and main arteries, PGE2 seems to be an
important vasodilator in the neonate (88, 119) and, as a
result, probably contributes to the lower cerebral and retinal vascular
resistance characteristic of fetal life. Prostanoids have been
implicated in cerebral and retinal blood flow autoregulation in the
adult and newborn subject (34, 36, 38, 85, 169). PGE2, along with PGI2 and PGF2
,
is released from brain and ocular vasculature in response to acute
rises in systemic blood pressure (34-36). Because
PGF2
(and PGE2 on parenchymal vessels) causes minimal constriction in newborns compared with adults (7, 88, 125), the balance of prostaglandin action is shifted onto PGI2-elicited [and possibly PGD2-elicited
(5)] relaxation, which in turn curtails the upper limit
of cerebral blood flow autoregulation. Accordingly, inhibition of COX
and more specifically of COX-2 in the newborn unveils an otherwise
appropriate autoregulatory response (34, 36, 81, 126).
PGI2 is readily released in response to conditions that
evoke adaptive responses, such as during acute hypercapnia,
hypotension, and ischemia, and exerts a major role in
increasing blood flow to the central nervous system (66, 118,
119, 121, 166, 197, 198). However, it is of interest that in
response to prolonged hypercapnia, PGE2 [and not
PGI2 or nitric oxide (NO); Refs. 32, 99, 121, 122, 231]
may become the main regulator of vascular tone, but this effect is
mediated indirectly through induction of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS;
Ref. 141), consistent with a role for PGE2 in
governing the expression of this enzyme (62). Along these
lines, PGE2, by acting through its EP3
receptor, exerts a dominant role in controlling the increased
constitutive NOS expression in brain and microvasculature of the newly
born subject (62, 63); in choroid, however, it is
PGD2, via the DP receptor, that seems to govern
increased neonatal eNOS expression (61). Thus the high
levels of prostaglandins during birth transition regulate constitutive
NOS expression, which in turn contributes to the relatively limited
cerebral and ocular autoregulatory ability of the neonate (61,
83). Contrary to PGE2 and PGF2
, the effects of PGI2 on brain vasculature do not differ as a
function of age (88). This age-dependent action of
PGI2 varies, however, according to the tissue, such that in
retina PGI2 is a less effective relaxant in the newborn
than in the adult (7), whereas in choroid the reverse is
observed (5). Along the same lines, the relaxant effects
of PGD2 are greater in the immature than the mature subject (5).
TxA2 is largely responsible for the delayed effects of
asphyxia-ischemic insults, as observed in retinal, choroidal
(3, 6, 37), pulmonary (207), and placental
(223) circulatory beds. These compromising actions of
TxA2 are further facilitated during oxidant stresses,
especially in the immature subject (3, 6, 97) relatively
devoid of antioxidants (55, 208); correspondingly, during
oxidative stresses, TxA2 is generated more abundantly in the newborn than in the adult (6, 97). In this context
TxA2 has been found to mediate the effects of major stable
products of peroxidation, the isoprostanes (97, 114).
Furthermore, not only is TxA2 production greater in the
immature than in the mature subject, but also TxA2-induced
constriction is more pronounced in fetus and newborn than in adult
(7, 97). Moreover, an effect previously unidentified for
TxA2 acting via TP was recently unveiled, specifically,
neuromicrovascular degeneration (Fig. 1)
resulting from endothelial cell death, which contributes to the
vasoobliteration in models of retinopathy of prematurity
(22).
|
In ductus arteriosus PGE2 is the major prostaglandin that affects tone (48). Although the ductus generates more PGI2 than PGE2, PGE2 is markedly more potent in relaxing this vessel (46). The other prostanoids play small, if any, physiological roles (191, 192, 194). The effects of PGE2 on ductal tone are also developmentally regulated with loss of responsiveness in the immediate neonate compared with the fetus (1, 47). Physiological mechanisms contributing to decreased actions of circulating PGE2 include loss of the placenta, which is the major source of circulating PGE2 in the fetus (210), an increase in pulmonary blood flow at birth, because the lungs are a major site of prostaglandin catabolism (213), and a decrease in relaxant PGE2 receptors (23, 29). Increased oxygen tension and PGE2 oppose each other's actions in controlling ductal tone (191); in addition, elevated oxygen tension also inhibits PGI2 synthase, which decreases formation of ductal PGI2, thus promoting contraction of the ductus arteriosus (192, 193).
| |
MOLECULAR CHARACTERISTICS OF PROSTANOID RECEPTORS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As discussed above, prostanoids exert their effects through their respective receptors. Changes in prostanoid actions as a function of development take into account receptor density and coupling. Before proceeding with a description of the ontogeny of prostaglandin receptors we will review the pharmacology, molecular biology, and signaling of these receptors.
The earliest prostanoid receptor classification system was based on the
differential effects of PGE and PGF analogs on three isolated tissues
(guinea pig uterus, human myometrium, and rabbit jejunum)
(171). Subsequent reports supported directly
(72) or indirectly (12) the existence of
multiple receptor types, and Kennedy et al. (108) proposed
a prostanoid receptor classification. Using a comparison of the rank
orders of agonist potency in a range of smooth muscle preparations and
prior evidence in the literature, these investigators hypothesized the
existence of distinct receptors for each of the bioactive prostanoids.
Under the proposed classification, the receptors for PGD2,
PGE2, PGF2
, PGI2, and
TxA2 are denoted DP, EP, FP, IP, and TP, respectively. Studies also identified PGE-sensitive tissues that exhibited different activities to specific agonists and antagonists, prompting a further division of the EP receptors into EP1, EP2,
EP3, and EP4 (52, 53). In
addition, a newly identified receptor that binds PGD2, named chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule on TH2 cells because
of its properties, has been uncovered in T helper type 2 cells,
eosinophils, and basophils (92); however, this
seven-transmembrane PGD2 receptor does not contain
characteristic molecular signatures of prostanoid receptors but rather
of chemokine receptors (139).
The cloning of the prostanoid receptors identified further
heterogeneity, which arises as a result of alternative mRNA splicing. The molecular mechanism of alternative mRNA splicing involves the
formation of multiple mRNA and protein products from a single gene.
Specifically, splice variants have been identified for the EP1, EP3, FP, and TP receptor homologs of
various species. There are currently nine known subtypes of the human
EP3 receptor: EP3-1a, EP3-1b, EP3-II,
EP3-III, EP3-IV, EP3-V,
EP3-VI, EP3-e, and EP3-f (8,
111, 176). Mouse (100, 152, 199), rat
(204), bovine (145), and rabbit
(31) counterparts have also been identified for some of
these EP3 subtypes; subtypes of the EP3
receptors are distinguished by variances in the tail of the
carboxyl-terminal portion. Human subtypes also exist for the TP
receptor (174), specifically TP
and
TP
, which, as for EP3 subtypes, vary by the
tail of their carboxyl-terminal end. Two splice variants have been
identified for each of the rat EP1 (160) and
ovine FP (172) receptors. These have been designated as
EP1 and EP1-variant and as FPA and
FPB, respectively; variants of EP1, FP, and TP also differ between each other by their carboxyl-terminal portions. Human homologs to EP1 and FP subtypes have not been identified.
The eight known types of prostanoid receptors are each encoded by an individual gene. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that receptors sharing a common signaling pathway have higher sequence homology than receptors sharing a common prostanoid as their preferential ligand (28, 177, 212). The effects of prostanoid receptors on smooth muscle reflect this relationship. Thus EP2, EP4, DP, and IP induce smooth muscle relaxation and are more closely related to each other than to the other prostanoid receptors. Similarly, EP1, FP, and TP receptors cause smooth muscle contraction and form another group based on sequence homology. The EP3 receptors also usually stimulate smooth muscle contraction and define a third group. The signal transduction pathways underlying these mechanisms of prostanoid action are shared within these groups and will be explained in a section below. On the basis of these phylogenetic analyses, it has been suggested that the COX pathway may have evolved from PGE2 and an ancestral EP receptor (147). The evolution of the different EP receptor types from this ancestral prostanoid receptor would have linked PGE2 to different signal transduction pathways. The receptors for the other prostanoids would have then evolved by gene duplication of these different EP receptor subtypes.
Alternative splicing of the exon encoding the seventh transmembrane
domain occurs at a position approximately 9-12 amino acids into
the carboxy terminus of the EP3, FP, and TP receptors of various species. The rat EP1 receptor is also subject to
alternative splicing but instead diverges midway into the sixth
transmembrane domain. The variant form (rEP1-variant)
contains none of the amino acids that are highly conserved within the
seventh transmembrane domain of the other prostanoid receptors.
Generally, prostanoid receptor isoforms exhibit similar ligand binding
but differ in their signaling pathways, their sensitivity to
agonist-induced desensitization, and their tendency toward constitutive
activity, as will be discussed. Whereas there is homology between the
EP3 receptor isoforms of different species, the human and
mouse TP receptor isoforms demonstrate no homology. This may be
indicative of other TP isoforms (147). The receptors that
are subject to alternative splicing (EP1, EP3,
FP, and TP) are phylogenetically related, perhaps suggesting the
evolutionary conservation of the sequence(s) involved in this process.
The rEP1, EP3-II, FPA, and TP
splice variants are all generated by the failure to
utilize a potential splice site (173). The splicing out of
various introns and the use of downstream exons generate the other
alternatively spliced forms of EP3. The regulation of the
process of alternative splicing with respect to the prostanoid
receptors has yet to be studied.
Prostanoid receptors are rhodopsin type, containing seven transmembrane domains, an extracellular amino terminus, and an intracellular carboxy terminus; accordingly, three intracellular and three extracellular loops are found. The three-dimensional crystal structure of a membrane-contained mammalian GPCR, only accomplished specifically for rhodopsin so far, confirms this topology (163). The evidence suggesting that prostanoid receptors are rhodopsin-type receptors precedes their molecular cloning and was based on coupling of the TP receptor to G proteins (17) and its sensitivity to agonist-induced desensitization (138). The purification of the TP receptor from human platelets (216) allowed its partial protein sequence to be identified, leading to the isolation of a cDNA for TP (93). Homology screening based on this sequence has established recombinant clones from various species for the eight individual prostanoid receptors previously defined pharmacologically. There are 28 amino acid residues conserved within all prostanoid receptor sequences, and 8 of these are shared with other GPCRs. These residues are believed to be particularly important in receptor structure and/or function. For instance, an Asp residue in the second transmembrane domain of various GPCRs is involved in ligand binding and signal transduction (184), although the role of this residue has not been studied directly in any prostanoid receptors. Two conserved Cys residues (1 in each of the 1st and 2nd extracellular loops) are suggested to form a disulfide bond and contribute to the stabilization of GPCRs in the membrane (59). In the rabbit EP3 receptor, an Ala residue substituted for the Cys residue in the second extracellular loop had no effect on binding (14). This is in contrast to studies of the human TP receptor, where substitution of Ser for the analogous Cys completely abolished ligand binding (39, 54). These studies also showed a similar effect by mutating the Cys of the first extracellular loop, which corroborates evidence demonstrating a loss of agonist binding to TP after chemical perturbation of these Cys residues (with dithiothreitol or sulfhydryl alkylation) (60).
There are several prostanoid receptor-specific motifs, including sequences in the second extracellular loop (G-R-Y-X-X-Q-X-P-G-T/S-W-C-F) as well as in the third and seventh transmembrane domain (M-X-F-F-G-L-X-X-L-L-X-X-X-A-M-A-X-E-R and L-X-A-X-R-X-A-S/T-X-N-Q-I-L-D-P-W-V-Y-I-L, respectively). These conserved regions are thought to play fundamental roles in the structure of the prostanoid binding domains. An Arg in the seventh transmembrane domain conserved between all prostanoid receptors was proposed to be the binding site for the carboxy moiety of the prostanoids (14, 98); the conserved motif in the second extracellular loop may also function in this regard (14). Residues are also conserved among prostanoid receptors for signal transduction. An Arg in the first intracellular loop is conserved between all prostanoid receptors. A mutation of this residue to Leu in the TP receptor was associated with a bleeding disorder (94).
As well as containing conserved residues, prostanoid receptors share
several other characteristics with other members of the GPCR family.
They enclose consensus sites for N-glycosylation of Asn
residues (Asn-X-Ser/Thr) in their extracellular domains. The amount of
glycosylation can be significant as demonstrated when purified TP
receptors of molecular mass ~57 kDa were shifted to their predicted
molecular mass (based on primary structure) of ~37 kDa on treatment
with N-glycanase (131). The glycosylation sites
are requisite for ligand binding at the human TP receptor (40), and mutation of the Asn residues or deletion of
their carbohydrate moieties abolishes binding. In addition, it has
recently been found that N-glycosylation of the
EP3
receptor is required for localization to the plasma
membrane but not for appropriate folding of the protein
(26).
| |
RECEPTOR SIGNALING |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Early studies of the second messengers downstream of the
prostanoids focused on cyclic nucleotides (53). For
instance, PGE2 and PGF2
were reported to
stimulate cAMP (33) and cGMP (64),
respectively. Since then, other signal transduction pathways have been
suggested by the observation of prostanoid-mediated activation of
second messengers such as free Ca2+ and inositol phosphate
(147). The molecular cloning of the prostanoid receptors
has facilitated observation of their coupling to heterotrimeric G
proteins. These heterotrimeric G proteins are composed of three structural subunits designated
,
, and
, of which numerous subtypes exist for each (78). Functionally, G proteins
comprise two subunits, since receptor activation provokes the
dissociation of the G
-subunit from a complex of the
G
-subunits. Both the G
- and the G
- subunits can act as
effectors in signal transduction (44, 178).
Prostanoid receptors sharing a common signaling pathway have higher
sequence homology than receptors sharing a common prostanoid as their
preferential ligand (28, 177, 212). Thus three clusters of
related receptors have been defined: 1) DP, IP,
EP2, and EP4; 2) EP1,
FP, and TP; and 3) EP3. Prostanoid receptors in
group 1 are linked to heterotrimeric G proteins that are
composed of a G
-subunit that stimulates adenylate cyclase
(designated Gs
) to produce cAMP. An increase in
intracellular cAMP concentration is observed after stimulation of the
recombinant human DP (28), IP (27, 105, 142),
EP2 (177), and EP4 (11,
20) receptors, in addition to their species homologs. The
results obtained with recombinant receptors corroborated those obtained
previously in isolated tissues. For instance, PGD-, PGE-, and
PGI-responsive receptors cause the stimulation of cAMP production in
platelets (230) and in vasculature (2, 5,
81). However, the recombinant human IP receptor can also mediate
inositol phosphate production and increases in free Ca2+
levels by coupling with G
q (144). Likewise,
EP2, EP4, and DP receptors in choroid do not
couple to adenylate cyclase but rather to eNOS (2, 5);
this may be evoked by G
action on phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
(44), which in turn activates, sequentially, protein kinase B (PKB) (219) and eNOS (58,
71). Of interest, ontogenic differences in the expression of
EP2, EP4, and DP in ocular vasculature do not
explain the greater relaxation evoked by their stimulation in the young
subject; rather, it is the greater expression of the eNOS per se that
is responsible for their augmented vasomotor actions (2, 5,
84).
Prostanoid receptors in group 2 couple to increases in
intracellular free Ca2+ through the activation by
G
q of phospholipase C, with subsequent inositol
phosphate liberation. This pathway has been demonstrated for FP using
anti-G
q antibodies (101), which
corroborates earlier results demonstrating inositol phosphate turnover
in isolated luteal cells on PGF2
administration
(175). In the case of TP, G
q activation is
the primary effector pathway (189) as shown during
stimulation of native TP receptors in platelets (13). However, the previously described TP receptor splice variants TP
and TP
also can signal through
Gi
and Gs
to inhibit and
stimulate adenylate cyclase, respectively (95).
EP1 preferentially couples to G
q
(53). An increase in inositol phosphate after its
stimulation in brain and ocular vasculature is clearly observed (4, 128).
The EP3 subtypes constitute group 3 of the
prostanoid receptor family and employ as their primary effector pathway
the inhibition of adenylate cyclase through the
Gi
-family (149). However, the molecular
cloning of the bovine EP3 receptor splice variants
demonstrates the array of second messengers to which these receptors
are coupled. Four subtypes of bovine EP3 have been cloned
(designated A, B, C, and D), and all show identical agonist binding
properties (145). However, EP3A acts through
Gi
to inhibit adenylate cyclase, EP3B and
EP3C signal through Gs
to activate adenylate
cyclase, and EP3D is coupled to Gi
,
Gs
, and G
q, resulting in the inhibition and activation of adenylate cyclase as well as the activation of
phospholipase C. On the other hand, nuclear EP3
receptors seem to be G protein dependent but not coupled to adenylate
cyclase or phospholipase C activation (25). A novel type
of G protein regulation has also been reported for the EP3B
and EP3C receptors. In addition to their stimulatory
effects on Gs
, they are thought to negatively regulate G
protein activity by specifically inhibiting the GTPase activity of
Go
, a member of the Gi
-family
(150). Along the same lines, EP3D-induced
ductus arteriosus relaxation is pertussis toxin, NO, and endothelium
insensitive but dependent on ATP-sensitive potassium channel activation
(29); the mechanisms remain to be elucidated, although
direct receptor-channel interaction is a possibility
(130). The EP3 receptor subtypes may also
differ in their levels of constitutive activity, the
agonist-independent activity of the receptor. This evidence comes from
studies of the mouse isoforms of the EP3 receptor
(designated
,
, and
). EP3
is not
constitutively active, whereas EP3
is, with respect to
the Gi
-mediated inhibition of adenylate cyclase
(148); the demonstration of levels of activity similar to
EP3
on treatment of EP3
-transfected cells
with pertussis toxin (which inactivates Gi
) confirms
that the EP3
-Gi
is constitutively active.
| |
PROSTANOID RECEPTOR DISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the PGE2 receptors, EP3 and EP4 are the most widely distributed and are detected in nearly every tissue (53, 147). EP1 and EP2, on the other hand, have a limited distribution. EP1 is present mostly on vascular and nonvascular smooth muscle (38, 53), and EP2 is present mostly in lung, placenta, endometrium, renal tubules, brain synaptosomes, and heart (127, 177), as well as on vascular and nonvascular smooth muscle (7, 117). FP receptors are found in corpus luteum, iris sphincter muscle, trabecular meshwork, and vascular smooth muscle (53, 147). IP and TP receptors are primarily localized in platelets and vascular smooth muscle; IP is also present in dorsal root ganglia. DP is the least abundant prostanoid receptor and is primarily found in retina; DP is also present in leptomeninges and choroid plexus (53, 147) and is weakly expressed in gut and lungs.
Studies on plasma membrane of brain microvessels revealed a two- to
threefold lower density of EP and FP receptors in newborn compared with
adult (128). In both porcine newborn and adult brain
intraparenchymal microvessels, ~80% of PGE2 receptors
are of the EP1 subtype and the remainder are
EP3 (128); EP2 and EP4 are undetectable. Accordingly, stimulation of EP1,
EP3, and FP evokes less constriction of intraparenchymal
brain vessels in the newborn than in the adult (125).
Similar functional observations have been made on retinal and choroidal
vessels (2, 5, 7). However, these ocular vascular beds
exhibit a different profile of EP2 and EP4
expression in the developing subject, such that in retinal microvessels
EP4 is not found, whereas EP2 density is
greater in adult than in newborn, and in choroid all EP receptors are
expressed more in the mature subject with the exception of EP2, which is equivalently expressed in newborn and adult.
The density of EP2 and EP4, however, does not
readily translate functionally in choroid, where EP2- and
EP4-induced relaxation is significantly greater in younger
subjects (2). The same applies to DP, which exhibits a
similar density in newborn and adult brain, retinal, and choroidal
vessels but markedly greater relaxation in the immature subject (Ref.
2; personal observations). The developmental profile of IP
and TP receptor expression on vascular beds has not been determined;
functional assays using specific agonists have been described above. A
summary of prostanoid receptor differences in newborn and adult brain
and ocular vascular beds is presented in Table
1.
|
Although PGE2 plays a cardinal role in fetal ductal tone,
the types of EP receptors implicated have only recently been
identified. EP2, EP3D- (the only
EP3 detected in ductus; Ref. 29), and
EP4 receptors have been detected in fetal porcine and ovine
ductus arteriosus (0.75 gestation) (23, 29);
EP1 was not detected. EP4 has been suggested to
confer the principal relaxant function induced by PGE2
(192). These ex vivo findings were substantiated in vivo
in fetal sheep (~0.75 gestation) by using a selective EP4
antagonist (THG-213); THG-213 caused a significant decrease in ductal
diameter without changes in pulmonary blood flow and systemic pressures
(unreported observations) (Fig. 2),
consistent with a major role for EP4 in fetal ductal tone
(192).
|
The mechanisms responsible for the perinatal-related decrease in PGE2 responsiveness of ductus arteriosus have recently been investigated. It has been observed that PGE2 receptor density decreased by threefold in the immediate newborn compared with the fetus (0.75 gestation). As indicated above, EP2, EP3D-, and EP4 receptors are present in fetus ductus in equivalent densities, whereas only EP2 is found in the immediate postnatal ductus (23, 29). Surprisingly, but of relevance, EP3 stimulation in ductus arteriosus was associated with relaxation in both fetal rabbits and lambs (29, 194). Thus a loss of EP3D- and EP4 receptors in the immediate newborn along with preservation of EP2 density and function was consistent with a decreased response of the newborn ductus to PGE2; hence EP2 appears to mediate the vasorelaxant effects of PGE2 in full-term neonatal ductus arteriosus.
Prostanoids function in an autocrine, intracrine, and/or paracrine
manner. The wide tissue distribution of prostanoids and their receptors
underscores the various effects mediated through their interactions.
Several lines of evidence suggest that prostanoids may act not only on
cell-surface receptors, but also intracellularly at receptors other
than peroxysome proliferator-activated receptors (90, 110,
168), which mediate actions of metabolites of PGD2 (mostly PGJ2 and
15-deoxy-
12,14-PGJ2) but not of
PGE2 and PGF2
(110, 232). The
enzymes responsible for prostaglandin synthesis, cytosolic
phospholipase A2 (PLA2, which releases
arachidonic acid) and COX-1 and -2, have been found to be located at
the nuclear membrane, and these can also translocate to this site in
response to stimuli (135, 185, 196). A
membrane-associated transporter that facilitates influx of prostanoids
has been identified (186). A number of other observations pointed toward possible intracellular sites of action for major prostaglandins. For instance, a robust increase in eNOS expression was
observed after stimulation of EP3 despite a marked paucity of plasma membranal EP3 receptors in newborn microvessels
(62). Similarly, the total absence of EP2
receptors in plasma membrane preparations of the newborn brain was
inconsistent with the neuroprotective effects of EP2
stimulation in the neonate (140). Thus it was proposed
that prostanoids may exert effects via intracellular receptors in the
vicinity of their formation. This inference has recently been tested
and corroborated. DP and all known subtypes of EP receptors were
detected in nuclear membrane fractions using binding studies, where
their relative distribution differed from that in plasma membrane. In
addition, the presence of EP1, EP3
, and
EP4 on perinuclear membranes was identified on native
endothelial cells by immunocytochemical techniques employing confocal
as well as electron microscopy (24, 25). Furthermore,
cells transfected with the receptor containing exogenous immunogenic
epitopes revealed robust perinuclear localization of the receptor, an
example of which appears in Fig. 3 (COS
cells, which normally do not express prostanoid receptors, transfected
with EP3
tagged amino terminally with FLAG). The same
intracellular localization was observed in HEK-293 cells (which
normally do not express prostanoid receptors) transfected with EP
receptors fused to green fluorescent protein (24). The
functionality of these receptors was confirmed by stimulating isolated
nuclei with EP agonists, where a dose-dependent increase in nuclear
calcium entry was revealed in addition to an induction of gene
transcription for c-fos (24) and inducible NOS
(iNOS) (25). Furthermore, inhibition of the
prostaglandin transporter in whole endothelial cells stimulated with
PGE2 prevented eNOS transcription
(62). Although the factors and molecular domains involved
in cellular localization as well as the signaling mechanisms remain to
be identified, these studies revealed for the first time the presence
of functional GPCRs at the nuclear membrane and provided a mechanism by
which PGE2 could affect expression of constitutive NOS in
the developing subject. A model depicting this regulation of NOS by
PGE2 acting via nuclear EP3 receptors is
presented in Fig. 4. These findings set
forth new perspectives in the biology of prostanoid receptors.
|
|
| |
PROSTANOID RECEPTOR REGULATION: PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS IN THE DEVELOPING SUBJECT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostanoid receptor expression regulation is not yet clearly
elucidated. Different factors act on the cis-acting
regulatory elements of their respective genes (21, 69, 106, 111,
156, 157). The 5'-flanking region and first intron of many of
these receptor genes have basal promoter motifs (such as a TATA box), as well as several responsive motifs, including those for
proinflammatory agents (such as nuclear factor-
B). Although many
different motifs have been identified, less information is available
regarding the actual regulation of receptor gene expression. The
studies to date suggest that species or cell-type differences may play a role. For instance, the TP receptor contains a phorbol ester response
element, and TP receptor expression can be stimulated in human
erythroleukemia (HEL) cells (143). However, despite the
presence of response elements for glucocorticoids and interleukin (IL)-6 in the TP gene, these factors are insufficient to induce TP
expression in HEL cells (109). They can induce TP
expression in rat cultured vascular smooth muscle cells
(202). In vivo regulation of prostanoid receptor
expression has not yet been studied directly, however.
Mechanisms that regulate translation also partake in governing receptor expression, but these remain poorly defined. Despite the high homology between the prostanoid receptors of various species, there are differences in the translation initiation sites of some receptor types that affect the amino-terminal extracellular domain of the receptor (147). For instance, the human, bovine, and rabbit EP3 receptor is 20 amino acid residues longer than the rat and mouse homologs. The human IP receptor is 30 amino acids shorter than the mouse and rat homologs. In contrast, the human DP receptor is only one residue longer than its mouse and rat counterparts.
Desensitization of the prostanoid receptors is also not fully understood. Most of the prostanoid receptors exhibit agonist-induced (homologous) downregulation of their receptors, but the time dependence varies according to the receptor type. Many of the receptors are known to be susceptible to the second messenger kinases, but the role for GPCR kinases (GRKs) is not clear. GPCRs are often posttranslationally modified at their cytoplasmic domains. Phosphorylation of Ser and Thr residues occurs as part of the process of receptor desensitization, which is the waning of receptor response after persistent stimulation (9, 67, 123). Heterologous desensitization involves feedback inhibition by the second messenger kinases that these receptors activate (i.e., PKA and PKC). Stimulation of these pathways can cause phosphorylation and subsequent desensitization of any GPCR containing the appropriate PKA or PKC consensus site(s) (Ser/Thr-X-Lys/Arg and Arg-X-X-Ser, respectively). Homologous desensitization is an alternate pathway that involves receptor phosphorylation by a specific GRK and its subsequent binding by arrestin, a protein that sterically restricts signaling to the G protein. Desensitization of all prostanoid receptor types except DP has been demonstrated. Many reports identify the importance of heterologous desensitization in the regulation of prostanoid receptor activity, and a role for homologous desensitization has only recently been suggested.
Both short-term (5 min) and long-term (24 h) desensitization of the
mouse EP1 receptor involve PKC, and the desensitization is
observed as a suppression of the agonist-mediated dose response and a reduction in EP1 mRNA levels, respectively
(104). The mouse EP2 receptor undergoes
long-term agonist-induced desensitization in the form of receptor
downregulation after a 12-h exposure to PGE2 but is
insensitive to short-term desensitization (30 min) (155).
Short-term (1 h) desensitization of human EP2 was observed on PKC activation (233). Splice variants of a given
species homolog of EP3 differ in their sensitivity to
desensitization. The mouse EP3
exhibits sequestration
after short-term (30 min) PGE2 exposure and downregulation
on long-term (24 h) PGE2 exposure, while mouse
EP3
does not undergo agonist-induced desensitization (152, 153). Similarly, the human EP3-II
demonstrates slow persistent desensitization in contrast to the rapid
transient desensitization exhibited by the EP3-III and
EP3-IV receptors (10). Desensitization of
EP4 is perhaps the most intensely studied to date of the EP receptors. The mouse EP4 receptor is sensitive to both
short-term (30 min) and long-term (12 h) desensitization
(155). The rapid agonist-induced desensitization of human
EP4 is independent of second messenger kinases and is
instead regulated by GRKs (19, 153). Even though the
desensitization of the IP receptor has been studied for the native
receptor in a single cell type (neuroblastoma-glioma cell hybrid,
NG108-15), the results are contradictory. Long-term (17 h)
desensitization has been observed as receptor sequestration and
downregulation with no change in agonist affinity (113), where the kinases involved appear to depend on the agonist used (112). In contrast, another group has identified that
long-term desensitization is specifically accompanied by a concurrent
downregulation of the Gs
-subunit (9). PKC
is observed to mediate short-term (45 min) desensitization of the
native FP receptor in bovine iris sphincter (201).
Short-term desensitization in vivo of the FP receptor also occurs in
the ovine corpus luteum, where its temporal nature has been suggested
to influence the oxytocin-mediated pulsatile release of
PGF2
(115). The TP receptor has been shown
to undergo desensitization, specifically as short-term (10 min)
agonist-dependent phosphorylation, which could be blocked by
antagonist (161). The desensitization of the phospholipase
C effector pathway downstream of TP has also been shown in human
platelets (65). A recent report demonstrates that the TP
splice variants exhibit different sensitivities to desensitization;
TP
is susceptible to agonist-induced desensitization in
a GRK-dependent manner, while TP
does not desensitize
(164). In contrast to the other prostanoid receptors, there are no direct reports of desensitization of the DP receptor.
Because prostanoids, especially prostaglandins and to a much lesser
extent TxA2, are increased during the birth transition period (6, 103, 125, 134), and because the density of many prostanoid receptors is decreased during this time (see Table 1),
homologous developmental regulation of the prostanoid receptors has
been invoked. A reduction in prostanoid levels in newborn brain,
retina, and choroid to those of the adult, by titrating the dose of the
COX inhibitor ibuprofen (24-48 h) (81), led to a
concomitant increase in [3H]PGE2 and
[3H]PGF2
binding in vascular tissue
(2, 81, 125, 126). This increase in prostaglandin
receptors could be specifically prevented by PGE2 or
PGF2
agonists, suggesting a cause-effect relationship
between the binding and the prostaglandin levels in the immediate
newborn period (125, 129); receptor-coupled mechanisms
seemed unaffected. However, this homologous upregulation was not
uniformly observed for all prostanoid receptors. The
constriction-evoking EP1, EP3, and FP exhibited
a homologous regulation by the high PGE2 and
PGF2
tissue levels during the birth transition period, and densities of these receptors increased to adult values when prostaglandin levels were reduced to those of the adult. In contrast, the densities of the relaxation-inducing EP2,
EP4, and DP receptors in brain and ocular vasculatures were
unaffected by prostaglandin synthase inhibition (2, 5,
81); likewise, IP and TP receptor-associated functions were also
unaltered (5). The absent modulation in TP-induced
constriction may be related to the minor changes in TxA2
levels in the neonate, but this does not apply to EP2,
EP4, IP, and DP receptors where PGE2,
PGI2, and PGD2 significantly change
(5). Hence, changes in prostanoid receptor
expression during the birth transition period can only in part be
attributed to a homologous regulation by their ligands. The findings
also disclose a possibly physiologically relevant pattern whereby high perinatal levels of prostaglandins lead to a downregulation of receptors associated with vasoconstriction without affecting those associated with relaxation, favoring altogether a vasorelaxation. An
insufficient ability to limit blood flow and oxygen delivery to brain
and retina in a premature subject may participate in the development of
intraventricular cerebral hemorrhage and retinopathy of prematurity
(85). However, in the term neonate this excess vasorelaxation may be regarded as beneficial, especially at the end of
parturition when frequent episodes of hypoxia occur secondarily to
intensifying uterine contractions (43, 57). A graphic
scheme depicting the modulation of contractile prostaglandin receptors by endogenous prostanoids in the immediate neonate is presented in Fig.
5.
|
| |
PROSTANOID RECEPTOR GENE DISRUPTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Targeted gene ablation or disruption has provided important information on the role of prostanoid receptors, especially because of the lack of suitable antagonists for this receptor family. The disruption of all of the prostanoid receptor genes has now been reported.
There are three individual reports of the genetic disruption of the
EP1 receptor gene (EP1
/
)
(16, 217, 225). A gender-specific effect on blood pressure homeostasis was observed. Surprisingly and as yet not understood, male
but not female EP1
/
mice exhibited less
PGE2-induced hypotension relative to wild-type mice
(16), suggesting that in males most of the vasodepressor action of PGE2 is mediated by EP1. A decrease
in the number of preneoplastic lesions in
EP1
/
mice relative to wild-type mice was
found using a mouse model of colon cancer (225).
Of all of the prostanoid receptors, the ablation of the EP2
receptor gene (EP2
/
) has been studied most
intensely (15, 96, 107, 211). Contradictory effects of the
EP2
/
phenotype are apparent for blood
pressure homeostasis. Both hypertension (107) and
hypotension (211) are reported for
EP2
/
mice relative to wild type; the
hypertension is consistent with the vasorelaxant effects of
EP2 stimulation, while the hypotension possibly relates to
an effect of EP2 on activation of the renin-angiotensin system (211). The hypotensive responses of
PGE2 are markedly attenuated in female but not male
EP2
/
mice (15), suggesting a
major role for EP2 in vasodepressor responses of
PGE2 in females. Salt-sensitive hypertension is observed in
EP2
/
mice, suggesting a role for
EP2 in the regulation of sodium in the kidney (107,
211). The EP2 receptor plays an important role in
reproduction since female EP2
/
mice exhibit
a reduced litter size, a decrease in ovulation number, and a reduced
fertilization rate (96, 107, 211). An
EP2-dependent role was demonstrated in the expansion of the
follicular granulosa cells surrounding the oocyte, which is a process
known as cumulus expansion. These results suggest that the incomplete
cumulus expansion observed in the absence of EP2
contributes to the reduced ovulation and the failure of fertilization
(96).
The knockout of the EP3 receptor gene
(EP3
/
) has also been reported (68,
205, 217). EP3 is clearly involved in
PGE2-induced pyrexia because
EP3
/
mice fail to mount a febrile response
to exogenous (i.e., lipopolysaccharide) and endogenous (i.e., IL-1
)
pyrogens (217). PGE2 also functions through
the EP3 receptor to concentrate urine; however, these effects are deemed unessential for the normal regulation of urinary osmolality (68). The EP3
/
mouse was also reported to be unable to secrete duodenal bicarbonate on
luminal perfusion with PGE2 relative to wild type
(205). Because these EP3
/
mice
subsequently exhibit susceptibility to acid-induced injury, this
receptor may function in maintaining mucosal integrity. EP3 is also implicated in vasopressor responses, but this role is also
gender specific; male but not female EP3
/
mice exhibited more PGE2-induced hypotension relative to
wild-type mice (16), suggesting a pressor response
attributed to EP3 in males.
Individual reports of the effects of ablation of the EP4
receptor gene (EP4
/
) concur that it has
various functions in the vascular system (15, 16, 154,
187). The principal observation in
EP4
/
mice is their inability to close the
ductus arteriosus immediately after birth; this causes pulmonary edema
and death within 72 h of birth of nearly 100% of animals
(154, 187). Interestingly, the ductus is unresponsive to
COX inhibition, suggesting that other mechanisms are responsible for
its patency; a role for NO in ductal patency is possible given its
contribution in this regard (50, 70). When this mouse
strain was bred on a mixed genetic background, ~20% of
EP4
/
survived (16); in female
EP4
/
mice hypotensive response to
PGE2 was attenuated, suggesting as for EP2 a
major role for EP4 in vasodepressor responses of PGE2 in females (15). The gender-related,
pressor-mediated effects of EP receptors reflect sexual dimorphism of
blood pressure regulation, but the mechanisms are not clear.
FP-knockout (FP
/
) mice have been generated and studied
for their reproductive function (200). Female
FP
/
mice are fertile, carry their litters to term, but
fail to undergo parturition. In mice this is largely because
progesterone levels remain elevated because PGF2
is
responsible for the luteolysis that subsequently reduces progesterone,
which otherwise maintains uterine quiescence and gestation.
PGF2
is also responsible for upregulating the uterine
oxytocin receptors that facilitate parturition (74); this
also contributes to the failure of initiating labor in
FP
/
mice.
Ablation of the gene for the DP receptor (132) suggests a
role for DP in allergic asthma. DP
/
mice demonstrated
no difference compared with wild-type mice in total IgE after
sensitization to ovalbumin. Howeve