|
|
||||||||
1 Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 14040-903; and 2 Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30180-112, Brazil
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have demonstrated that the hepatic function may have an important role in the development of tolerance to the pyrogenic effect induced by endotoxin. To further investigate if the role of the hepatic function in the development of tolerance also extends to that induced by other pyrogenic stimuli, we investigated the effect of galactosamine, a specific inhibitor of the hepatic protein synthesis, on the development of tolerance to the pyrogenic effect induced by muramyl dipeptide (MDP) in rats. Pyrogenic tolerance was observed after the second intravenous or intraperitoneal injection of MDP (500 µg/kg), 24 h after the first injection, similar to what was observed with endotoxin. Pyrogenic tolerance was abolished when galactosamine (300 mg/kg ip) was injected simultaneously with MDP (500 µg/kg iv) on the first day. When uridine (600 mg/kg ip) was administered simultaneously with galactosamine (300 mg/kg ip) and the first injection of MDP (500 µg/kg ip), pyrogenic tolerance was again observed after the second injection of the peptidoglycan. In conclusion, the hepatic function may not be important only for the development of tolerance to endotoxin, but also to a totally different pyrogenic stimulus such as MDP.
fever; peptidoglycan; liver; galactosamine; uridine
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ALTHOUGH FEVER
REPRESENTS an important adaptative response (20,
30), the development of tolerance to the pyrogenic effect induced by endotoxin (2, 34, 43), muramyl dipeptide (MDP) (32), tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
)
(9), or interleukin-1
(IL-1
) (40) is
usually observed when these pyrogenic stimuli are repeatedly injected
in experimental animals. It has been demonstrated that the tolerance is
not restricted to the pyrogenic effect but also extends to the
lethality, weight loss, and hypotension induced by some of the
previously mentioned inflammatory stimuli (18, 22).
However, the mechanisms involved in the establishment of the pyrogenic
tolerance are not fully understood. Both central and peripheral changes
have been suggested to explain the development of this phenomenon.
Nakamori et al. (27) reported that the production of
IL-1
in some circumventricular organs (organum vasculosum laminae terminalis, subfornical area, and postrema area) is
markedly reduced in pyrogenic tolerant rabbits. The production of
endogenous cryogens may also be involved in the development of
pyrogenic tolerance. Cooper et al. (3) observed an
increased arginine vasopressin immunoreactivity in the septal area of
pyrogenic tolerant guinea pigs, whereas Wilkinson and Kasting
(42) demonstrated that the microinjection of a
V1 antagonist into the septal area partially inhibited the
development of tolerance to the pyrogenic effect of endotoxin.
In addition to the central changes that may underlie the development of
pyrogenic tolerance, peripheral mechanisms may also be important.
Beeson (2) and Cooper and Cranston (4)
suggested that the tolerance to the pyrogenic effect of endotoxin would result from an increase of its clearance by the reticuloendothelial system resulting in a faster elimination of endotoxin from the circulation. Tolerant animals may also produce a seric component that
neutralizes endotoxin, as suggested by Riveau et al. (29) and Warren et al. (41). However, the aspect that has been
most investigated to explain the development of tolerance is the
production of the pyrogenic cytokines. There are many reports showing
that the production of TNF-
, IL-1
, and IL-6 induced by endotoxin is markedly reduced in tolerant animals (6, 25, 33, 37, 45). In addition, Frankenberger et al. (10)
demonstrated that IL-10, a cytokine that presents an anti-inflammatory
activity, is upregulated in endotoxin-tolerant rats. They also
suggested that the pyrogenic tolerance is not a passive reduction of
the functions of a tolerant cell but a well-orchestrated response characterized by a reduced production of inflammatory and an increased production of anti-inflammatory cytokines.
The hepatic function has also been proposed as an important element in
the development of tolerance to some of the effects induced by
endotoxin. Galactosamine, a specific inhibitor of the hepatic
protein synthesis (19), abolishes the protection against endotoxic shock induced by previous treatment with TNF-
, IL-1
, and interferon-
(24). Vogels et al. (39)
have also suggested that the protective effect conferred by the
previous treatment with cytokines against the mortality induced by high
doses of endotoxin is mediated by the synthesis of hepatic acute phase proteins (APP). We have recently demonstrated that the hepatic function
may also have an important role in the development of tolerance to the
pyrogenic effect induced by endotoxin (8). When
galactosamine was administered simultaneously with the first injection
of endotoxin, the development of tolerance observed after the second
injection of the pyrogenic stimulus was abolished.
The exact way the hepatic function contributes to the development of
tolerance to the pyrogenic effect induced by endotoxin is not clear,
but the synthesis of APP may be involved. Some APP inhibit the
production of prostaglandins and fever induced by TNF-
and IL-1
(36). The liver of tolerant animals may also be the source
of a seric component that neutralizes endotoxin, as suggested by Warren
et al. (41) and Riveau et al. (29). More
important, the liver has been found to play a major role in the
clearance of circulating endotoxin from the blood (11, 26,
44). Endotoxin may be processed by hepatocytes and secreted into
the biliary system, explaining its predominantly fecal excretion.
To further investigate if the role of the hepatic function in the development of tolerance also extends to that induced by other pyrogenic stimuli, we investigated the effect of galactosamine on the development of tolerance to the pyrogenic effect induced by MDP. This is justified as MDP is a synthetic 6-amino acid water-soluble peptidoglycan, a different pyrogenic stimulus compared with the lipopolysaccharide structure of endotoxin, and the way it is cleared from the blood is not clear.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental animals. Male Wistar rats (180-200 g) were used. The animals were housed at 24°C and with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle. The animals had access to food and water ad libitum.
Surgical procedures. One week before the experiments, rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (45 mg/kg ip) and stereotaxically implanted with a stainless steel guide cannula (0.8-mm outer diameter × 15-mm length) according to Paxinos and Watson (28). Each guide cannula was fixed to the skull by an acrylic dental cement attached to two stainless steel screws inserted into the frontal bones of the animals. At the end of the experiments, the position of the cannula was confirmed histologically.
Measurement of body temperature. Colonic temperature was measured with a telethermometer (Yellow Spring Instruments) in animals that were conscious and minimally restrained only at the moment of the measurement. Plastic-coated thermocouples were inserted 5 cm beyond the anal sphincter. All animals were trained to accept handling and colonic temperature measurements the day before the experiments. Baseline temperature measurements were obtained 2 h before any treatment. Basal colonic temperature was the average of four measurements. Colonic temperature was determined at 1-h intervals during 6 h after the injection of MDP. All experiments were carried out at the thermoneutral zone for rats (28 ± 1°C) (15) between 8 AM and 5 PM.
Experimental protocols. In the experiments to evaluate the development of tolerance, the pyrogenic stimulus was injected at 24-h intervals. When the effect of galactosamine and uridine on the development of tolerance was evaluated, both drugs were injected simultaneously with MDP in the first day.
Protocol 1 evaluated the time course of the febrile response induced by intracerebroventricular, intravenous, or intraperitoneal injection of MDP. The doses used were 50, 100, 250, and 500 µg/kg for the intravenous or intraperitoneal route, and 50, 250, and 750 ng for the intracerebroventricular route.
Protocol 2 evaluated the febrile response induced by three intracerebroventricular injections of MDP (750 ng) or two intravenous injections of MDP (500 µg/kg) at 24-h intervals.
Protocol 3 evaluated the effect of simultaneous injection of galactosamine (300 mg/kg ip) with MDP (500 µg/kg iv) on the first day on the development of pyrogenic tolerance observed after the second injection of MDP (500 µg/kg iv) 24 h later.
Protocol 4 evaluated the effect of simultaneous injection of galactosamine (300 mg/kg ip) and uridine (600 mg/kg ip) with MDP (500 µg/kg ip) on the first day on the development of pyrogenic tolerance observed after the second injection of MDP (500 µg/kg ip) 24 h later. To reduce the distress of the animals during the injection procedures, as they would receive three injections almost simultaneously, we chose the intraperitoneal route for the MDP injection in this protocol.
Drugs. MDP (N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-L-isoglutamine; ICN Biomedicals), D(+)-galactosamine (2-amino-2-deoxy-D-galactopyranose; Sigma), and uridine (Sigma) were used. All drugs were dissolved in pyrogen-free saline (0.9% NaCl). The concentrations of the solutions were MDP (50, 100, 250, and 500 µg/ml for intravenous or intraperitoneal injections; 25, 125, and 375 µg/ml for intracerebroventricular injections), galactosamine (300 mg/ml), and uridine (600 mg/ml).
Injections. When the intracerebroventricular route was used, a volume of 2 µl was injected over a period of 30 s. When the intraperitoneal or intravenous route was used, a volume of 1 ml/kg was injected.
Statistical analysis. All values are means ± SE. Statistical differences were determined by t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's post hoc test using the SPSS statistical software. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fever index (expressed in °C), i.e., the area under the curve over the 6-h monitoring period, was used for statistical analysis.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microinjection of MDP (250 or 750 ng) into the lateral ventricle
induced a statistically significant increase in colonic temperature (Fig. 1) [1-way ANOVA,
F(3,23) = 9.78, P = 0.0004]. Intravenous (Fig. 2) [1-way
ANOVA, F(4,35) = 12.52, P < 0.0001] or intraperitoneal (Fig. 3)
[1-way ANOVA, F(4,37) = 13.03, P < 0.0001] injection of MDP also induced a
dose-dependent increase in colonic temperature. Intravenous or
intraperitoneal injection of 100, 250, and 500 µg/kg MDP induced a
significant increase in colonic temperature that peaked 2-3 h
after injection. The increased colonic temperatures induced by
intracerebroventricular injection of MDP lasted longer than that
induced by intravenous or intraperitoneal injection.
|
|
|
We next investigated the pyrogenic response induced by repeated
intracerebroventricular injections of MDP (750 ng). The first injection
of MDP induced a significant increase in colonic temperature (t-test = 5.52, P < 0.0001). The
febrile response induced by the second and third
intracerebroventricular injections of MDP, on the second and third day,
respectively, was not changed, indicating that the development of
pyrogenic tolerance does not occur after three intracerebroventricular
injections of this pyrogenic stimulus (Fig.
4) [day 2: 1-way ANOVA,
F(2,22) = 21.10, P < 0.0001; day 3: F(2,16) = 21.45, P = 0.0001].
|
On the other hand, a pyrogenic tolerance was clearly observed after the
second intravenous injection of MDP (Fig.
5). The first intravenous injection of
MDP (500 µg/kg) induced a characteristic elevation (
0.8°C) in
colonic temperature (t-test = 7.07, P < 0.0001), whereas the second injection, on the second day, did not
induce an increase in colonic temperature higher than 0.2°C [1-way
ANOVA, F(2,20) = 20.61, P < 0.0001].
|
Next, we investigated if the development of tolerance to the pyrogenic
effect induced by MDP, similar to that induced by endotoxin (8), could also be inhibited by galactosamine.
Intraperitoneal injection of galactosamine (300 mg/kg)
simultaneous with the first injection of MDP (500 µg/kg iv) did not
change the febrile response induced by this pyrogenic stimulus [1-way
ANOVA, F(3,29) = 21.10, P < 0.0001]. On the other hand, the development of tolerance observed in the second day, after the second injection of MDP, was abolished in
the animals simultaneously treated with MDP and galactosamine in the
first day [1-way ANOVA, F(3,25) = 13.90, P < 0.0001] (Fig. 6).
|
Most of the effects induced by galactosamine are reversed by uridine,
indicating that they involve UTP depletion (7,
16). Thus we also investigated if the effect of
galactosamine on the development of tolerance to the pyrogenic effect
induced by MDP could be reversed by simultaneous treatment with
uridine. In this protocol, we injected MDP intraperitoneally. Similar
to what was observed for the intravenous route, the intraperitoneal
injection of MDP induced a febrile response with a similar time course
and magnitude, and a pyrogenic tolerance was observed after the second injection. Injection of galactosamine simultaneously with MDP in the
first day abolished the pyrogenic tolerance in the second day. However,
when uridine was simultaneously injected with galactosamine and MDP in
the first day, a pyrogenic tolerance was again observed after the
second injection of MDP, indicating that the effect of galactosamine
was reversed by uridine (Fig. 7)
[day 1: 1-way ANOVA, F(3,47) = 44.48, P < 0.0001; day 2:
F(4,47) = 15.65, P < 0.0001].
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of the present study give further support to the hypothesis that the hepatic function plays an important role in the development of tolerance to the fever induced by different pyrogenic stimuli. Galactosamine, a specific inhibitor of the hepatic protein synthesis, abolished the development of tolerance to the pyrogenic effect induced by MDP, a synthetic peptidoglycan with a structure completely different compared with that of endotoxin.
MDP induced fever after intraperitoneal, intravenous, and
intracerebroventricular injections in rats. However, the development of
tolerance to its pyrogenic effect was only observed after repeated intravenous or intraperitoneal injections. Three
intracerebroventricular injections did not result in the development of
pyrogenic tolerance. If further injections would result in the
development of tolerance is not clear. Goldbach et al.
(14) have also reported that tolerance to the pyrogenic
effect induced by TNF-
did not develop after four
intracerebroventricular injections of this cytokine in guinea pigs.
However, Kozak et al. (21) observed a progressive
reduction of the febrile response with repeated intracerebroventricular injections of endotoxin in rabbits that reached significance only after
the sixth injection. Thus we cannot exclude the possibility that a
tolerance to the pyrogenic effect of MDP would be observed after six or
more injections. These results suggest that the rapid development of
pyrogenic tolerance depends mainly on peripheral mechanisms, as this
phenomenon was clearly observed after the second intravenous or
intraperitoneal injection of endotoxin (8) or MDP (present study).
The development of pyrogenic tolerance observed after the second injection of MDP, similar to what was observed with endotoxin, was also abolished when galactosamine was injected simultaneously with MDP in the first day. This result extends the proposal that the hepatic function is important for the development of pyrogenic tolerance to stimuli with different structures. Although it has been demonstrated that the liver plays a major role in the clearance of circulating endotoxin from the blood (11, 26, 44), an observation that could give support to the role of hepatic function in the development of tolerance to this pyrogen, the role of this organ in the clearance of MDP is not known.
Galactosamine specifically inhibits the hepatic function, and this effect has been attributed to its metabolism by the hepatocytes, resulting in the depletion of UTP and an accumulation of UDP-galactosamine (5). As UTP is essential to the synthesis of many macromolecules, the synthesis of RNA, proteins, and glycogen by the hepatocytes is reduced by galactosamine. Most of the effects induced by galactosamine are thus reversed by uridine, indicating that they involve UTP depletion. When uridine was administered simultaneously with galactosamine and the first injection of MDP, the pyrogenic tolerance was again observed after the second injection of the peptidoglycan. These results are in agreement with the demonstration that other effects of galactosamine are reversed by uridine and suggest that the effects of galactosamine on the development of pyrogenic tolerance also involve UTP depletion.
The inhibition of hepatic function by galactosamine induces an
increased sensitivity of experimental animals to endotoxin (1,
12, 13), TNF-
(1, 23), and IL-1
(40). There is evidence that the protection conferred by
some cytokines against endotoxic shock or bacterial suspensions is also
mediated by APP produced by the liver (24, 39). Alcorn et
al. (1) showed that the acute phase response induced by
turpentine, characterized by an elevated production of APP, protects
mice against the lethal effect induced by high doses of endotoxin or
TNF. In addition, Vogels et al. (39) showed that
galactosamine abolishes the production of APP induced by IL-1 in mice
and the protective effect induced by this cytokine against the
lethality induced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
As galactosamine is an inhibitor of hepatic protein synthesis, we could suggest that the synthesis of one or more proteins would be essential for the development of tolerance to the pyrogenic effect induced by MDP and endotoxin. These proteins could inhibit the synthesis or neutralize the action of mediators involved in the genesis of fever, and the treatment with galactosamine, simultaneously with the first injection of MDP or endotoxin, would inhibit their synthesis and consequently the development of pyrogenic tolerance. In support of this hypothesis, it has been proposed that a seric component, probably of hepatic origin, neutralizes endotoxin (29, 41) and that serum with a high concentration of APP reduces the lethality induced by endotoxin (38). Directly related to the phenomenon investigated in the present study, it has been demonstrated that serum amyloid A, an APP produced by the liver, inhibits fever and hypothalamic production of prostaglandin E2 induced by cytokines in mice (36).
Schreiber et al. (35) showed that the maximum plasma
concentration of
2-macroglobulin and
1-acid glycoprotein, two APP produced by the liver
during inflammation, is reached only 48 h after the injection of
turpentine, indicating a delayed production of APP after injection of
an inflammatory stimulus. This delayed production, if it also happens
after MDP or endotoxin injection, would help explain why galactosamine
did not change the febrile response induced by the first stimulus with
MDP (present study) or endotoxin (8) but abolished the
pyrogenic tolerance in the second day.
Another possibility to explain the inhibition of development of pyrogenic tolerance in animals treated with galactosamine could be a reduction of MDP clearance from the blood, similar to what has been reported for endotoxin. However, there is no evidence that the liver plays a similar role in the clearance of MDP from the blood, which makes this hypothesis totally speculative. Adding to the discussion on the role of the hepatic function in the development of pyrogenic tolerance, Ivanov et al. (17) have recently suggested that the processes leading to pyrogenic tolerance may be controlled by the vagal innervation of the liver via unknown mechanisms.
In conclusion, the present results support the hypothesis that the hepatic function plays an important role in the development of pyrogenic tolerance. The important aspect raised by the present study is that the hepatic function may not be important only for the development of tolerance to endotoxin, a component of the wall of gram-negative bacteria, but also to a totally different pyrogenic stimulus, both in structure and origin, such as MDP. These results suggest that the hepatic function may contribute to the development of pyrogenic tolerance by different ways and give further support to the important role of the liver in the control of different aspects of the inflammatory response.
Perspectives
It has been demonstrated that there is a lack of cross tolerance between endotoxin and MDP in induction of fever, e.g., animals tolerant to the pyrogenic effect induced by endotoxin develop a febrile response after injection of MDP that is not distinguished from the febrile response of naive animals (31). As the hepatic function seems particularly important for the development of pyrogenic tolerance to both endotoxin and MDP, this allows the suggestion that endotoxin stimulates the synthesis and/or release of hepatic factors that are important for the development of tolerance to its pyrogenic effect, but not to that induced by MDP, and vice versa. If this hypothesis is true, it means that the liver may produce different factors that are important for the development of pyrogenic tolerance and, more important, the factors produced would depend on the nature of the pyrogenic stimulus.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Fundação de Auxílio à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo for financial support.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: I. R. Pelá, Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, Univ. of São Paulo, 14040-903 - Avenida do Café s/n Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (E-mail: irpela{at}usp.br).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 20 November 2000; accepted in final form 27 February 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Alcorn, JM,
Fierer J,
and
Chojkier M.
The acute-phase response protects mice from D-galactosamine sensitisation to endotoxin and tumor necrosis factor-
.
Hepatology
15:
122-129,
1992[ISI][Medline].
2.
Beeson, PB.
Tolerance to bacterial pyrogens. Factors influencing its development.
J Exp Med
86:
29-44,
1947[Abstract].
3.
Cooper, KE,
Blahser S,
Malkinson TI,
Merker G,
Roth J,
and
Zeisberger E.
Changes in body temperature and vasopressin content of brain neurons in pregnant and non-pregnant guinea pigs during fevers produced by Poly I:PolyC.
Pflügers Arch
412:
292-296,
1988[ISI][Medline].
4.
Cooper, KE,
and
Cranston WJ.
Clearance of radioactive bacterial pyrogen from the circulation.
J Physiol
166:
41P-42P,
1963.
5.
Decker, K,
and
Keppler D.
Galactosamine hepatitis: key role of the nucleotide deficiency period in the pathogenesis of cell injury and cell death.
Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol
71:
77-106,
1974.
6.
Evans, GF,
and
Zuckerman SH.
Glucocorticoid-dependent and -independent mechanisms involved in lipopolysaccharide tolerance.
Eur J Immunol
21:
1973-1979,
1991[ISI][Medline].
7.
Farber, JL,
Gill G,
and
Konishi Y.
Prevention of galactosamine-induced liver cell necrosis by uridine.
Am J Pathol
72:
53-62,
1973[ISI][Medline].
8.
Ferreira, MES,
Coelho MM,
and
Pelá IR.
Effect of galactosamine, an inhibitor of hepatic protein synthesis, on endotoxin-induced fever and pyrogenic tolerance.
Ann NY Acad Sci
856:
256-260,
1998[ISI][Medline].
9.
Fraker, DL,
Stovroff MC,
Merino MJ,
and
Norton JA.
Tolerance to tumor necrosis factor in rats and the relationship to endotoxin tolerance and toxicity.
J Exp Med
168:
95-105,
1988
10.
Frankenberger, M,
Pechumer H,
and
Ziegler-Heitbrock L.
Interleukin-10 is upregulated in LPS tolerance.
J Inflamm
45:
56-63,
1995[ISI][Medline].
11.
Freudenberg, MA,
Freudenberg N,
and
Galanos C.
Time course of cellular distribution of endotoxin in liver, lungs and kidneys of rats.
Br J Exp Pathol
63:
56-65,
1982[ISI][Medline].
12.
Freudenberg, MA,
Keppler D,
and
Galanos C.
Requirement for lipopolysaccharide-responsive macrophages in galactosamine-induced sensitisation to endotoxin.
Infect Immun
51:
891-895,
1986
13.
Galanos, C,
Freudenberg MA,
and
Reutter W.
Galactosamine induced sensitization to the lethal effects of endotoxin.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
76:
5939-5943,
1979
14.
Goldbach, JM,
Roth J,
Stör B,
and
Zeisberger E.
Lack of tolerance development to tumor necrosis factor alpha inside the central nervous system.
Experientia
52:
774-777,
1996[ISI][Medline].
15.
Gordon, CJ.
Thermal biology of the laboratory rat.
Physiol Behav
47:
963-991,
1990[Medline].
16.
Holstege, A,
Anukarhanonta T,
Yamamoto M,
Koch HK,
Katterman R,
Lesch R,
and
Keppler D.
Preventive effects of 5-fluorouridine and uridine on D-galactosamine and acute liver cell injury.
Exp Mol Pathol
34:
170-182,
1981[ISI][Medline].
17.
Ivanov, AI,
Kulchitsky VA,
Sugimoto N,
Simons CT,
and
Romanovsky AA.
Does the formation of lipopolysaccharide tolerance require intact vagal innervation of the liver?
Auton Neurosci
85:
111-118,
2000[ISI][Medline].
18.
Johnston, CA,
and
Greisman SE.
Handbook of Endotoxin. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1985, p. 359-401.
19.
Keppler, D,
and
Decker K.
Studies on the mechanism of galactosamine hepatitis: accumulation of galactosamine-1-phosphate and its inhibition of UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase.
Eur J Biochem
10:
219-225,
1969[ISI][Medline].
20.
Kluger, MJ.
Fever revisited.
Pediatrics
90:
846-850,
1992
21.
Kozak, W,
Sosynski D,
Szewczenko M,
and
Bodurka M.
Lack of pyrogenic tolerance transmission between brain and periphery in the rabbit.
Experientia
46:
1010-1011,
1990[ISI][Medline].
22.
Langhans, W,
Savoldelli D,
and
Weingarten S.
Comparison of the feeding responses to bacterial lipopolysaccharide and interleukin-1
.
Physiol Behav
53:
643-649,
1993[Medline].
23.
Lehmann, V,
Freudenberg MA,
and
Galanos C.
Lethal toxicity of lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis factor in normal and D-galactosamine-treated mice.
J Exp Med
165:
657-663,
1987
24.
Libert, C,
Bladel SV,
Brouckaert P,
Shaw A,
and
Fiers W.
Involvement of the liver, but not of IL-6, in IL-1-induced desensitisation to the lethal effects of tumor necrosis factor.
J Immunol
146:
2625-2632,
1991[Abstract].
25.
Mengozzi, M,
Sironi M,
Gadina M,
and
Ghezzi P.
Reversal of defective IL-6 production in lipopolysaccharide-tolerant mice by phorbol myristate acetate.
J Immunol
147:
899-902,
1991[Abstract].
26.
Mimura, Y,
Sakisaka S,
Harada M,
Sata M,
and
Tanikawa K.
Role of hepatocytes in direct clearance of lipopolysaccharide in rats.
Gastroenterology
109:
1969-1976,
1995[ISI][Medline].
27.
Nakamori, T,
Sakata Y,
Watanabe T,
Morimoto A,
Nakamura S,
and
Murakami N.
Suppression of interleukin-1
production in the circumventricular organs in endotoxin-tolerant rabbits.
Brain Res
675:
103-109,
1995[ISI][Medline].
28.
Paxinos, G,
and
Watson C.
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. New York: Academic, 1986.
29.
Riveau, GR,
Novitsky TJ,
Roslansky PF,
Dinarello CA,
and
Warren HS.
Role of interleukin-1 in augmenting serum neutralisation of bacterial lipopolysaccharide.
J Clin Microbiol
25:
889-892,
1987
30.
Roberts, NJ.
Impact of temperature elevation on immunologic defenses.
Rev Infect Dis
13:
462-472,
1991[ISI][Medline].
31.
Roth, J,
Aslan T,
Störr B,
and
Zeisberger E.
Lack of cross tolerance between LPS and muramyl dipeptide in induction of circulating TNF- and IL-6 in guinea pigs.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
273:
R1529-R1533,
1997
32.
Roth, J,
Hopkins SJ,
Hoadley ME,
Tripp A,
Aslan T,
Störr B,
Luheshi GN,
and
Zeisberger E.
Fever and production of cytokines in response to repeated injections of muramyl dipeptide in guinea-pigs.
Pflügers Arch
434:
525-533,
1997[ISI][Medline].
33.
Roth, J,
McClellan JL,
Kluger MJ,
and
Zeisberger E.
Attenuation of fever and release of cytokines after repeated injections of lipopolysaccharide in guinea-pigs.
J Physiol
477:
177-185,
1994[ISI][Medline].
34.
Roth, J,
and
Zeisberger E.
Endotoxin tolerance alters thermal response of guinea pigs to systemic infusions of tumor necrosis factor-
.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
268:
R514-R519,
1995
35.
Schreiber, G,
Tsykin A,
Aldred AR,
Thomas T,
Fung WP,
Dickson PW,
Cole T,
Birch H,
Jong FA,
and
Milland J.
The acute phase response in the rodent.
Ann NY Acad Sci
557:
61-85,
1989[ISI][Medline].
36.
Shainkin-Kestenbaum, R,
Berlyne G,
Zimlichman S,
Sorin HR,
Nyska M,
and
Danon A.
Acute phase protein, serum amyloid A, inhibits IL-1- and TNF-induced fever and hypothalamic PGE2 in mice.
Scand J Immunol
34:
179-183,
1991[ISI][Medline].
37.
Sironi, K,
Bianchi M,
Riganti F,
and
Ghezzi P.
Suppression of interleukin-6 production in endotoxin tolerance in a mouse glioma cell line: reversal by phorbol ester.
Lymphokine Cytokine Res
12:
39-43,
1993[ISI][Medline].
38.
Van Vugt, H,
Van Gool J,
and
De Ridder L.
2-Macroglobulin of the rat, an acute phase protein, mitigates the early course of endotoxin shock.
Br J Exp Pathol
67:
313-319,
1986[ISI][Medline].
39.
Vogels, MTE,
Cantoni L,
Carelli M,
Sironi M,
Ghezzi P,
and
Van Der Meer JWM
Role of acute phase proteins in interleukin-1-induced nonspecific resistance to bacterial infections in mice.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
37:
2527-2533,
1993
40.
Wallach, D,
Holtmann H,
Engelmann H,
and
Nophar Y.
Sensitisation and desensitization to lethal effects of tumor necrosis factor and IL-1.
J Immunol
140:
2994-2999,
1988[Abstract].
41.
Warren, HS,
Knights CV,
and
Siber GR.
Neutralisation and lipoprotein binding of lipopolysaccharides in tolerant rabbit serum.
J Infect Dis
154:
784-791,
1986[ISI][Medline].
42.
Wilkinson, MF,
and
Kasting NW.
Centrally acting vasopressin contributes to endotoxin tolerance.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
258:
R443-R449,
1990
43.
Yamashiro, O,
Morimoto A,
Sakata Y,
Watanabe T,
and
Murakami N.
Febrile and metabolic tolerance to endotoxin and human recombinant interleukin-1
in rabbits.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
264:
R1180-R1185,
1993
44.
Zlydaszyk, JC,
and
Moon RJ.
Fate of 51Cr-labeled lipopolysaccharide in tissue culture cells and livers of normal mice.
Infect Immun
14:
100-105,
1976
45.
Zuckerman, SH,
and
Evans GF.
Endotoxin tolerance: in vivo regulation of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1 synthesis is at the transcriptional level.
Cell Immunol
140:
513-519,
1992[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. Steiner, S. Chakravarty, J. R. Robbins, A. S. Dragic, J. Pan, M. Herkenham, and A. A. Romanovsky Thermoregulatory responses of rats to conventional preparations of lipopolysaccharide are caused by lipopolysaccharide per se-- not by lipoprotein contaminants Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): R348 - R352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. I. Salles, A. E. Tucker, D. E. Voth, and J. D. Ballard Toxin-induced resistance in Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin-treated macrophages PNAS, October 14, 2003; 100(21): 12426 - 12431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Scholz Fever Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): R913 - R915. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |