|
|
||||||||
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812 - 8582, Japan
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent studies have suggested that the central nervous system is responsible for activation of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) and the renin-angiotensin system in heart failure (HF). The aim of this study was to determine whether activation of the renin-angiotensin system within the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) plays a role in enhanced SNA in HF. High-output HF was induced by an aortocaval (A-V) shunt with some modifications in the rat. These rats exhibited a left ventricular dilatation and hemodynamic signs of high-output HF. Urinary catecholamine excretion and maximal renal SNA (RSNA) were greater in the A-V shunted rats than in the control rats. Microinjection of an angiotensin II type 1-receptor antagonist, CV11974, into the NTS was performed. The arterial pressure and RSNA were reduced by CV11974 to a greater degree in the A-V shunted rats than in the control rats. The expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme mRNA in the medulla was greater in the A-V shunted rats than in the control rats. These results suggest that activation of the renin-angiotensin system within the NTS contributes to an enhanced SNA in this model.
arteriovenous fistula; brain; sympathetic nervous system; heart failure
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CHRONIC HEART FAILURE (HF) is characterized by an enhanced neurohumoral drive in experimental animals as well as in patients (32, 34, 52). In patients with chronic HF, plasma norepinephrine levels increase with the severity of HF and the mortality rate (41). Although several mechanisms have been proposed, the actual mechanisms responsible for this sympathoexcitation in HF are not known. Impaired arterial baroreceptor reflex function has been suggested as one of the mechanisms responsible for an increased sympathetic tone in HF (32, 52). However, recent studies have shown that this increase in basal sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in HF is difficult to explain based only on this mechanism (5, 27). Therefore, central nervous system mechanisms have been suggested to be involved in this sympathoexcitation in HF (52).
The treatment of chronic HF with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)
inhibitors or
-blockers has been shown to decrease the mortality of
the patients (32, 34). In patients with HF, the renin-angiotensin system is also activated (32, 34).
Activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin
system in HF contributes to excessive vasoconstriction (32, 34,
52). Although activation of the renin-angiotensin system plays
an important role in HF (31), the depressed baroreflex
contol of the heart rate or renal SNA (RSNA) may be restored by
blocking the ANG II type 1 (AT1) receptor (11, 37,
38). ANG II modulates sympathetic function at many loci in the
central and peripheral nervous systems. DiBona et al. (11)
have shown that intracerebroventricular as well as intravenous
administration of losartan improves the depressed arterial baroreflex
control of RSNA in HF produced by myocardial infarction in rats. Their
results indicate that ANG II within the brain contributes to an
enhanced sympathetic drive in HF. However, the regions in the brain
that are activated by ANG II in HF are not known. The nucleus of the
solitary tract (NTS) plays an important role in controlling SNA and
contains many AT1 receptors (2, 18, 47, 48).
For example, microinjection of ANG II into the NTS has been found to
elicit a pressor response (8). On the other hand,
microinjection of an ANG II-receptor antagonist, [Sar1,Thr8]ANG II, into the NTS has been
shown to facilitate reflex control of heart rate (7).
Evidence suggests that the NTS contains all of the components of the
renin-angiotensin system including angiotensinogen, ACE, ANG II, and
AT1 receptors (2, 4, 9, 18, 29, 35,
46-48). However, questions arise as to whether the brain
renin-angiotensin system in the NTS is altered in HF, which would, in
turn, contribute to an enhanced sympathetic drive in HF.
The aim of this study was to examine the role of endogenous ANG II in the NTS in sympathoexcitation in HF. For this purpose, we micoinjected an AT1-receptor antagonist into the NTS and examined resultant changes in the arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and RSNA in rats with high-output HF resulting from the creation of aortocaval (A-V) shunts with some modification to increase the shunt flow (20). The A-V shunt model has been used for the study of circulatory overload state, which, in turn, produces a high-output HF such as an inadequate blood flow supply to organs (1, 6, 15, 17, 23, 45). Moreover, it has been shown that neurohumoral activation has been shown to occur in this model (15, 45). From these observations, the effects of AT1-receptor blockade within the NTS on the sympathetic nervous system in this model of high-output HF were examined.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male Wistar-Kyoto rats weighing 300-350 g were obtained from an established colony at the Animal Research Institute of Kyushu University Faculty of Medicine (39). This study was reviewed by the Committee on Ethics in Animal Experiments of Kyushu University and was performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of Kyushu University.
Aortocaval shunt model. An arteriovenous (A-V) shunt was induced using procedures described previously (15, 17, 23). Rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg ip), and the inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta were exposed through a midline abdominal incision under sterile conditions. The A-V shunt was produced using an 18-gauge needle at a point ~5 mm caudal to the left renal vein. The patency of the shunt was verified visually on the basis of swelling of the vena cava and mixing of arterial blood with venous blood. To increase the shunt flow, a constriction of the abdominal aorta was performed at a point ~5 mm caudal to the shunt as described previously (20). Sham operations were performed in control rats using procedures identical to those used for the A-V shunted rats, except for insertion of the needle and aortic constriction. The abdominal incision was closed, and the animal was allowed to recover. Six to eight weeks after the surgery, the rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg ip), and an echocardiographic examination of left ventricular (LV) diameter and wall motion was performed with a 7.5-MHz probe (ALOKA, SSD-5500). Short-axis views were used to guide the cursor for M-mode images of the LV. LV diastolic dimensions were measured from the trailing edge of the intraventricular septum to the leading edge of the posterior wall at the point of maximal ventricular diameter. Systolic dimensions were taken at the minimum ventricular diameter of the beats in systole using the same edge definition. Systolic ventricular function was quantified as ejection fraction. Urinary catecholamines were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.
For microinjection experiments, anesthesia was induced with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg ip), and an intravenous infusion of propofol (20~30 mg · kg
1 · h
1) was begun as
the effect of the pentobarbital sodium diminished, as described
previously (13, 25). The adequacy of anesthesia was
verified by the absence of a withdrawal response to nociceptive stimulation of a hindpaw and by a stable baseline arterial pressure and
heart rate. The femoral artery and vein were cannulated for recording
arterial blood pressure and for the administration of drugs. The
anesthetized rats were artificially ventilated.
Recording of the efferent renal SNA.
The left kidney was exposed through a left retroperitoneal flank
incision. A branch of the renal nerve was isolated from the fat and
connective tissues. A pair of stainless steel bipolar electrodes was
placed beneath the renal nerve, and the renal sympathetic nerve around
the recording electrode was covered with silicone gel (Sil-Gel,
Wacker-Chemie). Multifiber renal SNA (RSNA) was recorded and
preamplified with a high-gain differential amplifier (band width
150-1,000 Hz; model MEG-1100, Nihon-Kohden) fed into a nerve
traffic analyzer (model MET-1100, Nihon-Kohden) and converted to spikes
by a window discriminator, as described previously (13, 19). Background noise levels were determined by an intravenous injection of hexamethonium (30 mg/kg) and, thereafter, an intravenous injection of an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (100 mg/kg). The
background noise levels were subtracted during a later analysis of RSNA
(49). The baseline RSNA was recorded at resting conditions as well as during infusion of sodium nitroprusside (10 µg · kg
1 · min
1), which
decreased the arterial pressure by ~40 mmHg and increased RSNA to
maximal levels (43). The resting RSNA was normalized to
the maximal RSNA as determined above. For analysis of changes in RSNA
in the multifiber preparation, RSNA was normalized to 100% as the
stable value before microinjection. This method has been used to
normalize the differences derived from electrode position, which may
influence the results in the multifiber recordings (14).
Microinjection study. Sinoaortic denervation and vagotomy were performed before the microinjection study to eliminate arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptor reflexes, as described previously (13, 21). The rat was placed in a stereotaxic frame with the head flexed downward to an angle of approximately 45°. The dorsal surface of the medulla was exposed after a midline incision through the skin. A unilateral microinjection into the NTS was made via a glass micropipette (OD 50-70 µm), which was connected to a Hamilton microsyringe. The tip of the glass micropipette was lowered 0.5 mm below the surface of the medulla to coordinates 0.6 mm rostral and 0.6 mm lateral with respect to the calamus scriptorius, as described previously (8, 13, 42). The volume of vehicle and drug injections was 50 nl and was administered over a 30-s period. Artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at pH 7.4 was used as vehicle.
L-Glutamate (500 pmol in 50 nl) was microinjected unilaterally into the NTS to identify the depressor site. An AT1-receptor antagonist, CV11974, was microinjected either unilaterally into the NTS or into the area postrema at doses of 50 and 500 pmol in 50 nl. After over 30 min of the microinjection of CV11974, the ANG II type 2 (AT2)-receptor antagonist, PD123319, was microinjected into the NTS. As a control, we microinjected the vehicle solution used to dissolve CV11974 into the NTS to exclude the nonspecific effects.RNA isolation and Northern blot analysis. Four rats with an A-V shunt and four control rats were killed under deep pentobarbital sodium anesthesia, and the lower brain stem (0.2 mg, 2 mm thick) including the NTS was removed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was prepared from the brain stem using ISOGEN (Nippon Gene) followed by poly(A)+RNA purification with an oligo(dt)-cellulose column (Takara Shuzo). Poly(A)+RNA (5 µg/lane) was separated by electrophoresis and transferred onto a nylon membrane (Hybonde N+, Amersham). Hybridization was carried out using a 32P-labeled EcoR V-EcoR I fragment of rat ACE cDNA followed by autoradiography (12, 13, 24). Autoradiograms were scanned using a Fuji phosphoimaging system to measure the levels of ACE-receptor mRNAs, which were normalized against those of GAPDH mRNA.
Histological examination.
To determine the site of injection by postmortem examination after the
completion of the experiments, 100 nl of Evans blue were injected
through a micropipette positioned at the site of drug injection. After
the Evans blue injection, the rat was deeply anesthetized with an
overdose of pentobarbital sodium and the brain was perfused through the
heart with saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde solution. The brain
stem was removed, and frozen sections (50 µm) were cut serially. As
shown in Fig. 1, the location of the
injection site was identified by microscopic examination.
|
Statistical analysis. All values are expressed as means ± SE. The unpaired t-test was used to compare baseline values between the groups. The paired t-test was used to examine the effects of each intervention within a group. A two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple-comparison test was used to compare the differences in changes in arterial pressure, heart rate, and RSNA between the groups and between the drug dosages. Differences were considered significant for values of P < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baseline hemodynamic and echocardiographic evaluation.
Table 1 shows the results of the
hemodynamic and echocardiographic examination of the A-V shunted rats
and the control rats. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate
did not differ between the two groups. However, the LV end-diastolic
pressure (LVEDP) was higher (P < 0.0001) and the LV
dP/dt lower (P < 0.05) in the A-V shunted
rats than in the control rats. In addition, both the LVEDP and
the LV end-systolic diameters were larger (P < 0.0001 for each), and the ejection fraction was smaller (P < 0.001) in the A-V shunted rats than in the control rats. Finally, the
calculated stroke volume and cardiac output were significantly higher
in the A-V shunted rats than those in the control rats.
|
Organ wet weights, pleural effusion, and ascites.
As shown in Table 2, the wet weights of
the right and left ventricles and the lungs in the A-V shunted rats
were significantly higher than in the control rats. In addition,
pleural effusion and ascites were apparent in the A-V shunted rats.
|
Evaluation of baseline SNA.
As shown in Fig. 2A, 24-h
urinary epinephrine and norepinephrine excretions were significantly
greater in the A-V shunted rats than in the control rats
(P < 0.01, P < 0.0001 vs. control, respectively). The baseline RSNA, which was evaluated by lowering the
arterial pressure with an intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside, was significantly higher in the A-V shunted rats than in the control rats (P < 0.01, Fig. 2B). The actual RSNA
levels before and after sodium nitroprusside were 61 ± 9 and
156 ± 18 spikes/s, respectively, in the control rats and 230 ± 40 (P < 0.01 vs. control) and 273 ± 39 spikes/s, respectively, in the A-V shunted rats. The changes in MAP did
not differ between the two groups (
36 ± 7 vs.
38 ± 9 mmHg, respectively).
|
Effects of microinjection of CV11974 or
PD123319 into the NTS on arterial
pressure, heart rate, and RSNA.
The microinjection of L-glutamate into the NTS produced
similar decreases in MAP (
15 ± 3 vs.
13 ± 3 mmHg,
control vs. A-V shunted rats) and RSNA (
66 ± 14% vs.
65 ± 12%, control vs. A-V shunted rats) in the two groups.
|
|
|
Effects of microinjection of CV11974 into the area
postrema on arterial pressure, heart rate, and RSNA.
Microinjection of CV11974 (500 pmol) into the area postrema did not
alter arterial pressure (
0.6 vs.
2.4 mmHg), heart rate (
0.8 ± 0.8 vs.
1.0 ± 0.6 beats/min), and RSNA (0% vs. 2 ± 1%) in either group (control rats vs. A-V shunt rats,
n = 5 for each).
ACE-receptor mRNA level.
The expression of ACE-receptor mRNA in the lower brain stem was
determined by Northern blot analysis, as shown in Fig.
5. Densitometric analysis demonstrated
that the ratio of ACE mRNA to GAPDH mRNA was significantly higher in
the A-V shunted rats than in the control rats (P < 0.05).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A major finding in this study is that blocking the AT1 receptors, but not the AT2 receptors, in the NTS reduces arterial pressure, heart rate, and RSNA in rats with an A-V shunt. This suggests that activation of the renin-angiotensin system in the NTS via AT1 receptors contributes to an enhanced SNA in high output HF by an A-V shunt. Furthermore, we found an increase in ACE mRNA levels in the brain stem of rats with an A-V shunt, further supporting the hypothesis of activation of the renin-angiotensin system in the brain stem in this model.
First, we considered the possibility that the greater inhibition of arterial pressure, heart rate, and RSNA in response to the microinjection of CV11974 was due to the increased baseline vasoconstriction in A-V shunt model. This explanation seems unlikely, because a prior injection of L-glutamate produced similar depressor responses in the two groups. The L-glutamate injection, through the observed cardiovascular response to L-glutamate, was also important in the verification of the placement of the injection pipette in the dorsal medial NTS before injection of the AT1- or AT2-receptor antagonist. In addition, the vehicle solution was observed to have no effect on arterial pressure, heart rate, and RSNA, which excludes the possibility of nonspecific effects of the solution.
The A-V shunt model. In our model, high-output HF was produced by a volume overload through an arteriovenous fistula. This model has been used often as a model of HF (1, 6, 15, 17, 23, 45). However, this is an example of circulatory overload, which, in turn, leads to high-output HF (1, 6, 15, 17, 23, 45). Therefore, this model of HF is not consistent with that usually understood in the clinical context with a low cardiac output such as that in dilated cardiomyopathy or ischemic cardiomyopathy. In rats, a myocardial infarction through a coronary ligation is used as a low cardiac output model of HF. However, the mortality of that model is high, and the infarct size varies after a coronary ligation. On the other hand, a genetic model for dilated cardiomyopathy is not available in rats. The A-V fistula preparation of high-output HF is characterized by a circulatory overload. This model will eventually develop signs of ventricular failure with further increases in LVEDP (20). Furthermore, we induced a constriction of a portion of the aorta that was distal to the shunt portion. The addition of the aortic constriction produced HF that was more severe than in the usual arteriovenous shunt model demonstrated by other investigators (20). Our results clearly demonstrated an increased LVEDP, decreased LV dP/dt, enlarged LV end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters, and reduced ejection fraction. A postmortem examination also clearly demonstrated that the wet weights of the right and left ventricles and of the lungs were greater in the A-V shunted rats than in the control rats. In addition, pleural effusion and ascites were evident in the A-V shunted rats. More importantly, our model demonstrated neurohumoral activation, which is now considered an important target in the treatment of HF (32, 34). These results are consistent with those of previous studies (6, 11, 31, 32, 34). Sympathetic nervous system activation was demonstrated in two ways in our model. First, we found an elevated urinary norepinephrine excretion in our A-V shunt model, and second, we evaluated the baseline RSNA by reducing the arterial pressure with an intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside at the point determined to be the maximal RSNA. Our results are consistent with those obtained by Flaim et al. (15).
Activation of the renin-angiotensin system in the NTS in HF. The results of our study demonstrate that the renin-angiotensin system is activated in the NTS by high-output HF. We focused our efforts on the NTS, because this region is known to play an important role in central cardiovascular regulation and to process information from arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors as well as chemoreceptors (3, 10). In addition, the NTS receives inputs from higher centers such as the hypothalamus (10). The primary neurotransmitter in the NTS is believed to be L-glutamate (3, 10). Moreover, ANG II is considered an important neuromodulator in the NTS as well as in other areas of the brain (3, 47); however, the roles played by ANG II in the NTS are not fully understood. Microinjection of ANG II into the NTS has been reported to yield not only pressor, but also depressor effects (16, 36, 42). Microinjection of low doses of ANG II into the NTS in the rat produced hypotension and bradycardia that mimicked stimulation of the baroreceptor reflex (16). In contrast, high doses of ANG II microinjected into the NTS increased arterial pressure (8, 42). The exact mechanisms by which ANG II produces pressor or depressor responses in the NTS are unknown. The activation of different receptor subtypes and affinities may be due to opposite effects of this peptide (3, 16). Alternatively, there may be interactions with primary or other neurotransmitter systems (42). In this case, qualitatively different responses would be possible through different states of activation of other participating systems. On the other hand, microinjection of a nonselective ANG II antagonist, such as [Sar1,Thr8]ANG II or [Sar1,Ala8]ANG II, into the NTS has been shown to facilitate arterial baroreceptor reflex control of heart rate (7, 36), suggesting that endogenous angiotensin reduces arterial baroreflex control. Furthermore, microinjection of the selective AT1-receptor antagonist CV11974 into the NTS facilitates baroreflex control of RSNA (33). Consistent with the results of our study, microinjection of an AT1-receptor antagonist, such as losartan or CV11974, did not alter baseline arterial pressure, heart rate, and/or RSNA in normotensive rats (16, 33). Matsumura et al. (33) also found no effect of microinjection of CV11974 into the NTS on baseline arterial pressure, heart rate, or RSNA in normotensive as well as in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Interestingly, we recently found that microinjection of CV11974 into the NTS produced dose-dependent decreases in arterial pressure, heart rate, and RSNA in hypertensive rats with chronic nitric oxide synthase inhibition (13). These findings are similar to the results of the present study. In our experiments, because the reflex effects on arterial pressure and RSNA unmask the effects of unilateral injection of the drug into the NTS, we performed microinjection of an AT1-receptor antagonist into the NTS after baroreceptor denervation to rule out secondary effects of this drug, because the reflex effects on arterial pressure and RSNA unmask the effects of unilateral injection of the drug into the NTS.
In addition to the microinjection experiments, we measured ACE-receptor mRNA levels in the lower brain stem and found that ACE mRNA levels were greater in the A-V shunted rats than in the sham control rats. Although these results suggest that ANG II in the lower brain stem may be increased in our A-V shunt model, the results of our study do not demonstrate this parameter directly, because we did not measure ANG II concentration in the NTS due to technical problems. Another explanation is that the number of AT1 receptors may be increased in our model. All components of the renin-angiotensin system exist independently in the brain as well as in various other peripheral organs and tissues (47). The brain is one of the major sites of ACE mRNA expression (46), and the NTS has been demonstrated to have few AT2 receptors (2, 4, 48). Thus it is possible that activation of the renin-angiotensin system occurs in the brain as well as peripheral organs and tissues in the A-V shunted rats via the AT1 receptors.The brain renin-angiotensin system and the sympathetic nervous system in HF. Recent studies have demonstrated that the brain renin-angiotensin system is activated in HF via AT1 receptors and contributes to an enhanced SNA in HF. DiBona et al. (11) have shown that the intracerebroventricular administration of losartan to conscious rats with myocardial infarction decreases RSNA and increases arterial baroreflex gain. These results suggest that ANG II in the brain contributes to both the increased basal level of RSNA and the attenuated arterial baroreflex control of RSNA in HF. However, there are many sites of ANG II binding in the brain stem, including the NTS, the area postrema, and the rostral and caudal regions of the VLM (47). In the NTS, ANG II injection decreases arterial baroreflex gain, whereas a [Sar1,Thr8]ANG II injection increases arterial baroreflex gain (7). Zhang et al. (51) have shown that the chronic increase in sympathetoexcitation, decrease in sympathoinhibition, and desensitized baroreflex function in HF may depend on the brain renin-angiotensin system, because these changes can be normalized by a chronic central AT1-receptor blockade with losartan. In the same laboratory, Leenen et al. (26) demonstrated that increased brain levels of ouabain activate the brain renin-angiotensin system in HF. However, the precise mechanisms and sites by which the brain renin-angiotensin system is activated in HF cannot be determined based on the results of these studies. Our results indicate the importance of the NTS in the activation of the renin-angiotensin system and the subsequent increase in RSNA in high-output HF due to an A-V shunt.
Areas in the brain other than the NTS may play a role in activation of the sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin system. Recent studies using immunohistochemical detection of Fra-like immunoreactivity as a marker of long-term neuronal activation have demonstrated that the paraventricular nucleus, supraoptic nucleus, and locus ceruleus as well as the NTS have significant increases in numbers of Fra-positive neurons in rats with myocardial infarction (44). Further studies will be needed to examine whether these areas also exhibit activation of the renin-angiotensin system in HF leading to an enhanced SNA. Although AT1 receptors are rich in the area postrema, we found no effect of microinjection of CV11974 into the area postrema. The significance and exlanation for this finding is unclear.Limitations of this study. As mentioned above, our model is not a low cardiac output model of HF. Although the A-V shunt model produces high-output HF and neurohumoral activation (15, 45), further studies will be needed to determine whether activation of the renin-angiotensin system in the NTS occurs in a low cardiac output model of HF.
We used sodium nitroprusside to determine the maximal level of RSNA as one of the markers of the increased SNA in this model. Because baroreflex function is abnormal in HF, determining the maximal level of RSNA by this method is difficult. However, the reduction of arterial pressure by ~40 mmHg is known to produce maximal increases in SNA that eventually reach a plateau (43). The reduction of arterial pressure by infusion of sodium nitroprusside did not differ between the A-V shunted rats and the control rats. Furthermore, we measured the urinary catecholamine excretion as another index of increased SNA in the A-V shunt model. Renal function may be impaired in rats with an A-V shunt, and normalization by urinary creatinine excretion would be an improved method. However, we observed clear differences without such normalization. We evaluated multifiber recordings of RSNA between rats by counting spikes per second, which might underestimate the level of RSNA (22). Therefore, we normalized RSNA, as shown in Fig. 2B, although we observed a significantly increased baseline RSNA. Clear differences were still observed between the two groups. Thus we believe that endogenous ANG II, via AT1 receptors, increases RSNA in our model. In summary, our results strongly suggest that endogenous ANG II in the NTS contributes to the increased sympathetic drive in high-output HF generated by an A-V shunt via AT1 receptors but not via AT2 receptors.Perspectives
Recently, Liu and Zucker (30) proposed the hypothesis that both a loss of nitric oxide and an increase in ANG II are necessary for sustained increases in SNA in HF. Nitric oxide has been shown to play an important role in the NTS in controlling the sympathetic nervous system (19). Thus the nitric oxide system may be altered in HF (40, 49, 50) and contribute to enhanced SNA as well as activation of the renin-angiotensin system. In addition, recent clinical studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors and AT1-receptor antagonists in patients with HF (32, 34). Some evidence suggests that, after oral administration, AT1-receptor antagonists such as losartan cross the blood-brain barrier and affect the brain renin-angiotensin system (28). Development of a new AT1-receptor antagonist, which has more affinity for the brain, may be desirable for the treatment of patients with chronic HF.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan (C11670689).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The results of this study were presented in part at the 71st Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Dallas, TX, November 8-11, 1998 (Circulation 98: I-211, 1998).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Y. Hirooka, Dept. of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu Univ., 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan (E-mail: hyoshi{at}cardiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 7 August 2000; accepted in final form 7 February 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Abassi, ZA,
Gurbanov K,
Mulroney SE,
Potlog C,
Opgenorth TJ,
Hoffman A,
Haramati A,
and
Winaver J.
Impaired nitric oxide-mediated renal vasodilation in rats with experimental heart failure.
Circulation
96:
3655-3664,
1997
2.
Allen, AM,
Moeller I,
Jenkins TA,
Zhuo J,
Aldred GP,
Chai SY,
and
Mendelsohn FAO
Angiotensin receptors in the nervous system.
Brain Res Bull
47:
17-28,
1998[ISI][Medline].
3.
Andresen, MC.
Nucleus tractus solitarius
gateway to neural circulatory control.
Annu Rev Physiol
56:
93-116,
1994[ISI][Medline].
4.
Barnes, KL,
McQueeney AJ,
and
Ferrario CM.
Receptor subtype that mediates the neuronal effects of angiotensin II in the rat dorsal medulla.
Brain Res Bull
31:
195-200,
1993[ISI][Medline].
5.
Brändle, M,
Patel KP,
Wang W,
and
Zucker IH.
Hemodynamic and norepinephrine responses to pacing-induced heart failure in conscious sinoaortic-denervated dogs.
J Appl Physiol
81:
1855-1862,
1996
6.
Brodski, S,
Gurbanov K,
Abassi Z,
Hoffman A,
Ruffodo RR, Jr,
Feuerstein GZ,
and
Winaver J.
Effects of eprosartan on renal function and cardiac hypertrophy in rats with experimental heart failure.
Hypertension
32:
746-752,
1998
7.
Campagnole-Santos, MJ,
Diz DI,
and
Ferrario CM.
Baroreceptor reflex modulation by angiotensin II at the nucleus tractus solitarii.
Hypertension
11, Suppl1:
I167-I171,
1988.
8.
Casto, R,
and
Phillips MI.
Mechanism of pressor effects by angiotensin in the nucleus tractus solitarius of rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
247:
R575-R581,
1984.
9.
Chevillard, C,
and
Saavedra JM.
Distribution of angiotensin converting enzyme activity in specific areas of the rat brain stem.
J Neurochem
38:
281-284,
1982[ISI][Medline].
10.
Dampney, RAL
Functional organization of central pathways regulating the cardiovascular system.
Physiol Rev
74:
323-364,
1994
11.
DiBona, GF,
Jones SY,
and
Brooks VL.
ANG II receptor blockade and arterial baroreflex regulation of renal nerve activity in cardiac failure.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
269:
R1189-R1196,
1995
12.
Dzau, VJ,
Ingelfinger J,
Pratt RE,
and
Ellison KE.
Identification of renin and angiotensinogen messenger RNA sequences in mouse and rat brains.
Hypertension
8:
544-548,
1986
13.
Eshima, K,
Hirooka Y,
Shigematsu H,
Matsuo I,
Koike G,
Sakai K,
and
Takeshita A.
Angiotensin in the nucleus tractus solitarii contributes to neurogenic hypertension caused by chronic nitric oxide synthase inhibition.
Hypertension
36:
259-263,
2000
14.
Feng, QP,
Carlsson S,
Thoren P,
and
Hender T.
Characteristics of renal sympathetic nerve activity in experimental congestive heart failure in the rat.
Acta Physiol Scand
150:
259-266,
1994[ISI][Medline].
15.
Flaim, SF,
Minteer WJ,
Nellis SH,
and
Clark DP.
Chronic arteriovenous shunt: evaluation of a model for heart failure in rat.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
236:
H698-H704,
1979
16.
Fow, JE,
Averill DB,
and
Barnes KL.
Mechanisms of angiotensin-induced hypotension and bradycardia in the medial solitary tract nucleus.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
267:
H259-H266,
1994
17.
Garcia, R,
and
Diebold S.
Simple, and rapid, and effective method of producing aortocaval shunts in the rat.
Cardiovasc Res
24:
430-432,
1990
18.
Gehlert, DR,
Gackenheimer SL,
and
Schober DA.
Autoradiographic localization of subtypes of angiotensin II antagonist binding in the brain.
Neuroscience
44:
501-514,
1991[ISI][Medline].
19.
Harada, S,
Tokunaga S,
Momohara M,
Masaki H,
Tagawa T,
Imaizumi T,
and
Takeshita A.
Inhibition of nitric oxide formation in the nucleus tractus solitarius increases renal sympathetic nerve activity in rabbits.
Circ Res
72:
511-516,
1993
20.
Hirano, S,
Imamura T,
Matsuo T,
Ishiyama Y,
Kato J,
Kitamura K,
Koiwaya Y,
and
Eto T.
Differential responses of circulating and tissue adrenomedullin and gene expression to volume overload.
J Card Fail
6:
120-129,
2000[ISI][Medline].
21.
Hirooka, Y,
Polson JW,
and
Dampney RAL
Pressor and sympathoexcitatory effects of nitric oxide in the rostral ventrolateral medulla.
J Hypertens
14:
1317-1324,
1996[ISI][Medline].
22.
Hopp, FA,
Seagard JL,
and
Kampine JP.
Comparison of four methods of averaging nerve activity.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
251:
R700-R711,
1986
23.
Huang, M,
LeBlanc MH,
and
Hester R.
Evaluation of the needle technique for producing an arteriovanous fistula.
J Appl Physiol
77:
2907-2911,
1994
24.
Koike, G,
Kriger JE,
Jacob HJ,
Mukoyama M,
Pratt RE,
and
Dzau VJ.
Angiotensin converting enzyme and genetic hypertension: cloning of rat cDNAs and characterization of the enzyme.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
198:
380-386,
1994[ISI][Medline].
25.
Krassioulov, AV,
and
Weaver LC.
Connections between the pontine reticular formation and rostral ventrolateral medulla.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
265:
H1386-H1392,
1993
26.
Leenen, FHH,
Yuan B,
and
Huang BS.
Brain "ouabain" and angiotensin II contribute to cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
277:
H1786-H1792,
1999
27.
Levett, JM,
Marinelli CC,
Lund DD,
Pardini BJ,
Nader S,
Scott BD,
Augelli NV,
Kerber RE,
and
Schmid PD, Jr.
Effects of
-blockade on neurohumoral responses and neurochemical markers in pacing-induced heart failure.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
266:
H468-H475,
1994
28.
Li, Z,
Bains JS,
and
Ferguson AV.
Functional evidence that the angiotensin losartan crosses the blood-brain barrier in the rat.
Brain Res Bull
30:
33-39,
1993[ISI][Medline].
29.
Lind, RW,
Swanson LW,
and
Ganten D.
Organization of angiotensin II immunoreactive cells and fibers in the rat central nervous system.
Neuroendocrinology
40:
2-24,
1985[ISI][Medline].
30.
Liu, J-L,
and
Zucker IH.
Regulation of sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure: a role for nitric oxide and angiotensin II.
Circ Res
84:
417-423,
1999
31.
Lohmeier, TE,
Mizelle HL,
Reinhart GA,
and
Montani J-P.
Influence of angiotensin on the early progression of heart failure.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
278:
R74-R86,
2000
32.
Mark, AL.
Sympathetic dysregulation in heart failure: mechanisms and therapy.
Clin Cardiol
18, SupplI:
I-3-I-8,
1995.
33.
Matsumura, K,
Averill DB,
and
Ferrario CM.
Angiotensin II acts at AT1 receptors in the nucleus of the solitary tract to attenuate the baroreceptor reflex.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
275:
R1611-R1619,
1998
34.
Middlekauff, HR,
and
Mark AL.
The treatment of heart failure: the role of neurohumoral activation.
Intern Med
37:
112-122,
1998[ISI][Medline].
35.
Mungall, BA,
Shinkel TA,
and
Sernia C.
Immunocytochemical localization of angiotensinogen in the fetal and neonatal rat brain.
Neuroscience
67:
505-524,
1995[ISI][Medline].
36.
Mosqueda-Garcia, R,
Tseng C-J,
Appalsamy M,
and
Robertson D.
Cardiovascular effects of microinjection of angiotensin II in the brainstem of renal hypertensive rats.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
255:
374-381,
1990
37.
Murakami, H,
Liu J-L,
and
Zucker IH.
Blockade of AT1 receptors enhances baroreflex control of heart rate in conscious rabbits with heart failure.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
271:
R303-R309,
1996
38.
Murakami, H,
Liu J-L,
and
Zucker IH.
Angiotensin II enhances baroreflex control of sympathetic outflow in heart failure.
Hypertension
29:
564-569,
1997
39.
Numaguchi K, Egashira K, Takemoto M, Kadokami T, Shimokawa H, Sueishi
K, and Takeshita A. Chronic inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis
causes coronary microvascular remodeling in rats. Hypertension
26: 957-962.
40.
Patel, KP,
Zhang K,
Zucker IH,
and
Krukoff TL.
Decreased gene expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in hypothalamus and brainstem of rats in heart failure.
Brain Res
734:
109-115,
1996[ISI][Medline].
41.
Rector, TS,
Olivari MT,
Levine TB,
Francis GS,
and
Cohn JN.
Predicting survival for an individual with congestive heart failure using the plasma norepinephrine concentration.
Am Heart J
114:
148-152,
1987[ISI][Medline].
42.
Rettig, R,
Healy DP,
and
Printz MP.
Cardiovascular effects of microinjections of angiotensin II into the nucleus tractus solitarii.
Brain Res
364:
233-240,
1986[ISI][Medline].
43.
Takishita, S,
and
Ferrario CM.
Altered control of cardiovascular function in sodium-depleted dogs.
Hypertension
4, SupplII:
175-182,
1982
44.
Vahid-Ansari, F,
and
Leenen FHH
Pattern of neuronal activation in rats with CHF after myocardial infarction.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
275:
H2140-H2146,
1998
45.
Villarreal, D,
Freeman RH,
and
Johnson RA.
Neurohumoral modulators and sodium balance in experimental heart failure.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
264:
H1187-H1193,
1993
46.
Whiting, P,
Nava S,
Mozley L,
Eastham H,
and
Poat J.
Expression of angiotensin converting enzyme mRNA in rat brain.
Mol Brain Res
11:
93-96,
1991[Medline].
47.
Wright, JW,
and
Harding JW.
Regulatory role of brain angiotensins in the control of physiological and behavioral responses.
Brain Res Rev
17:
227-262,
1992[Medline].
48.
Wright, JW,
and
Harding JW.
Brain angiotensin receptor subtypes in the control of physiological and behavioral responses.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
18:
21-53,
1994[ISI][Medline].
49.
Zhang, K,
and
Patel KP.
Effects of nitric oxide within the paraventricular nucleus on renal sympathetic nerve discharge: role of GABA.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
275:
R728-R734,
1998
50.
Zhang, K,
Zucker IH,
and
Patel KP.
Altered number of diaphorase (NOS) positive neurons in the hypothalamus of rats with heart failure.
Brain Res
786:
219-225,
1998[ISI][Medline].
51.
Zhang, W,
Huang BS,
and
Leenen FHH
Brain renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic hyperactivity in rats after myocardial infarction.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
276:
H1608-H1615,
1999
52.
Zucker, IH,
Wang W,
Brändle M,
Schultz HD,
and
Patel KP.
Neural regulation of sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis
37:
397-414,
1995[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.-Z. Wang, L. Gao, H.-J. Wang, I. H. Zucker, and W. Wang Interaction between cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex and chemoreflex is mediated by the NTS AT1 receptors in heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): H1216 - H1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bishara, H. Shiekh, T. Karram, I. Rubinstein, Z. S. Azzam, N. Abu-Saleh, S. Nitecki, J. Winaver, A. Hoffman, and Z. A. Abassi Effects of Novel Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists on Renal Function and Cardiac Hypertrophy in Rats with Experimental Congestive Heart Failure J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2008; 326(2): 414 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-Z. Wang, L. Gao, Y.-X. Pan, I. H. Zucker, and W. Wang AT1 receptors in the nucleus tractus solitarii mediate the interaction between the baroreflex and the cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex in anesthetized rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): R1137 - R1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sakima, D. B. Averill, S. O. Kasper, L. Jackson, D. Ganten, C. M. Ferrario, P. E. Gallagher, and D. I. Diz Baroreceptor reflex regulation in anesthetized transgenic rats with low glia-derived angiotensinogen Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): H1412 - H1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sherrod, D. R. Davis, X. Zhou, M. D. Cassell, and C. D. Sigmund Glial-specific ablation of angiotensinogen lowers arterial pressure in renin and angiotensinogen transgenic mice Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): R1763 - R1769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sakai, Y. Hirooka, H. Shigematsu, T. Kishi, K. Ito, H. Shimokawa, A. Takeshita, and K. Sunagawa Overexpression of eNOS in brain stem reduces enhanced sympathetic drive in mice with myocardial infarction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): H2159 - H2166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Persson The kidney and hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2003; 284(5): R1176 - R1178. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Lohmeier Neurohumoral regulation of arterial pressure in hemorrhage and heart failure Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): R810 - R814. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Stauss Baroreceptor reflex function Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): R284 - R286. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Skott Renin Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2002; 282(4): R937 - R939. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||