|
|
||||||||
Departments of Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Division of Cardiology, General Clinical Research Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies
have suggested that premenopausal women are more prone to orthostatic
intolerance than men. Additionally, it has been postulated that the
vestibulosympathetic reflex is important in regulating postural-related
changes in sympathetic activity. The purpose of the present study was
to determine whether men and women differ in their sympathetic and
cardiovascular responses to stimulation of the otolith organs elicited
by head-down rotation (HDR). Heart rate (HR), arterial pressure, calf
blood flow (CBF), and leg muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were
measured during 3 min of HDR in the prone posture in 33 women and 30 men. With the exception of HR (71 ± 2 and 63 ± 1 beats/min
for women and men, respectively; P < 0.01), all
baseline variables were not different between genders. There were no
gender differences in responses to HDR. MSNA increased 72 ± 33 units (43%) in the men and 88 ± 15 units (59%) in the women
during HDR (P < 0.01). CBF decreased [
0.6 ± 0.1 (15%) and
0.5 ± 0.1 (19%)
ml · min
1 · 100 ml
1] and
calf vascular resistance increased [8 ± 2 (21%) and 11 ± 3 (25%) units during HDR for men and women, respectively
(P < 0.01)]. Both in the men and women, HR increased
2 ± 1 beats/min (P < 0.01). These results
demonstrate that sympathetic activation during HDR in the prone posture
is similar in men and women. Therefore, these findings suggest that the
vestibulosympathetic reflex is not different between healthy men and women.
autonomic nervous system; cardiovascular control; orthostasis; gender; spaceflight
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ORTHOSTATIC INTOLERANCE IS the inability of the cardiovascular system to maintain adequate cerebral blood flow while in the upright posture. Symptoms associated with this syndrome include lightheadedness, nausea, and dizziness, which then may lead to syncope. Although orthostatic intolerance affects men and women both, it appears more commonly in women (19). A series of studies have shown women less tolerant to lower body negative pressure (LBNP) than men (2, 4, 8, 15, 23). In one study, it was reported that women were as much as 62% less tolerant than men during LBNP (23). Similarly, women have demonstrated greater orthostatic intolerance to standing after spaceflight (7). The exact mechanisms contributing to gender differences in orthostatic intolerance are unknown. However, because plasma norepinephrine responsiveness has been shown to be less during presyncopal LBNP and head-up tilt in women than men (1, 2, 13), this finding suggests that impaired neural mechanisms could play a role in the greater orthostatic intolerance in women.
One neural mechanism that may contribute to differences in orthostatic tolerance between men and women is the vestibulosympathetic reflex. The vestibular system has been shown to assist in the maintenance of arterial pressure during an orthostatic challenge and to activate sympathetic nerve activity in animals (3, 10, 25, 26) and humans (9, 16, 18, 21). In the cat, bilateral transection of the vestibular nerve results in an inability to compensate for postural-associated changes in arterial pressure (3, 10). However, with an intact vestibular system, arterial pressure is quickly restored with a concomitant increase in vascular resistance to compliant vascular beds. In humans, head-down rotation (HDR) in the prone posture results in a prompt increase in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) (9, 16, 17, 21). The increase in MSNA to HDR has been attributed to the activation of the otolith organs of the vestibular apparatus (9, 16, 18, 21).
Because our previous human studies examining the vestibulosympathetic reflex have focused on physiological responses to HDR without specific consideration of potential gender differences, the purpose of this study was to compare the vestibulosympathetic reflex between healthy men and women. With increasing evidence that women are more susceptible to orthostatic intolerance, it was hypothesized that HDR would elicit smaller increases in MSNA and vascular responses in women compared with men.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects.
Thirty-three women and thirty men volunteered for this study. All
subjects were healthy, nonsmoking, normotensive adults and were not
taking medicine at the time of the study. Data used for this study were
collected both prospectively and retrospectively. Physical
characteristics both for the men and women are shown in Table
1. In the 14 women who were tested
prospectively, 11 women were taking oral contraceptives. The testing
procedures were explained before obtaining written consent from all of
the subjects. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine.
|
Experimental design. All of the studies were performed with the subject positioned prone on a table to allow maximal HDR. The protocol began with a 3-min baseline period with the subject's neck extended and the chin supported (21). After the baseline period, the subject's head was passively lowered below the edge of the table for 3 min with the assistance of another individual. The subject's head was then returned to the erect baseline position for an additional 3-min period of data collection.
Leg MSNA, calf blood flow (CBF), arterial pressure, and heart rate were measured during the entire protocol. Calf vascular resistance (CVR) was determined by dividing mean arterial pressure (MAP) by CBF for each minute. CBF was measured in only 20 men and 19 women. Ambient temperature in the laboratory during these experiments ranged from 21 to 24°C.Measurements. Multifiber recordings of MSNA were made by inserting a tungsten microelectrode into a peripheral nerve located behind the knee. A reference electrode was positioned subcutaneously 2-3 cm away from the recording electrode. Criteria for an acceptable recording of MSNA have been previously reported (9). The nerve signal was amplified (50,000-90,000 times) and filtered at a band width of 700-2,000 Hz. The filtered signal was rectified and integrated (time constant, 0.1 s) to obtain a mean voltage display of the nerve activity. Sympathetic recordings that indicated possible electrode site shifts or had electromyogram activity during the experiment were excluded.
Continuous measurements of arterial pressure and heart rate were made by a Finapres blood pressure monitoring unit (Ohmeda, Englewood, CO). CBF was measured in the contralateral leg to the nerve recording by venous occlusion plethysmography (Hokanson EC 4 plethysmograph, D. E. Hokanson, Bellevue, WA) using a mercury-in-Silastic strain gauge placed around the largest diameter of the calf muscles. Circulation to the foot was arrested by inflating a sphygmomanometer cuff around the ankle to 200 mmHg. A venous congesting cuff was placed around the upper leg and inflated to a pressure of 40 mmHg at 15-s intervals. The mean voltage neurogram, heart rate, arterial pressure tracing, and CBF were collected (MacLab 8e, ADInstruments, Milford, MA) and routed to an online computer (PowerMac G3, Apple) for monitoring and data-collection purposes throughout the study.Data analysis. MSNA was expressed both as burst frequency (bursts/min) and total activity. Sympathetic bursts were identified by inspection of the mean voltage neurogram. Total activity was calculated by summing the area of identified bursts for each minute using a computer program (Peaks, ADInstruments). Total activity was expressed in arbitrary units.
An unpaired t-test was used to compare the physical characteristics and baseline values between the men and women. HDR data were analyzed by a one-within (time), one-between (gender) repeated-measures analysis of variance. A significance level of P < 0.05 was used for statistical tests. Because the responses during 3-min of HDR were not significantly different, only the data for the first minute are presented. All values are presented as means ± SE.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects. The physical and baseline characteristics for the men and women are presented in Table 1. There were no age differences between the men and women; however, body mass (77 ± 2 and 63 ± 2 kg) and body mass index (25 ± 2 and 23 ± 3 kg/m2) were significantly greater in the men (P < 0.01). Resting MSNA, MAP, CBF, and CVR were not different between the men and women (Table 1). However, women had higher resting heart rates than men (71 ± 2 and 63 ± 1 beats/min, respectively; P < 0.01).
Sympathetic and cardiovascular responses to HDR.
Responses to HDR were not different between genders (i.e., no
significant interaction or main effect for gender). MSNA burst frequency and total activity increased significantly during HDR by
44 ± 10% and 59 ± 11% for women and 33 ± 14% and
43 ± 12% for men, respectively (P < 0.01; Fig.
1). The increase in MSNA corresponded with a decrease in CBF (19 ± 3% and 15 ± 4%
ml · min
1 · 100 ml
1;
P < 0.01) and an increase in CVR (25 ± 3% and
21 ± 6% units; P < 0.01) during HDR for women
and men, respectively (P < 0.01; Fig.
2). Heart rate increased 2 ± 1 beats/min during HDR for men and women (P < 0.01). HDR
did not elicit a change in MAP in both groups. All variables returned
to pre-HDR values on return of the head to the upright (i.e., baseline)
position.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purpose of this investigation was to examine whether women and men differ in their sympathetic and cardiovascular responses to HDR in the prone posture. Because women have been reported to be less tolerant to orthostatic challenges than men (2, 4, 8, 15, 23), it was hypothesized that women's MSNA responses to HDR would be less than men. However, contrary to the proposed hypothesis, the major finding from this study was that men and women have comparable sympathetic and cardiovascular responses to HDR. These findings indicate that the vestibulosympathetic reflex is engaged similarly in healthy men and women during HDR.
Our laboratory has been investigating the vestibulosympathetic reflex in humans. These studies have demonstrated significant increases in MSNA during HDR. Through a number of experiments, our results suggest that the increase in MSNA elicited by HDR is mediated by the vestibular system. Specifically, our previous results indicate that the otolith organs, not the semicircular canals, mediate increases in MSNA (18). Potential mechanisms such as neck afferents, central command, visual inputs, baroreflexes, and activation of nonspecific receptors from the head have been demonstrated not to contribute to increases in MSNA. Thus HDR is a simple test of altered input from the otolith organs on the sympathetic nervous system. The current study again demonstrates increases in MSNA and CVR with HDR in a large number of young subjects. However, the current study extends our previous findings by demonstrating similar MSNA and CVR responses to HDR both in men and women.
A number of studies has reported less orthostatic tolerance in women
than men (2, 4, 8, 15, 23). Additionally, it has been
estimated that of the 500,000 Americans suffering from orthostatic
intolerance, young women comprise the largest segment of this
population (19). In recent years, considerable effort has
been made to determine possible mechanisms responsible for this greater
incidence of orthostatic intolerance in women. Convertino
(2) comprehensively examined a number of mechanisms that
could contribute to lower orthostatic tolerance in women. LBNP
tolerance in women was associated with attenuated heart rate responses
to carotid baroreceptor stimulation, greater drop in cardiac output
during LBNP, increased
1-adrenoreceptor
responsiveness, lower blood volume, and lower levels of circulating
norepinephrine at presyncope compared with men. This latter finding
of lower circulating norepinephrine in women had been also reported
during head-up tilt (1, 13, 24). Decreased
responsiveness of norepinephrine to LBNP and head-up tilt in women
compared with men suggests that a neural mechanism could account for
gender differences in orthostatic tolerance. Because the
vestibulosympathetic reflex has been shown to contribute importantly to
orthostasis (3, 10), it was feasible that the
vestibulosympathetic reflex could be different between men and women
and result in less sympathetic outflow in women when engaged. However,
the results of this study suggest this is not the case.
Because input from the otolith organs was altered during HDR when other neural reflex mechanisms were not, we cannot rule out the possibility that during an orthostatic stress (i.e., LBNP or standing), central integration of the vestibulosympathetic reflex with other neural reflexes on sympathetic outflow is different in men and women. As stated previously, it has been reported that women and men respond to orthostatic stresses by activating different compensatory mechanisms (2). Additionally, these data do not rule out a role for the vestibular otolith organs in explaining gender differences in orthostasis after exposure to microgravity. Female astronauts are less tolerant to standing and exhibit more episodes of syncope than male astronauts after exposure to microgravity (7). Exposure to microgravity has been reported to change the morphological and physiological function of the otolith organs (20, 22). Consequently, the otolith organs could be unable to respond properly on reentry to the earth's gravitational forces and could alter the vestibulosympathetic reflex.
The small increase in heart rate with the HDR was comparable between men and women. On the basis of previous work, it is believed that this small increase is related to activation of neck afferents (16). We have noted small increases in heart rate when the neck afferents, but not the otolith organs, were engaged with different head movements. The increase in heart rate by the neck afferents may be mediated by either vagal withdrawal or sympathetic activation. Because of the rapidity of the increase in heart rate, this points to parasympathetic withdrawal. However, the current study was not designed to specifically answer this question.
Previous human studies have compared sympathetic responses to other physical stressors in men and women. Studies examining responses during cold and mental stress have found no gender differences in MSNA responses (12). Examination of the arterial chemoreflex using hypoxia has also found no differences in peak MSNA responses (11). However, earlier MSNA responses to hypoxia were noticed in women. MSNA responses to isometric handgrip have produced equivocal results. Studies have reported no difference (12) and attenuated responses (5) to isometric handgrip in women compared with men. Differences between these results may be related to what phase in the menstrual cycle the women were tested (6). The current finding that MSNA responses to the vestibulosympathetic reflex elicited by HDR is similar between men and women adds to this growing body of data regarding possible gender differences in reflex control of MSNA.
One limitation of the current study is that the menstrual cycle in the women was not controlled. Minson et al. (14) recently reported that baseline MSNA and sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was altered by the menstrual cycle. Thus it is possible the conclusions derived from this study could be different if the menstrual cycle was controlled. However, because arterial pressure was not changed by HDR in the women, this would appear to minimize the impact of this factor.
In summary, HDR elicited similar sympathetic and cardiovascular responses in men and women. These results suggest that the vestibulosympathetic reflex is not different between healthy men and women. Thus the greater incidence of orthostatic intolerance in otherwise healthy women appears not to be related to functional differences in vestibular activation of the sympathetic nervous system.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The author appreciates the technical assistance of Heidi Harris and Keith Hume.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This project was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-58503) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAG 9-1034). Additional support was provided by the National Institutes of Health-sponsored General Clinical Research Center with a National Center for Research Resources Grant M01-RR10732.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. A. Ray, Penn State College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Div. of Cardiology H047, 500 Univ. Drive, Hershey, PA 17033 (E-mail: caray{at}psu.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 16 March 2000; accepted in final form 5 June 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Barnett, SR,
Morin RJ,
Kiely DK,
Gagnon M,
Azhar G,
Knight EL,
Nelson JC,
and
Lipsitz LA.
Effects of age and gender on autonomic control of blood pressure dynamics.
Hypertension
33:
1195-200,
1999
2.
Convertino, VA.
Gender differences in autonomic functions associated with blood pressure regulation.
Am J PhysiolRegulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
275:
R1909-R1920,
1998
3.
Doba, N,
and
Reis DJ.
Role of the cerebellum and the vestibular apparatus in regulation of orthostatic reflexes in the cat.
Circ Res
40:
9-18,
1974[Medline].
4.
El-Bedawi, KM,
and
Hainsworth R.
Combined head-up tilt and lower body suction: a test of orthostatic tolerance.
Clin Auton Res
4:
41-47,
1994[Medline].
5.
Ettinger, SM,
Silber DH,
Collins BG,
Gray KS,
Sutliff G,
Whisler SK,
McClain JM,
Smith MB,
Yang QX,
and
Sinoway LI.
Influences of gender on sympathetic nerve responses to static exercise.
J Appl Physiol
80:
245-251,
1996
6.
Ettinger, SM,
Silber DH,
Gray KS,
Smith MB,
Yang QX,
Kunselman AR,
and
Sinoway LI.
Effects of the ovarian cycle on sympathetic neural outflow during static exercise.
J Appl Physiol
85:
2075-2081,
1998
7.
Fritsch-Yelle, JM,
Whitson PA,
Bondar RL,
and
Brown TE.
Subnormal norepinephrine release relates to presyncope in astronauts after spaceflight.
J Appl Physiol
81:
2134-2141,
1996
8.
Hordinsky, JR,
Gebhardt U,
Wegmann HM,
and
Schafer G.
Cardiovascular and biochemical response to simulated space flight entry.
Aviat Space Environ Med
52:
16-18,
1981[Medline].
9.
Hume, KM,
and
Ray CA.
Sympathetic responses to head-down rotations in humans.
J Appl Physiol
86:
1971-1976,
1999
10.
Jian, BJ,
Cotter LA,
Emanuel BA,
Cass SP,
and
Yates BJ.
Effects of bilateral vestibular lesions on orthostatic tolerance in awake cats.
J Appl Physiol
86:
1552-1560,
1999
11.
Jones, PP,
Davy KP,
and
Seals DR.
Influence of gender on the sympathetic neural adjustments to alterations in systemic oxygen levels in humans.
Clin Physiol
19:
153-160,
1999[ISI][Medline].
12.
Jones, PP,
Spraul M,
Matt KS,
Seals DR,
Skinner JS,
and
Ravussin E.
Gender does not influence sympathetic neural reactivity to stress in healthy humans.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
270:
H350-H357,
1996
13.
Lenders, JWM,
Willemen JJ,
de Boo T,
Lemmens WAJ,
and
Thien T.
Lower increase in plasma catecholamines in both normo- and hypertensive women than in men after adrenergic stimulation.
J Hypertens
5, Suppl5:
S337-S339,
1987.
14.
Minson, CT,
Halliwill JR,
Young TM,
and
Joyner MJ.
Influence of the menstrual cycle on sympathetic activity, baroreflex sensitivity, and vascular transduction in young women.
Circulation
101:
862-868,
2000
15.
Montgomery, LD,
Kirk PJ,
Payne PA,
Gerber RL,
Newton SD,
and
Williams BA.
Cardiovascular responses of men and women to lower body negative pressure.
Aviat Space Environ Med
48:
138-145,
1977[Medline].
16.
Ray, CA,
and
Hume KM.
Neck afferents and muscle sympathetic activity in humans: implications for the vestibulosympathetic reflex.
J Appl Physiol
84:
450-453,
1998
17.
Ray, CA,
Hume KM,
and
Shortt TL.
Skin sympathetic outflow during head-down neck flexion in humans.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
273:
R1142-R1146,
1997
18.
Ray, CA,
Hume KM,
and
Steele SL.
Sympathetic nerve activity during natural stimulation of horizontal semicircular canals in humans.
Am J PhysiolRegulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
275:
R1274-R1278,
1998
19.
Robertson, D.
The epidemic of orthostatic tachycardia and orthostatic intolerance.
Am J Med Sci
317:
75-77,
1999[ISI][Medline].
20.
Ross, MD.
Morphological changes in rat vestibular system following weightlessness.
J Vestib Res
3:
241-251,
1993[Medline].
21.
Shortt, TL,
and
Ray CA.
Sympathetic and vascular responses to head-down neck flexion in humans.
Am J PhysiolHeart Circ Physiol
272:
H1780-H1784,
1997
22.
Von Baumgarten, RJ.
European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 1. Overview.
Exp Brain Res
64:
239-246,
1986[ISI][Medline].
23.
White, DD,
Gotshall RW,
and
Tucker A.
Women have lower tolerance to lower body negative pressure than men.
J Appl Physiol
80:
1138-1143,
1996
24.
White, M,
Courtemanche M,
Stewart DJ,
Talajic M,
Mikes E,
Cernacek P,
Vantrimpont P,
Leclerc D,
Bussieres L,
and
Rouleau JL.
Age- and gender-related changes in endothelin and catecholamine release and in autonomic balance in response to head-up tilt.
Clin Sci (Colch)
93:
309-316,
1997[Medline].
25.
Woodring, SF,
Rossiter CD,
and
Yates BJ.
Pressor response elicited by nose-up vestibular stimulation in cats.
Exp Brain Res
113:
165-168,
1997[ISI][Medline].
26.
Yates, BJ,
and
Miller AD.
Properties of sympathetic reflexes elicited by natural vestibular stimulation: implications for cardiovascular control.
J Neurophysiol
71:
2087-2092,
1994
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. L. Sauder, T. O. Leonard, and C. A. Ray Greater sensitivity of the vestibulosympathetic reflex in the upright posture in humans J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 65 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Lawrence, C. A. Ray, and J. R. Carter Vestibulosympathetic reflex during the early follicular and midluteal phases of the menstrual cycle Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2008; 294(6): E1046 - E1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Carter and C. A. Ray Sympathetic responses to vestibular activation in humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R681 - R688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Momen, B. Handly, A. Kunselman, U. A. Leuenberger, and L. I. Sinoway Influence of sex and active muscle mass on renal vascular responses during static exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H121 - H126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Cason, M. DenBleyker, K. Ferrence, J. C. Smith, and T. A. Houpt Sex and estrous cycle differences in the behavioral effects of high-strength static magnetic fields: role of ovarian steroids Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): R659 - R667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Xue, K. Skala, T. A. Jones, and M. Hay Diminished baroreflex control of heart rate responses in otoconia-deficient C57BL/6JEi head tilt mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): H741 - H747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Monahan and C. A. Ray Vestibulosympathetic reflex during orthostatic challenge in aging humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): R1027 - R1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Carter, C. A. Ray, and W. H. Cooke Vestibulosympathetic reflex during mental stress J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2002; 93(4): 1260 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Monahan and C. A. Ray Interactive effect of hypoxia and otolith organ engagement on cardiovascular regulation in humans J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2002; 93(2): 576 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Shoemaker, C. S. Hogeman, M. Khan, D. S. Kimmerly, and L. I. Sinoway Gender affects sympathetic and hemodynamic response to postural stress Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): H2028 - H2035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Ray and K. D. Monahan Aging Attenuates the Vestibulosympathetic Reflex in Humans Circulation, February 26, 2002; 105(8): 956 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |