AJP - Regu AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 279: R944-R950, 2000;
0363-6119/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Racette, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Racette, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S.
Vol. 279, Issue 3, R944-R950, September 2000

Racial differences in lipid metabolism in women with abdominal obesity

Susan B. Racette, Jeffrey F. Horowitz, Bettina Mittendorfer, and Samuel Klein

Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We evaluated palmitate rate of appearance (Ra) in plasma during basal conditions and during a four-stage epinephrine infusion plus pancreatic hormonal clamp in nine white and nine black women with abdominal obesity, who were matched on fat-free mass, total and percent body fat, and waist-to-hip circumference ratio. On the basis of single-slice magnetic resonance imaging analysis, black women had the same amount of subcutaneous abdominal fat but less intra-abdominal fat than white women (68 ± 9 vs. 170 ± 14 cm2, P < 0.05). Basal palmitate Ra was lower in black than in white women (1.95 ± 0.26 vs. 2.88 ± 0.23 µmol · kg fat-free mass-1 · min-1, P < 0.005), even though plasma insulin and catecholamine concentrations were the same in both groups. Palmitate Ra across a physiological range of plasma epinephrine concentrations remained lower in black women, because the increase in palmitate Ra during epinephrine infusion was the same in both groups. We conclude that basal and epinephrine-stimulated palmitate Ra is lower in black than in white women with abdominal obesity. The differences in basal palmitate kinetics are not caused by alterations in plasma insulin or catecholamine concentrations or lipolytic sensitivity to epinephrine. The lower rate of whole body fatty acid flux and smaller intra-abdominal fat mass may have clinical benefits because of the relationship between excessive fatty acid availability and metabolic diseases.

fatty acid; lipolysis; catecholamine; adipose tissue; stable isotopes


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

THE PREVALENCE OF OBESITY, defined as body mass index (BMI) >= 30 kg/m2, in the United States is much higher in black (African-American) than in white (Caucasian) women (12). However, the mortality rate associated with obesity is lower in black than in white women (7). Moreover, the prevalence of some of the cardiovascular disease risk factors associated with abdominal obesity (impaired glucose tolerance and dyslipidemia) is lower in abdominally obese black women than in white women when both groups are matched on BMI, percent body fat, and waist-to-hip ratio or waist circumference (3, 8, 10).

The mechanism(s) responsible for the differences in metabolic abnormalities between black and white women with abdominal obesity is not known. It has been hypothesized that increased fatty acid release from visceral/intra-abdominal (4) and subcutaneous fat (18) is responsible for many of the metabolic complications associated with abdominal obesity because of fatty acid effects on hepatic glucose production, insulin-mediated glucose uptake, and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) production (13). Therefore, it is possible that racial differences in lipolytic sensitivity to insulin or epinephrine, the major plasma hormones that regulate fatty acid release from adipose tissue, contribute to the metabolic differences observed between black and white obese women. Although it has been shown that the antilipolytic effect of insulin in vitro is greater in abdominal subcutaneous adipocytes obtained from black than from white women with abdominal obesity (9), the same research group recently found that the suppressive effect of insulin on fatty acid rate of appearance (Ra) in plasma in vivo was similar in black and white obese women (2). These results make it unlikely that differences in insulin-mediated fatty acid metabolism are responsible for the metabolic differences between groups. However, the effect of race on the sensitivity of fatty acid kinetics to epinephrine has not been investigated.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whole body fatty acid kinetics in response to a physiological range of plasma epinephrine concentrations in black and white women with abdominal obesity, matched for age, BMI, percent body fat, fat-free mass (FFM), and waist-to-hip circumference ratio. The pancreatic hormonal clamp technique (19) was used to minimize differences in plasma insulin concentration between groups and prevent the confounding influence of epinephrine-stimulated insulin secretion (14).


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Subjects. Eighteen premenopausal women (9 black and 9 white) with abdominal obesity (BMI 32-40 kg/m2, >40% body wt as fat, waist-to-hip circumference ratio >= 0.85), matched on age, BMI, percent body fat, FFM, and waist-to-hip circumference ratio, participated in the study (Table 1). All subjects completed a comprehensive medical examination, including history and physical examination, electrocardiogram, standard blood and urine tests, and an oral glucose tolerance test. All subjects had normal glucose tolerance, and none had evidence of illness. The subjects were not engaged in regular physical activity. The study was approved by the Human Studies Committee and the General Clinical Research Center Scientific Advisory Committee of Washington University School of Medicine, and written informed consent was obtained from all volunteers before their participation.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Subject characteristics

Body composition. Total body fat mass (FM) and FFM were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (QDR 1000/w, Hologic, Waltham, MA). Abdominal (subcutaneous and intra-abdominal) adipose tissue was quantified by magnetic resonance imaging (Siemens, Iselin, NJ) (1). A single-slice image at the L2-L3 interspace was analyzed for subcutaneous and intra-abdominal adipose tissue content.

Isotope and hormone infusion study. Subjects were admitted to the General Clinical Research Center on the evening before the isotope and hormone infusion study. At 1900 on the day of admission, subjects received a standard meal (55% carbohydrate, 30% fat, and 15% protein) containing 12 kcal/kg adjusted body weight. Adjusted body weight was calculated as follows: ideal body weight + 0.25(actual body weight - ideal body weight), where ideal body weight was based on the medium frame of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company table (24). A snack comprised of two cans of Ensure (Ross Laboratories, Columbus, OH), containing a total of 500 kcal, 80 g of carbohydrate, 17.6 g of protein, and 12.2 g of fat, was served at 2230 and consumed within 30 min.

On the next morning, after subjects had fasted overnight, three catheters were inserted: one was placed into an antecubital vein to infuse hormones and glucose, the second into the contralateral antecubital vein to infuse palmitate tracer, and the third into a radial artery for blood sampling. Catheters were kept patent with infusions of 0.9% saline solution.

At 0800 (time 0), after withdrawal of a blood sample to measure fasting lipid concentrations and background isotopic enrichment, a 7-h isotope and hormone infusion study (Fig. 1) was started. [2,2-2H2]palmitate (98% atom percent excess) or [1-13C]palmitate (99% atom percent excess; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Andover, MA) bound to human albumin (Centeon LLC, Kankakee, IL) was infused at a constant rate (0.04 µmol · kg body wt-1 · min-1) for 1 h by means of a calibrated syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, South Natick, MA) to assess basal plasma fatty acid kinetics. At 1 h, a pancreatic hormonal clamp (19) was initiated: somatostatin (0.17 µg · kg FFM-1 · min-1; BACHEM Feinchemikalien, Bubendorf, Switzerland), insulin (0.08 mU · kg FFM-1 · min-1; Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Princeton, NJ), and recombinant human growth hormone (0.00375 µg · kg FFM-1 · min-1; Genentech, San Francisco, CA) were infused continuously for 6 h (from 1 h to 7 h). The rate of insulin infusion during the pancreatic clamp was chosen to eliminate the confounding influence of basal hyperinsulinemia associated with abdominal obesity on the lipolytic response to epinephrine. Plasma glucose concentrations were monitored (Glucose AutoAnalyzer, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA) every 10 min between 1 and 3.5 h, and 20% dextrose was infused as necessary to maintain euglycemia during the baseline period of the hormonal clamp. All subjects achieved euglycemia without dextrose infusion by 2.5 h. Therefore, dextrose was not infused during the last hour of the baseline period of the hormonal clamp or during the remainder of the infusion study. At 2.5 h, the palmitate tracer infusion was restarted and continued throughout the study to assess fatty acid kinetics during the baseline period of the pancreatic hormonal clamp and each stage of epinephrine infusion. At 3.5 h, a four-stage epinephrine infusion protocol was started. Epinephrine (Lederle Laboratories, Chicago, IL), containing ascorbic acid (0.5 mg/ml) to prevent degradation, was infused at 0.00125, 0.005, 0.0125, and 0.025 µg · kg FFM-1 · min-1. Each epinephrine infusion lasted 30 min, separated by a 30-min interval between stages without epinephrine infusion to reestablish basal epinephrine concentrations and basal fatty acid kinetics.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic diagram of isotope infusion study protocol. Epi 1, Epi 2, Epi 3, and Epi 4, epinephrine infusion at 0.00125, 0.005, 0.0125, and 0.025 µg · kg fat-free mass-1 · min-1, respectively.

Blood sampling. Blood samples were obtained before the beginning of the isotope infusion, every 5 min during the last 15 min of the basal period (4 samples between 45 min and 1 h) and the pancreatic hormonal clamp baseline period (4 samples between 3.25 and 3.5 h), and every 5 min throughout each 30-min epinephrine infusion (6 samples) to determine palmitate kinetics and substrate and hormone concentrations. Samples were collected in prechilled tubes containing EDTA to determine isotope enrichment and fatty acid concentration, reduced glutathione and EGTA to determine plasma catecholamine concentration, and EDTA with Trasylol to determine plasma insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon concentrations. After centrifugation, plasma was collected and stored at -70°C for subsequent analysis.

Analyses. Plasma catecholamine concentrations were determined radioenzymatically (31). Plasma insulin (26) and C-peptide (20) concentrations were measured by RIA. Plasma total cholesterol, high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides were determined enzymatically (Roche/Hitachi 747 Analyzer, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) with commercially available kits; low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated as the difference between total and HDL cholesterol. Plasma free fatty acid concentrations were quantified by gas chromatography with heptadecanoic acid as an internal standard (35).

Plasma palmitate tracer-to-tracee ratio was determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with an MSD 5971 system (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA) with a capillary column (27). Briefly, plasma proteins were precipitated with acetone, and plasma lipids were extracted with hexane. Fatty acids were converted to their methyl esters with iodomethane and isolated by using solid-phase extraction cartridges. Samples were dried in a Speed-Vac concentrator (Savant Instruments, Farmingdale, NY), reconstituted in heptane, and transferred to auto sampler vials for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Ions at mass-to-charge ratios 270.2, 271.2 ([1-13C]palmitate), and 272.2 ([2,2-2H2]palmitate), representing the molecular ions of unlabeled and labeled methyl esters, respectively, formed by electron impact ionization, were selectively monitored.

Calculations. Palmitate Ra in the basal state and during the baseline period of the pancreatic hormonal clamp were calculated using Steele's equation for steady-state conditions (32). During steady-state conditions, palmitate Ra is equal to palmitate rate of disappearance (Rd). Plasma palmitate tracer-to-tracee ratio and concentration data obtained during each 30-min epinephrine infusion were smoothed by spline fitting (34), and the non-steady-state equation of Steele (32) was used to calculate palmitate kinetics during each epinephrine stage. The effective volume of distribution of palmitate was estimated to be 40 ml/kg.

Statistical analysis. Student's t-test for independent samples was used to test the significance of differences in basal palmitate kinetics between black and white women. The responses of palmitate Ra to epinephrine were evaluated by a two-way (subject group × epinephrine stage) ANOVA for repeated measures. Significant F ratios from ANOVA were followed by Tukey's post hoc analyses to assess the significance of differences in palmitate Ra between the black and white groups and between epinephrine stages. An alpha  = 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Values are means ± SE.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasma hormone concentrations. Mean plasma epinephrine concentrations were similar in the black and white women during basal conditions and the baseline period of the pancreatic hormonal clamp (Fig. 2A). Plasma epinephrine concentrations increased progressively during epinephrine infusion at 0.00125, 0.005, 0.0125, and 0.025 µg · kg FFM-1 · min-1 (P < 0.05) and were the same in both groups. Plasma norepinephrine concentrations were similar in black and white women (average 1.04 ± 0.05 and 0.96 ± 0.05 nmol/l, respectively) throughout the study and were not affected by epinephrine infusion. Mean basal plasma insulin (Fig. 2B) and C-peptide (Fig. 2C) concentrations were similar in black and white women and decreased by ~75% during the pancreatic hormonal clamp in both groups (both P < 0.05). Mean plasma glucagon concentrations were similar in black and white women during basal conditions (70 ± 8 and 83 ± 13 pg/ml, respectively, P = 0.57) and identical throughout the epinephrine infusions (52 ± 4 and 52 ± 5 pg/ml, respectively).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Mean plasma epinephrine, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations during basal conditions, pancreatic hormonal clamp baseline, and 4 stages of epinephrine infusion (Epi 1, Epi 2, Epi 3, and Epi 4) in white (open circle ) and black () women with abdominal obesity. Values are means ± SE. Epinephrine concentration was significantly different from basal and hormonal clamp baseline values, P < 0.05.

Plasma lipids. Basal plasma triglyceride, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol concentrations were lower in black than in white women (Table 2). There was a trend for higher plasma HDL cholesterol concentrations in black than in white women, but this difference was not statistically significant (Table 2). Basal plasma fatty acid concentrations tended to be lower in black than in white women (0.41 ± 0.05 vs. 0.50 ± 0.04 mmol/l), but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). Plasma fatty acid concentrations increased significantly (P < 0.05) during the baseline period of the pancreatic hormonal clamp in black and white women (to 1.02 ± 0.08 and 1.11 ± 0.06 mmol/l, respectively, P = 0.29 between groups) but did not increase further with epinephrine infusion and were similar in black and white women (1.07 ± 0.09 and 1.21 ± 0.08 mmol/l, respectively, P = 0.13) during the epinephrine infusions.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Basal plasma lipid concentrations

Fatty acid kinetics. Basal palmitate Ra (and Rd), expressed relative to FM or FFM, was ~25% lower in our black than our white women (P < 0.05; Fig. 3). Palmitate Ra increased during the baseline period of the hormonal clamp in both groups. Although there was a trend toward an increase in palmitate Ra during each stage of epinephrine infusion, the increase was not significantly different from the baseline period during any of the four stages because of the large variability in Ra values (Fig. 4). The differences in palmitate Ra between black and white women persisted across all stages of epinephrine infusion. However, the relative and absolute increases in palmitate Ra from basal values were the same in the two groups (Fig. 5).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Basal palmitate rate of appearance (Ra) expressed relative to fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in white and black women with abdominal obesity. Values are means ± SE. * Significantly different from white, P < 0.05.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Palmitate Ra expressed relative to FM (A) and FFM (B) during pancreatic hormonal clamp baseline and 4 stages of epinephrine infusion in white (open circle ) and black () women with abdominal obesity. Values are means ± SE. The difference between black and white was significant (P < 0.05).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Palmitate Ra expressed as relative (A) and absolute (B) change from pancreatic hormonal clamp baseline during each stage of epinephrine infusion in white (open circle ) and black () women with abdominal obesity. Values are means ± SE.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Although the prevalence of obesity is greater in black than in white women, black women have a lower risk of developing some of the metabolic complications associated with obesity when both groups are matched on BMI, body fat, and waist circumference or waist-to-hip circumference ratio (3, 8, 10). We hypothesized that the differences in metabolic abnormalities between groups may be related to racial differences in the regulation of fatty acid metabolism. Therefore, we evaluated basal fatty acid Ra and the sensitivity of fatty acid kinetics to epinephrine, the major plasma hormone that stimulates lipolysis, in black and white women with abdominal obesity. A palmitate tracer infusion, in conjunction with a pancreatic hormonal clamp, was used to assess fatty acid kinetics across a physiological range of plasma epinephrine concentrations without the confounding influence of epinephrine-stimulated insulin secretion (14). Our results demonstrate that basal fatty acid kinetics were lower in obese black than in obese white women matched for percent body fat and waist-to-hip circumference ratio. However, the sensitivity of fatty acid mobilization in response to epinephrine infusion was the same in both groups.

We previously found that whole body lipolytic sensitivity to epinephrine is blunted in white women with abdominal obesity compared with lean white women (17). The results from the present study demonstrate that obese black women are just as insensitive to the lipolytic effects of epinephrine as obese white women. The precise mechanism responsible for the blunted response is not known but may be related to a decrease in subcutaneous abdominal adipocyte beta 2-adrenergic receptor density observed in women with abdominal obesity (28). In fact, the blunted lipolytic response to epinephrine in abdominally obese white women in vivo is specific to abdominal, rather than femoral, subcutaneous adipose tissue (17). Although we assume that the lower whole body lipolytic sensitivity in our black women also was caused by a decreased response to epinephrine in upper-body fat, we did not evaluate regional lipolytic activity in our study subjects. It is possible that the stimulation of lipolysis caused by the decrease in plasma insulin concentration during the pancreatic hormonal clamp blunted the lipolytic effect of epinephrine in our subjects. However, lipolytic rates per unit of FM during epinephrine infusion were much lower in our obese subjects than in lean subjects (17), suggesting that our obese subjects had additional capacity for lipolysis. Furthermore, the decline in plasma insulin concentrations during the pancreatic clamp was similar in black and white women and, therefore, should not have affected our comparison between the two groups.

The rate of fatty acid release into plasma during basal conditions was lower in our black than in our white subjects. In contrast, Albu et al. (2) found similar values for basal fatty acid Ra in black and white women matched for adiposity. However, basal glycerol Ra, which provides another index of lipolysis, was lower in their black than in their white subjects. It is unlikely that differences in the concentration of or sensitivity to the major plasma hormones that regulate lipolysis (i.e., insulin and epinephrine) were responsible for the racial difference in basal fat metabolism observed in the present study. Basal plasma insulin and epinephrine concentrations were the same in the two groups. Furthermore, results from the present study, in conjunction with those reported by Albu et al., demonstrate that the sensitivity of fatty acid kinetics to inhibition by insulin and stimulation by epinephrine is the same in black and white obese women. It is possible that racial differences in body fat distribution contributed to the differences in basal fatty acid Ra. Although total body FM, percent body weight as fat, waist-to-hip circumference ratio, and waist circumference were similar in our black and white groups, intra-abdominal FM in our black subjects was one-half that of our white subjects. Fatty acids released from intra-abdominal fat that are not cleared by the liver enter the systemic circulation and are detected by a systemic fatty acid tracer infusion. Fatty acids released from a larger intra-abdominal FM in our white subjects may have contributed to their higher fatty acid Ra values. However, it seems unlikely that the difference in intra-abdominal FM alone was large enough to completely explain the observed differences in systemic fatty acid Ra, because only 15% of systemic fatty acid flux in obese persons is derived from splanchnic fatty acids (16, 23). Therefore, the differences we observed in basal fatty acid kinetics between our black and white women were likely due to differences in lipolysis of subcutaneous adipose tissue triglycerides, involving other lipolytic regulatory mechanisms, such as sympathetic nervous system activity (5), cortisol secretion (29), or local adenosine (30) or cytokine (15) production.

The lower rate of whole body fatty acid Ra and Rd during basal and epinephrine-stimulated conditions and the smaller amount of visceral/intra-abdominal FM observed in our black than in our white subjects may have considerable clinical benefits and may help explain differences in the prevalence of metabolic abnormalities between black and white obese women. Increased fatty acid release from visceral/intra-abdominal (4) and subcutaneous (18) fat may be responsible for many of the metabolic complications associated with abdominal obesity, such as insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia (13). Excessive release of fatty acids from adipose tissue can impair insulin's ability to suppress hepatic glucose production (11, 25) and decrease insulin-mediated glucose uptake (6, 11, 33). Furthermore, increased delivery of fatty acids to the liver can increase hepatic VLDL production and plasma lipoprotein concentrations (21). In concert with previous studies (2, 3, 8, 10, 22), we found lower plasma triglyceride, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol concentrations and a trend toward higher plasma HDL cholesterol concentrations in our black subjects than in our white subjects.

In summary, we found that black women with abdominal obesity had lower basal rates of fatty acid release into plasma and tissue uptake from plasma than white women who were matched on FFM, total body FM, percent body weight as fat, and waist-to-hip circumference ratio. Whole body lipolytic sensitivity to epinephrine, determined by the increase in fatty acid Ra during epinephrine infusion, was the same in the two groups. However, fatty acid Ra across a physiological range of plasma epinephrine concentrations remained lower in black than in white women because of the differences in basal fatty acid kinetics. The lower rate of fatty acid flux in black women may have important clinical benefits because of the relationship between excessive fatty acid release and metabolic diseases.

Perspectives

Obesity is a major public health problem in the United States and other industrialized countries because of its increasing prevalence, association with serious medical diseases, and considerable economic impact. In addition to percent body fat, the location of excess body fat is also an important risk factor for medical complications. Persons with abdominal (upper body) obesity are at increased risk for insulin resistance, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and ischemic heart disease than are those with gluteal/femoral (lower body) obesity. It is likely that increased fatty acid release from intra-abdominal and subcutaneous fat in persons with abdominal obesity contributes to many of their metabolic complications because of the effects of fatty acid uptake on hepatic glucose and VLDL production and skeletal muscle insulin-mediated glucose uptake. However, the prevalence of some of these metabolic abnormalities is lower in black than in white women with abdominal obesity when both groups are matched on BMI, percent body fat, and waist-to-hip ratio or waist circumference. The results of the present study suggest that differences in metabolic abnormalities between groups may be related to racial differences in the regulation of fatty acid metabolism. The lower rate of whole body fatty acid Ra and Rd during basal and epinephrine-stimulated conditions and the smaller amount of visceral/intra-abdominal FM observed in our black than in our white subjects may have important clinical benefits and may be responsible for some of the differences in the prevalence of metabolic abnormalities between black and white obese women.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Renata Braudy and the nursing and dietary staff of the General Clinical Research Center for assistance in performing the experimental protocols and Dr. Guohong Zhao and Weiqing Feng for technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK-37948, RR-00036 (General Clinical Research Center), AG-13629 (Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center), RR-00954 (Mass Spectrometry Resource), and DK-56341 (Clinical Nutrition Research Unit).

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Klein, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8127, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 28 October 1999; accepted in final form 10 March 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Abate, N, Burns D, Peshock RM, Abhimanyu G, and Grundy SM. Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: validation against dissection in human cadavers. J Lipid Res 35: 1490-1496, 1994[Abstract].

2.   Albu, JB, Curi M, Shur M, Murphy L, Matthews DE, and Pi-Sunyer FX. Systemic resistance to the anti-lipolytic effect of insulin in black and white women with visceral obesity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 277: E551-E560, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Albu, JB, Murphy L, Frager DH, Johnson JA, and Pi-Sunyer FX. Visceral fat and race-dependent health risks in obese nondiabetic premenopausal women. Diabetes 46: 456-462, 1997[Abstract].

4.   Arner, P. Differences in lipolysis between human subcutaneous and omental adipose tissues. Ann Med 27: 435-438, 1995[ISI][Medline].

5.   Bartness, TJ, and Bamshad M. Innervation of mammalian white adipose tissue: implications for the regulation of total body fat. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 275: R1399-R1411, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Boden, G, Chen X, Ruiz J, White JV, and Rossetti L. Mechanisms of fatty acid-induced inhibition of glucose uptake. J Clin Invest 93: 2438-2446, 1994.

7.   Calle, EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, and Heath CW, Jr. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. N Engl J Med 341: 1097-1105, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Conway, JM, Yanovski SZ, Avila NA, and Hubbard VS. Visceral adipose tissue differences in black and white women. Am J Clin Nutr 61: 765-771, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Dowling, HJ, Fried SK, and Pi-Sunyer FX. Insulin resistance in adipocytes of obese women: effects of body fat distribution and race. Metabolism 44: 987-995, 1995[ISI][Medline].

10.   Dowling, HJ, and Pi-Sunyer FX. Race-dependent health risks of upper body obesity. Diabetes 42: 537-543, 1993[Abstract].

11.   Ferrannini, E, Barrett EJ, Bevilacqua S, and DeFronzo RA. Effect of fatty acids on glucose production and utilization in man. J Clin Invest 72: 1737-1747, 1983.

12.   Flegal, KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, and Johnson CL. Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960-1994. Int J Obes 22: 39-47, 1998[ISI][Medline].

13.   Frayn, KN, Williams CM, and Arner P. Are increased plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentrations a risk marker for coronary heart disease and other chronic diseases? Clin Sci (Colch) 90: 243-253, 1996[Medline].

14.   Galster, AD, Clutter WE, Cryer PE, Collins JA, and Bier DM. Epinephrine plasma thresholds for lipolytic effects in man. Measurements of fatty acid transport with [1-13C]palmitic acid. J Clin Invest 67: 1729-1738, 1981.

15.   Gasic, S, Tian B, and Green A. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha stimulates lipolysis in adipocytes by decreasing Gi protein concentrations. J Biol Chem 274: 6770-6775, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Havel, RJ, Kane JP, Balasse EO, Segel N, and Basso LV. Splanchnic metabolism of free fatty acids and production of triglycerides of very low density lipoproteins in normotriglyceridemic and hypertriglyceridemic humans. J Clin Invest 49: 2017-2035, 1970.

17.   Horowitz, JF, and Klein S. Whole-body and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue lipolytic sensitivity to epinephrine is suppressed in women with upper-body obesity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 277: E325-E331, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Jensen, MD, Haymond MW, Rizza RA, Cryer PE, and Miles JM. Influence of body fat distribution on free fatty acid metabolism in obesity. J Clin Invest 83: 1168-1173, 1989.

19.   Krentz, AJ, Boyle PJ, MacDonald LM, and Schade DS. Octreotide: a long-acting inhibitor of endogenous hormone secretion for human metabolic investigations. Metabolism 43: 24-31, 1994[ISI][Medline].

20.   Kuzuya, H, Blix PM, Horwitz DL, Steiner DF, and Rubenstein AH. Determination of free and total insulin and C-peptide in insulin-treated diabetics. Diabetes 26: 22-29, 1977[Abstract].

21.   Lewis, GF, Uffelman KD, Szeto LW, Weller B, and Steiner G. Interaction between free fatty acids and insulin in the acute control of very low density lipoprotein production in humans. J Clin Invest 95: 158-166, 1995.

22.   Lovejoy, JC, de la Bretonne JA, Klemperer M, and Tulley R. Abdominal fat distribution and metabolic risk factors: effects of race. Metabolism 45: 1119-1124, 1996[ISI][Medline].

23.   Martin, ML, and Jensen MD. Effects of body fat distribution on regional lipolysis in obesity. J Clin Invest 88: 609-613, 1991.

24.   Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. . In: Metropolitan Height and Weight Tables. New York: Metropolitan Life Found, 1983, p. 3-9. (Stat. Bull. 64)

25.   Mittelman, SD, Fu YY, Rebrin K, Steil G, and Bergman RN. Indirect effect of insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production is dominant, even with hyperglucagonemia. J Clin Invest 100: 3121-3130, 1997[ISI][Medline].

26.   Morgan, DR, and Lazarow A. Immunoassay of insulin: two antibody system. Diabetes 12: 115-126, 1963[ISI].

27.   Patterson, BW, Zhao G, and Klein S. Improved accuracy and precision of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry measurements for metabolic tracers. Metabolism 47: 706-712, 1998[ISI][Medline].

28.   Reynisdottir, S, Wahrenberg H, Calstrom K, Rossner S, and Arner P. Catecholamine resistance in fat cells of women with upper-body obesity due to decreased expression of beta 2-adrenoreceptors. Diabetologia 37: 428-435, 1994[ISI][Medline].

29.   Samra, JS, Clark ML, Humphreys SM, MacDonald IA, Matthews DR, and Frayn KN. Effects of morning rise in cortisol concentration on regulation of lipolysis in subcutaneous adipose tissue. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 271: E996-E1002, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Schwabe, U, Ebert R, and Erbler HC. Adenosine release from fat cells: effect on cyclic AMP levels and hormone actions. Adv Cyclic Nucleotide Res 5: 569-584, 1975[Medline].

31.   Shah, SD, Clutter WE, and Cryer PE. External and internal standards in the single isotope derivative (radioenzymatic) assay of plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine in normal humans and persons with diabetes mellitus or chronic renal failure. J Lab Clin Med 106: 624-629, 1985[ISI][Medline].

32.   Steele, R. Influences of glucose loading and of injected insulin on hepatic glucose output. Ann NY Acad Sci 82: 420-430, 1959.

33.   Thiebaud, D, DeFronzo RA, Jacot E, Golay A, Acheson K, Maeder E, Jequier E, and Felber J-P. Effect of long-chain triglyceride infusion on glucose metabolism in man. Metabolism 31: 1128-1136, 1982[ISI][Medline].

34.   Wegman, EJ, and Wright W. Spline in statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 78: 351-366, 1985.

35.   Wolfe, RR. Radioactive and Stable Isotope Tracers in Biomedicine: Principles and Practice of Kinetic Analysis. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1992.


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 279(3):R944-R950
0363-6119/00 $5.00 Copyright © 2000 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
B. Mittendorfer, O. Liem, B. W. Patterson, J. M. Miles, and S. Klein
What Does the Measurement of Whole-Body Fatty Acid Rate of Appearance in Plasma by Using a Fatty Acid Tracer Really Mean?
Diabetes, July 1, 2003; 52(7): 1641 - 1648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Racette, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Racette, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online