|
|
||||||||
B inhibitor peptide
inhibits spontaneous and interleukin-1
-induced sleep
Department of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy, Pharmacology, and Physiology, Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Pullman, Washington 99164-6520
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B)
is a transcription factor that when activated promotes production of
several sleep-promoting substances such as interleukin-1
(IL-1
),
tumor necrosis factor-
, and nerve growth factor. Therefore, we
hypothesized that inhibition of NF-
B activation would attenuate
sleep. A NF-
B cell-permeable inhibitor peptide (IP) was injected
intracerebroventricularly (5 and 50 µg for rats, 100 µg for
rabbits). On a separate day, time-matched control injections of a
cell-permeable inactive control peptide were done in the same animals.
The 50-µg dose of IP in rats and the 100-µg dose in rabbits
significantly inhibited non-rapid eye movement sleep and rapid eye
movement sleep if administered during the light period. Moreover,
pretreatment of rabbits with 100 µg of the IP 12 h before
intracerebroventricular injection of IL-1
(10 ng) significantly
attenuated IL-1
-induced sleep and febrile responses. The current
data support the hypothesis that a brain cytokine network is involved
in sleep regulation and that NF-
B is a crucial factor in
physiological sleep regulation.
electroencephalogram; power density; rapid eye movement sleep; rabbits; rats
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE NUCLEAR
FACTOR-
B (NF-
B) family includes the proteins
p50, p52, p65, c-Rel, and Rel B. They are capable of forming
heterodimers and as such complex with
B DNA sequence motifs and
thereby affect transcription (1, 38). NF-
B
exists in an inactive form in the cytosol combined to its inhibitory
subunit I
B. Nuclear translocation of NF-
B occurs after
phosphorylation of I
B in response to various stimuli, including
cytokines, nerve growth factor (NGF), bacterial and viral products,
excitatory neurotransmitters, oxidative stress, etc. Large proteins
such as NF-
B require active nuclear import, and this is dependent on
a short peptide signal composed mainly of basic amino acids; p50 has
such a nuclear localization sequence. Within the central nervous system
(CNS), NF-
B has a role in inflammatory responses, neuronal
plasticity, development, and some pathological processes (reviewed in
Ref. 38).
Sleep is regulated in part via an extensive biochemical network
involving changes in expression of several sleep regulatory substances
(reviewed in Refs. 20, 22). Several of these sleep regulatory
substances are either upregulated in response to NF-
B activation or
themselves induce NF-
B activation. For example, several somnogenic
substances activate NF-
B; the list includes interleukin-1 (IL-1; 7, 14, 34, 53), tumor necrosis factor (TNF; 7, 51, 53), NGF
(6, 32, 51), interferon-
(7), epidermal growth factor (37,
53), acidic fibroblast growth factor (5), insulin (3), and insulin-like growth factor (37, 53; sleep effects reviewed in Refs. 19, 20, 23, 36). Furthermore, NF-
B is
involved in the expression of IL-2 (17), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2; 18, 34), inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS-2; reviewed in
Refs. 12, 48), IL-1, TNF (reviewed in Refs. 1, 38), NGF
(14-16), and the adenosine A1 receptor
(35); all of these substances are part of the biochemical
network involved in sleep regulation. Some substances, such as
IL-4, IL-10 (9, 10, 50), and
glucocorticoids (reviewed in Ref. 2), directly or indirectly inhibit
NF-
B activation, and they inhibit sleep (reviewed in Ref. 23).
Collectively, such considerations led us previously to demonstrate that
sleep deprivation promotes NF-
B activation in murine cerebral cortex
and that cortical NF-
B activation has a diurnal rhythm, with higher
levels of activation occurring during daylight hours (the sleep period
in mice) than during the dark period (8). Thus the
activation of NF-
B correlated with higher sleep propensity. However,
direct evidence linking NF-
B activation to sleep has heretofore been lacking.
Previously, a cell-permeable NF-
B inhibitor peptide (IP) bearing the
nuclear localization sequence of the NF-
B p50 subunit required for
the nuclear uptake of NF-
B was described (30). The IP
also contains a cell-permeable hydrophobic region of the signal peptide
of a Kaposi fibroblast growth factor as a membrane-translocating carrier, and thereby it can bring the nuclear localization sequence into cells. It is thought that the IP inhibits NF-
B translocation by
competing with NF-
B complexes for the cellular machinery responsible for nuclear translocation of NF-
B (30). We hypothesized
that inhibition of NF-
B activation by the IP would inhibit sleep. We
report herein that the NF-
B cell-permeable IP inhibits spontanenous sleep in rats and rabbits and IL-1
-induced sleep in rabbits.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Agents
A NF-
B cell-permeable IP (amino acid sequence:
AAVALLPAVLLALLAPVQRKRQKLMP; mol wt 2781.5) and a NF-
B cell-permeable
inactive control peptide (CP) (amino acid sequence:
AAVALLPAVLLALLAPVQRNGQKLMP; mol wt 2668.3) were purchased
from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). The inactive CP has the
substitutions (underlined) of Asn for Lys and Gly for Arg in the
nuclear localization sequence region of the IP peptide. In the murine
endothelial LE-II cell line, lipopolysaccharide-induced nuclear
translocation of the NF-
B complexes is inhibited by IP but not by
CP. The maximum cellular uptake of IP was observed at 37°C between 30 min and 1 h, and the maximum inhibitory effect was observed at the
concentration of 18 µM (30). In our studies, IP and CP
were dissolved in pyrogen-free isotonic saline (PFS; Abbott). The
concentrations of these peptides were 5 µg/4 µl and 50 µg/4 µl
for rats and 100 µg/25 µl for rabbits. Recombinant human IL-1
was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). It was dissolved in
PFS at a concentration of 10 ng/25 µl. The peptides were stored under
sterile conditions at
80°C until the experiment.
Animals
Twenty-three male Sprague-Dawley rats (360-420 g) and 22 male New Zealand White rabbits (4.0-5.5 kg) were surgically implanted with electroencephalographic (EEG) electrodes, a brain thermistor, a lateral intracerebroventricular (icv) cannula, and electromyographic (EMG) electrodes (only in rats) under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia as previously described (25). Briefly, the guide cannula was placed in the left lateral ventricle for icv injection. A calibrated 30-k
thermistor (model 44008; Omega
Engineering, Stamford, CT) was implanted on the dura mater over the
parietal cortex to measure brain temperature (Tbr). The
leads from the electrodes and the thermistor were routed to a Teflon
pedestal. The pedestal, guide cannula, and leads were attached to the
skull with dental acrylic (Duz-All; Coralite Dental Products, Skokie,
IL). In rats, the patency of the guide cannula was verified by a
drinking response induced by icv injecion of 40 ng angiotensin II
(25). After a 1-wk (for rats) or a 2-wk (for rabbits)
recovery period, the animals were placed in experimental chambers (Hot
Pack 352600, Philadelphia, PA). The animals were kept on a 12:12-h
light-dark cycle (lights on at 0800 for rats or 0600 for rabbits) at
22 ± 1°C (for rats) or 21 ± 1°C (for rabbits) ambient
temperature. Water and food were ad libitum throughout the experiment.
Rats and rabbits were habituated to the recording procedure for at least 3 days and 1 day, respectively.
Recording and Analysis
A flexible tether connecting the EEG and EMG electrodes and the thermistor led to an electronic swivel (SL6C, Plastics One). In rabbits, body movements were detected by ultrasonic detectors (Biochemical Instrumentation, University of Tennessee). The leads from the swivel and movement detectors were routed to Grass model 7D polygraphs in an adjacent room. The EEG was filtered below 0.1 Hz and above 35 Hz. The amplified signals were digitized at the frequency of 128 Hz for the EEG and at 2 Hz for Tbr and motor activity. Tbr data were saved on a computer in 10-s intervals. Online Fourier analysis of the EEG was performed. The vigilance states of wakefulness, non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) and rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) were visually determined off-line in 10-s epochs by using criteria previously reported (25-27, 46, 47). In brief, wakefulness was characterized by fast low-amplitude EEG waves, gradually increasing Tbr, and a high incidence of gross body movements. NREMS was associated with slow high-amplitude EEG waves, slowly decreasing Tbr, and lack of body movements. In contrast, REMS was characterized by fast low-amplitude EEG waves, appearance of theta activity in the EEG, rapidly increasing Tbr at REMS onset, and a lack of body movement. The average of EEG power density in the delta frequency band (0.5-4.0 Hz) during NREMS, which is called EEG slow-wave activity (SWA), was calculated. The average power of SWA throughout the entire 23-h control-recording period in each animal was normalized to 100%. Then all SWA data were expressed as a percent of the control value. In rabbits, power spectrum analysis during NREMS was performed for the 0.5-25 Hz frequency range. The average power in each 1-Hz frequency bandwidth during NREMS of control recordings was normalized to 100%, and then all EEG power data during the treatment-recording period was converted to a percent of these values. The average amount of time spent in each vigilance state, SWA, and Tbr were calculated for 3-h intervals and used for statistical analysis.Experimental Protocols
Experiment 1: effects of IP and CP on spontaneous sleep in rabbits. A total of seven rabbits was used. Each rabbit received two icv injections of 25 µl PFS 15 min apart on the control day. On the next day they were injected with 100 µg of CP or IP in a volume of 25 µl PFS followed by 25 µl PFS (15-min interval). On another day they received 100 µg of CP or IP (each rabbit received a different drug from that administered on the first experimental day) followed by 25 µl PFS (15-min interval). All injections were performed between 0830 and 0915. After injections, all rabbits were recorded from for 23 h.
Experiment 2: effects of IP on IL-1
-induced-sleep in
rabbits (pretreatment 15 min before IL-1
administration in the light
period).
A total of seven rabbits was used. Each rabbit received two icv
injections of 25 µl of PFS 15 min apart on the control day. On the
next day they were injected with 25 µl of PFS or 100 µg of IP in a
volume of 25 µl PFS followed 15 min later by 10 ng IL-1
in a
volume of 25 µl PFS. Seven days later they received 100 µg of IP or
25 µl of PFS (each rabbit received a different drug from that of the
previous administration) followed 15 min later by 10 ng IL-1
in a
volume of 25 µl PFS. All injections were performed between 0830 and
0915. After injections, all rabbits were recorded from for 23 h.
Experiment 3: effects of IP or CP on IL-1
-induced sleep
in rabbits (pretreatment 12 h before IL-1
administration at
dark onset).
A total of eight rabbits was used. On the control day each rabbit
received icv injection of 25 µl PFS just before the light onset
(0530-0600), and they received the second icv
injection of 25 µl PFS just before the dark onset
(1730-1800). On the next day they were injected with
100 µg of CP or IP in a volume of 25 µl PFS just before the light
onset, and they also received 10 ng of IL-1
in a volume of 25 µl
PFS just before the dark onset. Seven days later they received 100 µg
of CP or IP (each rabbit received a different drug from that previously
injected) just before the light onset and 10 ng of IL-1
in a volume
of 25 µl PFS just before the dark onset. After injections all rabbits
were recorded from for 23 h.
Experiment 4: effects of IP and CP on spontaneous sleep in rats. A total of 23 rats was used. On the control day all rats received an icv injection of 4 µl PFS to obtain the control values. On the next day these rats received 5 µg of CP or IP (n = 7) or 50 µg of CP or IP (n = 8) in a volume of 4 µl PFS. On the second experimental day each rat received an equal dose of CP or IP. These injections took place between 0730 and 0800. One-half of the rats were injected icv with IP and then CP, whereas the rest of them received CP and then IP. After injections, EEG, EMG, and Tbr were recorded for the next 23 h. Furthermore, in an additional eight rats the same experiment was performed, except that injections were done just before dark onset (1930-2000).
Statistical Analysis
All analyses were performed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures across the entire recording period and 3-h time blocks followed by Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) test. For power spectrum analysis data the actual EEG power density values were summed in four frequency bands [delta (0.5-4.0 Hz), theta (4.5-8.0 Hz), alpha (8.5-12.0 Hz), beta (12.0-25.0 Hz)] wave activities, and then one-way ANOVA for repeated measures was performed for these four frequency bands. A significant level of P < 0.05 was accepted.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiment 1: Effects of IP and CP on Spontaneous Sleep in Rabbits
The 100-µg dose of IP significantly inhibited NREMS [ANOVA for 23-h postinjection period, treatment effect: F(2,12) = 7.60, P < 0.01; with time-treatment interaction: F(14,84) = 4.42, P < 0.0001; SNK test: control vs. IP, q(3,12) = 5.25, P < 0.05 and CP vs. IP q(2,12) = 4.09, P < 0.05 (Table 1)]. This inhibitory effect began 10 h postinjection and continued to 21 h postinjection (Fig. 1). After the 100 µg of IP, REMS was also inhibited [ANOVA for 23-h postinjection period, treatment effect: F(2,12) = 10.86, P < 0.005; SNK test: control vs. IP, q(2,12) = 5.06, P < 0.05 and CP vs. IP, q(3,12) = 6.19, P < 0.05 (Fig. 1 and Table 1)]. During the first 3 h postinjection the IP enhanced NREMS above values obtained after control [SNK test: control (1-3 h) vs. IP (1-3 h), q(6,84) = 5.32, P < 0.05] but not after CP (Fig. 1). Similarly, although a transient increase in EEG SWA was observed during the first 3 h after injection of the IP compared with the control [ANOVA, time-treatment interaction: F(14,84) = 2.84, P < 0.005; SNK test: control (1-3 h) vs. IP (1-3 h), q(3,84) = 4.95, P < 0.05], the IP did not significantly affect EEG SWA compared with results obtained after CP injections during this period. EEG SWA occurring 10-21 h after the IP tended to decrease; the effect was in parallel with the suppression of NREMS during the same period, but this effect did not reach significance (Fig. 1). Power density in the EEG during the first 6 h postinjection (when NREMS was increased after IP) tended to increase in the 0.5- to 5-Hz frequency band and decrease in the 9- to 16-Hz band (Fig. 2). Although the increases in the delta frequency band did not reach significance, the decreases in the alpha frequency band were significant compared with corresponding values in control and CP groups [ANOVA, treatment effects: F(2,12) = 6.33, P < 0.05; SNK test: control vs. IP, q(2,12) = 4.181, P < 0.05 and CP vs. IP, q(3,12) = 4.51, P < 0.005] (Fig. 2A). In contrast, EEG power densities during NREMS in the dark period (10-21 h) postinjection in frequency bands lower than 15 Hz were inhibited after 100 µg of the IP, whereas power densities in frequency bands between 16 and 20 Hz increased compared with results obtained after the control or CP injection (Fig. 2B). The decrease in the delta frequency band after the IP was significant compared with corresponding values in the control and CP groups [ANOVA, treatment effect: F(2,12) = 7.23, P < 0.01; SNK test: control vs. IP, q(3,12) = 4.89, P < 0.05 and CP vs. IP, q(2,12) = 4.36, P < 0.05]. The IP slightly increased Tbr during the initial 9-h postinjection period compared with the other two groups [ANOVA, time-treatment interaction: F(14,84) = 10.09, P < 0.0001].
|
|
|
Experiment 2: Effects of IP on IL-1
-Induced Sleep in Rabbits
(Pretreatment 15 min Before IL-1
Administration in the Light Period)
significantly increased NREMS; however, pretreatment with
IP did not inhibit IL-1
-induced NREMS (Table 1) [ANOVA for 23-h
postinjection period, treatment effects:
F(2,12) = 3.89, P < 0.05; with time-treatment interaction:
F(14,84) = 3.61, P < 0.0005; SNK test: control vs. PFS + IL-1
,
q(3,12) = 3.84, P < 0.05]. Although IL-1
significantly inhibited
REMS, pretreatment with the IP did not affect the REMS inhibition
induced by IL-1
[ANOVA for 23-h postinjection period, treatment
effects: F(2,12) = 8.54, P < 0.005; with time-treatment interaction:
F(14,84) = 1.99, P < 0.05; SNK test: control vs. PFS + IL-1
,
q(2,12) = 4.03, P < 0.05 and control vs. IP + IL-1
,
q(3,12) = 5.68, P < 0.05] (Table 1). The effect of IL-1
on EEG SWA
was time dependent. IL-1
significantly increased EEG SWA during the
initial 3-h postinjection period; however, nonsignificant reductions in
EEG SWA were observed beginning 10 h postinjection. Therefore,
IL-1
reduced the total value of EEG SWA during the 23-h
postinjection period, but it did not reach significance [ANOVA for
23 h: F(2,12) = 2.92, P = 0.0929 (Table 1)]. These effects were not affected
by pretreatment with the IP. IL-1
significantly increased
Tbr; however, the IP did not inhibit this effect [ANOVA
for 23-h postinjection period, treatment effects:
F(2,10) = 23.41, P < 0.0005; with time-treatment interaction:
F(14,70) = 3.40, P < 0.0005; SNK test: control vs. PFS + IL-1
,
q(3,10) = 9.33, P < 0.05 and control vs. IP + IL-1
, q(2,10) = 6.90, P < 0.05 (Table 1)].
Experiment 3: Effects of IP and
CP on IL-1
-Induced Sleep in Rabbits
(Pretreatment 12 h Before IL-1
Administration at
Dark Onset)
administration plus pretreatment with the CP
markedly increased NREMS (about 3 h of extra NREMS occurred
compared with the base line). This effect was partly blocked by
pretreatment with the IP [ANOVA for 23-h treatment effects:
F(2,14) = 25.44, P < 0.0001; with time-treatment interaction:
F(14,98) = 4.42, P < 0.0001; SNK test: control vs. CP + IL-1
,
q(3,14) = 10.08, P < 0.05; control vs. IP + IL-1
,
q(2,14) = 6.89, P < 0.05; and CP + IL-1
vs. IP + IL-1
,
q(2,14) = 6.43, P < 0.05 (Table 1, Fig.
3)]. IL-1
in combination with
pretreatment with the CP significantly suppressed REMS (there was about
20 min less of REMS compared with saline control). Similarly, IL-1
in combination with pretreatment with the IP also induced REMS
inhibition; this REMS inhibition was not significantly changed from
that observed after IL-1
and the CP [ANOVA for 23-h postinjection
treatment effects: F(2,14) = 5.86, P < 0.05; with time-treatment interaction:
F(14, 98) = 2.70, P < 0.005; SNK test: control vs. CP + IL-1
,
q(3,14) = 4.66, P < 0.05 and control vs. IP + IL-1
,
q(2,14) = 3.48, P < 0.05 (Fig. 3, Table 1)]. Time-dependent changes
in EEG SWA were also observed after IL-1
treatment. IL-1
plus CP
pretreatment significantly increased EEG SWA during the initial 6 h; however, EEG SWA was significantly lower during the 15- to 23-h
postinjection period (Fig. 3). As a consequence, EEG SWA was suppressed
in the CP + IL-1
group during the entire 23-h period (Table 1).
In contrast, there was no significant differences in EEG SWA between
the control and IP + IL-1
group [ANOVA for 23-h postinjection
period, treatment effects:
F(2,14) = 4.28, P < 0.05; with time-treatment interaction: F(14,98) = 6.26, P < 0.0001; SNK test: control vs. CP + IL-1
, q(3,14) = 4.14, P < 0.05]. The power spectrum analysis in NREMS during the initial 8 h of the dark period revealed that relative delta power (0.5-4 Hz) in the CP + IL-1
-treated group
significantly increased; this effect was significantly inhibited by the
IP [ANOVA, treatment effects:
F(2,14) = 7.47, P < 0.01; SNK test: control vs. CP + IL-1
,
q(3,14) = 5.15, P < 0.05 and CP + IP vs. IP + IL-1
,
q(2,14) = 4.17, P < 0.05] (Fig.
4A). In the initial 8 h of the light period (12 h after IL-1
and 24 h after IP or CP injections), there was a significant reduction of power in the all-frequency bands in the CP + IL-1
and IP + IL-1
groups (Fig. 4B). The reduction of the relative power in
this frequency band in the IP + IL-1
group was less than that
in the CP + IL-1
group (Fig. 4B); however, this
effect did not reach significance between the two groups. IL-1
significantly increased Tbr after the pretreatment with the
CP or the IP compared with the control; however, the IP partly blocked
IL-1
-induced febrile responses [ANOVA for 23-h postinjection
period, treatment effects:
F(2,12) = 18.22, P < 0.0005; with time-treatment interaction:
F(14,84) = 8.88, P < 0.0001; SNK test: control vs. CP + IL-1
,
q(3,12) = 8.45, P < 0.05; control vs. IP + IL-1
,
q(2,12) = 5.28, P < 0.05; and CP + IL-1
vs. IP + IL-1
,
q(2,12) = 3.17, P < 0.05 (Fig. 3, Table 1)].
|
|
Experiment 4: Effects of IP and CP on Spontaneous Sleep in Rats
Intracerebroventricular administration of 5 µg of the IP had no effect on NREMS, REMS time, SWA, and Tbr in rats. Although 50 µg of the CP slightly increased NREMS compared with the control after light onset administration, 50 µg of the IP decreased the total amount of time spent in NREMS compared with the control or the CP group [ANOVA for 23-h postinjection period, treatment effects: F(2,14) = 17.52, P < 0.0005; SNK test: control vs. CP, q(2,14) = 4.03, P < 0.05; control vs. IP, q(2,14) = 4.34, P < 0.05; and CP vs. IP, q(3,14) = 8.37, P < 0.05 (Table 2)]. The 50-µg dose of IP given at the light onset also suppressed REMS compared with the control but not compared with results obtained after the CP [ANOVA for 23-h postinjection period, treatment effects: F(2,14) = 6.38, P < 0.05; SNK test: control vs. IP, q(3,14) = 5.02, P < 0.05]. Neither SWA nor Tbr was affected by the 50-µg dose. CP administration at dark onset did not affect any sleep parameters (Table 2).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The major finding of the present study is that the IP inhibits
spontaneous NREMS in rats and rabbits. The inhibitory actions of the IP
on NREMS are similar to those we previously reported for IL-4
(27) and IL-10 (26) in rabbits in that the
inhibitory effects began 8-10 h postinjection and were observed
only during the dark period after administration in the light period.
The reason for this delay remains unknown, but there are several
possibilities. For example, the time for the diffusion of the IP from
cerebrospinal fluid to effective sites could be long. The NREMS
inhibitory action of the IP could result from the suppression of the
production of new sleep-promoting substances such as IL-1
and
TNF-
. The mRNA levels of IL-1
and TNF-
are already high during
the initial few daylight hours (4, 45);
therefore, IL-1
and TNF-
levels in the CNS were likely high at
the time of the IP injection during the light period. Because bolus
injections of IL-1
or TNF-
enhance sleep for 6-12 h, high
levels of endogenous IL-1
or TNF-
may also maintain sleep for
several hours, the IP-induced inhibition only becoming manifest as
newly produced IL-1
or TNF-
, etc. is reduced.
Another result of this study is that the IP inhibited IL-1
-induced
sleep in rabbits. We performed this experiment because the IL-1 type I
receptor signals via NF-
B (13, 40).
Pretreatment of rabbits with the IP 15 min before IL-1
administration was without effect. However, there was a significant
inhibition of IL-1
-induced NREMS if rabbits were pretreated 12 h prior to IL-1
administration. The reasons for this time delay are
likely similar to those described above for the actions of the IP on
spontaneous sleep.
EEG delta-wave amplitudes are thought to reflect the intensity of
NREMS. For example, EEG supranormal slow waves occur during the deep
sleep after sleep deprivation (46). In the current study
the IP inhibited spontaneous EEG SWA in the 0.5- to 4-Hz frequency band
during the dark period in rabbits. Moreover, the IP attenuated
IL-1
-induced augmentation in EEG SWA (0.5-4 Hz) during the dark
hours. These findings provide support for the idea that NF-
B is
involved in physiological sleep regulation. Regardless, changes in EEG
SWA did not always correspond to those of NREMS in the current study.
This suggests that the mechanism of maintaining NREMS is different from
that of generating EEG SWA. Many previous studies support this notion.
For example, electrolytic lesions of the preoptic area of the
hypothalamus induce long-term reduction of EEG SWA, whereas NREMS
returns close to normal values after 8 days postlesion
(44). Rats allowed to eat only during the daylight hours
shift their diurnal rhythm of NREMS, becoming daytime active and
nighttime sleep, but do not shift the diurnal rhythm of changes in EEG
SWA (42). Moreover, benzodiazepines enhance NREMS but
decrease EEG SWA, whereas GABAA receptor agonists enhance
NREMS with an increase in EEG SWA. (29, reviewed in Ref. 28).
In the present study, we showed that the IP also inhibits REMS in rats
and rabbits; however, it neither antagonized nor augmented the
inhibition of REMS induced by IL-1
. Interestingly, the onset of
IP-induced inhibition of REMS is faster than that of NREMS, occurring
within 4-6 h postinjection. These data are also consistent with
the REMS inhibitory actions of IL-4 (27) and IL-10
(26) and support the involvement of NF-
B in the REMS
inhibitory mechanisms of IL-4 and IL-10. It is thought that sleep
regulatory mechanisms of REMS are different from those of NREMS. A
possible mechanism of IL-4 and IL-10 could be due to the inhibition of
NOS-2 (26, 27). A brain stem NOergic
mechanism is implicated in REMS regulation. Microinjection of
N
-nitro-L-arginine, a NOS
inhibitor, into the pedunculopontine tegmental area reduces REMS in
cats (11). NO is thought to provide a negative feedback
signal via NF-
B; NO inhibits transcription of the NOS-2 gene by
interfering with binding of NF-
B to target DNA sites
(39). Another possible mechanism of REMS suppression could
be due to a suppression of NGF expression. NGF promotes REMS in rabbits
(47) and cats (52). NGF is important in the development and maintenance of cholinergic basal forebrain neurons; these neurons are involved in REMS regulation (reviewed in Ref. 49).
Collectively, it is reasonable to assume that the IP inhibition of REMS
results from several processes.
The IP did not increase Tbr in rats but slightly increased
Tbr in rabbits; the cause of this mild febrile response in
rabbits is unknown. This effect was transient and occurred before
IP-induced inhibition of NREMS occurred. It is possible, though not
certain, that in the process of manufacturing the IP small amounts of
contaminants such as endotoxin were introduced. Regardless, the IP
attenuated IL-1
-induced febrile responses. A possible inhibitory
mechanism for this effect involves prostaglandins (PG). IL-1
increases PGE2 synthesis via induction of COX-2
(34). NF-
B is involved in the production of COX-2 mRNA
(18, 34). Therefore, it is possible that the
IP inhibited IL-1
-induced COX-2 gene expression and thereby
attenuate the febrile response of IL-1
.
Perspectives
Current results indicate that the inhibition of DNA transcription, a subcellular event, results in an inhibition of sleep, a multicellular event. The mechanism by which this occurs remains unknown, although the results are consistent with our hypothesis concerning sleep mechanisms (reviewed in Refs. 21, 24). We had described the involvement of growth factors, including several NF-
B-sensitive substances such as IL-1,
TNF, NGF, the adenosine A1 receptor, COX-2, NOS-2, fibroblast growth
factor, insulin-like growth factor-1, epidermal growth factor, IL-4,
IL-10, and IL-2, in NREMS regulation (reviewed in Ref. 23). These
factors are organized in parallel redundant interacting systems, each
affecting each other and collectively regulating sleep. We posited that within small groups of highly interconnected neurons, the intense use
of neurons leads to the production of one or more of the
above-mentioned growth factors; this has been demonstrated for IL-1,
NGF, and neurotrophin-2 (NT-2; 33, 41, 43). The growth factors, in
turn, via autocrine and paracrine actions induced altered input-output relationships for the affected neurons (e.g., Ref. 31). We proposed that these altered input-output relationships are sleep at the local
neuronal group level. Thus if NF-
B transcription is inhibited by the
IP, new neuronal use-induced production of these growth factors would
be curtailed, as would the shift to altered input-output relationships
and hence sleep. That some sleep persists in IP-treated animals can be
explained in part by the fact that some somnogenic growth factors,
e.g., NT-2, are NF-
B independent. It also seems unlikely that a
single bolus injection of the IP would lead to the inhibition of all
B binding sites. Finally, the IP may not inhibit nuclear
translocation of all the NF-
B/Rel family heterodimers.
Results are also consistent with our idea of sleep function. Many of
the NF-
B-sensitive growth factors also play a role in synaptic
plasticity and efficacy. Because the microcircuitry of the brain
remains dynamic throughout adulthood and is determined to a large
degree by its use and disuse, some mechanism is needed to maintain
synapses responsible for innate and acquired memories. For example,
many of the synapses involved in those processes, such as mating
behavior, respiratory responses to high carbon dioxide levels, or for
recall of memories formed years before, are seldom used, yet are
maintained. These synapses, like others, need stimulation to remain
efficacious. Growth factors, induced by neuronal use via their ability
to alter expression of genes involved in synapse formation, provide the
structural basis for synapses and as a result alter the microcircuitry
as a function of neural use. The manner by which they keep seldom-used
synapses functional is that they also have secondary actions affecting membrane potentials of nearby cells and thereby alter the input-output relationships of those cells (e.g., Ref. 31). Thus synapses that were
not activated by an initial environmental stimulus are secondarily
activated after a time delay due to growth factor production and
diffusion times (see Krueger and Obál for a model of these
events, reviewed in Refs. 21, 24). Such actions shift activity patterns
within neural groups and divorce the output of such affected groups
from immediate reference to the environment. Thus the shift in activity
serves to preserve synapses not directly activated by environmental
cues, and the desynchrony between environmental input and neural group
output provides a basis for the reduced responsiveness to the
environment associated with sleep. Current results suggest that NF-
B
could play a role in this cascade of events.
In conclusion, current data are consistent with the hypothesis that the
cytokine network in the CNS is involved with sleep regulation. NF-
B
is a critical transcriptional factor regulating the CNS cytokine
network, and it likely plays an important role in physiological sleep regulation.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Richard A. Brown for expertise in animal care.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NS-25378, NS-31453, and HD-36520).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. M. Krueger, Dept. of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy, Pharmacology, and Physiology, Washington State Univ., College of Veterinary Medicine, PO Box 646520. Pullman, WA 99164-6520 (E-mail: krueger{at}vetmed.wsu.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 22 December 1999; accepted in final form 25 February 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Ballou, LR,
Laulederkind SJ,
Rosloniec EF,
and
Raghow R.
Ceramide signalling and the immune response.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1301:
273-287,
1996[Medline].
2.
Barnes, PJ.
Nuclear factor-
B.
Int J Biochem Cell Biol
29:
867-870,
1997[ISI][Medline].
3.
Benoliel, AM,
Kahn-Peries B,
Imbert J,
and
Verrando P.
Insulin stimulates haptotactic migration of human epidermal keratinocytes through activation of NF-
B transcription factor.
J Cell Sci
110:
2089-2097,
1997[Abstract].
4.
Bredow, S,
Guha-Thakurta N,
Taishi P,
Obál F, Jr,
and
Krueger JM.
Diurnal variations of tumor necrosis factor-
mRNA and
-tubulin mRNA in rat brain.
Neuroimmunomodulation
4:
84-90,
1997[ISI][Medline].
5.
Byrd, VM,
Ballard DW,
Miller GG,
and
Thomas JW.
Fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1) enhances IL-2 production and nuclear translocation of NF-
B in FGF receptor-bearing Jurkat T cells.
J Immunol
162:
5853-5859,
1999
6.
Carter, BD,
Kaltschmidt C,
Kaltschmidt B,
Offenhäuser N,
Röhm-Matthaei B,
Baeuerle PA,
and
Barde YA.
Selective activation of NF-
B by nerve growth factor through the neurotrophin receptor p75.
Science
272:
542-545,
1996[Abstract].
7.
Chaturvedi, MM,
Higuchi M,
and
Aggarwal BB.
Effect of tumor necrosis factors, interferons, interleukins, and growth factors on the activation of NF-
B: evidence for lack of correlation with cell proliferation.
Lymphokine Cytokine Res
13:
309-313,
1994[ISI][Medline].
8.
Chen, Z,
Gardi J,
Kushikata T,
Fang J,
and
Krueger JM.
Nuclear factor-
B-like activity increases in murine cerebral cortex after sleep deprivation.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
276:
R1812-R1818,
1999
9.
Clarke, CJ,
Hales A,
Hunt A,
and
Foxwell BM.
IL-10-mediated suppression of TNF-
production is independent of its ability to inhibit NF-
B activity.
Eur J Immunol
28:
1719-1726,
1998[ISI][Medline].
10.
Clarke, CJ,
Taylor-Fishwick DA,
Hales A,
Chernajovsky Y,
Sugamura K,
Feldmann M,
and
Foxwell BM.
Interleukin-4 inhibits
light chain expression and NF-
B activation but not I
B
degradation in 70Z/3 murine pre-B cells.
Eur J Immunol
25:
2961-2966,
1995[ISI][Medline].
11.
Datta, S,
Patterson EH,
and
Siwek DF.
Endogenous and exogenous nitric oxide in the pedunculopontine tegmentum induces sleep.
Synapse
27:
69-78,
1997[ISI][Medline].
12.
Eizirik, DL,
Flodstrom M,
Karlsen AE,
and
Welsh N.
The harmony of the spheres: inducible nitric oxide synthase and related genes in pancreatic beta cells.
Diabetologia
39:
875-890,
1996[ISI][Medline].
13.
Fang, J,
Wang Y,
and
Krueger JM.
Effects of interleukin-1
on sleep are mediated by the type I receptor.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
274:
R655-R660,
1998
14.
Friedman, WJ,
Thakur S,
Seidman L,
and
Rabson AB.
Regulation of nerve growth factor mRNA by interleukin-1 in rat hippocampal astrocytes is mediated by NF-
B.
J Biol Chem
271:
31115-31120,
1996
15.
Heese, K,
Fiebich BL,
Bauer J,
and
Otten U.
NF-
B modulates lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial nerve growth factor expression.
Glia
22:
401-407,
1998[ISI][Medline].
16.
Heese, K,
Hock C,
and
Otten U.
Inflammatory signals induce neurotrophin expression in human microglial cells.
J Neurochem
70:
699-707,
1998[ISI][Medline].
17.
Hoyos, B,
Ballard DW,
Bohnlein E,
Siekevitz M,
and
Greene WC.
B-specific DNA binding proteins: role in the regulation of human interleukin-2 gene expression.
Science
244:
457-460,
1989
18.
Hwang, D,
Jang BC,
Yu G,
and
Boudreau M.
Expression of mitogen-inducible cyclooxygenase induced by lipopolysaccharide: mediation through both mitogen-activated protein kinase and NF-
B signaling pathways in macrophages.
Biochem Pharmacol
54:
87-96,
1997[ISI][Medline].
19.
Kapás, L,
Obál F, Jr,
and
Krueger JM.
Humoral regulation of sleep.
Int Rev Neurobiol
35:
131-160,
1993[ISI][Medline].
20.
Krueger, JM,
and
Majde JA.
Microbial products and cytokines in sleep and fever regulation.
Crit Rev Immunol
14:
355-379,
1994[ISI][Medline].
21.
Krueger, JM,
and
Obál F, Jr.
A neuronal group theory of sleep function.
J Sleep Res
2:
63-69,
1993[Medline].
22.
Krueger, JM,
and
Obál F, Jr.
Sleep regulatory substances.
In: Monographs in Clinical Neuroscience, edited by Schwartz WJ.. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1997, p. 175-194.
23.
Krueger, JM,
Obál F, Jr,
and
Fang J.
Humoral regulation of physiological sleep: cytokines and GHRH.
J Sleep Res
8, Suppl1:
53-59,
1999.
24.
Krueger, JM,
Obál F, Jr,
Kapás L,
and
Fang J.
Brain organization and sleep function.
Behav Brain Res
69:
177-185,
1995[ISI][Medline].
25.
Kushikata, T,
Fang J,
and
Krueger JM.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor enhances spontaneous sleep in rats and rabbits.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
276:
R1334-R1338,
1999
26.
Kushikata, T,
Fang J,
and
Krueger JM.
Interleukin-10 inhibits spontanenous sleep in rabbits.
J Interferon Cytokine Res
19:
1025-1030,
1999[ISI][Medline].
27.
Kushikata, T,
Fang J,
Wang Y,
and
Krueger JM.
Interleukin-4 inhibits spontaneous sleep in rabbits.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
275:
R1185-R1191,
1998
28.
Lancel, M.
Role of GABAA receptors in the regulation of sleep: initial sleep responses to peripherally administered modulators and agonists.
Sleep
22:
33-42,
1999[ISI][Medline].
29.
Lancel, M,
Cronlein TA,
and
Faulhaber J.
Role of GABAA receptors in sleep regulation. Differential effects of muscimol and midazolam on sleep in rats.
Neuropsychopharmacology
15:
63-74,
1996[ISI][Medline].
30.
Lin, YZ,
Yao SY,
Veach RA,
Torgerson TR,
and
Hawiger J.
Inhibition of nuclear translocation of transcription factor NF-
B by a synthetic peptide containing a cell membrane-permeable motif and nuclear localization sequence.
J Biol Chem
270:
14255-14258,
1995
31.
Luk, WP,
Zhang Y,
White TD,
Lue FA,
Wu C,
Jiang CG,
Zhang L,
and
Moldofsky H.
Adenosine: a mediator of interleukin-1
-induced hippocampal synaptic inhibition.
J Neurosci
19:
4238-4244,
1999
32.
Nakajima, K,
Kikuchi Y,
Ikoma E,
Honda S,
Ishikawa M,
Liu Y,
and
Kohsaka S.
Neurotrophins regulate the function of cultured microglia.
Glia
24:
272-289,
1998[ISI][Medline].
33.
Neeper, SA,
Gomez-Pinilla F,
Choi J,
and
Cotman CW.
Physical activity increases mRNA for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor in rat brain.
Brain Res
726:
49-56,
1996[ISI][Medline].
34.
Newton, R,
Kuitert LM,
Bergmann M,
Adcock IM,
and
Barnes PJ.
Evidence for involvement of NF-
B in the transcriptional control of COX-2 gene expression by IL-1
.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
237:
28-32,
1997[ISI][Medline].
35.
Nie, Z,
Mei Y,
Ford M,
Rybak L,
Marcuzzi A,
Ren H,
Stiles GL,
and
Ramkumar V.
Oxidative stress increases A1 adenosine receptor expression by activating nuclear factor
B.
Mol Pharmacol
53:
663-669,
1998
36.
Obál, F, Jr,
Kapás L,
Bodosi B,
and
Krueger JM.
Changes in sleep in response to intracerebral injection of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in the rat.
Sleep Research Online
1:
87-91,
1998.
37.
Obata, H,
Biro S,
Arima N,
Kaieda H,
Kihara T,
Eto H,
Miyata M,
and
Tanaka H.
NF-
B is induced in the nuclei of cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells by stimulation of various growth factors.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
224:
27-32,
1996[ISI][Medline].
38.
O'Neill, LA,
and
Kaltschmidt C.
NF-
B: a crucial transcription factor for glial and neuronal cell function.
Trends Neurosci
20:
252-258,
1997[ISI][Medline].
39.
Park, SK,
Lin HL,
and
Murphy S.
Nitric oxide regulates nitric oxide synthase-2 gene expression by inhibiting NF-
B binding to DNA.
Biochem J
322:
609-613,
1997.
40.
Reddy, SA,
Huang JH,
and
Liao WS.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in interleukin 1 signaling. Physical interaction with the interleukin 1 receptor and requirement in NF-
B and AP-1 activation.
J Biol Chem
272:
29167-29173,
1997
41.
Rocamora, N,
Welker E,
Pascual M,
and
Soriano E.
Upregulation of BDNF mRNA expression in the barrel cortex of adult mice after sensory stimulation.
J Neurosci
16:
4411-4419,
1996
42.
Roky, R,
Kapás L,
Taishi P,
Fang J,
and
Krueger JM.
Food restriction alters the diurnal distribution of sleep in rats.
Physiol Behav
67:
697-703,
1999[Medline].
43.
Schneider, H,
Pitossi F,
Balschun D,
Wagner A,
del Ray A,
and
Besedovski HO.
A neuromodulatory role of interleukin-1
in the hippocampus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
95:
7778-7783,
1998
44.
Shoham, S,
Blatteis CM,
and
Krueger JM.
Effects of preoptic area lesions on muramyl dipeptide-induced sleep and fever.
Brain Res
476:
396-399,
1989[ISI][Medline].
45.
Taishi, P,
Bredow S,
Guha-Thakurta N,
Obál F, Jr,
and
Krueger JM.
Diurnal variations of interleukin-1
mRNA and
-actin mRNA in rat brain.
J Neuroimmunol
75:
69-74,
1997[ISI][Medline].
46.
Takahashi, S,
Fang J,
Kapás L,
Wang Y,
and
Krueger JM.
Inhibition of brain interleukin-1 attenuates sleep rebound after sleep deprivation in rabbits.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
273:
R677-R682,
1997
47.
Takahashi, S,
and
Krueger JM.
Nerve growth factor enhances sleep in rabbits.
Neurosci Lett
264:
149-152,
1999[ISI][Medline].
48.
Taylor, BS,
Alarcon LH,
and
Billiar TR.
Inducible nitric oxide synthase in the liver: regulation and function.
Biochemistry (Mosc)
63:
766-781,
1998[Medline].
49.
Thoenen, H,
Bandtlow C,
and
Heumann R.
The physiological function of nerve growth factor in the central nervous system: comparison with the periphery.
Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol
109:
145-178,
1987[ISI][Medline].
50.
Wang, P,
Wu P,
Siegel MI,
Egan RW,
and
Billah MM.
Interleukin (IL)-10 inhibits nuclear factor
B (NF-
B) activation in human monocytes. IL-10 and IL-4 suppress cytokine synthesis by different mechanisms.
J Biol Chem
270:
9558-9563,
1995
51.
Wood, JN.
Regulation of NF-
B activity in rat dorsal root ganglia and PC12 cells by tumour necrosis factor and nerve growth factor.
Neurosci Lett
192:
41-44,
1995[ISI][Medline].
52.
Yamuy, J,
Morales FR,
and
Chase MH.
Induction of rapid eye movement sleep by the microinjection of nerve growth factor into the pontine reticular formation of the cat.
Neuroscience
66:
9-13,
1995[ISI][Medline].
53.
Yerneni, KK,
Bai W,
Khan BV,
Medford RM,
and
Natarajan R.
Hyperglycemia-induced activation of nuclear transcription factor
B in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Diabetes
48:
855-864,
1999[Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. A. Jhaveri, V. Ramkumar, R. A. Trammell, and L. A. Toth Spontaneous, homeostatic, and inflammation-induced sleep in NF-{kappa}B p50 knockout mice Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): R1516 - R1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yoshida, T. Kubota, and J. M. Krueger A cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor attenuates spontaneous and TNF-{alpha}-induced non-rapid eye movement sleep in rabbits Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R99 - R109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fujimori, Y. Fujitani, K. Kadoyama, H. Kumanogoh, K. Ishikawa, and Y. Urade Regulation of Lipocalin-type Prostaglandin D Synthase Gene Expression by Hes-1 through E-box and Interleukin-1beta via Two NF-kappa B Elements in Rat Leptomeningeal Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 6018 - 6026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yasuda, S. Takahashi, and A. Matsuki Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Reduces Ketamine- and Propofol-Induced Anesthesia Time in Rats Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 952 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kubota, J. Fang, R. A. Brown, and J. M. Krueger Interleukin-18 promotes sleep in rabbits and rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): R828 - R838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kubota, R. A. Brown, J. Fang, and J. M. Krueger Interleukin-15 and interleukin-2 enhance non-REM sleep in rabbits Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): R1004 - R1012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kubota, J. Fang, Z. Guan, R. A. Brown, and J. M. Krueger Vagotomy attenuates tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}-induce |