AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R1503-R1510, 1998;
0363-6119/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, J.
Right arrow Articles by Halsted, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, J.
Right arrow Articles by Halsted, C. H.
Vol. 275, Issue 5, R1503-R1510, November 1998

Membrane and tissue distribution of folate binding protein in pig

Jesus Villanueva, Erh-Hsin Ling, Carol J. Chandler, and Charles H. Halsted

Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Folate binding protein may participate in folate homeostasis by regulating monoglutamyl folate transport across relevant cell membranes. We compared the activity, immunoreactivity, and transcripts of folate binding protein in pig liver, kidney, and jejunal mucosa and their relevant cell membranes. Binding of [3H]folic acid was sixfold greater to pig liver plasma membranes than to kidney brush-border membranes, whereas there was no binding to jejunal brush-border membranes. The IgG fraction of rabbit antibody detected pig recombinant folate binding protein at 30 kDa and stained pig liver plasma membranes and kidney brush-border membranes but did not react with jejunal brush-border membranes. Folate binding protein transcripts were present in threefold greater abundance in pig liver than in kidney. Species comparisons showed folate binding protein transcripts in rat and human kidney but not in liver. Thus folate binding protein participates in folate homeostasis by regulating uptake by renal tubular membranes and uniquely by pig liver plasma membranes, but it is not involved in jejunal folate absorption.

liver; kidney; jejunum

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

FOLATE HOMEOSTASIS is regulated in part by the uptake of folates by intestinal, hepatic, and renal membranes. The digestion of dietary polyglutamyl folates at the jejunal brush-border (JBB) membrane is followed by membrane uptake and transport of derivative monoglutamyl folates (7). Folate uptake at the liver plasma membrane (LPM) is followed by intrahepatic storage and metabolism (34) and then secretion of ~10% to an enterohepatic folate circulation and the remainder to the systemic circulation (35). Urinary folate excretion is regulated by >95% tubular reabsorption at the kidney brush-border (KBB) membrane (42). Candidate proteins that regulate the membrane uptake of monoglutamyl folates include the high-affinity folate binding protein (FBP) (1) and a lower-affinity transporter, the reduced folate carrier protein (1, 8).

The overall goal of the present study was to study the potential role of FBP in folate homeostasis in the pig by comparing its activities, transcripts, and immunoreactivities in relevant membranes and tissues. We chose the pig as an experimental model because we have previously shown a similar process of hydrolysis of polyglutamyl folate and of JBB folate hydrolase in pig and human (7) and because we recently cloned and described the molecular sequence and properties of the cDNA of pig liver FBP (38).

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Chemicals. [3',5',7,9-3H]folic acid (28 Ci/mmol); [3',5',7,9-3H]5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid (27 Ci/mmol); and [3',5',7-3H]methotrexate (26 Ci/mmol) were purchased from Moraveck Biochemicals (Brea, CA). The superscript preamplification system was purchased from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Taq DNA polymerase was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). All other reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO) and various commercial sources. [alpha -32P]dCTP (3,000 mCi/mmol) and [alpha -35S]dATP (1,000 mCi/mmol) were purchased from Amersham Life Sciences (Arlington Heights, IL). The full-length cDNA for pig liver FBP was available from our recent study (38). cDNA probes for human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were obtained from ATCC (Rockville, MD). Hybridization-ready blots containing poly(A)+ RNA from multiple human and rat tissues were obtained from Clontech Laboratories (Palo Alto, CA). Protein A was obtained from Sigma. Purified bovine milk FBP was a gift from F. Kolhouse, University of Colorado. Rabbit anti-human sera to KB human cancer cell FBP was a gift from S. Rothenberg, State University of New York Brooklyn.

Animals and tissues. Initial kinetic studies used tissues from 4-mo-old, 40-kg Yorkshire pigs of both sexes that were fed commercial diets ad libitum, whereas subsequent comparison studies used frozen tissues and membranes that were obtained from a prior study of five juvenile male Yucatan micropigs that had been fed a balanced control diet for 12 mo that contained all essential nutrients including added folic acid at 16.6 mg/kg body wt (39). For each experiment, tissues were obtained fresh at open surgery of anesthetized pigs. Following described protocols, liver samples were used for immediate preparation of LPM, which were then frozen at -80°C before further use, whereas kidney and jejunal mucosal samples were initially frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C before subsequent preparations of KBB and JBB membranes (39). For each jejunal mucosal harvest, adjacent 10-cm sections of proximal jejunum were resected, opened longitudinally, and rapidly rinsed with ice-cold saline or saline containing 4 M guanidium thiocyanate to inhibit intestinal RNAses before jejunal mucosa scraping and freezing.

Tissue folates. Serum and tissue folates were measured by conventional microbiological assay with Lactobacillus casei. Serum folates were assayed without heat denaturation of protein. Tissue folates were assayed following homogenization, heat denaturation, folate extraction, and treatment with purified exogenous hog kidney folate hydrolase to convert tissue polyglutamyl folates to their monoglutamyl derivatives (36).

Membrane preparations. LPM, KBB membranes, and JBB membranes were purified from fresh liver and from frozen and thawed kidney and jejunal mucosal samples as previously described (18, 39). According to the marker enzymes Na+-K+-ATPase, leucine aminopeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase, hepatic sinusoidal membranes were purified 20-fold and canalicular membranes 4- and 7-fold, respectively, and combined as LPM. KBB and JBB membranes were identified with 12-fold purity on the basis of activities of alkaline phosphatase and leucine aminopeptidase. Each preparation was deemed free of contamination by mitochondria, microsomes, or lysosomal membranes as shown by lack of enrichment of succinic dehydrogenase, NADPH cytochrome-c reductase, and beta -N-acetylglucosaminidase assay, respectively (39). The specific activities, enrichments, and recoveries of each membrane marker were determined after protein measurement by the Bio-Rad assay (Richmond, CA).

Folate binding. To dissociate endogenously bound folate, each membrane preparation was acid-washed by dilution in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 3.5, then centrifuged at 16,000 g for 10 min. In each assay, removal of the endogenous folate by acid dissociation increased [3H]folic acid binding by ~90%, indicating that the FBP receptor in each membrane was for the most part occupied by folate molecules. Membrane pellets were resuspended in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl, and used for the equilibrium binding assay. Concentrations of [3H]folic acid or other labeled folate derivatives ranging from 0.5 to 50 nM were added to duplicate samples containing 0.1 mg membrane protein, 150 mmol of NaCl, and 100 mmol of potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, in a final volume of 1.0 ml. Following 30-min incubations at 37°C, 0.1-ml aliquots were removed and counted in a Beckman LS 3901 scintillation counter to determine specific activities. The samples were then centrifuged at 16,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The concentration of unbound (free) folate was measured after counting 0.5 ml of the supernatant. After removal of the remaining supernatant, bound folate was measured in the pellet, which was resuspended in 1 ml of phosphate buffer, pH 3.5, and transferred to a scintillation vial for counting. By plotting the concentration of bound folate versus the concentration of bound folate divided by the concentration of free folate, the affinity constant (Kd) and binding capacities (pmol/mg protein) were calculated by Scatchard plot analysis (17).

Initial experiments assessed the effects of pH, temperature, incubation time, protein concentration, and hyperosmolarity on [3H]folic acid binding by LPM that were isolated from a Yorkshire pig. Kinetic comparisons of membrane binding of different concentrations of [3H]folic acid, 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, and methotrexate were made using five different LPM preparations from our prior study of Yucatan micropigs (39). Subsequent comparisons were made of [3H]folic acid binding using JBB membranes, LPM, and KBB membranes prepared from tissues from the same five animals.

Preparation of recombinant FBP. The amplified 759-bp open reading frame of pig liver FBP (38) was ligated into pProEX-1 vector (Life Technologies) and then transformed into Escherichia coli. DNA was isolated from transformants using the standard minipreparation procedure to verify the correct insertion of the open reading frame. A recombinant FBP fusion protein was induced according to the manufacturer's protocol (Life Technologies) and purified by using TALON metal affinity resin (Clontech Laboratories) to release recombinant FBP under denaturing conditions in 8 M urea. The purity of the recombinant FBP was determined by 10% SDS-PAGE (15) before and after dialysis against PBS, and protein was identified by Coomassie blue stain (Bio-Rad).

Antiserum to recombinant FBP. Approximately 150 µg of recombinant FBP emulsified in an equal volume of complete Freund's adjuvant was injected subcutaneously into three or four sites in each of three New Zealand White rabbits. Two booster injections of 150 µg each of recombinant FBP emulsified in incomplete Freund's adjuvant were injected subcutaneously at 2-wk intervals, and the rabbits were bled 2-4 wk thereafter. Preimmune sera were used as control. The IgG fractions of preimmune and antisera were purified using a HiTrap affinity column (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ).

Immunoprecipitation. The specificity of rabbit antiserum IgG was determined by its immunoprecipitation of recombinant pig FBP. Following an established protocol (13), 40 µg of recombinant FBP were mixed with 10 µg of the purified IgG fraction of rabbit antiserum or preimmune serum and the volume was adjusted to 500 µl with Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.5. After overnight incubation at 4°C, 50 µl of protein A were added to the incubation mixture for an additional 1 h. After 1 min of centrifugation (200 g), the pellet was washed two times with PBS, pH 7.5, and once with 0.05 M Tris at pH 6.8, and was then resuspended with 20 µl Laemmli sample buffer (2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.05 M Tris at pH 6.8), heated for 5 min at 100°C, and resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. Protein bands in the original recombinant FBP and the immunoprecipitate were detected by Silver Stain Plus according to the manufacturer (Bio-Rad).

Immunoblots. In addition to confirming the size of recombinant pig FBP, immunoblots were used to validate the authenticity of the rabbit antiserum IgG by comparing its ability to detect purified bovine milk FBP with that of a separate rabbit antibody to human KB cell FBP. Two micrograms each of recombinant FBP and purified bovine milk FBP were resolved on 12.5% SDS-PAGE and then electrotransferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, MA), followed by sequential incubations with the purified IgG fraction of rabbit antiserum to recombinant FBP in 1:3,000 dilution or with antiserum to human KB cell FBP in 1:1,000 dilution. Each primary antibody treatment was followed by secondary incubation with 1:3,000 goat anti-rabbit antibody linked to alkaline phosphatase (Bio-Rad).

Immunohistochemistry. Membrane FBP was detected by immunohistochemical staining of relevant tissues with rabbit antiserum IgG. Liver, kidney and jejunal tissue samples were collected fresh from a Yorkshire pig and were stored in 10% Formalin at 4°C for paraffin embedding and then each was sectioned at 5 µm. Sections were deparaffinized, washed three times in PBS for 5 min each, and then treated with blocking solution containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 1% H2O2 for 1 h. After blocking, sections were incubated with 1:5,000 (vol/vol) of the IgG fraction of rabbit preimmune and antisera to recombinant FBP for 2 h at room temperature. After primary antibody incubation, sections were washed five times in PBS. Tissue slices were then incubated in 1:1,000 goat anti-rabbit serum linked to horseradish peroxidase for 1 h at room temperature, washed five times in PBS, and reacted for 10 min with True Blue (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD). Sections were washed five times in distilled water and mounted on gelatin-coated slides. Microscopic images were obtained using an Olympus BH-2 microscope linked to Optonics CCD-color digital camera. Images were digitized to a personal computer (Macintosh Power-PC) and printed from a laser printer with photograde gray scale at 600 dots per inch.

Northern blots. Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated from micropig tissues using the Fast Tract 2.0 mRNA isolation system (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) [3]. Five micrograms each of poly(A)+ RNA from each tissue were separated by electrophoresis on 1.0% (wt/vol) agarose/2.2 M formaldehyde gels, transferred to nylon membranes, and hybridized with an amplified 32P-labeled 759-bp fragment of the open reading frame of the cDNA of pig liver FBP (38). The primers for cDNA amplification by the polymerase chain reaction were constructed from bases 89 to 109 (sense) and from bases 834 to 851 (antisense) (38). A 32P-labeled 0.8-kb Xba I-Pst I fragment of human GAPDH cDNA was used as a positive internal control for mRNA. Following sequential hybridization with each probe, blots were washed twice for 15 min each in a solution of 6 × saline-sodium phosphate-EDTA (SSPE)/0.1% SDS at room temperature and then twice in 1 × SSPE/0.1% SDS at 37°C, and subsequently analyzed for 32P distribution and intensity using a Bio-Rad phosphoimager (37). Briefly, blotted dry membranes were exposed overnight with the high-sensitivity screen of a Molecular Imager System (GS-250, Bio-Rad) followed by screen scanning. The resulting images were processed and quantified using Phosphor Analyst software (Bio-Rad, v. 1.1). Counts accumulated by the radiation-sensitive screen of the phosphoimager were statistically analyzed after subtracting background from each sample.

Statistics. Results are expressed as means ± SE. Values from experiments that used micropig tissues and membranes were compared using Student's t-test. The acceptable level of significance (P) was <0.05 for each analysis.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Tissue folate levels. Total folate levels were measured in serum, liver, and kidney tissues from each of five Yucatan micropigs by microbiologic assay with L. casei. The folate level was greatest in the serum at 10.2 ± 3.3 nmol/l and was twice as concentrated in liver at 6.5 ± 0.8 nmol/g as in kidney at 2.6 ± 0.4 nmol/g (P < 0.005).

Folate binding by membranes. Preliminary studies of LPM isolated from a Yorkshire pig showed that the binding of [3H]folic acid at 37°C for 30 min was optimal at pH 7.5, was proportionate to protein concentration, and was not affected by increasing the osmolarity of the media by the addition of mannitol to the incubation medium (Fig. 1). Similar observations were made using purified KBB membranes (not shown). Figure 2 compares the kinetics of binding of [3H]folic acid by LPM, KBB membranes, and JBB membranes that were isolated from a Yorkshire pig. In this representative experiment, Kd values for [3H]folic acid by LPM and KBB membranes were similar, whereas the total binding capacity of [3H]folic acid (pmol/mg membrane protein) by LPM was greater than binding by KBB membranes, and there was no measurable binding of [3H]folic acid by isolated JBB membranes.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effects of pH (A), protein concentration (B), and buffer osmolarity (C) on binding of [3H]folic acid by liver plasma membrane (LPM) prepared from liver of Yorkshire pig. Osmolarity was adjusted by adding different concentrations of mannitol to the buffer solution.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Comparisons of [3H]folic acid binding by LPM (A), kidney brush-border (KBB) membranes (B), and jejunal brush-border (JBB) membranes (C) prepared from tissues from a Yorkshire pig. All measurements were made in duplicate. Scatchard plots show affinity binding constant (1/slope) at 1.4 nM in LPM and at 0.98 nM in KBB membrane. Binding capacities are calculated from the x-intercept at 11 pmol/mg in LPM and 1.5 pmol/mg in KBB membrane. No measurable specific binding was detected in JBB membrane.

Table 1 provides quantitative comparisons among the binding kinetics of [3H]folic acid, [3H]5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, and [3H]methotrexate by LPM samples that were available from five different Yucatan micropigs (39). As shown, the binding affinity of purified LPM for [3H]5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid was twofold greater than that for [3H]folic acid (P < 0.02), whereas the affinity of LPM for [3H]methotrexate was 10-fold less than the affinity for [3H]folic acid (P < 0.005), and the total binding capacity of LPM was similar for each substrate.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Binding of different 3H-labeled monoglutamyl folates by LPM

The binding of [3H]folic acid was compared in purified LPM, KBB membranes, and JBB membranes available from the same Yucatan micropigs (39). As shown in Table 2, binding affinities were similar, but the total binding capacity of LPM for [3H]folic acid was sixfold greater than that of KBB membranes (P < 0.005). As in the preliminary study (Fig. 2), there was no detectable binding of [3H]folic acid by JBB membranes from these animals.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Binding of [3H]folic acid by different membranes

Immunological studies. As shown in Fig. 3, recombinant pig FBP was identified by 10% SDS-PAGE as a single protein band at 30 kDa that was identical to the immunoprecipitate resulting from incubation with the IgG fraction of rabbit antiserum and protein A. As shown in Fig. 4, immunoblot with the IgG fraction of rabbit antiserum confirmed the recombinant protein at 30 kDa. The authenticity of the IgG antibody was validated by the identification of two protein bands in native purified bovine milk FBP at 31 and 38 kDa in separate reactions with either the rabbit IgG antibody to recombinant pig FBP or with the gift rabbit antiserum to human KB cell FBP. As shown in Fig. 5, membrane FBP was localized by immunohistochemical staining of liver, kidney, and jejunal mucosa using the IgG fraction of antiserum to the recombinant protein. FBP was detected on the surface of hepatocytes and renal tubular epithelial cells, whereas no staining was found in JBB membranes. FBP was identified incidentally within liver slices on the surfaces of intrasinusoidal red blood cells.


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Immunoprecipitation of recombinant folate binding protein (FBP). Proteins were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and identified by Silver Stain (see text). M, marker standards; lane 1, recombinant FBP identified as an overstained black band at 30 kDa; lane 2, recombinant FBP identified as a black band at 30 kDa following immunoprecipitation with IgG fraction of rabbit antisera complexed to protein A; lane 3, lack of immunoprecipitation by IgG fraction of preimmune rabbit sera complexed to protein A.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Immunoblots of pig purified recombinant FBP and bovine milk FBP. Two micrograms each of pig purified recombinant FBP and bovine milk FBP were resolved on 12.5% SDS-PAGE and then blotted with IgG fraction of rabbit antisera (lanes 1 and 2). Bovine milk FBP was also blotted with gift rabbit antisera to purified human KB cell FBP (lane 3). Each primary reaction was followed by secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody linked to alkaline phosphatase. Pig recombinant FBP was identified by its antisera at 30 kDa (lane 1), whereas native bovine FBP was identified by each antisera at 31 and 38 kDa (lanes 2 and 3).


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Immunohistochemical staining with IgG fractions of rabbit preimmune sera (left) and antisera to recombinant pig FBP (right). Sections of micropig liver (a and b), kidney (c and d), and jejunal mucosa (e and f) are shown. Arrows indicate positive reactions of antisera to recombinant FBP on the surface of representative hepatocyte membranes (b) and proximal renal tubule cells (d). Smaller round staining structures represent FBP on the surface of intrasinusoidal red cell membranes (b). CV, central vein. ×100 Magnification.

Northern blots of FBP transcripts. Figure 6 compares mRNA transcripts of FBP and GAPDH in liver and kidney samples from each Yucatan micropig. The FBP transcript intensity was consistently greater in micropig liver samples than in kidney samples, whereas GAPDH transcripts appeared in equal intensity in samples from each tissue. FBP mRNA was absent from jejunal mucosa (not shown). Quantitative analysis of phosphoimager intensities showed that the ratio of FBP to GAPDH in mRNA extracts of liver samples, 4.32 ± 0.5, was threefold greater than the ratio of 0.87 ± 0.1 in mRNA extracts of kidney samples (P < 0.001). Figure 7 compares the abundance of mRNA transcripts of FBP in commercially obtained human and rat tissues. Transcripts of FBP were found in human heart, placenta, lung, and kidney (Fig. 7A) and in rat kidney (Fig. 7B), but were absent from liver of both species.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Autoradiographs of Northern blots of mRNA prepared from 5 micropig livers (lanes 1-5) and kidneys (lanes 6-10). Blots were hybridized with cDNA probes of pig FBP (1.35 kb) and human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; 1.1 kb) as an internal standard. In each animal, the intensity of liver mRNA FBP was greater than that of kidney mRNA FBP, whereas GAPDH intensities were similar. Ratio of the intensity of FBP to GAPDH in liver was 3-fold greater than ratio in kidney (4.32 ± 0.48 vs. 0.87-0.07; P < 0.001).


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Northern blots of human and rat tissues. Human (A) and rat (B) Northern blots were obtained from Clontech Laboratories and were hybridized with 32P-labeled pig FBP cDNA open reading frame 759 bp fragment as described in the text. A: lane 1, heart; lane 2, brain; lane 3, placenta; lane 4, lung; lane 5, liver; lane 6, skeletal muscle; lane 7, kidney; lane 8, pancreas. B: lane 1, heart; lane 2, brain; lane 3, spleen; lane 4, lung; lane 5, liver; lane 6, skeletal muscle; lane 7, kidney; lane 8, testis. FBP transcripts were identified in human heart, placenta, lung, and kidney (A) and in rat kidney (B), but were absent from liver of either species.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

FBP, or the folate receptor, was identified as a 37-kDa glycosylated protein with a high affinity for folic acid and was characterized at the molecular level in several human cancer-cell lines and in human placenta (1, 6, 14, 22, 24, 27, 28). Recently, we characterized the cDNA of FBP from pig liver, finding >70% nucleotide and amino acid sequence homology with FBP from other species (38). The different isoforms of FBP are present on chromosome 11 (1) and appear to share a common open reading frame sequence with a carboxy terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor sequence (26). The role of FBP in folate homeostasis has been questioned because of its preference for oxidized folic acid over normally circulating 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid (1) and the absence of its transcripts and immunoreactivity in autopsy-derived human intestine and liver (40, 41). Recently, a different putative transporter, the 57-kDa reduced folate carrier protein, was cloned from mouse L1210 cells (5), and its sequence and transcripts were found in human placenta and intestine (21, 23). Thus FBP and/or the alternative reduced folate carrier could act independently or synergistically in the transport of monoglutamyl folates across tissue membranes.

Previous studies suggested that different transport mechanisms could account for folate uptake by membranes of intestinal mucosal epithelial cells, hepatocytes, and renal tubular epithelial cells. Studies that used isolated JBB vesicles from rat, rabbit, human, and pig defined a saturable transport carrier that operates with Michaelis constants of 0.5 to 1.5 µM, prefers 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid over folic acid as substrate, and demonstrates either H+ cotransport or anion exchange (20, 29, 31, 33), consistent with recent evidence for the presence of the reduced folate carrier in intestinal epithelial cells (21). Prior studies of hepatic folate uptake by liver cells and LPM provide evidence for either or both binding and carrier-mediated membrane transport. In an early study, parenteral [3H]folic acid was bound initially to rat LPM before the intrahepatic appearance of labeled intracellular folate (43). Another group demonstrated high-affinity FBP in solubilized rat LPM that exhibited Kd of ~7 nM and substrate preference for oxidized Pte-Glu (4). Other studies described minimal binding and predominant carrier-mediated transport of 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid by LPM vesicles isolated from human and rat liver (9, 10). FBP was isolated and purified from pig KBB membranes at 38.5 kDa with an apparent equal specificity for folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid (11). In another study, FBP that was purified from rat KBB membranes at an estimated 30 kDa exhibited substrate preference for folic acid and was localized to rat KBB membranes by immunofluorescence histochemistry (32). Other studies of monkey MA104 and human renal proximal tubule cells provided evidence for either binding and/or carrier-mediated transport of 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid (12, 16).

Within the context of membrane regulation of folate homeostasis in the pig, our studies suggest that FBP participates in folate uptake by the liver and to a lesser extent in the kidney, but plays no role in intestinal folate absorption. Previously, we isolated the cDNA for FBP from pig liver and identified its mRNA transcripts in a single experiment in both liver and kidney and its absence in the jejunum (38). The present studies extend these observations by 1) the quantitative demonstration that the binding capacity of purified pig LPM for [3H]folic acid is sixfold greater in pig liver than kidney (Table 2), 2) by the immunohistochemical identification of FBP in both LPM and KBB membranes and its absence from JBB membranes (Fig. 5), and 3) by the finding of mRNA transcript of FBP in threefold greater concentration in pig liver than kidney (Fig. 6).

In the present studies, the specificity and authenticity of the IgG fraction of antiserum to recombinant pig FBP was established by its capacity to immunoprecipitate and immunoblot the recombinant protein (Figs. 3 and 4) and to immunoblot native bovine milk FBP with resultant bands identical to those detected by an independent antibody (Fig. 4). The molecular size of recombinant pig FBP at 30 kDa (Figs. 3 and 4) is predicted from the 253 amino acid sequence of pig FBP (38), whereas the larger protein band detected by immunoblot at 38 kDa in native bovine FBP (Fig. 4) is consistent with other estimates for the molecular size of native FBP from pig renal tubular epithelium (11). The immunohistochemical staining of pig LPM and KBB membranes and absence of staining of JBB membranes (Fig. 5) are in keeping with FBP binding by isolated pig LPM and KBB membranes (Table 2) and the pig liver and kidney distribution of FBP transcripts (Fig. 6). The immunohistochemical localization of FBP to renal tubular cells by antibody to recombinant pig FBP (Fig. 5D) is consistent with its renal tubular localization in the rat by antibody to purified native rat FBP (32). Similarly, the immunohistochemical staining of FBP on the surfaces of pig hepatocytes (Fig. 5B) is in keeping with prior observations on the presence and binding properties of FBP in rat LPM (4, 43). The incidental staining of red cell membranes within the sinusoids of pig liver slices is consistent with the prior identification of FBP in human red cell membranes (2).

The finding of FBP activity and immunoreactivity in pig KBB membranes and renal tubules (Table 2, Fig. 5D) and its transcripts in kidney samples from pig, human, and rat tissues (Figs. 6 and 7) suggests a universal mammalian requirement for FBP in the renal tubular reabsorption of folate. On the other hand, the absence of FBP activity and immunoreactivity in pig JBB membranes (Figs. 2 and 5F) and its transcript in pig jejunal mucosa (38) suggests that this protein is not involved in the intestinal absorption of folates. This finding contradicts a prior observation on the identification of FBP in pig intestine by an affinity labeling technique (25) and is consistent with recent evidence for the presence and alternate role of the reduced folate carrier in transport of folates across the intestinal mucosal epithelium (21).

The present findings on the transcript distribution of FBP in tissues of pig, human, and rat (Figs. 6 and 7) suggest that liver FBP is unique to the pig and are consistent with a potential role for FBP in the transport of monoglutamyl folate from portal venous blood into the hepatocyte in this species. Also, the present finding of somewhat greater binding affinity for reduced 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid than folic acid by isolated pig LPM (Table 1) contrasts with prior observations on the preference of FBP for folic acid in various cell systems, placenta, and rat KBB membranes (1, 32) but is in keeping with studies of partially purified FBP from pig KBB membranes and of cell transfectants of human FBP, which showed similar binding specificity for folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolic (11, 14). The nanomolar range of binding affinity for each substrate (Tables 1 and 2) and the neutral pH optimum for binding (Fig. 1) are consistent with the kinetics of folate binding demonstrated by others who used different membranes (1, 11) and with the observed concentrations of serum (nmol/l) and tissue folates (nmol/g) in the present study of micropigs.

Others (19) showed that two different folate species, tetrahydrofolic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, exist uniquely in pig plasma in an approximate 3:1 ratio, in contrast to the single presence of 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid in the plasma of other species. The same group (30) demonstrated binding of tetrahydrofolic acid to a high-affinity pig plasma protein, which was proposed to stabilize this folate within the circulation and prevent its degradation. Although our studies demonstrated the preferential binding of 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid by LPM (Table 1), the existence of a separate or integrated mechanism for transfer of high-affinity, protein-bound tetrahydrofolic acid from pig circulation into pig liver has not been established and remains speculative.

Perspectives

Knowing how folates are transported across cell membranes is essential to understanding the regulation of intestinal absorption, hepatic uptake, and renal tubular reabsorption and the maintenance of folate homeostasis. Although FBP has been studied previously in isolated cell systems and membranes, ours is the first study to compare the activity and potential significance of FBP in three different regulatory organs, the intestinal mucosa, liver, and kidney, in the same animal model. Although our findings underscore the importance of FBP for folate uptake by the liver and renal tubule and its insignificance to intestinal absorption in the pig, they must be tempered by the realization that the pig is an imperfect animal model for study of human folate homeostasis. Thus the species comparison showed FBP transcript uniquely in pig liver but in common in rat, human, and pig kidney (Figs. 6 and 7). The finding that 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid appears as the preferred substrate for pig LPM (Table 1) is consistent with the presence of this folate in serum but runs contrary to established data on the preference of FBP for noncirculating folic acid (1). How FBP regulates the cellular uptake of 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid cannot be inferred by the present studies; controversies over the separate or synergistic mechanisms of FBP and the reduced folate carrier are reviewed in detail elsewhere (1). Further insights into the regulation of human folate homeostasis will require application of the present approach in the pig model to the study of both proteins in human tissues and membranes.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to I.-H. Tang for technical support in generation of the immunohistochemistry data. We are indebted to Dr. Fred Kolhouse for the gift of purified bovine milk FBP and to Dr. Sheldon Rothenberg for the gift of rabbit antisera to human KB cell FBP.

    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants DK-35747 and DK-45301.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests: C. H. Halsted, Division of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Univ. of California, Davis, School of Medicine, TB-156, Davis, CA 95616.

Received 26 March 1998; accepted in final form 22 July 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Antony, A. C. Folate receptors. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 16: 501-521, 1996[Medline].

2.   Antony, A. C., R. S. Kincade, R. S. Verma, and S. R. Krishnan. Identification of high affinity folate binding proteins in human erythrocyte membranes. J. Clin. Invest. 80: 711-723, 1987.

3.   Aviv, H., and P. Leder. Purification of biologically active globin messenger RNA by chromatography on oligothymidylate acid cellulose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69: 1408-1412, 1972[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Da Costa, M., and S. P. Rothenberg. Characterization of the folate-binding proteins associated with the plasma membrane of rat liver. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 939: 533-541, 1988[Medline].

5.   Dixon, K. H., B. C. Lanpher, J. Chie, K. Kelley, and K. H. Cowan. A novel cDNA restores reduced folate carrier activity and methotrexate sensitivity to transport deficient cells. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 17-20, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Elwood, P. C. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human folate-binding protein cDNA from placenta and malignant tissue culture (KB) cells. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 14893-15401, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Halsted, C. H. Intestinal absorption of dietary folates. In: Folic Acid Metabolism in Health and Disease, edited by M. F. Picciano, E. L. R. Stokstad, and J. F. Gregory, III.. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990, p. 23-45.

8.   Henderson, G. B. Folate-binding proteins. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 10: 319-335, 1990[Medline].

9.   Horne, D. W., K. A. Reed, J. Hoefs, and H. M. Said. 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate transport in basolateral membrane vesicles from human liver. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 58: 80-84, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Horne, D. W., K. A. Reed, and H. M. Said. Transport of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in basolateral membrane vesicles of rat liver. Am. J. Physiol. 262 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 25): G150-G158, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Kamen, B. A., and J. D. Caston. Properties of a folate binding protein (FBP) isolated from porcine kidney. Biochem. Pharmacol. 35: 2323-2329, 1986[Medline].

12.   Kamen, B. A., A. K. Smith, and R. G. W. Anderson. The folate receptor works in tandem with a probenecid-sensitive carrier in MA104 cells in vitro. J. Clin. Invest. 87: 1442-1449, 1991.

13.   Kessler, S. W. Use of protein A-bearing staphylococci for the immunoprecipitation and isolation of antigens from cells. Methods Enzymol. 73: 442-459, 1981[Medline].

14.   Lacey, S. W., J. M. Sanders, K. G. Rothberg, R. G. Anderson, and B. A. Kamen. Complementary DNA for the folate binding protein correctly predicts anchoring to the membrane by glycosylphosphatidylinositol. J. Clin. Invest. 84: 715-720, 1989.

15.   Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of the bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-683, 1970[Medline].

16.   McMartin, K. E., K. M. Morshed, D. J. Hazen-Martin, and D. A. Sens. Folate transport and binding by cultured human proximal tubule cells. Am. J. Physiol. 263 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 32): F841-F848, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Mendel, C. M., and D. B. Mendel. "Non-specific" binding. Biochem. J. 228: 269-272, 1985[Medline].

18.   Morre, J. D., and D. M. Morre. Preparation of mammalian plasma membranes by aqueous two-phase partition. Biotechniques 7: 946-958, 1989[Medline].

19.   Natsuhori, M., M. Shimoda, E. Kokue, T. Hayama, and Y. Takahashi. Tetrahydrofolic acid as the principal congener of plasma folates in pigs. Am. J. Physiol. 261 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 30): R82-R86, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Naughton, C. A., C. J. Chandler, R. B. Duplantier, and C. H. Halsted. Folate absorption in alcoholic pigs: in vitro hydrolysis and transport at the intestinal brush border membrane. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 50: 1436-1441, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Nguyen, T. T., D. L. Dyer, D. D. Dunning, S. A. Rubin, K. E. Grant, and H. M. Said. Human intestinal folate transporter: cloning, expression, and distribution of complementary RNA. Gastroenterology 112: 783-791, 1997[Medline].

22.   Page, S. T., W. C. Owen, K. Price, and P. C. Elwood. Expression of the human placental folate receptor transcript is regulated in human tissues. Organization and full nucleotide sequence of the gene. J. Mol. Biol. 229: 1175-1183, 1993[Medline].

23.   Prasad, P. D., S. Ramamoorthy, F. H. Leibach, and V. Ganapathy. Molecular cloning of the human placental folate transporter. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 206: 6811-6817, 1995.

24.   Ratnam, M., M. H. Marquardt, J. L. Duhring, and J. H. Freisheim. Homologous membrane folate binding proteins in human placenta: cloning and sequence of cDNA. Biochemistry 28: 8249-8254, 1989[Medline].

25.   Reisenauer, A. M. Affinity labeling of the folate-binding protein in pig intestine. Biochem. J. 267: 249-252, 1990[Medline].

26.   Rothberg, K. G., Y. Ying, J. F. Kolhouse, B. A. Kamen, and R. G. W. Anderson. The glycophospholipid-linked folate receptor internalizes folate without entering the clathrin-coated pit endocytic pathway. J. Cell Biol. 110: 637-649, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

27.   Sadasivan, E., M. M. Cedeno, and S. P. Rothenberg. Characterization of the gene encoding a folate-binding protein expressed in human placenta. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 4725-4735, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Sadasivan, E., and S. P. Rothenberg. The complete amino acid sequence of a human folate binding protein from KB cells determined from the cDNA. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 5806-5811, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Said, H. M., F. K. Ghishan, and R. Redha. Folate transport by human intestinal brush-border membrane vesicles. Am. J. Physiol. 252 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 15): G229-G236, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Sasaki, K., M. Natsuhori, M. Shimoda, Y. Saiur, and E.-I. Kokue. Role of high-affinity protein in the plasma distribution of tetrahydrofolate in pigs. Am. J. Physiol. 270 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 39): R105-R110, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Schron, C. M., C. Washington, and B. L. Blitzer. The transmembrane pH gradient drives uphill folate transport in rabbit jejunum. J. Clin. Invest. 76: 2030-2033, 1985.

32.   Selhub, J., and W. A. Franklin. The folate-binding protein of rat kidney. Purification, properties, and cellular distribution. J. Biol. Chem. 259: 6601-6606, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Selhub, J., and I. H. Rosenberg. Folate transport in isolated brush-border membrane vesicles from rat intestine. J. Biol. Chem. 256: 4489-4493, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

34.   Shane, B. Folate metabolism. In: Folic Acid Metabolism in Health and Disease, edited by M. F. Picciano, E. L. R. Stokstad, and J. F. Gregory, III.. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990, p. 65-68.

35.   Steinberg, S. E., C. L. Campbell, and R. S. Hillman. Kinetics of the normal folate enterohepatic cycle. J. Clin. Invest. 64: 83-88, 1979.

36.   Tamura, T. Microbiological assay of folates. In: Folic Acid Metabolism in Health and Disease, edited by M. F. Picciano, E. L. R. Stokstad, and J. F. Gregory III. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990, p. 121-138.

37.   Traut, R. R., D. Dey, D. E. Bochkariov, A. V. Oleinikov, G. G. Jokhadze, B. Hamman, and D. Jameson. Location and domain structure of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein L7/L12: site specific cysteine cross-linking and attachment of fluorescent probes. Biochem. Cell Biol. 73: 949-958, 1995[Medline].

38.   Van Hoozen, C. M., E.-H. Ling, and C. H. Halsted. Folate binding protein: molecular characterization and transcript distribution in pig liver, kidney and jejunum. Biochem. J. 319: 725-729, 1996.

39.   Villanueva, J., C. J. Chandler, N. Shimasaki, A. Tang, M. Nakamura, S. D. Phinney, and C. H. Halsted. Effects of ethanol feeding on liver, kidney, and jejunal membranes in micropigs. Hepatology 19: 1229-1240, 1994[Medline].

40.   Weitman, S. D., R. H. Lark, L. R. Coney, D. W. Fort, V. Frasca, V. R. Zurawshi, and B. A. Kamen. Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues. Cancer Res. 52: 3396-3401, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

41.   Weitman, S. D., A. G. Weinberg, L. R. Coney, V. R. Zurawski, D. S. Jennings, and B. A. Kamen. Cellular localization of the folate receptor: potential role in drug toxicity and folate homeostasis. Cancer Res. 52: 6708-6711, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

42.   Williams, W. M., and K. C. Huang. Renal tubular transport of folic acid and methotrexate in the monkey. Am. J. Physiol. 242 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 11): F484-F490, 1982.

43.   Zamierowski, M. M., and C. Wagner. Identification of folate binding proteins in rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 252: 933-938, 1977[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Compar Physiol 275(5):R1503-R1510
0002-9513/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. Inoue, Y. Nakai, S. Ueda, S. Kamigaso, K.-y. Ohta, M. Hatakeyama, Y. Hayashi, M. Otagiri, and H. Yuasa
Functional characterization of PCFT/HCP1 as the molecular entity of the carrier-mediated intestinal folate transport system in the rat model
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): G660 - G668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. H. Halsted, J. A. Villanueva, A. M. Devlin, and C. J. Chandler
Metabolic Interactions of Alcohol and Folate
J. Nutr., August 1, 2002; 132(8): 2367S - 2372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, J.
Right arrow Articles by Halsted, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, J.
Right arrow Articles by Halsted, C. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online