|
|
||||||||
1 United States-Japan Biomedical Research Laboratories, Tulane University Hebert Center, Belle Chasse, Louisiana 70037-3001; and 2 Peptide Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously reported the elevation of
plasma interleukin (IL)-6 activity in response to immobilization stress
in rats. To investigate the role of peripheral corticotropin-releasing
factor (CRF) in this response, we examined the effects of CRF
antagonists on immobilization-induced IL-6 response. Intravenous
pretreatment with either
[D-Phe12,Nle21,38,C
MeLeu37]-anti-human
rat (h/r) CRF12
41
(1.5 mg/kg) or
cyclo(30
33)[D-Phe12, Nle21,38,Glu30,Lys33]-h/rCRF12
41
(Astressin, 0.5 mg/kg) attenuated the IL-6 response to immobilization,
which confirmed our previous finding that systemic administration of an
antiserum against CRF blocked this response. In addition, an
intraperitoneal injection of h/rCRF (100 µg/kg) or rat urocortin (10 and 100 µg/kg) increased the plasma IL-6 activity, mimicking the
response to immobilization. An intravenous injection of h/rCRF (100 µg/kg) also elevated plasma IL-6 in adrenalectomized rats. These
findings suggest that peripheral CRF mediates the plasma IL-6 elevation
in response to immobilization.
neuroimmunomodulation; Astressin; [D-Phe12,Nle21,38,C
MeLeu37]-anti-human
rat corticotropin-releasing
factor12
41; urocortin; cytokine
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
INTERLEUKIN (IL)-6 was originally identified as a soluble immune tissue-derived factor that promotes the proliferation and differentiation of lymphocytes (27). Many reports have detailed the pleiotropic actions of IL-6, such as its induction of acute phase protein synthesis in the liver (15), stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (21), cytoprotective action against lethal irradiation (22), and neurotropic actions (10). These pleiotropic activities appear to play important roles in the host defense mechanism (2).
The elevation of plasma IL-6 activity in response to noninflammatory or noninfectious stressors such as restraint (29, 36), electrical foot shock (36), and exposure to open field (16) has been reported. We have investigated the mechanisms of this stress-induced plasma IL-6 response using immobilization as a stressor (3, 29). Chemical depletion of central catecholamine with intracerebroventricular administration of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) attenuated immobilization-induced plasma IL-6 response. Depletion of peripheral norepinephrine with intravenous 6-OHDA also reduced the response; thus both the central and peripheral catecholaminergic system appear to be involved (29). The HPA axis may exhibit an inhibitory influence, because both hypophysectomy and adrenalectomy augmented the immobilization-induced IL-6 response (29).
Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), a 41-amino acid peptide, was
first identified as a hypothalamic factor that stimulates the secretion
of ACTH from the anterior pituitary (31, 34). CRF not only acts as a
hypophysiotropic hormone but also functions as a neurotransmitter or
neuromodulator (4). There is abundant evidence that CRF mediates
integrated endocrine and autonomic and behavioral responses to stress
(8, 24). Our previous studies revealed that intravenous pretreatment
with a rabbit antiserum against CRF significantly suppressed both ACTH
and IL-6 responses to immobilization (3). Intracerebroventricular
injection of a CRF antagonist (
-helical CRF) attenuated the ACTH
response but failed to suppress the IL-6 response to immobilization
(3). These findings suggest that peripheral CRF, rather than central CRF, is involved in the immobilization-induced plasma IL-6
response.
The existence of a CRF-like immunoreactivity or a CRF-like substance
has been reported in many peripheral tissues (1, 20, 23, 25, 33). A
novel intrinsic CRF-related peptide, urocortin, has been cloned from
rat brain (35) and human placenta (7). Urocortin has a higher affinity
and activity than CRF on type 2
CRF receptors, which are the
dominant subtype in peripheral tissues, suggesting its role as a
natural ligand for type 2
receptors in peripheral tissue (35).
Although the physiological role of peripheral CRF or CRF-like
substances remains unknown, its local effects on immune or inflammatory
processes have been suggested (5, 12, 17).
Recently, new CRF antagonists,
[D-Phe12,Nle21,38,
C
MeLeu37]-anti-human rat (h/r)
CRF12
41
(D-PheCRF12
41) and
cyclo(30
33)[D-Phe12,Nle21,38,Glu30,Lys33]-h/rCRF12
41
(Astressin) have been developed (6, 9, 11). Because these new
antagonists possess a high affinity for CRF receptors, a high
solubility to water, and a relatively low affinity to CRF binding
protein, they are more potent in blocking ACTH secretion after
peripheral administration in vivo than previous antagonists such as
-helical CRF (6, 9, 11).
In the present study, we examined whether systemic pretreatment with CRF antagonists blocks immobilization-induced IL-6 response. We also tested the effects of intraperitoneal injections of various doses of CRF and urocortin on plasma IL-6 levels. To eliminate the suppressive influence of the HPA axis, we examined the effect of an intravenous injection of CRF using adrenalectomized rats.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals. Male CD rats (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) weighing 350-400 g were used. The animals were housed in a room maintained at ~25°C with illumination from 0800 to 2000. Standard Purina laboratory chow and water were available ad libitum. The experimental protocol was approved by the Tulane University Medical School Advisory Committee for Animal Resources (protocol no. 1783-3-03-105).
Cannulation into the jugular vein. To collect blood samples for plasma IL-6 and ACTH measurement, we implanted the animals with an indwelling jugular venous catheter filled with heparinized saline solution (50 U/ml). Surgery was performed 2 days before the experiment under ketamine (100 mg/kg ip) and xylazine (10 mg/kg ip) anesthesia.
Immobilization stress. The animals were adapted to the experimental conditions by daily handling for 7 days to avoid manipulative stress. On the day of experiment, the cages containing the rats were moved to a laboratory and left there for at least 2 h to acclimate to the experimental environment. The rats were restrained on a board in a supine position by taping the limbs to holders for 60 min without anesthesia. They were then released and returned to their home cages.
Drugs.
D-Phe-CRF12
41,
a CRF antagonist, and Astressin, a CRF antagonist, were synthesized by
one of the authors (J. Rivier), and rat urocortin was
provided by Dr. N. Yanaihara (Yanaihara Institute).
h/rCRF1
41 was purchased from
American Peptide (Sunnyvale, CA). The CRF antagonists and h/rCRF were
dissolved in 0.04 M phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 0.1%
bovine serum albumin and 0.01% ascorbic acid. The injection volume was 1 ml for both the intravenous and intraperitoneal injections.
Blood sampling.
Blood samples (0.7 ml) for determination of plasma IL-6 and ACTH levels
were taken through the jugular vein catheter 10 times (at
30, 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 300 min) before, during, and after
immobilization stress. Each sample was collected in an ice-chilled tube
containing Trasylol (aprotinin; 500 KIU, Mobay), and EDTA (2 mg,
Mallinckrodt). After centrifugation of the blood samples, the plasma
(0.3 ml) was removed and frozen at
80°C. The blood cells
were resuspended in physiological saline (0.3 ml) and injected through
the same catheter after each blood collection to prevent loss of blood
volume.
Plasma IL-6 concentration.
Plasma IL-6 activity was measured using an IL-6-dependent murine
hybridoma subclone B9 cell line. B9 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 with 25 mM HEPES containing 10% heat-inactivated (56°C, 30 min)
fetal bovine serum and a 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (GIBCO,
Baltimore, MD) in the presence of 20 hybridoma growth units/ml
recombinant human (rh) IL-6, where 1 unit was defined as the amount
that caused half-maximal B9 cell proliferation. A 2-µl plasma sample
was placed in a single well of a 96-well plate containing a 198-µl
culture medium and was serially diluted to 1:32 the original
concentration of the first well. In addition, each plate had a standard
diluted line containing the rhIL-6, in which the first well was 1 U
(100 µl). After five washes,
104/ml B9 cells in culture medium
were added to each well (100 µl) and the cells were incubated in 5%
CO2 at 37°C for 72 h. IL-6 activity was measured colorimetrically using thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide. The minimum detectable concentration was 15 U/ml in plasma. The inter- and intra-assay variations were <5 and 10%, respectively. The B9 cell assay is commonly used for measurement of plasma IL-6 levels by many investigators (16, 36). Although the rhIL-6 stimulated
the proliferation of B9 cell in a dose-dependent manner, other
cytokines, such as rh-tumor necrosis factor-
, rhIL-1
, rhIL-1
,
rhIL-2, rh-interferon (IFN)-
, recombinant mouse IFN-
, rhIFN-
,
rhIL-3, rhIL-3, rhIL-4, rh-granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating
factor (CSF), and rh-macrophage-CSF, did not. In this assay, CRF,
urocortin,
D-Phe-CRF12
41,
and Astressin (10 pg/ml-1 µg/ml) did not affect B9 cell growth
in vitro.
Radioimmunoassay. Plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels were determined by RIA using kits from the National Hormone and Pituitary Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and ICN Biomedicals (Irvine, CA), respectively.
Adrenalectomy. Animals were adrenalectomized bilaterally under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia 10 days before immobilization. Each adrenalectomized animal was implanted with a corticosterone pellet (10 mg; Innovative Research of America, Toledo, OH) to maintain normal basal serum levels of corticosterone and provided with drinking water containing 0.45% NaCl.
Statistical analysis. All values are given as means ± SE. A two-way ANOVA with a split-plot design was used to test the interaction effect of the treatment and the time over plasma IL-6 or ACTH levels. When a significant interaction was found, a repeated-measures ANOVA and Dunn's test were performed within each group to compare values at individual time points with the basal level. Student's t-test or a one-way ANOVA and Dunn's test were used to determine statistical differences among groups at individual time points. The significance level was adjusted by the Bonferroni procedure in repetitive comparisons. P < 0.05 was regarded as significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasma IL-6 and ACTH responses to immobilization. Figure 1A shows the plasma IL-6 response to 1-h immobilization. The values of each group were averaged and plotted against the individual times. Basal levels of plasma IL-6 were 21.8 ± 4.3 U/ml in the immobilized group and 30.3 ± 7.5 U/ml in the nonstressed control group; there was no significant difference between the two. Plasma IL-6 levels started to increase 30 min after the initiation of the immobilization, peaked at 90 min (1,989.6 ± 507.5 U/ml), quickly dropped at 120 min, and then gradually returned to the basal level after more than 300 min. There was a significant interaction effect of the immobilization and time over plasma IL-6 activity (two-way ANOVA, split-plot design, F = 11.671, P = 0.0021). The levels of plasma IL-6 in the immobilized animals at several time points were significantly higher than the basal level [60 and 90 min, repeated-measures ANOVA (F = 11.917, P = 0.0076) followed by Dunn's test, P < 0.01] or those in the control animals (30, 90, 120, 180, and 300 min, Student's t-test, P < 0.005). There was no significant change of IL-6 activity in the control animals over time (F = 2.288, P = 0.1364)
|
Figure 1B shows plasma ACTH levels immediately before immobilization and at 15 min after the initiation of the stress. There was a significant interaction effect of the immobilization and time over plasma ACTH concentration (F = 16.574, P = 0.0022 ). Immobilization increased plasma ACTH concentrations at 15 min significantly as compared with the basal (P < 0.01) and the control (P < 0.01).
Blockade of plasma IL-6 and ACTH response to immobilization by CRF
antagonists.
To investigate the possible involvement of peripheral CRF in
immobilization-induced plasma IL-6 elevation, a CRF antagonist, either
D-Phe-CRF12
41
(1.5 mg/kg) or Astressin (0.5 mg/kg), was injected intravenously 5 min
before the initiation of immobilization. Pretreatment with either
D-Phe-CRF12
41
(Fig.
2A) or
Astressin (Fig.
3A)
significantly attenuated the plasma IL-6 responses to immobilization
compared with the vehicle (F = 5.965, P = 0.0156, and
F = 3.680, P = 0.0329, respectively). Comparison
at individual time points revealed that the IL-6 level at 90 min in the
D-Phe-CRF12
41-treated group was significantly lower than that in the vehicle group (254.9 ± 81.4 vs. 1,512.7 ± 238.1 U/ml, Student's
t-test,
P = 0.0011). Astressin also reduced
the average of peak IL-6 levels at 90 min (1,032.2 ± 151.6 vs.
2,104.7 ± 388.1 U/ml) (P = 0.0244).
|
|
41:
F = 29.466, P = 0.0006; Astressin: F = 14.435, P = 0.0029) (Figs.
2B and
3B). The ACTH concentration at 15 min in either the
D-Phe-CRF12
41-
or Astressin-treated group was significantly lower than that in
corresponding vehicle control (P < 0.05).
Plasma IL-6 response to intraperitoneal injections of CRF and urocortin. To further investigate a possible involvement of peripheral CRF in the immobilization-induced IL-6 elevation, either rat CRF (10 and 100 µg/kg) or rat urocortin (10 and 100 µg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally and we examined the changes in plasma IL-6 and ACTH concentrations.
An intraperitoneal injection of CRF increased plasma IL-6 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4). The peak effect was observed at 90 min (173.0 ± 50.6 U/ml at 10 µg/kg and 626.4 ± 142.4 U/ml at 100 µg/kg) after the injection. The IL-6 concentration returned to baseline levels after more than 300 min. There was a significant interaction effect of CRF treatment and time over plasma IL-6 activity (F = 7.547, P = 0.0002). CRF at 100 µg/kg increased IL-6 activity significantly compared with the basal level (F = 12.875, P = 0.0031), whereas CRF at 10 µg/kg or the vehicle did not (F = 3.669, P = 0.1019, and F = 2.891, P = 0.1386, respectively). CRF at 100 µg/kg differed from the vehicle control at 90 and 120 min (1-way ANOVA, P < 0.005 followed by Dunn's test, P < 0.05).
|
Plasma IL-6 response to intravenous injections of CRF in adrenalectomized animals. In contrast to intraperitoneal injection, intravenous injection of CRF (100 µg/kg) does not cause significant changes in plasma IL-6 levels in intact rats (3). Intravenous injection of CRF quickly increases plasma ACTH and subsequently corticosterone levels, and high levels of corticosterone are known to suppress the IL-6 response to immobilization (29) and hemorrhagic shock (14). Thus, to eliminate the suppressive influence of the HPA axis, we examined the effect of an intravenous injection of CRF using adrenalectomized rats that had received corticosterone pellets subcutaneously to maintain normal levels of plasma corticosterone. Figure 6 shows the effect of intravenous injection of CRF (2-100 µg/kg) on plasma IL-6 levels. The basal corticosterone concentrations were 3.6 ± 0.9 to 4.0 ± 0.6 µg/dl, and there was no significant difference among groups.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present data show that an intravenous pretreatment with a specific
CRF receptor antagonist,
D-Phe-CRF12
41
(1.5 mg/kg) or Astressin (0.5 mg/kg), significantly attenuates
plasma IL-6 response to immobilization. This is consistent with
our previous finding that an intravenous injection of 0.5 ml rabbit
antiserum to rat CRF suppressed the IL-6 response (3).
The potent inhibiting action of these CRF antagonists on ACTH secretion
in vivo has already been reported. A bolus intravenous pretreatment
with 1.7 mg/kg
D-Phe-CRF12
41
and 0.1 mg/kg Astressin inhibited ACTH secretion in the
adrenalectomized rats for more than 60 and 90 min, respectively (9,
11). Intravenous pretreatment with Astressin at 0.3 mg/kg blocked
electric shock-induced ACTH secretion for at least 30 min in rats (9).
In the present study, treatments with these CRF antagonists also
inhibited the ACTH response to 1 h immobilization, proving their
effectiveness in blocking the actions of endogenous CRF induced by this
stressor.
It is unlikely that the attenuation of IL-6 response was brought about
by this ACTH blocking action, because either hypophysectomy or
adrenalectomy enhances the IL-6 response to immobilization (29).
Although it is not known whether peripherally administered CRF
antagonists can suppress the action of CRF acting as a
neurotransmitter/modulator in the brain, our previous studies showed
that an intracerebroventricular injection of a CRF antagonist,
-helical CRF (25 µg over 5 min followed by 25 µg over 60 min),
failed to block stress-induced IL-6 elevation (3). Thus the action of
peripheral CRF, rather than the central CRF, seems essential for the
immobilization-induced plasma IL-6 elevation. This is supported by the
present findings that an intraperitoneal injection of either CRF (100 µg/kg) or urocortin (10-100 µg/kg) elevated plasma IL-6 levels
with a time course similar to that observed after immobilization.
In contrast to an intraperitoneal injection, an intravenous injection of a high dose of CRF (a bolus injection of 50 µg/kg followed by an infusion of 50 µg/kg over 30 min) was not found to cause significant changes in plasma IL-6 levels in intact rats (3). The present study revealed that an intravenous administration of CRF could increase plasma IL-6 levels in adrenalectomized animals. Therefore, the ineffectiveness of intravenous CRF in normal rats might be attributed to the rapid activation of the HPA axis by CRF, which is known to suppress IL-6 production (14, 29). Another possible reason for the discrepancy of effectiveness between intravenous and intraperitoneal CRF is that the site of CRF action regarding the IL-6 response may be within the peritoneal cavity. In fact, the existence of CRF or CRF-like immunoreactivity has been reported in many abdominal organs, including the liver (28), pancreas (26), stomach (23, 33), and colon (13). Further study is necessary to determine the peripheral site of CRF action on IL-6 production and/or secretion during stress.
Our previous studies demonstrated that both central and peripheral catecholamines are involved in the immobilization-induced plasma IL-6 response (29). CRF has been detected in sympathetic ganglia in monkeys (32), as well as in neurons in spinal intermediolateral cell column in rats (20), and its role in modulating the release of catecholamine has been postulated (32). Therefore, it is possible that intraperitoneal injection of CRF stimulates peripheral sympathetic systems, thereby increasing plasma IL-6. However, the exact relationship between the sympathetic nervous system and the peripheral CRF in the stress-induced IL-6 elevation remains to be investigated.
The role of CRF as a local proinflammatory agent has also been suggested. Treatment with an anti-CRF antiserum suppressed carrageenin-induced inflammation, and a high concentration of CRF was detected in the inflamed tissue (12). CRF was present in the joints and surrounding tissues of Lewis rats with streptococcal cell wall- and adjuvant-induced arthritis, and CRF mRNA was expressed in the inflamed synovia (5). CRF was also reported to stimulate leukocytes to secrete cytokines such as IL-1, -2, and -6 (17, 30).
CRF receptors are divided into two subtypes, designated type 1 and type
2 receptors. The type 2 receptor has two splice variants, type 2
and
type 2
, with type 2
being the dominant subtype in peripheral
tissues (4, 18). Neither Astressin nor
D-Phe-CRF12
41 is selective to a particular subtype of CRF receptors (19). Urocortin
is reported to have ~40 times higher affinity for the type 2
receptors than CRF (35). We observed that urocortin at 10 µg/kg
elevated plasma IL-6 activity significantly, whereas CRF at the same
dose did not. This finding may be related to the different affinities
of these agonists to peripheral CRF receptors.
The elevation of plasma IL-6 concentration caused by psychological stressors is considered to be one of the most valuable models for studying the brain's control over immune functions and host defense mechanism. We conclude from the present study, together with our previous findings, that peripheral CRF is involved in stress-induced plasma IL-6 elevation. Further studies may reveal the underlying mechanisms and suggest the physiological and pathological roles of IL-6 elevation by stress.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Mark Boone for editorial assistance. We also thank Dr. Atsushi Takaki for assistance in evaluating the effects of CRF-related peptides and CRF antagonists on B9 cell growth in vitro.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-90-J-1888.
Address for reprint requests: A. Arimura, US-Japan Biomedical Research Laboratories, Tulane Univ. Hebert Center, Belle Chasse, LA 70037-3001.
Received 23 December 1997; accepted in final form 17 July 1998.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Aird, F.,
C. V. Clevenger,
M. B. Prystowsky,
and
E. Redei.
Corticotropin-releasing factor mRNA in rat thymus and spleen.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:
7104-7108,
1993
2.
Akira, S.,
T. Taga,
and
T. Kishimoto.
Interleukin-6 in biology and medicine.
Adv. Immunol.
54:
1-78,
1993[Medline].
3.
Arimura, A.,
A. Takaki,
and
G. Komaki.
Interactions between cytokines and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis during stress.
Ann. NY Acad. Sci.
739:
270-281,
1994[Medline].
4.
Chalmers, D. T.,
T. W. Lovenberg,
D. E. Grigoriadis,
D. P. Behan,
and
E. B. De Souza.
Corticotrophin-releasing factor receptors: from molecular biology to drug design.
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
17:
166-172,
1996[Medline].
5.
Crofford, L. J.,
H. Sano,
K. Karalis,
E. L. Webster,
E. A. Goldmuntz,
G. P. Chrousos,
and
R. L. Wilder.
Local secretion of corticotropin-releasing hormone in the joints of Lewis rats with inflammatory arthritis.
J. Clin. Invest.
90:
2555-2564,
1992.
6.
Curtis, A. L.,
D. E. Grigoriadis,
M. E. Page,
J. Rivier,
and
R. J. Valentino.
Pharmacological comparison of two corticotropin releasing factor antagonists: in vivo and in vitro studies.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
268:
359-365,
1994
7.
Donaldson, C. J.,
S. W. Sutton,
M. H. Perrin,
A. Z. Corrigan,
K. A. Lewis,
J. E. Rivier,
J. M. Vaughan,
and
W. W. Vale.
Cloning and characterization of human urocortin.
Endocrinology
137:
2167-2170,
1996[Abstract].
8.
Dunn, A.,
and
C. Berridge.
Physiological and behavioral responses to corticotropin-releasing factor administration: is CRF a mediator of anxiety or stress responses?
Brain Res. Rev.
15:
71-100,
1990[Medline].
9.
Gulyas, J.,
C. Rivier,
M. Perrin,
S. C. Koerber,
S. Sutton,
A. Corrigan,
S. L. Lahrichi,
A. G. Craig,
W. Vale,
and
J. Rivier.
Potent, structurally constrained agonists and competitive antagonists of corticotropin-releasing factor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:
10575-10579,
1995
10.
Hama, T.,
M. Miyamoto,
H. Tsukui,
C. Nishio,
and
M. Hatanaka.
Interleukin-6 as a neurotropic factor for promoting the survival of cultured basal forebrain cholinergic neurons from postnatal rats.
Neurosci. Lett.
104:
340-344,
1989[Medline].
11.
Hernandez, J.-F.,
W. Kornreich,
C. Rivier,
A. Miranda,
G. Yamamoto,
J. Andrews,
Y. Tache,
W. Vale,
and
J. Rivier.
Synthesis and relative potencies of new constrained CRF antagonists.
J. Med. Chem.
36:
2860-2867,
1993[Medline].
12.
Karalis, K.,
H. Sano,
J. Redwine,
S. Listwak,
R. L. Wilder,
and
G. P. Chrousos.
Autocrine or paracrine inflammatory actions of corticotropin-releasing hormone in vivo.
Science
254:
421-423,
1991
13.
Kawahito, Y.,
H. Sano,
M. Kawata,
K. Yuri,
S. Mukai,
Y. Yamamura,
H. Kato,
G. P. Chrousos,
R. L. Wilder,
and
M. Kondo.
Local secretion of corticotropin-releasing hormone by enterochromaffin cells in human colon.
Gastroenterology
106:
859-865,
1994[Medline].
14.
Komaki, G.,
P. E. Gottschall,
A. Somogyvari-Vigh,
I. Tatsuno,
T. Yatohgo,
and
A. Arimura.
Rapid increase in plasma IL-6 after hemorrhage, and posthemorrhage reduction of the IL-6 response to LPS, in conscious rats: interrelation with plasma corticosterone levels.
Neuroimmunomodulation
1:
127-134,
1994[Medline].
15.
Kushner, I.
The phenomenon of the acute phase response.
Ann. NY Acad. Sci.
389:
39-48,
1982[Medline].
16.
LeMay, L. G.,
A. J. Vander,
and
M. J. Kluger.
The effects of psychological stress on plasma interleukin-6 activity in rats.
Physiol. Behav.
47:
957-961,
1990[Medline].
17.
Leu, S. J. C.,
and
V. K. Singh.
Stimulation of interleukin-6 production by corticotropin-releasing factor.
Cell. Immunol.
143:
220-227,
1992[Medline].
18.
Lovenberg, T. W.,
C. W. Liaw,
D. E. Grigoriadis,
W. Clevenger,
D. T. Chalmers,
E. B. De Souza,
and
T. Oltersdorf.
Cloning and characterization of a functionally distinct corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtype from rat brain.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:
836-840,
1995
19.
Luthin, D. R.,
K. L. Youngblood,
A. Rabinovich,
M. R. Brown,
and
J. M. May.
Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) mediates ACTH release and hypotension by two pharmacologically distinct CRF receptor subtypes.
Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.
22:
1545,
1996.
20.
Merchenthaler, I.,
M. A. Hynes,
S. Vigh,
A. V. Shally,
and
P. Petrusz.
Immunocytochemical localization of corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) in the rat spinal cord.
Brain Res.
275:
373-377,
1983[Medline].
21.
Naitoh, Y.,
J. Fukuta,
T. Tominaga,
Y. Nakai,
S. Tamai,
K. Mori,
and
H. Imura.
Interleukin-6 stimulates the secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone in conscious, freely moving rats.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
155:
1459-1463,
1988[Medline].
22.
Neta, R.,
R. Perlstein,
S. Vogel,
G. Ledney,
and
J. Abrams.
Role of interleukin 6 (IL-6) in protection from lethal irradiation and in endocrine responses to IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor.
J. Exp. Med.
175:
689-694,
1992
23.
Nieuwenhuijzen-Kruseman, A. C.,
E. A. Linton,
P. J. Lowry,
L. H. Rees,
and
G. M. Besser.
Corticotropin-releasing factor immunoreactivity in human gastrointestinal tract.
Lancet
4:
1245-1246,
1982.
24.
Owens, M. J.,
and
C. B. Nemeroff.
Physiology and pharmacology of corticotropin releasing factor.
Pharmacol. Rev.
43:
425-473,
1991[Medline].
25.
Petrusz, P.,
I. Merchenthaler,
J. L. Maderdrut,
and
P. U. Heitz.
Central and peripheral distribution of corticotropin-releasing factor.
Federation Proc.
44:
229-235,
1985[Medline].
26.
Petrusz, P.,
I. Merchenthaler,
J. L. Maderdrut,
S. Vigh,
and
A. V. Schally.
Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-like immunoreactivity in the vertebrate endocrine pancreas.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80:
1721-1725,
1983
27.
Schimple, A.,
and
E. Wecker.
Replacement of T cell function by a T cell product.
Nature
237:
15-17,
1972.
28.
Suda, T.,
N. Tomori,
F. Tozawa,
T. Mouri,
H. Demura,
and
K. Shimizu.
Distribution and characterization of immunoreactive corticotropin-releasing factor in human tissue.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
59:
861-866,
1984[Abstract].
29.
Takaki, A.,
Q.-H. Huang,
A. Somogyvri-Vigh,
and
A. Arimura.
Immobilization stress may increase plasma interleukin-6 via central and peripheral catecholamines.
Neuroimmunomodulation
1:
335-342,
1994[Medline].
30.
Tsagarakis, S.,
and
A. Grossman.
Corticotropin-releasing hormone: interactions with the immune system.
Neuroimmunomodulation
1:
329-334,
1994[Medline].
31.
Turkelson, C.,
A. Arimura,
M. Culler,
J. Fishback,
K. Groot,
M. Konda,
M. Licino,
C. Thomas,
J. Chang,
and
M. Shimizu.
In vivo and in vitro release of ACTH by synthetic CRF.
Peptides
2:
425-431,
1981[Medline].
32.
Udelsman, R.,
J. P. Harwood,
M. A. Millan,
G. P. Chrousos,
D. S. Goldstein,
R. Zimlichman,
K. J. Catt,
and
G. Aguilera.
Functional corticotropin releasing factor receptors in the primate peripheral sympathetic nervous system.
Nature
319:
147-150,
1986[Medline].
33.
Uehara, A.,
N. Minamino,
M. H. Townsend,
and
A. Arimura.
Corticotropin-releasing activity in the rat gastric antrum.
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
183:
106-113,
1986[Abstract].
34.
Vale, W.,
J. Spiess,
C. Rivier,
and
J. Rivier.
Characterization of a 41-residue ovine hypothalamic peptide that stimulates secretion of corticotropin and
-endorphin.
Science
213:
1394-1397,
1981
35.
Vaughan, J.,
C. Donaldson,
J. Bittencourt,
M. H. Perrin,
K. Lewis,
S. Sutton,
R. Chan,
A. V. Turnbull,
D. Lovejoy,
C. Rivier,
J. Rivier,
P. E. Sawchenko,
and
W. Vale.
Urocortin, a mammalian neuropeptide related to fish urotensin 1 and to corticotropin-releasing factor.
Nature
378:
287-292,
1995[Medline].
36.
Zhou, D.,
A. W. Kusnecov,
M. R. Shurin,
M. DePaoli,
and
B. S. Rabin.
Exposure to physical and psychological stressors elevates plasma interleukin 6: relationship to the activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.
Endocrinology
133:
2523-2530,
1993[Abstract].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Kihara, M. Fujimura, I. Yamamoto, E. Itoh, A. Inui, and M. Fujimiya Effects of central and peripheral urocortin on fed and fasted gastroduodenal motor activity in conscious rats Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): G406 - G419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ando, R. F. Brown, R. D. Berg, and A. J. Dunn Bacterial translocation can increase plasma corticosterone and brain catecholamine and indoleamine metabolism Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): R2164 - R2172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |