AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 274: R1338-R1344, 1998;
0363-6119/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romero, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wingfield, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romero, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wingfield, J. C.
Vol. 274, Issue 5, R1338-R1344, May 1998

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis changes allow seasonal modulation of corticosterone in a bird

L. Michael Romero, Kiran K. Soma, and John C. Wingfield

Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

We examined possible mechanisms underlying seasonal stress modulation in Lapland longspurs (Calcarius lapponicus), a species that breeds and molts (the energetically costly replacement of feathers) in the Alaskan Arctic. Free-living Lapland longspurs show dramatically reduced maximal corticosterone release during molt compared with the breeding season, an effect lost in captive birds. Neither changes in corticosterone binding proteins nor the overall condition of the bird (assessed by weight and fat storage) can explain different seasonal corticosterone responses. Adrenal insensitivity also does not fully explain reduced maximal output because exogenous ACTH enhanced corticosterone release during molt. Exogenous ACTH in molting birds, however, cannot stimulate corticosterone to stress-induced levels during breeding, implying reduced adrenal capacity. Lapland longspur pituitaries appeared to respond to exogenous corticotropin-releasing factor, arginine vasotocin, and mesotocin (the avian equivalents of arginine vasopressin and oxytocin) during molt, suggesting that a mechanism upstream of the pituitary blunts corticosterone release. Taken together, these results indicate that seasonal modulation of corticosterone release in this species is controlled at multiple sites in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

stress; corticotropin-releasing factor; vasotocin; mesotocin; adrenocorticotropic hormone

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

GLUCOCORTICOID SECRETION is often considered to be an obligatory response to noxious stimuli. Several psychological factors, such as the degree of control over the noxious stimulus (see Ref. 17 for review), can alter glucocorticoid secretion, but in general, stimuli applied in similar psychological contexts within the same species produce similar magnitudes of glucocorticoid secretion. Exogenous corticosteroids, when given in concentrations mimicking stress-induced increases, can blunt endogenous secretion [presumably through negative feedback (9, 10)], but stress-induced corticosteroid release is resistant to feedback effects. This is thought to occur through facilitation of the corticosteroid response so that release continues despite what would normally be a robust feedback signal (10, 13). Circadian timing can often affect stimulus-evoked corticosterone release (9, 15), but with the exceptions of pregnancy (31), early development (28), changes in social rank (27), and some pathological changes during aging (27), the magnitude of corticosteroid release to identical stimuli has proven remarkably consistent throughout an animal's life.

Recently, however, several bird species have been shown to seasonally modulate corticosterone secretion [the most important glucocorticoid in birds (14)] in response to an identical stressor (1, 2, 26, 34, 35, 37-40). In Gambel's white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii), for instance, peak corticosterone levels in response to the stressors of capture and restraint are lower during winter (26) and during molt when the birds are replacing all their feathers (1) than during the breeding season. Thus, in contrast to mammalian systems studied to date, these birds apparently regulate their corticosterone response to stress depending on the environmental and/or physiological context of the stimulus.

All species that have been demonstrated to seasonally modulate corticosterone release breed in either the desert (40) or the Arctic (38). Both habitats are typified by a short optimal breeding season and harsh weather conditions that likely place large demands on an animal's ability to respond to stressful stimuli. One species known to modulate corticosterone release is the arctic-breeding Lapland longspur (2, 39). Both this study and earlier studies focused on free-living Lapland longspurs, but we also tested whether captive birds seasonally modulate corticosterone release as well. Specifically, we tested whether corticosterone levels differ in free-living birds during breeding and while undergoing a prebasic molt, and in captive birds in the spring and while undergoing a prenuptial molt (Fig. 1). In Lapland longspurs, the prebasic molt (during which all feathers are replaced) is not equivalent to the prenuptial molt [during which only the plumage of the head and neck are replaced (8)].


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Yearly life history sequence of the Lapland longspur (approximate timing taken from personal observations and Ref. 8).

It is unclear what physiological changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis allow modulation of corticosterone release. HPA axis architecture is similar in birds and mammals, with pituitary ACTH controlling adrenal corticosterone release (20, 21). In addition, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), arginine vasotocin (AVT), and mesotocin (MT) are present in the median eminence of the hypothalamus (3, 20, 21) and are known to control ACTH secretion (6), presumably via the hypothalamic-pituitary portal blood. AVT and MT appear to play similar roles in ACTH secretion in birds as arginine vasopressin or oxytocin [the 2 other major putative ACTH-releasing factors (32)] do in mammals. Altering the pituitary's sensitivity to these releasing factors could facilitate the seasonal changes in corticosterone release by decreasing ACTH release. Alternatively or in conjunction, seasonal changes in the adrenals' sensitivity to ACTH could modulate corticosterone secretion. Data are presented here from experiments designed to test these two possibilities in free-living Lapland longspurs by injecting ACTH, CRF, AVT, or MT intravenously and assessing maximal corticosterone output.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Subjects and field sites. Wild Lapland longspurs were caught on their breeding grounds on the Arctic tundra near Barrow, AK (71.1° N, 156.4° W) and near the Toolik Lake Research Station, located ~250 km south of Prudhoe Bay, AK (68° N, 149° W). Breeding longspurs were caught throughout the breeding season at both Barrow (from 12 May to 21 June 1994 and 1 June to 21 June 1995) and at Toolik Lake (from 19 May to 1 June 1995). Molting birds were caught at Barrow (from 6 to 14 August 1994 and from 30 July to 4 August 1995). Birds were trapped using Japanese mist nets, nest traps, or Potter traps baited with seeds. All experiments were initiated within 3 min of capture so that results are indicative of a free-living state. This avoided complications arising from acclimation to captive conditions. Previous studies of these two populations demonstrated no differences in the stress response between the sexes (2, 39), so sex was ignored in this study.

In addition, a group of birds was trapped in the spring at Toolik Lake in 1994 and transported to the University of Washington. They were housed in outside aviaries (ambient light and temperature). Blood samples were taken from these birds both during (December 1994) and after (March 1995) a prenuptial molt. These birds did not breed in captivity. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals and approved by the University of Washington Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Stress protocol. Birds were captured and subjected to the stressors of capture and restraint. The stress paradigm was identical during both seasons. Within 3 min of capture (or 3 min of entering the aviary for the captive birds), ~60 µl of blood were removed by a puncture of the alar vein in the wing and prepared for baseline corticosterone measurements. Because corticosterone levels generally do not start to rise until 3 min after stress initiation (38), all samples taken within 3 min were considered to reflect baseline levels and were grouped together for statistical purposes. Blood was collected in heparinized microhematocrit capillary tubes (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), and cotton stanched the blood flow.

Immediately after the initial blood sample, birds were injected intrajugularly with various releasing hormones dissolved in lactated Ringer solution (Baxter, Deerfield, IL). The jugular in this species lies just under the skin, which provides easy access. Injection of Ringer alone served as a control, and remaining birds received either 100 or 200 IU/kg body wt ACTH (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 3 or 6 µg/kg CRF (Sigma), 3 or 6 µg/kg AVT (Bachem), 3 µg/kg MT (Bachem), or 3 µg/kg each of CRF and AVT. All injections were in 10 µl of Ringer (mean body wt of 28 g).

We administered CRF, AVT, and MT to test pituitary responses. We attempted to mimic the highest effective in vitro doses reported for isolated pituitaries from ducks (6) and chickens (5) by assuming a total blood volume of 15% body weight for each bird (unpublished observations), which results in an in vivo dose of ~3 µg/kg body wt. Studies in pigeons (33) and a species of captive sparrows (unpublished data) suggest that 3 µg/kg body wt saturates the pituitary's response, but we doubled the dose in some animals to verify these results in Lapland longspurs. Doses of AVT and MT approaching 10 µg/kg cannot be used because they approach lethal doses (33). We are thus confident that these doses of releasing factors saturated the pituitary's ability to respond.

After hormone injection, birds were placed in opaque cloth bags for a 30-min restraint period, after which ~60 µl of blood were removed for stimulated corticosterone measurements. After the last bleed, all birds were weighed, scored for fat [an average of furcular (area in the neck above the breast bone) and abdominal fat measured on a semiquantitative scale of 0-5 with 5 being the fattest], given a Fish and Wildlife Service identification band, and released. Birds retrapped after sampling were not used so that all birds were naive to the stress protocol.

Sample processing and assays. Capillary tubes containing blood were sealed on one end with clay and stored on ice. Samples were centrifuged for 6 min at ~400 g within 12 h, and plasma was removed and stored at -20°C and transported to the University of Washington for analysis. Corticosterone was extracted from plasma with dichloromethane and assayed by radioimmunoassay with an antibody from Endocrine Sciences (for details of the radioimmunoassay, see Ref. 40). Interassay and intra-assay variations were 15 and 8%, respectively. Corticosterone binding protein (CBP) capacity and affinity were determined by generating a steroid-free plasma and measuring radiolabeled corticosterone binding as described previously (36). Briefly, after creating a Scatchard plot using the bound/unbound ratio and correcting for nonspecific binding, we fitted a line to the curve (by least squares) and used the reciprocal of the slope to determine the dissociation constant (in nmol/l) and the intersection with the abscissa to determine capacity (in nmol/l). To collect sufficient plasma for CBP analysis, plasma samples from several animals were combined.

Statistical analysis. Differences between injection paradigms, seasonal baseline and maximal corticosterone levels, seasonal changes in weight and fat (for free-living birds), and CBP levels were compared by ANOVA followed by Fisher's protected least-significant difference (PLSD) post hoc tests. Seasonal changes in weight and fat for captives were assessed using paired t-tests. Comparisons between study sites of baseline and stress-induced corticosterone levels were made using a two-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's PLSD. Diel differences (differences associated with time of capture) in baseline corticosterone were compared using a second-order polynomial regression, and baseline corticosterone levels as a function of capture date were compared using simple regression. Spearman rank correlations were used to assess any relationships between corticosterone levels and fat and weight.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Several possible confounding factors associated with capturing wild birds, such as time and date of capture, proved not to be problematic and were ignored. Birds were captured throughout most of the 24 h of daylight (from 0400 to 2400) yet showed no diel differences (differences associated with time of capture) in baseline corticosterone levels during either season (r2 = 0.022, P = 0.27 and r2 = 0.104, P = 0.09 for breeding and molt, respectively). Neither did corticosterone levels vary over the course of a single season (r2 = 0.004, P = 0.63 and r2 = 0.015, P = 0.39 for breeding and molt, respectively).

Samples during the breeding season were collected from two different sites (Toolik Lake and Barrow). There was no significant difference in baseline corticosterone values between the two sites [7.60 ± 0.75 ng/ml at Barrow (n = 53) compared with 9.20 ± 0.45 ng/ml at Toolik Lake (n = 64); P = 0.060, F = 3.60]. Surprisingly, there was a large difference in weights [28.47 ± 0.27 g at Barrow (n = 58) compared with 26.86 ± 0.27 g at Toolik Lake (n = 75); P < 0.0001, F = 16.90] that was opposite a change in fat scores (1.18 ± 0.11 at Barrow compared with 1.52 ± 0.10 at Toolik Lake; P < 0.05, F = 5.07). However, there were no correlations between individual fat contents and either baseline or 30-min corticosterone levels at either site (Z < 0.8 and P > 0.16 for all tests).

In free-living birds, there were no differences between breeding and molt in weight (Fig. 2A), but birds had smaller fat stores during molt (Fig. 2B). Surprisingly, captive birds increased their fat scores during a prenuptial molt (Fig. 2B) that corresponded to an increase in weight (Fig. 2A). The overall increase in fat stores in captive birds relative to free-living birds likely reflects easy access to food.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Seasonal weight (A) and fat stores (B) in free-living and captive Lapland longspurs. Each bar represents the mean ± SE for sample sizes indicated at bottom of bars for each group. * P < 0.0005 (t = 5.61) for weight and * P < 0.005 (t = 3.68) for fat in captives compared with spring and * P < 0.005 (t = 3.04) for free-living birds compared with breeding birds.

Response to stress. Lapland longspurs increased corticosterone in response to the stress of capture and restraint during both seasons (Fig. 3). The response to capture and restraint, however, was dramatically reduced during molt. Although CBP levels also fall during molt (Fig. 4), only maximal corticosterone titers during breeding ever reach concentrations that saturate the binding capacity of CBPs. The change in CBP levels does not appear to be accompanied by production of different proteins because the binding affinity remained constant during both seasons (Kd = 4.9 × 10-7 M during breeding and Kd = 5.0 × 10-7 M during molt; P = 0.93, F = 0.006).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Changes in corticosterone levels in response to capture and restraint during both breeding and molt in free-living Lapland longspurs. All baseline samples taken before 3 min are grouped together, and 30-min samples are from Ringer-injected controls. Points represent means ± SE for each group at each sampling time; n = 117 and 52 for baseline levels in breeding and molting birds, respectively (P < 0.0001, F = 49.28), and n = 23 and 8 for levels after 30 min in breeding and molting birds, respectively (P < 0.0001, F = 21.09).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Capacity of corticosterone binding proteins (CBP) during breeding and molt in free-living Lapland longspurs. To compare capacity with circulating levels, data from Fig. 2 have been converted to nmol/l. Each bar represents mean ± SE for each group for n = 7 (combination of 12 animals) and n = 3 (combination of 19 animals) for breeding and molting birds, respectively. Cort, corticosterone. * P < 0.025 (F = 7.67) compared with breeding CBP capacity.

Adrenal and pituitary responses. There was a seasonal difference in corticosterone release in response to exogenous ACTH coupled with capture and handling. The adrenals in breeding Lapland longspurs failed to further elevate corticosterone levels with two doses of exogenous ACTH compared with the Ringer-injected control (Fig. 5A). On the other hand, during molt, the lower dose of exogenous ACTH produced a fourfold elevation of corticosterone compared with Ringer-injected controls (Fig. 5B). Additionally, in no molting bird did ACTH-stimulated corticosterone reach Ringer-injected control levels during breeding.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Adrenal and pituitary sensitivities to their respective releasing factors during breeding (A) and molt (B) in free-living Lapland longspurs. Each bar represents mean ± SE of corticosterone titers at 30 min for sample sizes indicated for each group; sample sizes are at bottom of bars. Doses are per kg body wt. CRF, corticotropin-releasing factor; AVT, arginine vasotocin; MT, mesotocin. * P < 0.05 (F = 2.83) compared with Ringer injection.

Responses to exogenous ACTH-releasing factors also varied seasonally (Fig. 5). The ability to interpret responses in breeding Lapland longspurs are limited because of the lack of a response to exogenous ACTH (see DISCUSSION), but no releasing factor significantly altered corticosterone levels. In contrast, during molt, all releasing factors enhanced corticosterone release, although only the highest dose of CRF was effective.

Although corticosterone responses during prebasic molt were dramatically reduced in free-living Lapland longspurs, corticosterone release was not altered during a prenuptial molt in captive birds (Fig. 6). Their responses to captive stress during the molt and later in the spring were intermediate to responses of free-living birds. Furthermore, the adrenals in captive birds responded equivalently to exogenous ACTH coupled with capture and handling at both sample times. Interestingly, the response to exogenous ACTH in captives was equivalent to the response in free-living breeding birds.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Corticosterone response to restraint and blood sampling and adrenal sensitivity to 100 IU/kg body wt ACTH in captive Lapland longspurs. Each bar represents the mean ± SE for sample sizes indicated at bottom of bar for each group. * P < 0.0005 (F = 15.82 for spring and F = 16.51 for prenuptial molt) compared with Ringer injection in same season. There were no seasonal differences.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Stress response. Free-living Lapland longspurs modulate corticosterone release seasonally in response to an identical stressor (Fig. 3), consistent with previous studies in Lapland longspurs (2, 39) and several other bird species (1, 26, 30, 37-40). It is not clear, however, which season represents the more usual levels because samples were not collected at other times during the year. This phenomenon, however, may disappear during captivity (Fig. 6).

We refer to baseline instead of basal levels, because the activity of animals before capture is unknown. Animals in the vicinity of our traps are often very active socially and are occasionally threatened by predators, both of which could elevate corticosterone levels. Additionally, many animals rapidly decrease corticosterone concentrations when feeding [e.g., rats (18)]. Because birds at Potter traps often fed for several minutes before being captured, corticosterone levels may decrease in these birds just before capture. These two confounding variables make determination of true basal levels problematic. However, the low variance of these initial samples suggests that they are close, if not identical, to basal values.

Breeding birds secreted far more corticosterone than did molting birds. This might not be meaningful, however, if extra corticosterone was simply bound to more CBP, thereby making the amount of corticosterone available to target tissues equivalent during both seasons. Although CBP levels were also elevated during breeding, they do not fully compensate for the elevated corticosterone levels. Baseline corticosterone levels were far below CBP binding capacity during both seasons (Fig. 4), indicating that little free steroid is present during unstressed conditions. After the stress of capture and handling, however, only breeding corticosterone levels exceeded CBP binding capacity. Not only are absolute corticosterone levels higher during breeding, but presumably biological activity is further enhanced by saturating CBP binding capacity. This indicates that target tissues are indeed exposed to more corticosterone during the breeding season than they are during molt.

Although fat stores in free-living longspurs were lower during molt (Fig. 2B), in neither season do individual fat scores explain interindividual variations in corticosterone levels. This contrasts with an earlier study on the Barrow population (39) that reported leaner birds achieving higher corticosterone levels after capture and handling (although fat scores were more variable than in this study). Captive birds, on the other hand, increase both fat stores and weight during a prenuptial molt, but also without correlating with either individual or seasonal corticosterone responses. Thus this study does not support a role for fat stores in the magnitude of the corticosterone response.

Adrenal response. The damped corticosterone secretion during molt in free-living birds does not appear to be mediated solely at the adrenal level. All molting birds further increased corticosterone release after exogenous ACTH injection (Fig. 5B). This suggests that the adrenals could respond further during stress if they received more endogenous ACTH. Corticosterone synthesis by the adrenals is thus not the limiting step serving to reduce stress-induced corticosterone levels during molt. In contrast, the very-high-stress-induced corticosterone levels in breeding birds, coupled with the inability to respond to exogenous ACTH, suggest that adrenals in breeding birds are responding maximally to stress-induced ACTH release. This study does not address, however, whether other hormones, such as prolactin and the thyroid hormones, alter corticosterone synthesis (4).

The failure of exogenously stimulated release during molt to reach stress-induced levels during breeding, however, suggests that adrenal sensitivity is damped even if they can still respond to a further signal. Damped adrenal sensitivity supports evidence that adrenal tissue characteristics in white-crowned sparrows can vary with season (19). These investigators further suggest that adrenal activity is greatest during early spring and deteriorates after breeding, consistent with the present results. Whether reduced adrenal capacity facilitates modulation or is simply a compensation for a lower ACTH signal remains to be shown.

It should be remembered that any enhanced corticosterone response to exogenous hormones in this study is in addition to stress-induced release. Because using wild populations precludes injecting hormones into undisturbed animals, every animal in this study activates its HPA axis in response to the stress of being captured, held, and bled. We assume that these stimuli maximally activate the HPA axis so that modulation of corticosterone release results from physiological constraints rather than changes in the perceived stressfullness of the stimuli. In other words, capture and restraint are assumed to be equally stressful to each bird regardless of season, so that differences in corticosterone release reflect physiological and not cognitive changes (see also Refs. 34, 37, and 39). Capture and handling are far from normal occurrences in the lives of these species, supporting this assumption. The present experiments, therefore, do not test whether or not the adrenal or pituitary glands respond to stress; both glands are already responding. Rather, these experiments test whether that response is maximal or whether the gland could respond further if it received a larger releasing signal.

Pituitary response. The HPA axes in birds and mammals are similar. The avian hypothalamus connects to the anterior pituitary via a portal blood system beginning in the median eminence (20). The avian median eminence is further divided into distinct anterior and posterior portions, with only anterior vessels projecting to the anterior pituitary (20, 21). Both CRF and AVT immunoreactive fibers terminate in the external zone of the anterior median eminence (3, 16, 20), consistent with a role in ACTH secretion. MT fibers are only found in the internal zone and may not release MT into the portal vasculature (21). Castro et al. (6), however, found that CRF, AVT, and MT can induce ACTH release from the isolated duck pituitary. Castro et al. (6) also report that AVT and MT are more potent than CRF at stimulating ACTH release in the duck. CRF is likely important, however, because CRF content decreases in the median eminence after unilateral adrenalectomy (20) and CRF stimulates ACTH release from the isolated chicken pituitary (5). Thus CRF, AVT, and perhaps MT, contribute to ACTH release in birds.

Assessing the effectiveness of ACTH-releasing hormones by measuring corticosterone release is problematic. Neither CRF, AVT, nor MT generally stimulate corticosterone release directly, acting instead through ACTH. Unfortunately, field conditions make measuring ACTH difficult because preventing degradation is problematic. We can, however, infer stimulated ACTH release. Because adrenal glands respond to exogenous ACTH during molt in Lapland longspurs (Fig. 5B), any further ACTH secreted in response to exogenous CRF, AVT, or MT should be reflected in enhanced corticosterone release. In contrast, high stress-induced corticosterone levels in breeding birds apparently saturated the adrenal's ability to respond. Interpreting effects of ACTH-releasing hormones is therefore difficult at this time of year, but they are included to indicate that none of these releasing factors acts directly on the adrenals to alter normal corticosterone release.

In molting longspurs, stimulation of corticosterone release by all three releasing factors suggests that the pituitary is not a primary site mediating seasonal modulation. Presumably the pituitary will respond during molt with more ACTH if it receives a larger signal from the hypothalamus. That the response is not saturated at the pituitary suggests that the hypothalamus fails to secrete a saturating dose of ACTH-releasing factors. This implies that the hypothalamus may be the primary mediator of seasonal corticosterone modulation in this species.

In addition, stimulation of corticosterone release by the lower doses of AVT and MT, but not by the lower dose of CRF, supports studies showing that AVT and MT are superior ACTH-releasing hormones in the duck (6) and in the pigeon (33). A primary role for AVT would parallel a primary role for arginine vasopressin in sheep (11, 12, 29) but contrasts with CRF playing a primary role in rats and humans (23).

Captive responses. In contrast to free-living Lapland longspurs, corticosterone responses in captive birds do not appear to be seasonally modulated. There are at least four possible explanations for this result. First, captivity may prevent initiation of breeding, thereby preventing the expression of breeding corticosterone levels. In at least one other species (white-crowned sparrows), corticosterone levels during molt, rather than during breeding, are more representative of yearly levels (26). Second, providing shelter and food ad libitum may obviate any necessity for modulating corticosterone seasonally. Third, chronic stress can dramatically alter HPA axis function (27) and may be a serious problem in captive animals. Fourth, different control mechanisms may operate during prenuptial compared with prebasic molt. Regardless, the corticosterone response does not change during prenuptial molt in captive birds, and exogenous ACTH injections suggest that sites higher than the adrenal are controlling corticosterone levels.

Seasonal modulation. Taken together, results from injecting exogenous releasing factors suggest that mechanisms underlying seasonal modulation consist of both decreased adrenal capacity to secrete corticosterone (indicated by the reduced responsiveness to exogenous ACTH during molt vis-à-vis breeding) and decreased hypothalamic capacity to secrete CRF, AVT, and MT (indicated by the ability of exogenous ACTH-releasing factors to further elevate corticosterone). The purpose for modulating corticosterone release, however, remains controversial. Several species of vertebrates, including birds and amphibians (24), can modulate glucocorticoid release. All known instances appear related to the animal's physiological state, such as breeding or molt. Several bird species reduce corticosterone release during breeding, which is thought to facilitate parental behavior in the face of disruptive severe weather (39), but parental behavior does not occur during molt. Instead, corticosterone's ability to mobilize protein may dictate a decreased response at this time because protein mobilization could be detrimental during the energetically costly molt [daily energy costs for molt are 58% of the basal metabolic rate in white-crowned sparrows (22)].

Very few studies in any species have examined mechanisms underlying inhibition of glucocorticoid release other than from negative feedback. Although seasonal changes in the functioning of the HPA axis have not, to this point, been demonstrated in mammals, several studies have examined reductions in glucocorticoid release in response to reward presentation (7, 18, 25). Seasonal modulation of corticosterone release in birds presents a tractable model for examining inhibition of glucocorticoid release. In addition, using wild species allows us to study mechanisms of the stress response in an ecologically relevant situation. Studying seasonal modulation of corticosterone in birds, therefore, should uncover novel, or underappreciated, control mechanisms in the HPA axis that will likely provide insights into HPA axis functioning in all vertebrates.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are deeply indebted to Robert Suydam and the North Slope Borough of Alaska for their logistical support. We would also like to thank Lynn Erkmann, Tom Hahn, and Kathleen O'Reilly for technical help and Tom Hahn and Robert Sapolsky for comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant 1RO1NS30240-01 and National Science Foundation Grant OPP-9300771 to J. C. Wingfield and both a postdoctoral award administered through the American Psychological Association and a National Science Foundation postdoctoral fellowship to L. M. Romero. K. K. Soma is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute predoctoral fellow.

Address for reprint requests: L. M. Romero, Dept. of Biology, Tufts Univ., Medford, MA 02155.

Received 15 August 1997; accepted in final form 26 January 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Astheimer, L. B., W. A. Buttemer, and J. C. Wingfield. Gender and seasonal differences in the adrenocortical response to ACTH challenge in an Arctic passerine, Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 94: 33-43, 1994[Medline].

2.   Astheimer, L. B., W. A. Buttemer, and J. C. Wingfield. Seasonal and acute changes in adrenocortical responsiveness in an arctic-breeding bird. Horm. Behav. 29: 442-457, 1995[Medline].

3.   Ball, G. F., P. L. Faris, and J. C. Wingfield. Immunohistochemical localization of corticotropin-releasing factor in selected brain areas of the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) and the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). Cell Tissue Res. 257: 155-161, 1989[Medline].

4.   Carsia, R. V. Hormonal control of avian adrenocortical function: cellular and molecular aspects. In: Progress in Comparative Endocrinology. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990, p. 439-444.

5.   Carsia, R. V., H. Weber, and F. M. J. Perez. Corticotropin-releasing factor stimulates the release of adrenocorticotropin from domestic fowl pituitary cells. Endocrinology 118: 143-148, 1986[Abstract].

6.   Castro, M. G., F. E. Estivariz, and F. C. Iturriza. The regulation of the corticomelanotropic cell activity in Aves II. Effect of various peptides on the release of ACTH from dispersed, perfused duck pituitary cells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 83A: 71-75, 1986.

7.   Coe, C. L., M. E. Stanton, and S. Levine. Adrenal responses to reinforcement and extinction: role of expectancy versus instrumental responding. Behav. Neurosci. 4: 654-658, 1983.

8.   Cramp, S., and C. M. Perrins. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, The Middle East, and North Africa: The Birds of the Western Palearctic. New York: Oxford University, 1994.

9.   Dallman, M. F., S. F. Akana, C. S. Cascio, D. N. Darlington, L. Jacobson, and N. Levin. Regulation of ACTH secretion: variations on a theme of B. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 43: 113-173, 1987.

10.   Dallman, M. F., S. F. Akana, K. A. Scribner, M. J. Bradbury, C.-D. Walker, A. M. Strack, and C. S. Cascio. Stress, feedback and facilitation in the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. J. Neuroendocrinol. 4: 517-526, 1992.

11.   Engler, D. Evidence that the hypothalamus exerts both stimulatory and inhibitory influences over adrenocorticotropin secretion and biosynthesis in the sheep. Regul. Pept. 45: 171-182, 1993[Medline].

12.   Familari, M., A. I. Smith, R. Smith, and J. W. Funder. Arginine vasopressin is a much more potent stimulus to ACTH release from ovine anterior pituitary cells than ovine corticotropin-releasing factor. Neuroendocrinology 50: 152-157, 1989[Medline].

13.   Graessler, J., R. Kvetnansky, D. Jezova, M. Dobrakovova, and G. R. van Loon. Prior immobilization stress alters adrenal hormone responses to hemorrhage in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 26): R661-R667, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Holmes, W. N., and J. G. Phillips. The adrenal cortex of birds. In: General, Comparative, and Clinical Endocrinology of the Adrenal Cortex, edited by I. Chester-Jones, and I. W. Henderson. London, UK: Academic, 1976, p. 293-420.

15.   Jones, M. T., and B. Gillham. Factors involved in the regulation of adrenocorticotropic hormone/B-lipotropic hormone. Physiol. Rev. 68: 743-818, 1988[Free Full Text].

16.   Korf, H.-W., G. C. Panzica, C. Viglietti-Panzica, and A. Oksche. Pattern of peptidergic neurons in the avian brain: clusters---local circuitries---projections. Basic Appl. Histochem. 32: 55-75, 1988[Medline].

17.   Levine, S., C. Coe, and S. G. Wiener. Psychoneuroendocrinology of stress---a psychobiological perspective. In: Psychoendocrinology, edited by F. R. Brush, and S. Levine. New York: Academic, 1989, p. 341-377.

18.   Levine, S., and G. D. Coover. Environmental control of suppression of the pituitary-adrenal system. Physiol. Behav. 17: 35-37, 1976[Medline].

19.   Lorenzen, L. C., and D. S. Farner. An annual cycle in the interrenal tissue of the adrenal gland of the white-crowned sparrow, Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 4: 253-263, 1964.

20.   Mikami, S. Immunocytochemistry of the avian hypothalamus and adenohypophysis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 103: 189-248, 1986[Medline].

21.   Mikami, S., and S. Yamada. Immunohistochemistry of the hypothalamic neuropeptides and anterior pituitary cells in the Japanese quail. J. Exp. Zool. 232: 405-417, 1984[Medline].

22.   Murphy, M. E., and J. R. King. Energy and nutrient use during moult by white-crowned sparrows Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii. Ornis Scand. 23: 304-313, 1992.

23.   Owens, M. J., and C. B. Nemeroff. Physiology and pharmacology of corticotropin-releasing factor. Pharmacol. Rev. 43: 425-473, 1991[Medline].

24.   Paolucci, M., V. Esposito, M. M. Di Fiore, and V. Botte. Effects of short postcapture confinement on plasma reproductive hormone and corticosterone profiles in Rana esculenta during the sexual cycle. Boll. Zool. 57: 253-259, 1990.

25.   Romero, L. M., S. Levine, and R. M. Sapolsky. Adrenocorticotropin secretagog release: stimulation by frustration and paradoxically by reward presentation. Brain Res. 676: 151-156, 1995[Medline].

26.   Romero, L. M., M. Ramenofsky, and J. C. Wingfield. Season and migration alters the corticosterone response to capture and handling in an arctic migrant, the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 116C: 171-177, 1997[Medline].

27.   Sapolsky, R. M. Stress, the Aging Brain, and the Mechanisms of Neuron Death. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1992.

28.   Sapolsky, R. M., and M. Meaney. Maturation of the adrenocortical stress response: neuroendocrine control mechanisms and the stress hyporesponsive period. Brain Res. Rev. 11: 65-76, 1986.

29.   Smith, A. I., N. Levin, C. A. Wallace, P. Farnworth, M. Blum, and J. L. Roberts. The role of vasopressin on ACTH secretion and biosynthesis in the ovine pituitary gland. Regul. Pept. 45: 237-241, 1993[Medline].

30.   Smith, G. T., J. C. Wingfield, and R. R. Veit. Adrenocortical response to stress in the common diving petrel, Pelecanoides urinatrix. Physiol. Zool. 67: 526-537, 1994.

31.   Smith, R., and M. Thomson. Neuroendocrinology of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in pregnancy and the puerperium. Baillieres Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 5: 167-186, 1991[Medline].

32.   Vale, W., J. Vaughan, M. Smith, G. Yamamoto, J. Rivier, and C. Rivier. Effects of synthetic ovine corticotropin-releasing factor, glucocorticoids, catecholamines, neurohypophysial peptides, and other substances on cultured corticotropic cells. Endocrinology 113: 1121-1130, 1983[Abstract].

33.   Westerhof, I., J. T. Lumeij, J. A. Mol, W. E. van den Brom, and A. Rijnberk. In vivo studies on the effects of ovine corticotrophin-releasing hormone, arginine vasotocin, arginine vasopressin, and haloperidol on adrenocortical function in the racing pigeon (Columba livia domestica). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 88: 76-82, 1992[Medline].

34.   Wingfield, J. C., P. DeViche, S. Sharbaugh, L. B. Astheimer, R. Holberton, R. Suydam, and K. Hunt. Seasonal changes of the adrenocortical responses to stress in redpolls, Acanthis flammea, in Alaska. J. Exp. Zool. 270: 372-380, 1994.

35.   Wingfield, J. C., K. Kubokawa, K. Ishida, S. Ishii, and M. Wada. The adrenocortical response to stress in male bush warblers, Cettia diphone: a comparison of breeding populations in Honshu and Hokkaido, Japan. Zool. Sci. (Tokyo) 12: 615-621, 1995.

36.   Wingfield, J. C., K. S. Matt, and D. S. Farner. Physiologic properties of steroid hormone-binding proteins in avian blood. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 53: 281-292, 1984[Medline].

37.   Wingfield, J. C., K. M. O'Reilly, and L. B. Astheimer. Modulation of the adrenocortical responses to acute stress in Arctic birds: a possible ecological basis. Am. Zool. 35: 285-294, 1995.

38.   Wingfield, J. C., J. P. Smith, and D. S. Farner. Endocrine responses of white-crowned sparrows to environmental stress. Condor 84: 399-409, 1982.

39.   Wingfield, J. C., R. Suydam, and K. Hunt. The adrenocortical responses to stress in snow buntings (Plectrophenax nivalis) and Lapland longspurs (Calcarius lapponicus) at Barrow, Alaska. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 108B: 299-306, 1994.

40.   Wingfield, J. C., C. M. Vleck, and M. C. Moore. Seasonal changes of the adrenocortical response to stress in birds of the Sonoran Desert. J. Exp. Zool. 264: 419-428, 1992[Medline].


AJP Regul Integr Compar Physiol 274(5):R1338-R1344
0363-6119/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. Hazard, M. Couty, and D. Guemene
Characterization of CRF, AVT, and ACTH cDNA and pituitary-adrenal axis function in Japanese quail divergently selected for tonic immobility
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1421 - R1429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. L. Rich and L. M. Romero
Exposure to chronic stress downregulates corticosterone responses to acute stressors
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): R1628 - R1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romero, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wingfield, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romero, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wingfield, J. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online