| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808-4124; and 2 University of California- Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
Nutrient preferences and orosensory responses were characterized in two mouse inbred strains. In two-bottle solution tests (tastant vs. vehicle; ascending concentrations), the effects of strain and chow type (12 or 26% fat) on preference thresholds for sucrose and corn oil were compared in AKR/J and SWR/J mice. SWR/J mice displayed lower preference thresholds and ingested more sucrose than AKR/J mice did. SWR/J mice also showed lower preference thresholds and consumed more corn oil than AKR/J mice did; corn oil preference was suppressed 3.5-fold in AKR/J mice compared with SWR/J mice when fed 26% fat chow. Next, licking was recorded during 30-s access to sucrose or corn oil across a range of concentrations. SWR/J mice licked the tastants more than AKR/J mice did. Analysis of modal interlick intervals during lick training revealed that SWR/J mice licked water faster than AKR/J mice when water deprived, suggesting that motor as well as sensory factors may determine lick responses to tastants in brief-access tests. Finally, in two-bottle tests pitting maximally preferred concentrations of sucrose (8 or 16%) against corn oil (20%), SWR/J mice highly preferred sucrose over corn oil at either sucrose concentration. AKR/J mice preferred corn oil over 8% sucrose but reversed their preference when 16% sucrose was offered. These results support a primary role of flavor in the nutrient preferences of SWR/J mice. In AKR/J mice, the low lick activity for sucrose and corn oil and greater suppression of corn oil preference by the high-fat chow suggest that their preferences depend more on postingestive factors than on flavor.
taste; drinking; inbred strains; mouse
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. L. White, L. V. Dishaw, P. R. Sheehe, and S. L. Youngentob The Relationship between PROP and Ethanol Preferences: An Evaluation of 4 Inbred Mouse Strains Chem Senses, November 1, 2007; 32(9): 847 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Sclafani and J. I. Glendinning Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): R712 - R720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. K. Smith Richards, B. N. Belton, B. York, and J. Volaufova Mice bearing Acads mutation display altered postingestive but not 5-s orosensory response to dietary fat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): R311 - R319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Kawai and T. Fushiki Importance of lipolysis in oral cavity for orosensory detection of fat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): R447 - R454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ehmke Mouse gene targeting in cardiovascular physiology Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): R28 - R30. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. B. Persson The mouse is a small rabbit Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): R1544 - R1544. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Cupples Regulation of body weight Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): R1264 - R1266. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
