AJP - Regu Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 259: R780-R785, 1990;
0363-6119/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drake, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gabel, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drake, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gabel, J. C.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 259, Issue 4 780-R785, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of outflow pressure on liver lymph flow in unanesthetized sheep

R. E. Drake and J. C. Gabel
Center for Microvascular and Lymphatic Studies, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030.

We used lymph flow rate (QL) to lymphatic vessel outflow pressure (Po) relationships to analyze lymphatic flow in five unanesthetized sheep with liver lymphatic cannulas. The olecranon was the zero reference level for pressures. Increases in Po did not change QL until Po exceeded 19 +/- 4 (SD) cmH2O. However, for Po greater than 19 +/- 4 cmH2O, QL decreased linearly with increases in Po. We fit regression lines to the QL vs. Po data for Po greater than 19 cmH2O and estimated the effective lymphatic resistance (RL) as -delta Po/delta QL. The effective pressure driving lymph (PL) was the Po at which QL = 0. At baseline, RL = 0.18 +/- 0.10 cmH2O.min.microliter-1 and PL = 29.6 +/- 3.4 cmH2O. When we increased hepatic vein pressure by 5.7 +/- 1.7 cmH2O, QL increased to 6.2 +/- 3.2 times baseline, RL decreased to 0.050 +/- 0.015 cmH2O.min.microliter-1, and PL increased to 37.1 +/- 3.5 cmH2O (P less than 0.05). Thus 1) liver lymph flow is very sensitive to increases in hepatic vein pressure, 2) there is a substantial QL vs. Po plateau for liver lymphatics, and 3) after hepatic venous pressure elevations, liver lymph flow increases as if it were driven by a higher pressure through a lower resistance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online