AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 256: R19-R28, 1989;
0363-6119/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohlson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohlson, L.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 256, Issue 1 19-R28, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Morphological dynamics of ureteral transport. I. Shape and volume of constituent urine fractions

L. Ohlson
Department of Radiology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Ureteral transport was studied in 50 urinary systems by urography with video recording in the upright and recumbent positions using low-osmolality and high-osmolality contrast media. Morphometry and volumetry were applied to right urinary systems in which the urine-filled segments had a circular cross section at maximum peristaltic distension. The filling of the lumbar segment was composed of four fractions, each entering that segment by a specific mechanism: 1) the residual urine left behind by the preceding contraction ring, 2) the postcontraction injection from the pyelocalyceal system, 3) the extraperistaltic flow, and 4) the peristaltic injection produced by the pyelocalyceal contraction rings. The variations in the precontraction filling by fractions 1-3 and in the volume of fraction 4 gave rise to four types of transport. The junction between the lumbar and pelvic segments constituted a constant point of resistance to flow that prevented fractions 1-3 from entering the pelvic segment, the peristaltic injection into that segment being determined solely by the resistance at the junction and the volume of the bolus in the lumbar segment. Extraperistaltic flow to the bladder constituted a separate type of transport.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online