AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 249: R417-R423, 1985;
0363-6119/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, F. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, F. G.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 249, Issue 4 417-R423, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Potentiation of nerve-induced bladder contractions after calcium channel blockade

F. G. Carpenter

The potentiation of nerve-induced bladder contractions (NIC) by tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA), K+, or carbachol could result from a greater Ca2+ entry through Ca2+ channels in the muscle or from a greater release of transmitter by nerve terminals. Contractions of equal magnitude by the rat urinary bladder in vitro were initiated by carbachol, K+, or transmural stimulation of urinary bladder motor nerves at 1 Hz. Contractions elicited by K+ or carbachol were drastically reduced by verapamil (0.5 microM), but NICs were unaffected. Thus the role of Ca2+ channels in NICs seems uncertain. NICs are potentiated approximately 50% by K+ (15 mM), carbachol (0.5 microM), or 4-aminopyridine (0.2 mM) and over twofold by TEA (5 mM). Although verapamil (1-5 microM) reduced NICs in a dose-dependent relation, potentiation by each compound was the same. Thus Ca2+ channels probably play no role in potentiation. The resistance of the bladder to distention reflects its viscoelasticity and is Ca2+ sensitive. Because viscoelasticity was decreased by verapamil coincident with the reduction in NICs, both may result from lowered intracellular Ca2+ (Cai2+). However, because the potentiating compounds failed to restore bladder viscoelasticity, they probably did not elevate Cai2+. Therefore, in verapamil-treated preparations potentiation is most probably caused by an enhancement of transmitter release.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online