AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 247: R427-R444, 1984;
0363-6119/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gander, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Moore-Ede, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gander, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Moore-Ede, M. C.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 247, Issue 3 427-R444, Copyright © 1984 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Modeling the action of zeitgebers on the human circadian system: comparisons of simulations and data

P. H. Gander, R. E. Kronauer, C. A. Czeisler and M. C. Moore-Ede

In our two-oscillator model for the human circadian timing system, the effect of an environmental synchronizing cycle (zeitgeber) is determined by the periods of the two oscillators and of the zeitgeber and by the zeitgeber strength. The oscillators x and y are postulated to regulate the core temperature and rest-activity rhythms, respectively. From published examples of experiments in which human subjects were exposed to artificial zeitgebers, it is possible to derive estimates of the periods of the core temperature and/or the rest-activity rhythms and the zeitgeber. Two strengths of zeitgeber input to the model that correspond to two of the common zeitgeber regimes used in human entrainment studies have now been elucidated. Thus specific model simulations can be generated for each of the available examples of entrainment of human subjects by artificial zeitgebers. Such simulations indicate that the model can reproduce, with remarkable subtlety, the types of full and partial entrainment observed experimentally. The model is thus demonstrated to accommodate the period and phase control of endogenous rhythms by environmental zeitgebers, which is a crucial functional attribute of circadian timing systems.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online