AJP - Regu Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 243: R245-R250, 1982;
0363-6119/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKean, T.
Right arrow Articles by Landon, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKean, T.
Right arrow Articles by Landon, R.

AJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol 243, Issue 3 245-R250, Copyright © 1982 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of the response of muskrat, rabbit, and guinea pig heart muscle to hypoxia

T. McKean and R. Landon

Papillary muscles were removed from anesthetized muskrats and rabbits and mounted in a muscle chamber maintained at 29 degrees C. Muscles were stimulated at a rate of 12/min and subjected to 30 min of hypoxia followed by 30 min of reoxygenation. Peak tension in muskrats declined less than peak tension in rabbits during oxygen deprivation. During reoxygenation, peak tension in muskrats rapidly returned to control levels and then exceeded control, whereas peak tension in rabbits never recovered. Time to peak tension was largely unaffected in muskrats during hypoxia and decreased in rabbits. During reoxygenation, time to peak tension increased in muskrats and returned to control in rabbits. Hearts from muskrats and guinea pigs were removed under ether anesthesia and perfused retrograde with a physiological saline solution. Developed tension, heart rate, coronary blood flow, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) output were monitored. During 30 min of hypoxia, muskrat hearts developed a profound bradycardia compared to guinea pigs. Coronary flow increased in both species but less so in muskrats. Guinea pig hearts developed contracture whereas muskrat hearts relaxed. During reoxygenation heart rate and coronary blood flow returned toward normal but cells released large amounts of LDH, indicating cell damage. It is concluded that the isolated heart of the muskrat, a diving mammal, is better able to deal with hypoxia than the heart of the nondividing guinea pig and rabbit.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online