AJP - Regu Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (September 9, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00116.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
297/6/R1813    most recent
00116.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salter-Venzon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Watts, A. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salter-Venzon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Watts, A. G.
Submitted on February 20, 2009
Revised on August 25, 2009
Accepted on September 8, 2009

Site-Specific Attenuation of Food Intake But Not The Latency To Eat After Hypothalamic Injections of Neuropeptide Y in Dehydrated-Anorexic Rats.

Dawna Salter-Venzon and Alan G. Watts1*

1 University of Southern California

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: watts{at}usc.edu.

The anorexia that accompanies cellular dehydration in rats (DE-anorexia) offers a relatively simple model for investigating the functional organization of neural mechanisms that can suppress feeding during dehydration. Previous studies strongly suggest that the inputs that drive ingestive behavior control neurons in the paraventricular nucleus (PVH) and lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) remain active during DE-anorexia. Here we examine whether these two regions retain their sensitivity to neuropeptide Y (NPY). NPY is an important component in two major feeding-related inputs from the arcuate nucleus and the hindbrain. We found that intake responses to NPY injections in the LHA and PVH were suppressed in DE-anorexia, but the PVH remained less sensitive to the effects of NPY than the LHA in DE-anorexic animals. Indeed the higher dose of NPY (238 pmol) completely overcame shorter periods of DE-anorexia when injected into the LHA but not the PVH. However, the latency to eat after NPY injections remained unchanged from control animals, irrespective of NPY dose, injection location, or intensity of anorexia. Furthermore, the onset and size of the strong and rapidly induced compensatory feeding that follows the return of water to DE-anorexic animals was also unaffected by any NPY injections. These data support the hypothesis that DE-anorexia develops as a consequence of the premature termination of regularly initiated meals, which perhaps involves processes that perhaps involves processes that alter the sensitivity of satiety mechanisms downstream to the PVH and LHA.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.